Bradley the best fighter Pacquiao has faced in his career, I can prmose you this. YOu fooled the fans too long Pac, it all ends soon. Load up on Bradley, there is no way Pac will win this fight. Pac is a beaten fighrr mentally and physcially vs JMM, I saw it in his eyes, he was a defeated man. Now he's facing a guy who's going to be a star in boxing, a hungry young lion who is better skilled than Pac. Fight will be ugly if Pac cannot handle bradley on the inside and he will be stopped.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Bradley the best fighter Pacquiao has faced in his career, I can prmose you this. YOu fooled the fans too long Pac, it all ends soon. Load up on Bradley, there is no way Pac will win this fight. Pac is a beaten fighrr mentally and physcially vs JMM, I saw it in his eyes, he was a defeated man. Now he's facing a guy who's going to be a star in boxing, a hungry young lion who is better skilled than Pac. Fight will be ugly if Pac cannot handle bradley on the inside and he will be stopped.
right......meanwhile Devon has faster hand speed and better footwork. Meanwhile a slow flat footed old JMM just schooled Manny. This section will be hilarious after the fight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tlml1899:
God I hope this is a joke
Bradley wont be able to handle Manny's speed
right......meanwhile Devon has faster hand speed and better footwork. Meanwhile a slow flat footed old JMM just schooled Manny. This section will be hilarious after the fight.
right......meanwhile Devon has faster hand speed and better footwork. Meanwhile a slow flat footed old JMM just schooled Manny. This section will be hilarious after the fight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jerseyboy89:
right......meanwhile Devon has faster hand speed and better footwork. Meanwhile a slow flat footed old JMM just schooled Manny. This section will be hilarious after the fight.
Bradley the best fighter Pacquiao has faced in his career, I can prmose you this. YOu fooled the fans too long Pac, it all ends soon. Load up on Bradley, there is no way Pac will win this fight. Pac is a beaten fighrr mentally and physcially vs JMM, I saw it in his eyes, he was a defeated man. Now he's facing a guy who's going to be a star in boxing, a hungry young lion who is better skilled than Pac. Fight will be ugly if Pac cannot handle bradley on the inside and he will be stopped.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jerseyboy89:
Bradley the best fighter Pacquiao has faced in his career, I can prmose you this. YOu fooled the fans too long Pac, it all ends soon. Load up on Bradley, there is no way Pac will win this fight. Pac is a beaten fighrr mentally and physcially vs JMM, I saw it in his eyes, he was a defeated man. Now he's facing a guy who's going to be a star in boxing, a hungry young lion who is better skilled than Pac. Fight will be ugly if Pac cannot handle bradley on the inside and he will be stopped.
fact. Devon Alexander is a southpaw who is faster and longer than Pacquiao.
Fact. Kendall Holt left hook has more power than Pacquiao left hand.
Fact. Bradley was hit by a left hook that he did not see coming that would have put other fighters too sleep and got up and dominated the rest of the fight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sowhat83:
fact. Devon Alexander is a southpaw who is faster and longer than Pacquiao.
Fact. Kendall Holt left hook has more power than Pacquiao left hand.
Fact. Bradley was hit by a left hook that he did not see coming that would have put other fighters too sleep and got up and dominated the rest of the fight.
The early rounds will be very very telling on how this fight plays out. If Timmy can sucesfully fight on the inside and force Pac to fight backing up and Pac back touches the ropes, HE"S in BIG BIG TROUBLE. Remember, Tim is not Margarito or any of these guys who tried backing up. Tim is very slick and quick when on the inside. If Pac back touches the ropes like it did vs Hatton and Margarito, the fight will be over. It's DONE. In fact I will say that Pac will not last the distance if he cannot handle Bradley on the inside.
I do not know Bradleys gameplan, but he is a multi dimensional fighter who will come with multiple gameplans and fully expect him to be victorious unless a robbery takes place.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kmoney85:
The early rounds will be very very telling on how this fight plays out. If Timmy can sucesfully fight on the inside and force Pac to fight backing up and Pac back touches the ropes, HE"S in BIG BIG TROUBLE. Remember, Tim is not Margarito or any of these guys who tried backing up. Tim is very slick and quick when on the inside. If Pac back touches the ropes like it did vs Hatton and Margarito, the fight will be over. It's DONE. In fact I will say that Pac will not last the distance if he cannot handle Bradley on the inside.
I do not know Bradleys gameplan, but he is a multi dimensional fighter who will come with multiple gameplans and fully expect him to be victorious unless a robbery takes place.
jersey does your previous 10 wrog predictions count for anything with you. We know what happens. Pacman wins (I liked Bradley till you got involved) and you disappear. You come back with a new thread. More bullsh!t. It loses again. Law of probability means u will get one fight right and then crow ffrom the rooftops, despite the fact u lost 15 in a row before that...I could put all your bad picks on this thread but I couldnt be bothered. Everyone knows you are a total retarded barrell of monkey spunk..
U are a pathetic little troll, little weasel of a man who ruins this great forum...It fact its no longer great and u are a huge reason why..
0
jersey does your previous 10 wrog predictions count for anything with you. We know what happens. Pacman wins (I liked Bradley till you got involved) and you disappear. You come back with a new thread. More bullsh!t. It loses again. Law of probability means u will get one fight right and then crow ffrom the rooftops, despite the fact u lost 15 in a row before that...I could put all your bad picks on this thread but I couldnt be bothered. Everyone knows you are a total retarded barrell of monkey spunk..
U are a pathetic little troll, little weasel of a man who ruins this great forum...It fact its no longer great and u are a huge reason why..
jersey does your previous 10 wrog predictions count for anything with you. We know what happens. Pacman wins (I liked Bradley till you got involved) and you disappear. You come back with a new thread. More bullsh!t. It loses again. Law of probability means u will get one fight right and then crow ffrom the rooftops, despite the fact u lost 15 in a row before that...I could put all your bad picks on this thread but I couldnt be bothered. Everyone knows you are a total retarded barrell of monkey spunk..
U are a pathetic little troll, little weasel of a man who ruins this great forum...It fact its no longer great and u are a huge reason why..
right, my demarcus corley pick was real luck.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:
jersey does your previous 10 wrog predictions count for anything with you. We know what happens. Pacman wins (I liked Bradley till you got involved) and you disappear. You come back with a new thread. More bullsh!t. It loses again. Law of probability means u will get one fight right and then crow ffrom the rooftops, despite the fact u lost 15 in a row before that...I could put all your bad picks on this thread but I couldnt be bothered. Everyone knows you are a total retarded barrell of monkey spunk..
U are a pathetic little troll, little weasel of a man who ruins this great forum...It fact its no longer great and u are a huge reason why..
JerseyBoy89, You want to post your thoughts, go right ahead and do it. I offer you my favorite quote of which I have embraced and carried through the peaks and valleys of life. FUCKEM ALL BIG & SMALL
0
JerseyBoy89, You want to post your thoughts, go right ahead and do it. I offer you my favorite quote of which I have embraced and carried through the peaks and valleys of life. FUCKEM ALL BIG & SMALL
The early rounds will be very very telling on how this fight plays out. If Timmy can sucesfully fight on the inside and force Pac to fight backing up and Pac back touches the ropes, HE"S in BIG BIG TROUBLE. Remember, Tim is not Margarito or any of these guys who tried backing up. Tim is very slick and quick when on the inside. If Pac back touches the ropes like it did vs Hatton and Margarito, the fight will be over. It's DONE. In fact I will say that Pac will not last the distance if he cannot handle Bradley on the inside.
I do not know Bradleys gameplan, but he is a multi dimensional fighter who will come with multiple gameplans and fully expect him to be victorious unless a robbery takes place.
I agree Pacquiao should stay off the ropes. Bradley doesn't have the intelligence of Morales, Barrera, Marquez or Cotto, but the blueprint has already been laid out by these guys, and one of the keys is to unload a combination when Pacquiao squares himself up on the ropes. Bradley has too much loop in his punches for my liking, but one of his strenghts is how he picks his spots to unload a combination - even if the punches are sloppy. I'm sure Bradley's camp has picked up on this and also how important it is to nuetralize Pac's biggest weapon - his straight left. This is done by the right hander circling to his left and also countering Pac when he overextends himself, which he often does.
I don't completely count out Bradley and I feel the odds are a very wrong reflection of the probabilities, yet I still favor Pacquiao. Bradley isn't raw, but he has fundamental flaws. He's fast, but not as fast as Pacquiao. He's experienced but not as much as Pacquiao, etc.
However Bradley is peaking and he just fought 2 smart southpaws. Plus the blueprint has been laid out on how to beat Pacquiao. Most importanly Bradley has the balls, combined with the minimum requirements of athleticism and ring smarts to pull off the upset. Don't underestimate Bradley's trainer when comparing fighters. He hasn't straightened out Bradley's punches, but he always gives great advice in between rounds and Bradley respects him.
Jerseyboy I know you get alot of hate on this board but I don't think it's a bad idea to lay a little on Bradley.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jerseyboy89:
The early rounds will be very very telling on how this fight plays out. If Timmy can sucesfully fight on the inside and force Pac to fight backing up and Pac back touches the ropes, HE"S in BIG BIG TROUBLE. Remember, Tim is not Margarito or any of these guys who tried backing up. Tim is very slick and quick when on the inside. If Pac back touches the ropes like it did vs Hatton and Margarito, the fight will be over. It's DONE. In fact I will say that Pac will not last the distance if he cannot handle Bradley on the inside.
I do not know Bradleys gameplan, but he is a multi dimensional fighter who will come with multiple gameplans and fully expect him to be victorious unless a robbery takes place.
I agree Pacquiao should stay off the ropes. Bradley doesn't have the intelligence of Morales, Barrera, Marquez or Cotto, but the blueprint has already been laid out by these guys, and one of the keys is to unload a combination when Pacquiao squares himself up on the ropes. Bradley has too much loop in his punches for my liking, but one of his strenghts is how he picks his spots to unload a combination - even if the punches are sloppy. I'm sure Bradley's camp has picked up on this and also how important it is to nuetralize Pac's biggest weapon - his straight left. This is done by the right hander circling to his left and also countering Pac when he overextends himself, which he often does.
I don't completely count out Bradley and I feel the odds are a very wrong reflection of the probabilities, yet I still favor Pacquiao. Bradley isn't raw, but he has fundamental flaws. He's fast, but not as fast as Pacquiao. He's experienced but not as much as Pacquiao, etc.
However Bradley is peaking and he just fought 2 smart southpaws. Plus the blueprint has been laid out on how to beat Pacquiao. Most importanly Bradley has the balls, combined with the minimum requirements of athleticism and ring smarts to pull off the upset. Don't underestimate Bradley's trainer when comparing fighters. He hasn't straightened out Bradley's punches, but he always gives great advice in between rounds and Bradley respects him.
Jerseyboy I know you get alot of hate on this board but I don't think it's a bad idea to lay a little on Bradley.
Everyone needs to realize that the whirlwind Pacquiao that one punched Hatton blew out other fighters doesn't exist anymore. The regression has been subtle, yet very clear.
Although styles make fights, Bradley is light years ahead of the fighter that (by all reasonable accounts) defeated Pacquiao in November. He certainly is younger, quicker and of comparable strength and stamina.
I see absolutely no confidence form the Roach camp. They're all human and we're finally starting to see some wear and tear on both the champ and they people that made him the greatest in the sport the last few years. Manny's well hidden personal problems are now public knowledge and being exposed more each day.
Eventually, even the best fighters lose their edge. Sometimes it's simply by choice, other times it's forced upon them. As far as Pacquiao is concerned, it's a combination of both. The fact remains that we aren't looking at the same fighter. I see a fighter and man that has been broken down and humbled - one that is looking forward to moving on with his life.
Bradley is the most complete fighter that Pacquiao has fought since he has entered the higher weight classes. Everyone else had either significant disadvantages in speed, power and/or general athletic ability. I'm not attacking the impressive victories he's had since moving up, but if you look at it objectively they are very flawed to say the least. Bradley has no such flaws. He's in his prime and nobody has come close to beating him.
If you're expecting a textbook Pacquiao ass whooping, you're either nostalgic or delusional. Don't be nostalgic or delusional. Look at the whole picture and break it down. It's all there when you think about it. The only question is how much love will Bradley get on the cards?
0
Everyone needs to realize that the whirlwind Pacquiao that one punched Hatton blew out other fighters doesn't exist anymore. The regression has been subtle, yet very clear.
Although styles make fights, Bradley is light years ahead of the fighter that (by all reasonable accounts) defeated Pacquiao in November. He certainly is younger, quicker and of comparable strength and stamina.
I see absolutely no confidence form the Roach camp. They're all human and we're finally starting to see some wear and tear on both the champ and they people that made him the greatest in the sport the last few years. Manny's well hidden personal problems are now public knowledge and being exposed more each day.
Eventually, even the best fighters lose their edge. Sometimes it's simply by choice, other times it's forced upon them. As far as Pacquiao is concerned, it's a combination of both. The fact remains that we aren't looking at the same fighter. I see a fighter and man that has been broken down and humbled - one that is looking forward to moving on with his life.
Bradley is the most complete fighter that Pacquiao has fought since he has entered the higher weight classes. Everyone else had either significant disadvantages in speed, power and/or general athletic ability. I'm not attacking the impressive victories he's had since moving up, but if you look at it objectively they are very flawed to say the least. Bradley has no such flaws. He's in his prime and nobody has come close to beating him.
If you're expecting a textbook Pacquiao ass whooping, you're either nostalgic or delusional. Don't be nostalgic or delusional. Look at the whole picture and break it down. It's all there when you think about it. The only question is how much love will Bradley get on the cards?
Everyone needs to realize that the whirlwind Pacquiao that one punched Hatton blew out other fighters doesn't exist anymore. The regression has been subtle, yet very clear.
Although styles make fights, Bradley is light years ahead of the fighter that (by all reasonable accounts) defeated Pacquiao in November. He certainly is younger, quicker and of comparable strength and stamina.
I see absolutely no confidence form the Roach camp. They're all human and we're finally starting to see some wear and tear on both the champ and they people that made him the greatest in the sport the last few years. Manny's well hidden personal problems are now public knowledge and being exposed more each day.
Eventually, even the best fighters lose their edge. Sometimes it's simply by choice, other times it's forced upon them. As far as Pacquiao is concerned, it's a combination of both. The fact remains that we aren't looking at the same fighter. I see a fighter and man that has been broken down and humbled - one that is looking forward to moving on with his life.
Bradley is the most complete fighter that Pacquiao has fought since he has entered the higher weight classes. Everyone else had either significant disadvantages in speed, power and/or general athletic ability. I'm not attacking the impressive victories he's had since moving up, but if you look at it objectively they are very flawed to say the least. Bradley has no such flaws. He's in his prime and nobody has come close to beating him.
If you're expecting a textbook Pacquiao ass whooping, you're either nostalgic or delusional. Don't be nostalgic or delusional. Look at the whole picture and break it down. It's all there when you think about it. The only question is how much love will Bradley get on the cards?
Bradley is light years ahead of jmm? No way, jmm fought pacquiao 3 times and is a good counter puncher. This fight is very simple, pacquiao will win and thats that. No if ands or buts. Im gonna sprinkle a little bit on pacman by knockout. No confidence from roach? Ur crazy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:
Everyone needs to realize that the whirlwind Pacquiao that one punched Hatton blew out other fighters doesn't exist anymore. The regression has been subtle, yet very clear.
Although styles make fights, Bradley is light years ahead of the fighter that (by all reasonable accounts) defeated Pacquiao in November. He certainly is younger, quicker and of comparable strength and stamina.
I see absolutely no confidence form the Roach camp. They're all human and we're finally starting to see some wear and tear on both the champ and they people that made him the greatest in the sport the last few years. Manny's well hidden personal problems are now public knowledge and being exposed more each day.
Eventually, even the best fighters lose their edge. Sometimes it's simply by choice, other times it's forced upon them. As far as Pacquiao is concerned, it's a combination of both. The fact remains that we aren't looking at the same fighter. I see a fighter and man that has been broken down and humbled - one that is looking forward to moving on with his life.
Bradley is the most complete fighter that Pacquiao has fought since he has entered the higher weight classes. Everyone else had either significant disadvantages in speed, power and/or general athletic ability. I'm not attacking the impressive victories he's had since moving up, but if you look at it objectively they are very flawed to say the least. Bradley has no such flaws. He's in his prime and nobody has come close to beating him.
If you're expecting a textbook Pacquiao ass whooping, you're either nostalgic or delusional. Don't be nostalgic or delusional. Look at the whole picture and break it down. It's all there when you think about it. The only question is how much love will Bradley get on the cards?
Bradley is light years ahead of jmm? No way, jmm fought pacquiao 3 times and is a good counter puncher. This fight is very simple, pacquiao will win and thats that. No if ands or buts. Im gonna sprinkle a little bit on pacman by knockout. No confidence from roach? Ur crazy.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
