o/u Margin
u15
Cover By +7
ARMY -6
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
BUCK | 26 | 34 | 60 |
ARMY | 39 | 34 | 73 |
Army covered the spread of -6. The total score of 133 was under 148.
Bucknell @ Army
Mississippi State @ South Carolina
Creighton @ St. John's
Cover By +8
CREI +5
o/u Margin
o8.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
CREI | 39 | 42 | 81 |
SJU | 46 | 32 | 78 |
Creighton covered the spread of +5. The total score of 159 was over 150.5.
Charleston Southern @ Presbyterian
Wake Forest @ Clemson
Texas-Arlington @ Troy
James Madison @ Towson
George Mason @ VCU
Syracuse @ Notre Dame
o/u Margin
o2
Cover By +5
ND -5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
SYR | 38 | 31 | 69 |
ND | 42 | 37 | 79 |
Notre Dame covered the spread of -5. The total score of 148 was over 146.
The Citadel @ Mercer
UL Lafayette @ Georgia Southern
UL Monroe @ Georgia St.
o/u Margin
o15
Push
GSU -12
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
ULM | 35 | 35 | 70 |
GSU | 36 | 46 | 82 |
The spread for this game pushed at -12. The total score of 152 was over 137.
Northern Iowa @ Indiana St.
Campbell @ Hampton
Drake @ Valparaiso
UNC Asheville @ Gardner-Webb
High Point @ North Carolina A&T
Radford @ Longwood
Cover By +3
RAD +8
o/u Margin
o4.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
RAD | 31 | 35 | 66 |
LONG | 33 | 38 | 71 |
Radford covered the spread of +8. The total score of 137 was over 132.5.
Lipscomb @ Bellarmine
North Florida @ Jacksonville
Eastern Kentucky @ Jacksonville St.
o/u Margin
o1
Cover By +4.5
JVST -8.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
EKY | 28 | 40 | 68 |
JVST | 45 | 36 | 81 |
Jacksonville St. covered the spread of -8.5. The total score of 149 was over 148.
Stetson @ Kennesaw St.
Florida Gulf Coast @ Liberty
Central Arkansas @ North Alabama
Stony Brook @ Massachusetts Lowell
Wofford @ VMI
Western Carolina @ UNC Greensboro
La Salle @ Fordham
Massachusetts @ Dayton
South Florida @ East Carolina
Loyola (MD) @ Navy
American U. @ Lehigh
Chattanooga @ East Tennessee St.
Cover By +2.5
CHAT -3.5
o/u Margin
o20.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
CHAT | 40 | 43 | 83 |
ETSU | 31 | 46 | 77 |
Chattanooga covered the spread of -3.5. The total score of 160 was over 139.5.
West Virginia @ Iowa State
Cover By +2
WVU +5
o/u Margin
o32.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
WVU | 41 | 40 | 81 |
ISU | 31 | 53 | 84 |
West Virginia covered the spread of +5. The total score of 165 was over 132.5.
Lafayette @ Boston U
Colgate @ Holy Cross
o/u Margin
o8.5
Cover By +6
HC +13
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
COLG | 43 | 35 | 78 |
HC | 29 | 42 | 71 |
Holy Cross covered the spread of +13. The total score of 149 was over 140.5.
UMBC @ Hartford
Rutgers @ Michigan
o/u Margin
u2.5
Cover By +4
MICH -5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
RUTG | 30 | 32 | 62 |
MICH | 32 | 39 | 71 |
Michigan covered the spread of -5. The total score of 133 was under 135.5.
Texas Christian @ Texas
o/u Margin
o14.5
Push
TEX -9
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
TCU | 35 | 31 | 66 |
TEX | 30 | 45 | 75 |
The spread for this game pushed at -9. The total score of 141 was over 126.5.
Xavier @ Providence
o/u Margin
o54.5
Cover By +5
PROV -2
Team | 1 | 2 | OT | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
XAV | 36 | 34 | 22 | 92 |
PROV | 36 | 34 | 29 | 99 |
Providence covered the spread of -2. The total score of 191 was over 136.5.
Vermont @ Binghamton
Cover By +1.5
UVM -15.5
o/u Margin
u24
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
UVM | 37 | 29 | 66 |
BING | 17 | 32 | 49 |
Vermont covered the spread of -15.5. The total score of 115 was under 139.
New Hampshire @ NJIT
Albany @ Maine
Duke @ Virginia
o/u Margin
u4
Cover By +1.5
UVA +5.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
DUKE | 30 | 35 | 65 |
UVA | 25 | 36 | 61 |
Virginia covered the spread of +5.5. The total score of 126 was under 130.
Boston College @ NC State
Davidson @ Duquesne
Cover By +15.5
DAV -8.5
o/u Margin
u12
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
DAV | 36 | 38 | 74 |
DUQ | 33 | 17 | 50 |
Davidson covered the spread of -8.5. The total score of 124 was under 136.
Appalachian St. @ Little Rock
Coastal Carolina @ Arkansas St.
Illinois St. @ Southern Illinois
Texas State @ South Alabama
Grand Canyon @ Chicago St.
Evansville @ Loyola-Chicago
o/u Margin
u11.5
Cover By +30.5
L-IL -20.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
EVAN | 12 | 19 | 31 |
L-IL | 41 | 41 | 82 |
Loyola-Chicago covered the spread of -20.5. The total score of 113 was under 124.5.
Furman @ Samford
Bradley @ Missouri St.
Tulsa @ SMU
Houston @ Tulane
Cover By +5
HOU -9
o/u Margin
o10.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
HOU | 32 | 49 | 81 |
TULN | 27 | 40 | 67 |
Houston covered the spread of -9. The total score of 148 was over 137.5.
Mississippi @ Auburn
Cover By +3
MISS +16
o/u Margin
o0.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
MISS | 31 | 33 | 64 |
AUB | 43 | 34 | 77 |
Mississippi covered the spread of +16. The total score of 141 was over 140.5.
Butler @ Seton Hall
Cover By +2.5
BUT +8.5
o/u Margin
u3.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
BUT | 34 | 26 | 60 |
HALL | 34 | 32 | 66 |
Butler covered the spread of +8.5. The total score of 126 was under 129.5.
Louisiana State @ Kentucky
Cover By +2
LSU +7
o/u Margin
u5.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
LSU | 31 | 35 | 66 |
UK | 23 | 48 | 71 |
Louisiana State covered the spread of +7. The total score of 137 was under 142.5.
Wyoming @ Colorado St.
Cover By +0.5
WYO +6.5
o/u Margin
u28.5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
WYO | 27 | 28 | 55 |
CSU | 31 | 30 | 61 |
Wyoming covered the spread of +6.5. The total score of 116 was under 144.5.
Wisconsin @ Minnesota
o/u Margin
Push
Cover By +4
MINN +5
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
WIS | 38 | 30 | 68 |
MINN | 36 | 31 | 67 |
Minnesota covered the spread of +5. The total score of 135 pushed the pre-game total of 135.
Cincinnati @ Central Florida
Virginia Tech @ Georgia Tech
o/u Margin
u11
Cover By +2
GT +6
Team | 1 | 2 | Score |
---|---|---|---|
VT | 30 | 32 | 62 |
GT | 34 | 24 | 58 |
Georgia Tech covered the spread of +6. The total score of 120 was under 131.
Washington @ Washington St.
This page serves as the foundational platform for NCAAB bettors to initiate their handicapping process. It is where you delve into essential betting data that will shape your decision-making.
Presented here are all forthcoming matchups, coupled with live scores and outcomes. Before the game, bettors can view odds for each matchup and upon the game's conclusion, we give you a glance over the scores, fractionated by quarter.
After deciding your bets, the next step of the process involves scouring legal betting sites for the most favorable lines via our college basketball odds comparison tool. This platform reveals the odds for each game's point spread, moneyline, and total. Point spread betting is gambling on the predictive point gap between the two teams, while moneyline betting entails wagering on the team that is expected to triumph. Totals or Over/Under betting involves staking Over or Under on the amalgamated point total estimated to be scored in a specific game.
Covers also have March Madness odds from a full suite of the best March Madness betting sites!
Covers’ NCAAB scoreboard is a great place for bettors to start researching their college basketball picks.
The live and up-to-date odds come from the absolute best basketball betting sites and the matchup pages are a gateway into a huge array of NCAAB stats. Whether you are betting on the tournament or looking for a good matchup to use a new March Madness bonus or sportsbook promo with, this page is where you need to start!
Our live scores update in real-time, and our pre-games odds are refreshed every five minutes, so you see the best odds for betting on upcoming NCAAB games.
College basketball matchups are determined through a combination of league mandates and independently scheduled games, typically resulting in about 30-35 games in a season.
Injuries can significantly impact college basketball matchups and betting odds, as the loss of key players can drastically alter a team's competitive level.
The average score of a college basketball game varies widely but tends to be lower than professional games, typically falling somewhere in the 60s or 70s per team.