• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Boxing

    This Weekend (Early DLH Play)

    12 Next Last»
    HakAttack1
    G8RB8
    BenFraLinz
    LetMeSpin
    Fullbrights
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 1261
    Posts: 33
    12 Next Last»
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 2:24 AM ET #1

    +3.3 units posted plays

    I just put this in, so I might as well post it. I'm a little worried this line will trend downward.

    De La Hoya wins inside distance (+179) 2 units to win 3.58 units

    I might put more on this but I wanted to make sure I got some action in at this juicy price. I know Forbes has never been stopped but those have been almost all sub 140 fights or made-for-TV Contender shorties. He also has never fought anyone remotely on the level of DLH.

    I thought Alfonso would take Cotto deep and I was dead wrong. That was a case of Gomez being the naturally bigger guy. Now we have a similar case with Forbes being the naturally smaller man. Is he going to be tough enough to go 12 full rounds with Oscar?

    The only argument for Forbes is that De La Hoya looks past him. I don't see it. De La Hoya hand picked Forbes as a victim to jump start his retirement tour. He picked a guy that he can look good against. He'll have almost every advantage from size to power to skill when he steps into the ring Saturday. If that isn't the formula for an exciting stoppage win, I think someone needs to step in and call off the PBF fight.

    More coming later in the week.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    +3.3 units posted plays

    I just put this in, so I might as well post it. I'm a little worried this line will trend downward.

    De La Hoya wins inside distance (+179) 2 units to win 3.58 units

    I might put more on this but I wanted to make sure I got some action in at this juicy price. I know Forbes has never been stopped but those have been almost all sub 140 fights or made-for-TV Contender shorties. He also has never fought anyone remotely on the level of DLH.

    I thought Alfonso would take Cotto deep and I was dead wrong. That was a case of Gomez being the naturally bigger guy. Now we have a similar case with Forbes being the naturally smaller man. Is he going to be tough enough to go 12 full rounds with Oscar?

    The only argument for Forbes is that De La Hoya looks past him. I don't see it. De La Hoya hand picked Forbes as a victim to jump start his retirement tour. He picked a guy that he can look good against. He'll have almost every advantage from size to power to skill when he steps into the ring Saturday. If that isn't the formula for an exciting stoppage win, I think someone needs to step in and call off the PBF fight.

    More coming later in the week.
     
    G8RB8
    G8RB8
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 30086
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 9:58 AM ET #2

    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:

    He also has never fought anyone remotely on the level of DLH.

    De La Hoya hand picked Forbes as a victim to jump start his retirement tour. He picked a guy that he can look good against. He'll have almost every advantage from size to power to skill when he steps into the ring Saturday.

    This is my reasoning too.  I haven't decided to make the play yet because I'm debating on it and the under, but I will probably lock one of them up by tomorrow.  I just don't see DLH taking it the distance if he is able to look good and finish it, and he SHOULD have a good amount of opportunities. 

    I hope he looks fantastic so the Mayweather/DLH line goes south.  I'd love to have Floyd around -200.

    Bagel Sandwiches Suck
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HakAttack1:

    He also has never fought anyone remotely on the level of DLH.

    De La Hoya hand picked Forbes as a victim to jump start his retirement tour. He picked a guy that he can look good against. He'll have almost every advantage from size to power to skill when he steps into the ring Saturday.

    This is my reasoning too.  I haven't decided to make the play yet because I'm debating on it and the under, but I will probably lock one of them up by tomorrow.  I just don't see DLH taking it the distance if he is able to look good and finish it, and he SHOULD have a good amount of opportunities. 

    I hope he looks fantastic so the Mayweather/DLH line goes south.  I'd love to have Floyd around -200.

     
    BenFraLinz
    BenFraLinz
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 45
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 12:27 PM ET #3

    De La Hoya did hand pick Forbes. The question is why Forbes? Simple, not a threat in punching power. Oscar is the bigger guy, but Forbes has fought much bigger guys, but none near even a top contender ability. He fought on The Contender which has drawn a following for him vs Oscar. It's being broadcasted on HBO instead of PPV, the reason is that it wouldn't sell.

    HakAttack1 Also, you can get +240 u11.5 at BookMaker. It's better that +179 for a half of a round less you get 35% more money.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    De La Hoya did hand pick Forbes. The question is why Forbes? Simple, not a threat in punching power. Oscar is the bigger guy, but Forbes has fought much bigger guys, but none near even a top contender ability. He fought on The Contender which has drawn a following for him vs Oscar. It's being broadcasted on HBO instead of PPV, the reason is that it wouldn't sell.

    HakAttack1 Also, you can get +240 u11.5 at BookMaker. It's better that +179 for a half of a round less you get 35% more money.

     
    BenFraLinz
    BenFraLinz
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 45
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 12:42 PM ET #4

    As far as my view on the fight, it's difficult to place a large wager (total rounds) on what seems to be some major X factors in the fight.
    Factors:
    - Can Forbes's hand speed throw off Oscar enough so he won't get hit a lot? 
    - Can Forbes's handle a barrage of power shots by Oscar?
    - Can Forbes fight into the later rounds effectively (especially the championship rounds)?
    - If Oscar wins the first 8 rounds decisively, without hurting Forbes badly, will he just stay the course, or will he try to KO him?
     
    Everyone assumes Oscar will try for a KO, because in winning a UD, it will cause less interest in the Mayweather rematch. Oscar and his camp must see something in Forbes he feels he can exploit easily and impressively, but can he capitalize. I felt uneasy betting so much on Mayweather vs De La Hoya only cause of it was Golden Boy Promotions, and if De La Hoya won, it would have made the largest rematch payday in fight history. So you could say I was worried about some corruption, not De La Hoya actually winning.
     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    As far as my view on the fight, it's difficult to place a large wager (total rounds) on what seems to be some major X factors in the fight.
    Factors:
    - Can Forbes's hand speed throw off Oscar enough so he won't get hit a lot? 
    - Can Forbes's handle a barrage of power shots by Oscar?
    - Can Forbes fight into the later rounds effectively (especially the championship rounds)?
    - If Oscar wins the first 8 rounds decisively, without hurting Forbes badly, will he just stay the course, or will he try to KO him?
     
    Everyone assumes Oscar will try for a KO, because in winning a UD, it will cause less interest in the Mayweather rematch. Oscar and his camp must see something in Forbes he feels he can exploit easily and impressively, but can he capitalize. I felt uneasy betting so much on Mayweather vs De La Hoya only cause of it was Golden Boy Promotions, and if De La Hoya won, it would have made the largest rematch payday in fight history. So you could say I was worried about some corruption, not De La Hoya actually winning.
     
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 12:59 PM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by BenFraLinz:

    De La Hoya did hand pick Forbes. The question is why Forbes? Simple, not a threat in punching power. Oscar is the bigger guy, but Forbes has fought much bigger guys, but none near even a top contender ability. He fought on The Contender which has drawn a following for him vs Oscar. It's being broadcasted on HBO instead of PPV, the reason is that it wouldn't sell.

    HakAttack1 Also, you can get +240 u11.5 at BookMaker. It's better that +179 for a half of a round less you get 35% more money.



    Wow, thank you for pointing that bookmaker line out. As crazy as this sounds, I used do all of my betting except boxing at Bookmaker. I took almost all of my bankroll and moved it to 5dimes, because the boxing was so limited at bookmaker. I hadnt even looked at it in quite a while. Now, I'm seriously considering buying back in to bookmaker just to put a few dimes on that number.



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BenFraLinz:

    De La Hoya did hand pick Forbes. The question is why Forbes? Simple, not a threat in punching power. Oscar is the bigger guy, but Forbes has fought much bigger guys, but none near even a top contender ability. He fought on The Contender which has drawn a following for him vs Oscar. It's being broadcasted on HBO instead of PPV, the reason is that it wouldn't sell.

    HakAttack1 Also, you can get +240 u11.5 at BookMaker. It's better that +179 for a half of a round less you get 35% more money.



    Wow, thank you for pointing that bookmaker line out. As crazy as this sounds, I used do all of my betting except boxing at Bookmaker. I took almost all of my bankroll and moved it to 5dimes, because the boxing was so limited at bookmaker. I hadnt even looked at it in quite a while. Now, I'm seriously considering buying back in to bookmaker just to put a few dimes on that number.



     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 1:11 PM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by BenFraLinz:

    As far as my view on the fight, it's difficult to place a large wager (total rounds) on what seems to be some major X factors in the fight.
    Factors:
    - Can Forbes's hand speed throw off Oscar enough so he won't get hit a lot? 
    - Can Forbes's handle a barrage of power shots by Oscar?
    - Can Forbes fight into the later rounds effectively (especially the championship rounds)?
    - If Oscar wins the first 8 rounds decisively, without hurting Forbes badly, will he just stay the course, or will he try to KO him?
     
    Everyone assumes Oscar will try for a KO, because in winning a UD, it will cause less interest in the Mayweather rematch. Oscar and his camp must see something in Forbes he feels he can exploit easily and impressively, but can he capitalize. I felt uneasy betting so much on Mayweather vs De La Hoya only cause of it was Golden Boy Promotions, and if De La Hoya won, it would have made the largest rematch payday in fight history. So you could say I was worried about some corruption, not De La Hoya actually winning.
     


    I think you did hit the x factors here on the head and I think they are all valid but not enough for me to not envision Oscar stopping him.

    - If Steve Forbes' handspeed is enough to stymie Oscar, I'd be shocked. I don't want to rag on the guy, but it wasn't enough to trouble Grady Brewer. In every fight that I've seen of Forbes, even in his wins, I have never thought "Oh there's a guy with elite, game changing hand speed. Good, but not great.

    - I am hoping the answer to the second question is no. But I can't say for sure because Forbes has never really been badly hurt in a fight. He's also never been in with someone like Oscar. I'm not thinking that Oscar can one punch Forbes out of this fight, but hoping that a few rounds of work will accumulate.

    -If Forbes gets this into the 11th, in my opinion, that will mean he has been competitive in the fight. I really don't think Oscar is in the mindset for carrying this guy 12 easy rounds. At least, I hope not. The world is watching. This is a showcase for him and I expect him to get it done.

    As an aside, I am thinking about making a small covering play on Forbes by decision with the idea that if this thing goes to the scorecards, it will mean that it was a competitive fight and Forbes brought a great gameplan into the fight.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BenFraLinz:

    As far as my view on the fight, it's difficult to place a large wager (total rounds) on what seems to be some major X factors in the fight.
    Factors:
    - Can Forbes's hand speed throw off Oscar enough so he won't get hit a lot? 
    - Can Forbes's handle a barrage of power shots by Oscar?
    - Can Forbes fight into the later rounds effectively (especially the championship rounds)?
    - If Oscar wins the first 8 rounds decisively, without hurting Forbes badly, will he just stay the course, or will he try to KO him?
     
    Everyone assumes Oscar will try for a KO, because in winning a UD, it will cause less interest in the Mayweather rematch. Oscar and his camp must see something in Forbes he feels he can exploit easily and impressively, but can he capitalize. I felt uneasy betting so much on Mayweather vs De La Hoya only cause of it was Golden Boy Promotions, and if De La Hoya won, it would have made the largest rematch payday in fight history. So you could say I was worried about some corruption, not De La Hoya actually winning.
     


    I think you did hit the x factors here on the head and I think they are all valid but not enough for me to not envision Oscar stopping him.

    - If Steve Forbes' handspeed is enough to stymie Oscar, I'd be shocked. I don't want to rag on the guy, but it wasn't enough to trouble Grady Brewer. In every fight that I've seen of Forbes, even in his wins, I have never thought "Oh there's a guy with elite, game changing hand speed. Good, but not great.

    - I am hoping the answer to the second question is no. But I can't say for sure because Forbes has never really been badly hurt in a fight. He's also never been in with someone like Oscar. I'm not thinking that Oscar can one punch Forbes out of this fight, but hoping that a few rounds of work will accumulate.

    -If Forbes gets this into the 11th, in my opinion, that will mean he has been competitive in the fight. I really don't think Oscar is in the mindset for carrying this guy 12 easy rounds. At least, I hope not. The world is watching. This is a showcase for him and I expect him to get it done.

    As an aside, I am thinking about making a small covering play on Forbes by decision with the idea that if this thing goes to the scorecards, it will mean that it was a competitive fight and Forbes brought a great gameplan into the fight.
     
    BenFraLinz
    BenFraLinz
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 45
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 1:59 PM ET #7

    Bookmaker had the best overall total on the fight in my opinion. I use 5dimes often for their prop bets. They have such a variety, that you can often find some great value. Bookmaker had great odds on the election early (lol). I remember using sportsbook during the Bush vs Gore. After their 2nd Debate, Bush went from a favorite to getting 8/5. I bet Bush +160. After the last Debate, Gore was now getting 2/1, and I covered my Bush bet just in case. I risked $1,000 to get $1600 on Bush after Debate #2, then after Debate #3 I bet Gore $500 to win $1000. I ended up winning $1100 thanks to good old fashioned cheating down in the sunshine state. That was the first time I bet an election, I could have middled it an took an automatic win, but I decided to go with the gamble. If the max bets weren't limited so low, I would have middled it. Just a nice old story about gambling and politics.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Bookmaker had the best overall total on the fight in my opinion. I use 5dimes often for their prop bets. They have such a variety, that you can often find some great value. Bookmaker had great odds on the election early (lol). I remember using sportsbook during the Bush vs Gore. After their 2nd Debate, Bush went from a favorite to getting 8/5. I bet Bush +160. After the last Debate, Gore was now getting 2/1, and I covered my Bush bet just in case. I risked $1,000 to get $1600 on Bush after Debate #2, then after Debate #3 I bet Gore $500 to win $1000. I ended up winning $1100 thanks to good old fashioned cheating down in the sunshine state. That was the first time I bet an election, I could have middled it an took an automatic win, but I decided to go with the gamble. If the max bets weren't limited so low, I would have middled it. Just a nice old story about gambling and politics.
     
    BenFraLinz
    BenFraLinz
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 45
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 2:05 PM ET #8

    I think that if Oscar can capitalize early with some of his strong left body shots, it will have an effect on Forbes. It will have to be done more on the ropes because I think in the center of the ring Forbes will be able to move out. Also, Forbes has a tendency to lean in for body shots in the center of the ring, which will give Oscar full opportunity to swing away with Forbes out of position (and Oscar won't have to worry about missing and getting countered big, because Forbes doesn't have the power).
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I think that if Oscar can capitalize early with some of his strong left body shots, it will have an effect on Forbes. It will have to be done more on the ropes because I think in the center of the ring Forbes will be able to move out. Also, Forbes has a tendency to lean in for body shots in the center of the ring, which will give Oscar full opportunity to swing away with Forbes out of position (and Oscar won't have to worry about missing and getting countered big, because Forbes doesn't have the power).
     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 7:49 PM ET #9

    I'm starting to believe in an Oscar ITD bet, but somehow it just seems a little too easy at 2-1. Do the books not know that this is supposed to be a showcase fight? Maybe Oscar will instruct the ref to step in if Forbes is ever close to being in trouble.

    Two things though from this thread, Gomez is naturally bigger than Cotto? I didn't know that. Losing to middleweights on the contender doesn't make you a middleweight in my book.

    Also, Forbes by decision is plainly a waste of money. He would have to put Oscar down multiple times and not lose a round to earn a draw on the cards. The incentive for GBP to cheat is simply too great for them to help themselves. Bet on a Forbes KO if you think there's any chance Oscar loses.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm starting to believe in an Oscar ITD bet, but somehow it just seems a little too easy at 2-1. Do the books not know that this is supposed to be a showcase fight? Maybe Oscar will instruct the ref to step in if Forbes is ever close to being in trouble.

    Two things though from this thread, Gomez is naturally bigger than Cotto? I didn't know that. Losing to middleweights on the contender doesn't make you a middleweight in my book.

    Also, Forbes by decision is plainly a waste of money. He would have to put Oscar down multiple times and not lose a round to earn a draw on the cards. The incentive for GBP to cheat is simply too great for them to help themselves. Bet on a Forbes KO if you think there's any chance Oscar loses.
     
    Fullbrights
    Fullbrights
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2006
    Posts: 4377
    Posted: Apr. 28, 2008 - 11:23 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I'm starting to believe in an Oscar ITD bet, but somehow it just seems a little too easy at 2-1. Do the books not know that this is supposed to be a showcase fight? Maybe Oscar will instruct the ref to step in if Forbes is ever close to being in trouble.

    Two things though from this thread, Gomez is naturally bigger than Cotto? I didn't know that. Losing to middleweights on the contender doesn't make you a middleweight in my book.

    Also, Forbes by decision is plainly a waste of money. He would have to put Oscar down multiple times and not lose a round to earn a draw on the cards. The incentive for GBP to cheat is simply too great for them to help themselves. Bet on a Forbes KO if you think there's any chance Oscar loses.


    LOL at what's in bold.

    Gomez was taller then then Cotto yes, but I agree he wasn't bigger.  Taller doesn't mean you are the naturally bigger guy.

    Maybe it's just me, but I really think it's tough to get a solid read on this fight.  Should DLH win, no doubt about it.  DLH gets less active as the fight goes and even though Forbes is the much smaller man he has always been durable.  I just don't know if DLH will be active enough in the second half of the fight to get Forbes out of there.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I'm starting to believe in an Oscar ITD bet, but somehow it just seems a little too easy at 2-1. Do the books not know that this is supposed to be a showcase fight? Maybe Oscar will instruct the ref to step in if Forbes is ever close to being in trouble.

    Two things though from this thread, Gomez is naturally bigger than Cotto? I didn't know that. Losing to middleweights on the contender doesn't make you a middleweight in my book.

    Also, Forbes by decision is plainly a waste of money. He would have to put Oscar down multiple times and not lose a round to earn a draw on the cards. The incentive for GBP to cheat is simply too great for them to help themselves. Bet on a Forbes KO if you think there's any chance Oscar loses.


    LOL at what's in bold.

    Gomez was taller then then Cotto yes, but I agree he wasn't bigger.  Taller doesn't mean you are the naturally bigger guy.

    Maybe it's just me, but I really think it's tough to get a solid read on this fight.  Should DLH win, no doubt about it.  DLH gets less active as the fight goes and even though Forbes is the much smaller man he has always been durable.  I just don't know if DLH will be active enough in the second half of the fight to get Forbes out of there.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2008 - 12:53 AM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I'm starting to believe in an Oscar ITD bet, but somehow it just seems a little too easy at 2-1. Do the books not know that this is supposed to be a showcase fight? Maybe Oscar will instruct the ref to step in if Forbes is ever close to being in trouble.

    Two things though from this thread, Gomez is naturally bigger than Cotto? I didn't know that. Losing to middleweights on the contender doesn't make you a middleweight in my book.

    Also, Forbes by decision is plainly a waste of money. He would have to put Oscar down multiple times and not lose a round to earn a draw on the cards. The incentive for GBP to cheat is simply too great for them to help themselves. Bet on a Forbes KO if you think there's any chance Oscar loses.


    Well I guess we can argue the definition of naturally bigger and whether Cotto or Gomez is naturally bigger. What I meant was Gomez had the advantage in height, reach and had fought at higher weight classes. In this fight, Forbes is at a disadvantage in height, reach and has fought at lower weight classes. That was the point I was making.

    As for wasting money, you are probably right, but this is my thinking:

    I think we can agree that Forbes isn't knocking DLH out. So, I'm laying 10 bucks on an 18-1 shot against a guy who is a gift decision away from being 1-4 in his last 5 years of action. And, I'm just covering my other action on the ITD bet.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    I'm starting to believe in an Oscar ITD bet, but somehow it just seems a little too easy at 2-1. Do the books not know that this is supposed to be a showcase fight? Maybe Oscar will instruct the ref to step in if Forbes is ever close to being in trouble.

    Two things though from this thread, Gomez is naturally bigger than Cotto? I didn't know that. Losing to middleweights on the contender doesn't make you a middleweight in my book.

    Also, Forbes by decision is plainly a waste of money. He would have to put Oscar down multiple times and not lose a round to earn a draw on the cards. The incentive for GBP to cheat is simply too great for them to help themselves. Bet on a Forbes KO if you think there's any chance Oscar loses.


    Well I guess we can argue the definition of naturally bigger and whether Cotto or Gomez is naturally bigger. What I meant was Gomez had the advantage in height, reach and had fought at higher weight classes. In this fight, Forbes is at a disadvantage in height, reach and has fought at lower weight classes. That was the point I was making.

    As for wasting money, you are probably right, but this is my thinking:

    I think we can agree that Forbes isn't knocking DLH out. So, I'm laying 10 bucks on an 18-1 shot against a guy who is a gift decision away from being 1-4 in his last 5 years of action. And, I'm just covering my other action on the ITD bet.
     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: Apr. 29, 2008 - 4:04 AM ET #12

    HA, I understood the point you're making about Oscar and Forbes, but I failed to see the connection to the Cotto fight. I agree that Oscar can stop smaller guys he has completely outclassed, particularly ones that want to stand and trade shots with him like Gatti and Mayorga. I guess we'll see if he can pressure a slick guy like Forbes and stop him. It's not Forbes's hand speed that worries me, Oscar can certainly match him there, it's his legs and his style. I'd like to know how big the ring will be. And by all means, it's your money, so fire away on that decision prop. I just think some form of Oscar injury or cut ending the fight is more likely than Forbes winning on the scorecards.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    HA, I understood the point you're making about Oscar and Forbes, but I failed to see the connection to the Cotto fight. I agree that Oscar can stop smaller guys he has completely outclassed, particularly ones that want to stand and trade shots with him like Gatti and Mayorga. I guess we'll see if he can pressure a slick guy like Forbes and stop him. It's not Forbes's hand speed that worries me, Oscar can certainly match him there, it's his legs and his style. I'd like to know how big the ring will be. And by all means, it's your money, so fire away on that decision prop. I just think some form of Oscar injury or cut ending the fight is more likely than Forbes winning on the scorecards.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Apr. 30, 2008 - 3:20 PM ET #13

    I like the Love Child tonight, but I'm not willing to lay the -280. I wish there were some props for this fight. Anyways, added more to the DLH under:

    De La Hoya/Forbes Under 11.5 (+180) 2 units to win 3.6 units

    I'm glad 5 dimes added this prop. I like it better than the under 9.5 because I could see a late stoppage.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I like the Love Child tonight, but I'm not willing to lay the -280. I wish there were some props for this fight. Anyways, added more to the DLH under:

    De La Hoya/Forbes Under 11.5 (+180) 2 units to win 3.6 units

    I'm glad 5 dimes added this prop. I like it better than the under 9.5 because I could see a late stoppage.
     
    bigeiii
    bigeiii
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2003
    Posts: 5870
    Posted: Apr. 30, 2008 - 7:33 PM ET #14

    I like the love child as well HA1. & his nearly 5:1 ITD line. I played both with the Brit chalks.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I like the love child as well HA1. & his nearly 5:1 ITD line. I played both with the Brit chalks.

    GLA!
    bigeiii
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 1, 2008 - 4:51 PM ET #15

    Adding a chalk parlay that I like alot for the weekend and a small play tonight.

    Jesus Gonzales (-485)
    Hanshaw/Dirrell Over 8.5 (-280)
    Firat Arslan (-350)

    2 units to win 2.21 units

    Gonzales/Richardson Under 9.5 (+280) .5 units to win 1.4 units

    I don't know anything about this Durrell Richardson character and can only assume this is another showcase opportunity for Gonzales. The guy only has 4 KO's so he doesnt appear to have much power and I figure the decision is in the bag for Gonzales. Gonzales fights awful opposition, but has shown the ability to stop them. I guess this is a step up, but I like the value in the under. Also, Gonzales seems to spend alot of time on the canvas, so that covers me a bit there too.

    I would have thought the Dirrell Over would have been exorbitant. I don't know why it is only -280, but ill take it. If Hanshaw can stay in there 12 rounds with RJJ, I think he can go 9 with Speed Racer.

    I love Arslan in this spot against Wilson. Everyone thinks Wilson has a shot at the KO, but he didn't come close against Flores and now hes stepping up on foreign soil. Arslan isnt great but I'm not sure how good you need to be to win 7 rounds from Ding-A-Ling man.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Adding a chalk parlay that I like alot for the weekend and a small play tonight.

    Jesus Gonzales (-485)
    Hanshaw/Dirrell Over 8.5 (-280)
    Firat Arslan (-350)

    2 units to win 2.21 units

    Gonzales/Richardson Under 9.5 (+280) .5 units to win 1.4 units

    I don't know anything about this Durrell Richardson character and can only assume this is another showcase opportunity for Gonzales. The guy only has 4 KO's so he doesnt appear to have much power and I figure the decision is in the bag for Gonzales. Gonzales fights awful opposition, but has shown the ability to stop them. I guess this is a step up, but I like the value in the under. Also, Gonzales seems to spend alot of time on the canvas, so that covers me a bit there too.

    I would have thought the Dirrell Over would have been exorbitant. I don't know why it is only -280, but ill take it. If Hanshaw can stay in there 12 rounds with RJJ, I think he can go 9 with Speed Racer.

    I love Arslan in this spot against Wilson. Everyone thinks Wilson has a shot at the KO, but he didn't come close against Flores and now hes stepping up on foreign soil. Arslan isnt great but I'm not sure how good you need to be to win 7 rounds from Ding-A-Ling man.

     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 2, 2008 - 3:57 AM ET #16

    looks like Gonzalez won a 12 rd. decison, advancing the parlay but dropping the under. I havent seen details yet, but ill take it because i like this parlay to hit.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    looks like Gonzalez won a 12 rd. decison, advancing the parlay but dropping the under. I havent seen details yet, but ill take it because i like this parlay to hit.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 2, 2008 - 7:08 PM ET #17

    Andre Dirrell wins 10 round decision (+161) 1 unit to win 1.61.

    Dirrell gets a terrible rap because of the Curtis Stevens fight. I don't care for his running style, but I just think he will score enough to win this fight. Hanshaw is too rough around the edges to deal with the frustrating style.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Andre Dirrell wins 10 round decision (+161) 1 unit to win 1.61.

    Dirrell gets a terrible rap because of the Curtis Stevens fight. I don't care for his running style, but I just think he will score enough to win this fight. Hanshaw is too rough around the edges to deal with the frustrating style.
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: May. 2, 2008 - 7:58 PM ET #18

    I can't remember the last time an American went to foreign soil and stole the show. If it goes to the cards... no way. Ding went over there to collect a large paycheck. No more, no less. I think this is often overlooked by people when capping boxing. You have to understand that the fight game has been cleaned up, but it is still the shadiest sport in American history. I doubt Ding is going to come out guns blazing and KO the hometown hero. He might not make it home alive....
     
     
    However, I highly doubt that he is going over there to lay down. Another loss and he is totally shot, and will have trouble making money down the road. Arslan by decision is my play in this one.
     
    Another random thought:
     
    Floyd Mayweather will always be 8 rounds to 4 better than DLH. That being said, my money is on DLH in the rematch. It just seems like these two are going to play this out for all it is worth. If Oscar was to win the rematch with Floyd Sr. in his corner, it sets the stage for the biggest rubber match in boxing history hands down. It wouldn't shock me if Floyd allowed himself to be "robbed" on the cards. He wouldn't lose much rep wise, nor would his legacy be hurt. Winning the rubber match against DLH would be the cap to his career. Just a theory.....
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I can't remember the last time an American went to foreign soil and stole the show. If it goes to the cards... no way. Ding went over there to collect a large paycheck. No more, no less. I think this is often overlooked by people when capping boxing. You have to understand that the fight game has been cleaned up, but it is still the shadiest sport in American history. I doubt Ding is going to come out guns blazing and KO the hometown hero. He might not make it home alive....
     
     
    However, I highly doubt that he is going over there to lay down. Another loss and he is totally shot, and will have trouble making money down the road. Arslan by decision is my play in this one.
     
    Another random thought:
     
    Floyd Mayweather will always be 8 rounds to 4 better than DLH. That being said, my money is on DLH in the rematch. It just seems like these two are going to play this out for all it is worth. If Oscar was to win the rematch with Floyd Sr. in his corner, it sets the stage for the biggest rubber match in boxing history hands down. It wouldn't shock me if Floyd allowed himself to be "robbed" on the cards. He wouldn't lose much rep wise, nor would his legacy be hurt. Winning the rubber match against DLH would be the cap to his career. Just a theory.....
     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: May. 2, 2008 - 10:19 PM ET #19

    I like the Dirrell play. I just talk myself into -125 for a little bit. Shobox really does a great job of putting together some of these cards.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I like the Dirrell play. I just talk myself into -125 for a little bit. Shobox really does a great job of putting together some of these cards.
     
    Coweringbeef
    Coweringbeef
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 223
    Posted: May. 2, 2008 - 10:25 PM ET #20

    Um, I played Jesus Gonzales too and cannot find any news on the result. Where is it?

    Anyone wants a easy bet, Dimitrenko over Rossy!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Um, I played Jesus Gonzales too and cannot find any news on the result. Where is it?

    Anyone wants a easy bet, Dimitrenko over Rossy!

     
    LetMeSpin
    LetMeSpin
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 1233
    Posted: May. 3, 2008 - 12:02 AM ET #21

    Holy God Andre Dirrell is good. This is the guy of whom Dan Rafael said he would rather watch cats puke than AD fight.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Holy God Andre Dirrell is good. This is the guy of whom Dan Rafael said he would rather watch cats puke than AD fight.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 3, 2008 - 2:15 AM ET #22

    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    Holy God Andre Dirrell is good. This is the guy of whom Dan Rafael said he would rather watch cats puke than AD fight.


    Yeah I agree hes real good, even better than i expected i guess. I didnt get to see the fight but i should have played it straight like you did. He had a historically awful fight but hes obviously got the tools. I saw that Rafael comment too and disagreed with it. I kind of have a soft spot for technicians like Ruiz, Raheem etc. If everybody would rather watch Jesse Feliciano get his brain beat in because he is an "action" fighter, than I am happy to be in the minority.

    Rough night in the account.down 3 units. Can get it back if Oscar comes to impress.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by LetMeSpin:

    Holy God Andre Dirrell is good. This is the guy of whom Dan Rafael said he would rather watch cats puke than AD fight.


    Yeah I agree hes real good, even better than i expected i guess. I didnt get to see the fight but i should have played it straight like you did. He had a historically awful fight but hes obviously got the tools. I saw that Rafael comment too and disagreed with it. I kind of have a soft spot for technicians like Ruiz, Raheem etc. If everybody would rather watch Jesse Feliciano get his brain beat in because he is an "action" fighter, than I am happy to be in the minority.

    Rough night in the account.down 3 units. Can get it back if Oscar comes to impress.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 3, 2008 - 2:20 AM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    I can't remember the last time an American went to foreign soil and stole the show. If it goes to the cards... no way. Ding went over there to collect a large paycheck. No more, no less. I think this is often overlooked by people when capping boxing. You have to understand that the fight game has been cleaned up, but it is still the shadiest sport in American history. I doubt Ding is going to come out guns blazing and KO the hometown hero. He might not make it home alive....
     
     
    However, I highly doubt that he is going over there to lay down. Another loss and he is totally shot, and will have trouble making money down the road. Arslan by decision is my play in this one.
     
    Another random thought:
     
    Floyd Mayweather will always be 8 rounds to 4 better than DLH. That being said, my money is on DLH in the rematch. It just seems like these two are going to play this out for all it is worth. If Oscar was to win the rematch with Floyd Sr. in his corner, it sets the stage for the biggest rubber match in boxing history hands down. It wouldn't shock me if Floyd allowed himself to be "robbed" on the cards. He wouldn't lose much rep wise, nor would his legacy be hurt. Winning the rubber match against DLH would be the cap to his career. Just a theory.....


    I agree about Dingaling but my parlay was just killed and I dont know if i can risk a straight bet. Ding is a nice guy and all and he had his ESPY moment but he looked shot in his last fight. He got himself a payday but i dont think it will amount to more than that.

    I can't agree with an idea that Floyd would even have it in the back of his mind to lose the rematch in any fashion. The guy is the p4p king and if he loses his 0, he'll lose that title and all of the money that goes with it. I'm of the opinion hes in boxing for the next 5 years, no matter what he says, so he wont want that.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by walktheline:

    I can't remember the last time an American went to foreign soil and stole the show. If it goes to the cards... no way. Ding went over there to collect a large paycheck. No more, no less. I think this is often overlooked by people when capping boxing. You have to understand that the fight game has been cleaned up, but it is still the shadiest sport in American history. I doubt Ding is going to come out guns blazing and KO the hometown hero. He might not make it home alive....
     
     
    However, I highly doubt that he is going over there to lay down. Another loss and he is totally shot, and will have trouble making money down the road. Arslan by decision is my play in this one.
     
    Another random thought:
     
    Floyd Mayweather will always be 8 rounds to 4 better than DLH. That being said, my money is on DLH in the rematch. It just seems like these two are going to play this out for all it is worth. If Oscar was to win the rematch with Floyd Sr. in his corner, it sets the stage for the biggest rubber match in boxing history hands down. It wouldn't shock me if Floyd allowed himself to be "robbed" on the cards. He wouldn't lose much rep wise, nor would his legacy be hurt. Winning the rubber match against DLH would be the cap to his career. Just a theory.....


    I agree about Dingaling but my parlay was just killed and I dont know if i can risk a straight bet. Ding is a nice guy and all and he had his ESPY moment but he looked shot in his last fight. He got himself a payday but i dont think it will amount to more than that.

    I can't agree with an idea that Floyd would even have it in the back of his mind to lose the rematch in any fashion. The guy is the p4p king and if he loses his 0, he'll lose that title and all of the money that goes with it. I'm of the opinion hes in boxing for the next 5 years, no matter what he says, so he wont want that.
     
    HakAttack1
    HakAttack1
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 387
    Posted: May. 3, 2008 - 2:22 AM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by Coweringbeef:

    Um, I played Jesus Gonzales too and cannot find any news on the result. Where is it?

    Anyone wants a easy bet, Dimitrenko over Rossy!




    Yeah i couldnt find it either at first, i ended up googling Houston Boxing and found a site saying he outpointed him.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Coweringbeef:

    Um, I played Jesus Gonzales too and cannot find any news on the result. Where is it?

    Anyone wants a easy bet, Dimitrenko over Rossy!




    Yeah i couldnt find it either at first, i ended up googling Houston Boxing and found a site saying he outpointed him.
     
     
    walktheline
    walktheline
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 4526
    Posted: May. 3, 2008 - 3:29 AM ET #25

    I don't think he'll be around another 5 years. He knows he will lose well before then. He would also have to fight Cotto at some point. If he loses to DLH, not many people are going to think any less of him. He won't lose a cent of money either. He may or may not want it. I do know one thing - the thing he wants the most is

    If the last fight was scored as close as it was and Floyd easily won AT LEAST 8 rounds.. GBP could easily steal a win with a slightly better DLH performance, even though they might not have to. I just have a gut feeling that the fix is in when it comes to those two fighting again... it is good for everyone - boxing, the fans, floyd, oscar, hbo, etc etc

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I don't think he'll be around another 5 years. He knows he will lose well before then. He would also have to fight Cotto at some point. If he loses to DLH, not many people are going to think any less of him. He won't lose a cent of money either. He may or may not want it. I do know one thing - the thing he wants the most is

    If the last fight was scored as close as it was and Floyd easily won AT LEAST 8 rounds.. GBP could easily steal a win with a slightly better DLH performance, even though they might not have to. I just have a gut feeling that the fix is in when it comes to those two fighting again... it is good for everyone - boxing, the fans, floyd, oscar, hbo, etc etc

    All Forums | Boxing
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,393 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 259,626 Covers arrow
    • Sunday 09/20/2026 576 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 180 Covers arrow
    • Colts vs chiefs in-game live 1,717 Covers arrow
    • Flawed Logic: and Bad Decisions: NFL Edition 4,231 Covers arrow
    • Dogs biting today? 3,960 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 99,309 Covers arrow
    • _📌 😎 Fubah's bets for NFL 2026: Week 02 🚩🚩 10,563 Covers arrow
    • Bags Week 2 LARGE **Cleveland Browns vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers** 5,411 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.