Juan Manuel Marquez -140 vs. Timothy Bradley
I don't think Bradley's been the same since the Pacquiao fight and his last fight might have ruined him. Marquez has had a career rejuvenation and wouldn't be surprised if he was juicing.
Liked JMM as soon as this fight was announced. Bradley was given a boxing lesson by Manny, then his last fight he was almost KO'd 3 times. Unless he gets his third gift decision in a row, can't see him beating JMM.
Frank the tank might be right about Bradley being ruined, remember the Meldrick Taylor vs Chavez fight, if Richard Steele wouldn't have stopped that fight, Taylor would have won that fight, despite pissing blood.
Liked JMM as soon as this fight was announced. Bradley was given a boxing lesson by Manny, then his last fight he was almost KO'd 3 times. Unless he gets his third gift decision in a row, can't see him beating JMM.
Frank the tank might be right about Bradley being ruined, remember the Meldrick Taylor vs Chavez fight, if Richard Steele wouldn't have stopped that fight, Taylor would have won that fight, despite pissing blood.
Liked JMM as soon as this fight was announced. Bradley was given a boxing lesson by Manny, then his last fight he was almost KO'd 3 times. Unless he gets his third gift decision in a row, can't see him beating JMM.
Frank the tank might be right about Bradley being ruined, remember the Meldrick Taylor vs Chavez fight, if Richard Steele wouldn't have stopped that fight, Taylor would have won that fight, despite pissing blood.
Liked JMM as soon as this fight was announced. Bradley was given a boxing lesson by Manny, then his last fight he was almost KO'd 3 times. Unless he gets his third gift decision in a row, can't see him beating JMM.
Frank the tank might be right about Bradley being ruined, remember the Meldrick Taylor vs Chavez fight, if Richard Steele wouldn't have stopped that fight, Taylor would have won that fight, despite pissing blood.
Frank it was a premature stoppage (we all know that) but Groves was not going to get to the end of 12..He was blowing heavy after 7 rounds. He put in a HUGE effort and Froch wouldn't go away. He got caught at the start of 8 and that changed everything. Round 9 he had gassed. I dont think he would have survived to the bell and for sure he wouldn't have gotten to 12...
Now Froch was never the quickest but he has aged as a fighter tonight. If Groves gets a rematch he is a better fighter, but he his stamina is a BIG problem..
Frank it was a premature stoppage (we all know that) but Groves was not going to get to the end of 12..He was blowing heavy after 7 rounds. He put in a HUGE effort and Froch wouldn't go away. He got caught at the start of 8 and that changed everything. Round 9 he had gassed. I dont think he would have survived to the bell and for sure he wouldn't have gotten to 12...
Now Froch was never the quickest but he has aged as a fighter tonight. If Groves gets a rematch he is a better fighter, but he his stamina is a BIG problem..
Frank it was a premature stoppage (we all know that) but Groves was not going to get to the end of 12..He was blowing heavy after 7 rounds. He put in a HUGE effort and Froch wouldn't go away. He got caught at the start of 8 and that changed everything. Round 9 he had gassed. I dont think he would have survived to the bell and for sure he wouldn't have gotten to 12...
Now Froch was never the quickest but he has aged as a fighter tonight. If Groves gets a rematch he is a better fighter, but he his stamina is a BIG problem..
Frank it was a premature stoppage (we all know that) but Groves was not going to get to the end of 12..He was blowing heavy after 7 rounds. He put in a HUGE effort and Froch wouldn't go away. He got caught at the start of 8 and that changed everything. Round 9 he had gassed. I dont think he would have survived to the bell and for sure he wouldn't have gotten to 12...
Now Froch was never the quickest but he has aged as a fighter tonight. If Groves gets a rematch he is a better fighter, but he his stamina is a BIG problem..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.