Final Nov 29
IND 89 -4.0 o137.5
PROV 73 4.0 u137.5
Final OT Nov 29
ALCN 65 17.5 o132.0
USA 74 -17.5 u132.0
Final Nov 29
APP 72 -1.0 o134.0
COLG 50 1.0 u134.0
Final Nov 29
DART 88 17.0 o140.0
BC 83 -17.0 u140.0
Final Nov 29
WEB 73 -3.0 o144.5
BGSU 70 3.0 u144.5
Final Nov 29
MINN 51 3.0 o128.5
WAKE 57 -3.0 u128.5
Final Nov 29
VALP 70 15.0 o150.5
DEP 89 -15.0 u150.5
Final Nov 29
IONA 62 -6.0 o133.5
TST 51 6.0 u133.5
Final Nov 29
ELON 56 -4.0 o137.0
ME 69 4.0 u137.0
Final Nov 29
VMI 64 20.5 o152.5
GW 77 -20.5 u152.5
Final Nov 29
JUDSON 41 -0.0 o0.0
BRAD 107 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 29
MW 72 11.0 o134.5
TROY 68 -11.0 u134.5
Final Nov 29
BING 62 1.5 o135.5
NIAG 65 -1.5 u135.5
Final OT Nov 29
TCU 72 -5.0 o139.5
CSU 76 5.0 u139.5
Final OT Nov 29
PITT 91 5.0 o146.5
OSU 90 -5.0 u146.5
Final OT Nov 29
ARIZ 76 6.5 o151.0
WVU 83 -6.5 u151.0
Final Nov 29
MORE 71 6.0 o128.0
CLEVST 69 -6.0 u128.0
Final Nov 29
NIU 59 3.0 o137.5
EIU 72 -3.0 u137.5
Final Nov 29
TNTC 56 23.5 o156.5
VAN 87 -23.5 u156.5
Final Nov 29
NCST 61 5.5 o153.5
BYU 72 -5.5 u153.5
Final Nov 29
PEPP 82 5.5 o138.0
NMSU 70 -5.5 u138.0
Final Nov 29
WICH 51 10.0 o155.5
FLA 88 -10.0 u155.5
Final Nov 29
SHSU 60 -1.5 o151.0
UNCW 69 1.5 u151.0
Final Nov 29
CentP 36 -0.0 o0.0
LIB 93 0.0 u0.0
Final Nov 29
UWG 65 19.0 o157.5
SAM 86 -19.0 u157.5
Final Nov 29
GMU 66 -2.0 o141.0
JMU 61 2.0 u141.0
Final Nov 29
HC 41 15.5 o126.0
UVA 67 -15.5 u126.0
Final Nov 29
ARST 86 -9.5 o157.0
INST 81 9.5 u157.0
Final Nov 29
LIU 56 3.0 o142.5
LAF 75 -3.0 u142.5
Final Nov 29
SCU 69 -1.5 o147.5
WASH 76 1.5 u147.5
Final Nov 29
NAVY 86 4.0 o141.5
PENN 78 -4.0 u141.5
Final Nov 29
WEBB 74 7.5 o152.5
BEL 83 -7.5 u152.5
Final Nov 29
NCAT 69 12.5 o151.5
ECU 93 -12.5 u151.5
Final Nov 29
OKLA 69 3.0 o149.5
LOU 64 -3.0 u149.5
Final Nov 29
PUR 80 -3.0 o144.5
MISS 78 3.0 u144.5
Final Nov 29
USU 61 -5.0 o135.5
UNT 57 5.0 u135.5
Final Nov 29
SEA 48 27.0 o141.0
DUKE 70 -27.0 u141.0
Final Nov 29
ECST 58 -0.0 o0.0
VCU 103 0.0 u0.0
Final OT Nov 29
HOF 68 -2.0 o134.5
RICE 63 2.0 u134.5
Final Nov 29
FAMU 58 32.5 o142.0
CLEM 86 -32.5 u142.0
Final Nov 29
GSU 76 31.0 o162.0
UK 105 -31.0 u162.0
Final Nov 29
LEM 81 6.0 o147.0
MAN 77 -6.0 u147.0
Final Nov 29
UNF 78 -2.5 o149.5
SIUE 73 2.5 u149.5
Final Nov 29
NW 66 -4.0 o136.0
UNLV 61 4.0 u136.0
Final OT Nov 29
TOWS 63 -3.5 o145.0
KENN 67 3.5 u145.0
Final Nov 29
SFA 68 -4.0 o130.5
ULM 60 4.0 u130.5
Final Nov 29
NWST 53 19.5 o142.5
LSU 77 -19.5 u142.5
Final Nov 29
UNCO 64 22.0 o151.0
TTU 89 -22.0 u151.0
Final Nov 29
GONZ 90 -18.5 o154.5
DAV 65 18.5 u154.5
Final Nov 29
SBON 68 -2.0 o138.5
UNI 56 2.0 u138.5
Final Nov 29
DSU 68 34.5 o141.0
TEX 90 -34.5 u141.0
Final Nov 29
BUT 87 8.5 o144.5
MSST 77 -8.5 u144.5
Final Nov 29
SMC 64 -6.5 o140.0
ASU 68 6.5 u140.0
Final Nov 29
UCI 51 -6.0 o136.5
KENT 39 6.0 u136.5
Final Nov 29
MVSU 48 31.5 o134.5
UCSB 81 -31.5 u134.5
Final Nov 30
USC 73 6.0 o153.5
UNM 83 -6.0 u153.5
Utah 0th Pacific-1217-14
Washington St. 0th Pacific-1211-21

Utah @ Washington St. preview

Beasley Coliseum

Last Meeting ( Jan 12, 2019 ) Washington St. 70, Utah 88


Utah’s late-season push for a coveted top-four Pac-12 finish has hit some speed bumps with back-to-back losses to Arizona State and Washington. But the Runnin’ Utes will try to get back on track Saturday night when they visit Washington State.



In the 98-87 loss to the visiting Sun Devils on Feb. 16, Utah’s defense was AWOL in allowing 54-percent shooting and a season high in points. In Wednesday’s 62-45 defeat at Washington, the Utes faltered offensively, sinking to season lows in points and field-goal percentage (28.0) while committing 18 turnovers. “To stay in games, you’ve got to be able to make the open ones against this team because you don’t get many open ones,” Utah coach Larry Krystkowiak said of the first-place Huskies and their 2-3 zone defense. “When you aren’t making your open ones, free throws included, it’s going to be a long night.” Washington State, meanwhile, is gaining steam at the right time, having won three of its last four following Wednesday’s hard-fought, 76-74 victory over a hot Colorado team.

TV: 8 p.m. ET, Pac-12 Network



ABOUT UTAH (14-12, 8-6 Pac-12): Guard Sedrick Barefield, the Utes’ leading scorer at 16.1 points per game, was the only Utah player to reach double figures Wednesday with 12 points, but all of those came in the contest’s opening seven minutes and he didn’t score again after exiting with early foul trouble. Fellow guard Parker Van Dyke also was held in check with seven points after averaging 15 points and connecting on 15-of-27 3-point attempts over his previous three outings. Aside from Barefield, freshman forward Timmy Allen (11.8) is the only other Utah player with a double-digit scoring average while 7-footer Jayce Johnson (7.3 boards), forward Donnie Tillman (5.3) and Allen (5.2) are the leading rebounders.

ABOUT WASHINGTON STATE (11-15, 4-9): Leading scorers Robert Franks and freshman forward C.J. Elleby (15.2) combined for 37 points and 14 rebounds Wednesday in the win over the Buffaloes. Franks finished with 19 points despite an off night shooting (6-of-19) but still leads the Pac-12 at 22.1 points per outing while shooting 51.4 percent from the field and 40.3 from 3-point range. Defense and rebounding, though, continue to rank as problem areas for the Cougars who are surrendering 77.3 points per game and own a minus-2.3 average margin on the glass – both of which rank ahead of only winless California in the conference.



TIP-INS

1. Utah’s 88-70 home win over Washington State on Jan. 12 was the Utes’ 10th straight victory in the series. Utah also has won six of eight and four straight in Pullman.

2. Paced by Marvin Cannon’s Pac-12-best 89.7 percentage, the Cougars pace the conference in free-throw accuracy with an overall percentage of 76.1.

3. After leading the conference for most of the season, Utah has slipped to second in field-goal percentage (46.7) and 3-point accuracy (37.6 percent).



PREDICTION: Utah 74, Washington State 70


Pages Related to This Topic