Okay guys, you go ahead and bet on Hamilton because your queries from years past are supporting them.
Masoli, Banks and Lawrence are all OUT for this game. That's Hamiltons 3 best players. On the road, after coming off a bye week and huge game against the 'best' team in the league last week.
0
Okay guys, you go ahead and bet on Hamilton because your queries from years past are supporting them.
Masoli, Banks and Lawrence are all OUT for this game. That's Hamiltons 3 best players. On the road, after coming off a bye week and huge game against the 'best' team in the league last week.
Dogbite: I'm an ambulance chaser? Can you explain that one to me? I just stated some facts for this coming game, not stats supporting years past where there is so much turnaround in the CFL and all those stats become irrelevant.
0
Dogbite: I'm an ambulance chaser? Can you explain that one to me? I just stated some facts for this coming game, not stats supporting years past where there is so much turnaround in the CFL and all those stats become irrelevant.
Ambulance chasers (AC) = sports bettors who think "healthy" teams have an advantage over "crippled teams" missing a star player who is a fantasy football favorite.
Linesmakers always make an adjustment for a missing star which roughly balances out the loss of physical talent. Meanwhile, the "healthy" team might be overconfident and sleep through the game films, possibly coming out flat in the first quarter (or half). The allegedly "crippled" team might rise up and support the backup, knowing their backs are against the wall. The allegedly "crippled" team (especially dogs) may actually have a psychological advantage which is never reflected in the pointspread.
History is repleted with examples that support my "Injuries are Bullshxt" hypothesis. This is a perfect example:
Decades ago NO was so bad they became the "Aints" and fans wore bags over their heads. Concurrently SF was a perennial powerhouse and had won a few Super Bowls.
My memory is not razor sharp, but the injury edge for SF was massive. NO was missing something like most of their starting OL's and two key defenders. NO was a 16 or 17 point dog in SF and they won outright, slaughtering thousands (or was it millions) of AC's.
It doesn't work all of the time,and to show that I'm an honest poster, here is a link to prove both:
A dog bite like me should know better than to take a weak HF.
By the way, if ACs had long-term success with that Zombie GroupThink "strategy," sports books would be hurting.
Good luck with your SSK bet, slushie007. I am fairly certain you risked more than the $6.60 I did.
0
Ambulance chasers (AC) = sports bettors who think "healthy" teams have an advantage over "crippled teams" missing a star player who is a fantasy football favorite.
Linesmakers always make an adjustment for a missing star which roughly balances out the loss of physical talent. Meanwhile, the "healthy" team might be overconfident and sleep through the game films, possibly coming out flat in the first quarter (or half). The allegedly "crippled" team might rise up and support the backup, knowing their backs are against the wall. The allegedly "crippled" team (especially dogs) may actually have a psychological advantage which is never reflected in the pointspread.
History is repleted with examples that support my "Injuries are Bullshxt" hypothesis. This is a perfect example:
Decades ago NO was so bad they became the "Aints" and fans wore bags over their heads. Concurrently SF was a perennial powerhouse and had won a few Super Bowls.
My memory is not razor sharp, but the injury edge for SF was massive. NO was missing something like most of their starting OL's and two key defenders. NO was a 16 or 17 point dog in SF and they won outright, slaughtering thousands (or was it millions) of AC's.
It doesn't work all of the time,and to show that I'm an honest poster, here is a link to prove both:
Slushie I respect you a lot. I know you have good intentions. I also thank you for your participation in the CFL forum. As far as me I very rarely bet on the same teams as other people. I love being on the bookies side. I wish that you would not take this personally.
Its a free forum you can do as you wish but expect me not to support many of your selections. I request that you respect my thread for I am taking the time to share the info that I support.
Be respectful even if you disagree. I hope you can do that. If you find that insulting or too difficult I would appreciate you not using this thread anymore.
Thanks and I hope you hit the bookies hard with your picks
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Slushie I respect you a lot. I know you have good intentions. I also thank you for your participation in the CFL forum. As far as me I very rarely bet on the same teams as other people. I love being on the bookies side. I wish that you would not take this personally.
Its a free forum you can do as you wish but expect me not to support many of your selections. I request that you respect my thread for I am taking the time to share the info that I support.
Be respectful even if you disagree. I hope you can do that. If you find that insulting or too difficult I would appreciate you not using this thread anymore.
Thanks and I hope you hit the bookies hard with your picks
That script was one of the BEST! Jesus these guys in Canada Write them better than they do in the NFL. That game was a joke. 20-0 Team is 5-1 against 0-6. Shit was scripted as fuck. Biggest dogs of the year as well.
And I am dam glad I rode with the bookies. I knew this !!!!
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slowbalt:
That script was one of the BEST! Jesus these guys in Canada Write them better than they do in the NFL. That game was a joke. 20-0 Team is 5-1 against 0-6. Shit was scripted as fuck. Biggest dogs of the year as well.
And I am dam glad I rode with the bookies. I knew this !!!!
Strong Qb on the road vs. a backup. Edmonton is high quality this season. In seasons past the Stamps are the best home team in the CFL.
63-12 SU
t:team = Stampeders and H and season >2011
This is not the year to be taking the Stamps without a cushion (multiple points).
I searched for this and found this query>>>
streak > 1 and pp:line < -7 and H and total<53 and line>-17 and p:A and rest<12
obviously I narrowed (fine tuned the results a bit more than I had to). Then I isolate Calgary in this situation here>>>
streak > 1 and pp:line < -7 and H and total<53 and line>-17 and p:A and rest<12 and t:team=Stampeders and season>2011
In the same time periods when the Stamps have a home record of 63-12, this query says 4 of the 12 losses were in this situation
losing 4 of 7 games straight up AT HOME. These were great Stamps teams and so far this season They are no so great.
This week we have already seen a 14 point dog and a 7 point dog win. The better team is Edmonton and the situation is not so great for the home Stamps.
Edmonton -1 for me
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Strong Qb on the road vs. a backup. Edmonton is high quality this season. In seasons past the Stamps are the best home team in the CFL.
63-12 SU
t:team = Stampeders and H and season >2011
This is not the year to be taking the Stamps without a cushion (multiple points).
I searched for this and found this query>>>
streak > 1 and pp:line < -7 and H and total<53 and line>-17 and p:A and rest<12
obviously I narrowed (fine tuned the results a bit more than I had to). Then I isolate Calgary in this situation here>>>
streak > 1 and pp:line < -7 and H and total<53 and line>-17 and p:A and rest<12 and t:team=Stampeders and season>2011
In the same time periods when the Stamps have a home record of 63-12, this query says 4 of the 12 losses were in this situation
losing 4 of 7 games straight up AT HOME. These were great Stamps teams and so far this season They are no so great.
This week we have already seen a 14 point dog and a 7 point dog win. The better team is Edmonton and the situation is not so great for the home Stamps.
After Calgary loses this home game they head off to Winnipeg next week. I expect them to be getting a chunk of points and that might be a situation to ride the Stamps.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
After Calgary loses this home game they head off to Winnipeg next week. I expect them to be getting a chunk of points and that might be a situation to ride the Stamps.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.