All Forums | Boxing

Play by Play.......w/ Corey Stinks

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 945
Posts: 53
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1465
Posted: #26
i know this aint the score and if it is im surprised but i have it
 
 
76-76 all...
this is a ugly ass fight...
 
wow...did witter bet the under....hahahahah
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #27
Wow Witter QUIT LOL..  He was doing better..  he must have hurt himself... Congrats to Alexander.,..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4403
Posted: #28
wtf lol....I knew I would win but that was ridiculous
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #29
Would love to see how the judges had it..

Wow.. I've never seen a guy quit like that.. smells fisht wasn't getting hit the past 2 rounds that bad... he must have bet against himself.. and the under LOL!

NO way any fighter quits.. especially when he's  doing okay in the fight. It's why I stay away from DON KING fights :)

I had it 5-3 but I see the judges having it 6-2 because I had a really close round that I gave to Witter probably for "looking better"
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #30
Outside Witters Dressing room it said "Witter Blue".. more like "Whitter Blew"

I like Alexander in this fight but never seen a guy quit when he was not in harms way.

I knew Witter was shot as a fighter, guess he knew he couldn't last 12 against aggression.

He lost everything as a fighter  you're last fight you "QUIT"

"WHitter the Quitter"
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1465
Posted: #31
 mack on campbell
 mack on another chalky favorite
mack telling the truth
mack 7-1 in his last 8
mack forgeting bout cotto itd and the ragin bull
mack bets 22k  on anything...
 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1465
Posted: #32
campbell 10-9
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #33
Actually Have Bradley winning that one.. 10-9 Bradley..

Nate looked dry and sloppy and let the judges know every time he got hit by nodding his head to Bradley and taunting him.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1465
Posted: #34
19-19 all
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #35
20-18 Bradley, Campbell looking a bit better I expected Nate to lose the first few  before he got "inside".

He started off too aggressive.. he looks like the BIGGER guy too (Nate that is).
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4526
Posted: #36
I also have it 19-19
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #37
Nate looks bad, BUT Bradley  is throwing tons of punches, his reflexes as gus stated.

Nate better stay up.,. Bradley spent himself...

30-27 Bradley... closest you can get to a 10-8 round.

Oh Nate said he cannot see.. fight is going to be called off "clash of heads" Nate gave up.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 4377
Posted: #38
Wow, this just got chaotic and I just lost some more dough.  Perfect.  Campbell new he was beat and quit, but the cut was from a butt.  The cut really didn't even look bad after they cleaned it up.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4526
Posted: #39
29-28, Timmy
 
Bradley really is trash... he just seems good because he beat one punch Holt and an obvious fading Campbell. The writing was on the wall for this one when Funeka outworked him BAD but got robbed and knocked down twice.
 
Bradley is going to get thrashed when he finally fights someone.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #40
Nate QUIT thinking he was getting the NO decision.

Refree said he saw a punch land.

Regardless Nate came in chunky and dry and did the exact opposite he was supposed to. He came out  super aggressive.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by Fullbrights:

Wow, this just got chaotic and I just lost some more dough.  Perfect.  Campbell new he was beat and quit, but the cut was from a butt.  The cut really didn't even look bad after they cleaned it up.


It was a head butt,  and caused Nate to go into the corner...

Nate COULD see out of the eye.. but I suspect a rematch :)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1465
Posted: #42
wow.....shitty ass day
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 4377
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by nuttyrich:

Nate QUIT thinking he was getting the NO decision.

Refree said he saw a punch land.

Regardless Nate came in chunky and dry and did the exact opposite he was supposed to. He came out  super aggressive.


Yep, similar to the Rahman-Toney fight here.  Result will probably be changed in similar fashion.  For betting purposes though it doesn't matter.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4526
Posted: #44
Better cash out before this one gets ruled a no contest on appeal :)
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 4377
Posted: #45
Uh?  The ref just said it was a butt that caused it.  This ref is retarded, he is talking himself in a circle; now he says a punch.  What an idiot.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 4377
Posted: #46
Man that eye healed quickly.  I think Campbell could have definitely kept going he just didn't want to and was looking for the easy way out similar to Rahman.

Jim Grey you are as dumb as the ref.  Nate, do you think it was intentional; referring to the butt?  Wow, talk about trying to stir up something.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 4377
Posted: #47
I am calling for it now....Set the lines quick.

Gary Shaw vs Don King

King gives Shaw a beatdown.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4526
Posted: #48
Bradley was 100% correct - he would have beaten Campbell today, and will beat him from the Hollywood in Florida for the rematch. What a circus, what a joke. Campbell got old against Funeka, and it was even more obvious today against a better fighter.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 1709
Posted: #49
Nate TRIED to get  cute, he knew the rules .. before the 4th, "NO Contest",and of course he makes up the 400K in the past 2 fights, and would get an automatic rematch.

Sorry for Nate but he could see and could of continued, but he tried to have his cake and eat it too.. 2 pays for one fight.

Unless it is reversed (bettors don't worry) as whoever won "now" is called the winner.

Unless  it's reversed I don't see a rematch unless Nate takes less money or Showtime pays more.

Question now for us... is as fans do we WANT to see a rematch, even though it was a clear head butt?

Nate looked chubby to me, and tried to impose the weight on Bradley but never got a chance to as Bradley as always will win the first few rounds.. sad to see the fight didn't go as I thought .. I expected Nate to open up on the inside... by mid-fight.. only way to know if that will happen is with a rematch.. which Bradley will MILK the most out of.. (don't blame him).

But if the fight was so easy and he could be Nate so easily, why not take what Bradley is calling easy money?
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1233
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

Better cash out before this one gets ruled a no contest on appeal :)
 


Walk, your bet is settled by the ruling announced in the ring. They won't be asking for money back after months of appeals.

Nutty, I don't need to see Nate Campbell fight again, but I'll be happy to fade him again at any weight.
All Forums | Boxing
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.