• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Lions-Bills Early Leans
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    My Feelings on Pacquiao vs Cotto

    walktheline
    boxingking09
    nuttyrich
    MIXED_NUTS
    Mack05
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 760
    Posts: 18
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Aug. 6, 2009 - 3:50 AM ET #1

    Summed up by one of the best in the world, Manny Steward.

    This response is from an exclusive interview by Geoffrey Ciani of East Side Boxing.

    Q: Changing things up a bit Manny, I’m curious, what is your opinion on the upcoming mega bout between Manny Pacquiao and Miguel Cotto?

    On the fight between Miguel Cotto and Pacquiao, I still think that Cotto is physically a very strong fighter, but I think he should not fight with his defense being the way it has been before. A lot of people are maybe underestimating the physical size of Cotto. What’s been so amazing about Pacquiao that I love so much from the first time I saw him about five years ago, he’s been fighting top notch everything. He’s never dodged anyone and he is what we call a “true pure born fighter”. He has the instincts of a fighter, the balance, the timing, the stamina—everything—and it’s just natural. He’s a fighter! If anyone was ever born to be a fighter, it would be a guy like him or (Roberto) Duran, but he’s better because he has great rhythm, and his defense and timing are a lot better than people think. When you really watch him, he’s got good in-and-out motion where you really can’t time him, but he’s been in there against a lot of good fighters: Morales, Barrera, we can go on and on and on. He’s never dodged anyone.

    I think he is still a natural 130-135 pound fighter. That’s his real true weight. The fights are being made now because a lot of the marquee fighters that are attractive—dream fights—are what he wants to make. But he is still a junior lightweight to lightweight fighting guys who are, in this case with Miguel, a true welterweight. So the real natural weight and strength, regardless of what they weigh on those scales, is still a ten to twelve pound difference. That will be negated, though, if Miguel does not fight the right fight because a good big man always beats a good little man, and I believe that, but if the big guy gets hit a lot and doesn’t take advantage of being able to block punches and to move the little guy into a position where you can hurt him, he will have problems.

    So right now, I would say everyone is so intrigued over Pacquiao, and thinks that he wins big, but I just don’t see it that way. I think that Miguel is going to have to improve his defense, in particular. His defense right up the middle—he has absolutely no defense for that, because his gloves are so wide, and fighters can punch right between his gloves. If he improves that and boxes, because he has really good boxing ability and a lot of people don’t realize that—as an amateur, and even in certain fights when he’s had to as a professional, he can box. So if he boxes and keeps his defense a little bit tighter, and if he starts banging those hard left hooks to the body on the smaller guy, this fight could be a very, very interesting fight.

    It could be a tough fight for Manny, because Manny is not really a welterweight. This is why Freddie Roach, his trainer, has been very concerned. Even though he beat an Oscar, who physically wasn’t where he should have been that night—but still, that’s not Pacquiao’s fault. Manny was trained to be prepared and whatever the opponent’s shortcomings were, that’s on the opponents, not him. But Freddie knows that Manny is really not a true welterweight, and that’s why he’s trying to at least get some kind of equilibrium in those fights by making the opponents come down in weight as close to Manny as they can for balance. I think that Manny is unbelievably solid and consistent with his performances, and he has been consistent for five years and they were all in top notch fights.

    Miguel has been a little inconsistent and has been in some rough fights. In the last fight with (Joshua) Clottey, I don’t criticize him the way some of the other people did because Clottey is a fighter I would not want any fighter to fight. He would have been a rough fight for Sugar Ray Leonard, for Tommy Hearns, and for any other welterweights in history. He’s that type of a guy with very tight defense, very strong, very good stamina, and the biggest advantage that you have when you fight him is that the last two rounds, oftentimes, he doesn’t punch. He’s relaxed, and when he does punch, he’s effective. For myself, I think I slightly may have had him (Clottey) ahead on rounds, but if I was a judge, I probably would have been more inclined to give it to Cotto because he won the last two rounds of the fight. I think that corner of Clottey didn’t tell him that he lost the first round. They won the first round, but regardless, because of the knock down it was a two point difference. The inexperience of them not telling him that and his tendency to just cover up caused him to lose. The point is, I respect anyone who fights Clottey. Clottey is a tough, tough guy.

    Based on Miguel having such a tough fight there and Manny looking like a million dollars knocking out Ricky Hatton and Oscar, that’s why the odds are totally going out of proportion and I don’t think that’s a fair assessment. I see it as almost a toss-up fight, myself.

    ______________________________________________________

    Saved me hours of time expressing similar concerns about Pac's natural abiltiy vs weight. Very solid piece worth reading twice.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    Summed up by one of the best in the world, Manny Steward.

    This response is from an exclusive interview by Geoffrey Ciani of East Side Boxing.

    Q: Changing things up a bit Manny, I’m curious, what is your opinion on the upcoming mega bout between Manny Pacquiao and Miguel Cotto?

    On the fight between Miguel Cotto and Pacquiao, I still think that Cotto is physically a very strong fighter, but I think he should not fight with his defense being the way it has been before. A lot of people are maybe underestimating the physical size of Cotto. What’s been so amazing about Pacquiao that I love so much from the first time I saw him about five years ago, he’s been fighting top notch everything. He’s never dodged anyone and he is what we call a “true pure born fighter”. He has the instincts of a fighter, the balance, the timing, the stamina—everything—and it’s just natural. He’s a fighter! If anyone was ever born to be a fighter, it would be a guy like him or (Roberto) Duran, but he’s better because he has great rhythm, and his defense and timing are a lot better than people think. When you really watch him, he’s got good in-and-out motion where you really can’t time him, but he’s been in there against a lot of good fighters: Morales, Barrera, we can go on and on and on. He’s never dodged anyone.

    I think he is still a natural 130-135 pound fighter. That’s his real true weight. The fights are being made now because a lot of the marquee fighters that are attractive—dream fights—are what he wants to make. But he is still a junior lightweight to lightweight fighting guys who are, in this case with Miguel, a true welterweight. So the real natural weight and strength, regardless of what they weigh on those scales, is still a ten to twelve pound difference. That will be negated, though, if Miguel does not fight the right fight because a good big man always beats a good little man, and I believe that, but if the big guy gets hit a lot and doesn’t take advantage of being able to block punches and to move the little guy into a position where you can hurt him, he will have problems.

    So right now, I would say everyone is so intrigued over Pacquiao, and thinks that he wins big, but I just don’t see it that way. I think that Miguel is going to have to improve his defense, in particular. His defense right up the middle—he has absolutely no defense for that, because his gloves are so wide, and fighters can punch right between his gloves. If he improves that and boxes, because he has really good boxing ability and a lot of people don’t realize that—as an amateur, and even in certain fights when he’s had to as a professional, he can box. So if he boxes and keeps his defense a little bit tighter, and if he starts banging those hard left hooks to the body on the smaller guy, this fight could be a very, very interesting fight.

    It could be a tough fight for Manny, because Manny is not really a welterweight. This is why Freddie Roach, his trainer, has been very concerned. Even though he beat an Oscar, who physically wasn’t where he should have been that night—but still, that’s not Pacquiao’s fault. Manny was trained to be prepared and whatever the opponent’s shortcomings were, that’s on the opponents, not him. But Freddie knows that Manny is really not a true welterweight, and that’s why he’s trying to at least get some kind of equilibrium in those fights by making the opponents come down in weight as close to Manny as they can for balance. I think that Manny is unbelievably solid and consistent with his performances, and he has been consistent for five years and they were all in top notch fights.

    Miguel has been a little inconsistent and has been in some rough fights. In the last fight with (Joshua) Clottey, I don’t criticize him the way some of the other people did because Clottey is a fighter I would not want any fighter to fight. He would have been a rough fight for Sugar Ray Leonard, for Tommy Hearns, and for any other welterweights in history. He’s that type of a guy with very tight defense, very strong, very good stamina, and the biggest advantage that you have when you fight him is that the last two rounds, oftentimes, he doesn’t punch. He’s relaxed, and when he does punch, he’s effective. For myself, I think I slightly may have had him (Clottey) ahead on rounds, but if I was a judge, I probably would have been more inclined to give it to Cotto because he won the last two rounds of the fight. I think that corner of Clottey didn’t tell him that he lost the first round. They won the first round, but regardless, because of the knock down it was a two point difference. The inexperience of them not telling him that and his tendency to just cover up caused him to lose. The point is, I respect anyone who fights Clottey. Clottey is a tough, tough guy.

    Based on Miguel having such a tough fight there and Manny looking like a million dollars knocking out Ricky Hatton and Oscar, that’s why the odds are totally going out of proportion and I don’t think that’s a fair assessment. I see it as almost a toss-up fight, myself.

    ______________________________________________________

    Saved me hours of time expressing similar concerns about Pac's natural abiltiy vs weight. Very solid piece worth reading twice.
     
    boxingking09
    boxingking09
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2009
    Posts: 221
    Posted: Aug. 6, 2009 - 4:40 PM ET #2

    Thanks, Nice way to share that with us.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Thanks, Nice way to share that with us.
     
    nuttyrich
    nuttyrich
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 1709
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2009 - 12:54 AM ET #3

    I agree Cotto is a pure 147 fighter, Pac- man fought a now washed up Diaz at 135, Oscar who looked like he had aids at 147 and a washed up Hatton at 140.

    My only gripe is that Cotto has to come DOWN at this stage in his  career those few pounds are precious.

    Cotto's defense will NOT improve, you cannot teach defense, his gifts are gifts and his weaknesses are his weaknesses.. and that will never change.

    Sure his defense will look good until Manny lands a good combo, and all that goes out the window, because he's a brawler/boxer mix.

    Pac-man is TOO fast for a very aging Cotto, but people need to realize Pac-man has been fighting washed up fighters WAY past their prime

    . Cotto is on the decline but FAR superior to what Manny has faced his past 3 fights.

    How does Many take a shot from a guy who can still hit and still has speed left.

    Cotto is hittable more than ever, combined with Pac-mans precision hitting and speed.. Cotto's best shot is to bully the much smaller Pac-man.

    Cotto does much better against smaller fighters, as seen by his last two fighters Margarito & Clottey Cotto CANNOT fight on the retreat, good news for him is Pac-man isn't Maragrito or Clottey (size or power wise).

    Pac-man still wins this fight but Cotto does have a few things going for him.. and the one I like the most is SIZE advantage.

    Remember  people were questioning if Manny can handle Ricky Hatton at 140. Cotto is NO Ricky Hatton, Ricky Hatton is a drunk piece of crap.. remember Cotto takes a few punches to GIVE a few back.

    Ricky Hatton, just TOOK the punches.

    Two years ago I would have said Cotto, but Manny gets this one on hand speed and head movement and foot work.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I agree Cotto is a pure 147 fighter, Pac- man fought a now washed up Diaz at 135, Oscar who looked like he had aids at 147 and a washed up Hatton at 140.

    My only gripe is that Cotto has to come DOWN at this stage in his  career those few pounds are precious.

    Cotto's defense will NOT improve, you cannot teach defense, his gifts are gifts and his weaknesses are his weaknesses.. and that will never change.

    Sure his defense will look good until Manny lands a good combo, and all that goes out the window, because he's a brawler/boxer mix.

    Pac-man is TOO fast for a very aging Cotto, but people need to realize Pac-man has been fighting washed up fighters WAY past their prime

    . Cotto is on the decline but FAR superior to what Manny has faced his past 3 fights.

    How does Many take a shot from a guy who can still hit and still has speed left.

    Cotto is hittable more than ever, combined with Pac-mans precision hitting and speed.. Cotto's best shot is to bully the much smaller Pac-man.

    Cotto does much better against smaller fighters, as seen by his last two fighters Margarito & Clottey Cotto CANNOT fight on the retreat, good news for him is Pac-man isn't Maragrito or Clottey (size or power wise).

    Pac-man still wins this fight but Cotto does have a few things going for him.. and the one I like the most is SIZE advantage.

    Remember  people were questioning if Manny can handle Ricky Hatton at 140. Cotto is NO Ricky Hatton, Ricky Hatton is a drunk piece of crap.. remember Cotto takes a few punches to GIVE a few back.

    Ricky Hatton, just TOOK the punches.

    Two years ago I would have said Cotto, but Manny gets this one on hand speed and head movement and foot work.


     
    boxingking09
    boxingking09
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2009
    Posts: 221
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2009 - 5:38 PM ET #4

    Rich, Another Great write up... You pointed out both sides excellent!!


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Rich, Another Great write up... You pointed out both sides excellent!!


     
    MIXED_NUTS
    MIXED_NUTS
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 580
    Posted: Aug. 9, 2009 - 1:47 AM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:

    I agree Cotto is a pure 147 fighter, Pac- man fought a now washed up Diaz at 135, Oscar who looked like he had aids at 147 and a washed up Hatton at 140.

    My only gripe is that Cotto has to come DOWN at this stage in his  career those few pounds are precious.

    Cotto's defense will NOT improve, you cannot teach defense, his gifts are gifts and his weaknesses are his weaknesses.. and that will never change.

    Sure his defense will look good until Manny lands a good combo, and all that goes out the window, because he's a brawler/boxer mix.

    Pac-man is TOO fast for a very aging Cotto, but people need to realize Pac-man has been fighting washed up fighters WAY past their prime

    . Cotto is on the decline but FAR superior to what Manny has faced his past 3 fights.

    How does Many take a shot from a guy who can still hit and still has speed left.

    Cotto is hittable more than ever, combined with Pac-mans precision hitting and speed.. Cotto's best shot is to bully the much smaller Pac-man.

    Cotto does much better against smaller fighters, as seen by his last two fighters Margarito & Clottey Cotto CANNOT fight on the retreat, good news for him is Pac-man isn't Maragrito or Clottey (size or power wise).

    Pac-man still wins this fight but Cotto does have a few things going for him.. and the one I like the most is SIZE advantage.

    Remember  people were questioning if Manny can handle Ricky Hatton at 140. Cotto is NO Ricky Hatton, Ricky Hatton is a drunk piece of crap.. remember Cotto takes a few punches to GIVE a few back.

    Ricky Hatton, just TOOK the punches.

    Two years ago I would have said Cotto, but Manny gets this one on hand speed and head movement and foot work.


    FINALLY WE ARE ON THE SAME PAGE MR.NUTSSY  I SEE MONEY PACQUAIO WINNING BY T.K.O  BEFORE THE 9TH ROUND ( CUT )
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:

    I agree Cotto is a pure 147 fighter, Pac- man fought a now washed up Diaz at 135, Oscar who looked like he had aids at 147 and a washed up Hatton at 140.

    My only gripe is that Cotto has to come DOWN at this stage in his  career those few pounds are precious.

    Cotto's defense will NOT improve, you cannot teach defense, his gifts are gifts and his weaknesses are his weaknesses.. and that will never change.

    Sure his defense will look good until Manny lands a good combo, and all that goes out the window, because he's a brawler/boxer mix.

    Pac-man is TOO fast for a very aging Cotto, but people need to realize Pac-man has been fighting washed up fighters WAY past their prime

    . Cotto is on the decline but FAR superior to what Manny has faced his past 3 fights.

    How does Many take a shot from a guy who can still hit and still has speed left.

    Cotto is hittable more than ever, combined with Pac-mans precision hitting and speed.. Cotto's best shot is to bully the much smaller Pac-man.

    Cotto does much better against smaller fighters, as seen by his last two fighters Margarito & Clottey Cotto CANNOT fight on the retreat, good news for him is Pac-man isn't Maragrito or Clottey (size or power wise).

    Pac-man still wins this fight but Cotto does have a few things going for him.. and the one I like the most is SIZE advantage.

    Remember  people were questioning if Manny can handle Ricky Hatton at 140. Cotto is NO Ricky Hatton, Ricky Hatton is a drunk piece of crap.. remember Cotto takes a few punches to GIVE a few back.

    Ricky Hatton, just TOOK the punches.

    Two years ago I would have said Cotto, but Manny gets this one on hand speed and head movement and foot work.


    FINALLY WE ARE ON THE SAME PAGE MR.NUTSSY  I SEE MONEY PACQUAIO WINNING BY T.K.O  BEFORE THE 9TH ROUND ( CUT )
     
    Mack05
    Mack05
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 4403
    Posted: Aug. 11, 2009 - 8:05 AM ET #6

    there is no way a featherweight knocks out a Welterweight with Cotto's fighting heart before round 9..Even with a Cut Cotto will fight on as he has proven
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    there is no way a featherweight knocks out a Welterweight with Cotto's fighting heart before round 9..Even with a Cut Cotto will fight on as he has proven
     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: Aug. 11, 2009 - 11:46 PM ET #7

    I don't think it's fair to call Pacquiao a featherweight, and Cotto is average to small as a welterweight anyhow. Manny definitely has the power to damage and stop Cotto.   
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I don't think it's fair to call Pacquiao a featherweight, and Cotto is average to small as a welterweight anyhow. Manny definitely has the power to damage and stop Cotto.   
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: Aug. 12, 2009 - 3:46 AM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I don't think it's fair to call Pacquiao a featherweight, and Cotto is average to small as a welterweight anyhow. Manny definitely has the power to damage and stop Cotto.   

    Cotto isn't a small welter, and I don't know why that gets thrown around so much. It just isn't true. He might be somewhat shorter than say... Paul Williams, but he isn't small for that weight at all.

    Pac isn't a feather anymore, and probably never really was. He MIGHT have the power, but I'm not worried about one punch power here. I'm worried that Manny would blow him out and get a drawn out stoppage.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I don't think it's fair to call Pacquiao a featherweight, and Cotto is average to small as a welterweight anyhow. Manny definitely has the power to damage and stop Cotto.   

    Cotto isn't a small welter, and I don't know why that gets thrown around so much. It just isn't true. He might be somewhat shorter than say... Paul Williams, but he isn't small for that weight at all.

    Pac isn't a feather anymore, and probably never really was. He MIGHT have the power, but I'm not worried about one punch power here. I'm worried that Manny would blow him out and get a drawn out stoppage.

     
    Buzzcat
    Buzzcat
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2008
    Posts: 1858
    Posted: Aug. 12, 2009 - 7:44 AM ET #9

    an aging cotto?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    an aging cotto?
     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: Aug. 12, 2009 - 7:32 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Cotto isn't a small welter, and I don't know why that gets thrown around so much. It just isn't true. He might be somewhat shorter than say... Paul Williams, but he isn't small for that weight at all.

    Pac isn't a feather anymore, and probably never really was. He MIGHT have the power, but I'm not worried about one punch power here. I'm worried that Manny would blow him out and get a drawn out stoppage.



    My point was that Cotto is not a big welterweight. He also has zero wins over top, big welters unless you feel he actually beat Clottey. The fact is that these guys are roughly the same in height and reach, and those who are counting on Cotto to use his great size advantage are going to be disappointed, especially when he is drawn from cutting 2 or 3 extra pounds.. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    Cotto isn't a small welter, and I don't know why that gets thrown around so much. It just isn't true. He might be somewhat shorter than say... Paul Williams, but he isn't small for that weight at all.

    Pac isn't a feather anymore, and probably never really was. He MIGHT have the power, but I'm not worried about one punch power here. I'm worried that Manny would blow him out and get a drawn out stoppage.



    My point was that Cotto is not a big welterweight. He also has zero wins over top, big welters unless you feel he actually beat Clottey. The fact is that these guys are roughly the same in height and reach, and those who are counting on Cotto to use his great size advantage are going to be disappointed, especially when he is drawn from cutting 2 or 3 extra pounds.. 
     
    MIXED_NUTS
    MIXED_NUTS
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 580
    Posted: Aug. 13, 2009 - 1:57 AM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:

    there is no way a featherweight knocks out a Welterweight with Cotto's fighting heart before round 9..Even with a Cut Cotto will fight on as he has proven
    ..... really ??? so you are putting another $100,000's on that MACKY
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Mack05:

    there is no way a featherweight knocks out a Welterweight with Cotto's fighting heart before round 9..Even with a Cut Cotto will fight on as he has proven
    ..... really ??? so you are putting another $100,000's on that MACKY
     
    MIXED_NUTS
    MIXED_NUTS
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 580
    Posted: Aug. 13, 2009 - 1:58 AM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I don't think it's fair to call Pacquiao a featherweight, and Cotto is average to small as a welterweight anyhow. Manny definitely has the power to damage and stop Cotto.   
    .....
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I don't think it's fair to call Pacquiao a featherweight, and Cotto is average to small as a welterweight anyhow. Manny definitely has the power to damage and stop Cotto.   
    .....
     
    Mack05
    Mack05
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 4403
    Posted: Aug. 13, 2009 - 5:14 AM ET #13

    no this isnt a 100k fight. Too many intangibles here..Some great fights coming up but making big money on them will be hard..
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    no this isnt a 100k fight. Too many intangibles here..Some great fights coming up but making big money on them will be hard..
     
    Zumbize
    Zumbize
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 668
    Posted: Aug. 14, 2009 - 11:43 AM ET #14

    The wild card hanging over this fight that makes it awful from a betting perspective is that until Manny lands his straight left on the button, we won't know whether Cotto brought his Mosley/ Judah chin to 145, or his Torres/ Corley chin. Because even if he boxes carefully for the first round or two the way I expect him to, his 140 pound chin is NOT going to be able to stand up to Manny's punches, and I mean not at all.

    If he can take a good shot, he absolutely has the presence and the skill to make Manny stop and think for a second, which is critical if you want any chance of beating him. When Pacquiao gets into any kind of rhythm, and he's basically an unstoppable force of nature.

    The respect for Manny is completely understandable, but the odds right now say that Cotto doesn't have a better chance than Hatton did, and that is absolutely silly.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The wild card hanging over this fight that makes it awful from a betting perspective is that until Manny lands his straight left on the button, we won't know whether Cotto brought his Mosley/ Judah chin to 145, or his Torres/ Corley chin. Because even if he boxes carefully for the first round or two the way I expect him to, his 140 pound chin is NOT going to be able to stand up to Manny's punches, and I mean not at all.

    If he can take a good shot, he absolutely has the presence and the skill to make Manny stop and think for a second, which is critical if you want any chance of beating him. When Pacquiao gets into any kind of rhythm, and he's basically an unstoppable force of nature.

    The respect for Manny is completely understandable, but the odds right now say that Cotto doesn't have a better chance than Hatton did, and that is absolutely silly.
     
    Coweringbeef
    Coweringbeef
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 223
    Posted: Aug. 14, 2009 - 12:03 PM ET #15

    Cotto IS a little small at 147.

    Compare him to other guys like Clottey, Margarito, Mosley, Paul Williams.

     

    He is definately a bit smaller, even Floyd Mayweather is a bigger guy.

     

    Cotto is just unlucky his body fits between the 140 and 147 divisions. If there was a division at say 144 or 145, he would be better served.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Cotto IS a little small at 147.

    Compare him to other guys like Clottey, Margarito, Mosley, Paul Williams.

     

    He is definately a bit smaller, even Floyd Mayweather is a bigger guy.

     

    Cotto is just unlucky his body fits between the 140 and 147 divisions. If there was a division at say 144 or 145, he would be better served.

     
    KO_1
    KO_1
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2009
    Posts: 845
    Posted: Aug. 15, 2009 - 1:43 AM ET #16

    Everybody at the wildcard gym says pacman will be victorious!!  GL
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Everybody at the wildcard gym says pacman will be victorious!!  GL
     
    Redlad
    Redlad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2001
    Posts: 6822
    Posted: Aug. 15, 2009 - 2:24 PM ET #17

    Easy fight for Pac-man. Pac-man Way To Fast for Cotto. Cotto's defense Will NOT improve enough to matter. Size in this fight is being way overrated. Cotto will get hit 8 times for every punch he lands. Will be shocked if this doesn't end in a Pac-Man KO. Steward a solid trainer. As a fight analyst === Not so solid.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Easy fight for Pac-man. Pac-man Way To Fast for Cotto. Cotto's defense Will NOT improve enough to matter. Size in this fight is being way overrated. Cotto will get hit 8 times for every punch he lands. Will be shocked if this doesn't end in a Pac-Man KO. Steward a solid trainer. As a fight analyst === Not so solid.
     
     
    MIXED_NUTS
    MIXED_NUTS
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 580
    Posted: Aug. 22, 2009 - 12:44 AM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    Easy fight for Pac-man. Pac-man Way To Fast for Cotto. Cotto's defense Will NOT improve enough to matter. Size in this fight is being way overrated. Cotto will get hit 8 times for every punch he lands. Will be shocked if this doesn't end in a Pac-Man KO. Steward a solid trainer. As a fight analyst === Not so solid.
    ....good one....MONEY PACQUIAO BY TKO
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Redlad:

    Easy fight for Pac-man. Pac-man Way To Fast for Cotto. Cotto's defense Will NOT improve enough to matter. Size in this fight is being way overrated. Cotto will get hit 8 times for every punch he lands. Will be shocked if this doesn't end in a Pac-Man KO. Steward a solid trainer. As a fight analyst === Not so solid.
    ....good one....MONEY PACQUIAO BY TKO
    All Forums | Boxing

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,243 Covers arrow
    • Wednesday 09/16/2026 697 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 218 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,460 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 3,924 Covers arrow
    • Wednesday 3,257 Covers arrow
    • Trump lies so much. 20,714 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Wed. Sept. 16, 2026 * MLB Baseball Plays*** 2,047 Covers arrow
    • What damage to America does the traitor and his party plan for the rest of the year.? 25,643 Covers arrow
    • pg mlb 2026 season thread 6,536 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.