6-2 ATS but the past doesn't mean a thing. I am looking for a few good spots to increase my bank.
I use past data and history and what I know about the teams to compile my thoughts and come up with solid plays.
BC Lions @ - 2.5 and 50 at most shops
Montreal Alouettes.
BC was 13-5 ATS last regular season. Wally Buono has made a big difference since returning as head coach. The other thing is they had some really good lines last year. Evidence of this is their road schedule last year.
Their biggest road line last year was -4 to Saskatchewan, and since Saskatchewan Montreal and Toronto all had QB issues covering their road favored spreads was quite easy 3-0 ATS as road favorites laying 4 or less.
If you look back at BC's road lines last year you will be very surprised at how easy some of those looked. To give you a few examples:
@ Hamilton with no Zack Collaros +5.5
@ Saskatchewan +2.
Reason for this they were coming in off a down year missing the playoffs and that is why Buono was back on the field coaching.
Moving on to this year pretty much the same thing. Home favored to high score Edmonton and they lose the game. Last week they move on to Toronto and get a nice line of +3 and yup they do what they should and they take the game and pull away in the 4th Q.
The Alouettes play a slow game. With players Like Sutton running the ball and Nik Lewis catching short balls they can keep making those 1st downs. Durrant is and will be an up grade at QB, but none the less he is not elite. The Alouette D is pretty darn good so they keep the game plan is keep the ball on offense and play stout D. They do a nice job.
This line and total is right where it should be so my approach will be waiting to see any line moves.
My thoughts are to buck the strong under trend (overs are 4-25) the Alouettes have going when their totals are set at 51 or higher, but as it looks its just not a good idea.
I don't think it is wise to play BC laying road points against a pretty strong D and the Alouettes upgrading their QB. The Als also have a nice running game. If the Al's can get an early lead it could be a tough climb to get the lead. BC in its second straight road trip out East but I am not sure that will be any issue early in the year.
Lean Al's and the points, the more points the better. If the total drops I might consider an over but if you watch them play it might be hard to watch.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
6-2 ATS but the past doesn't mean a thing. I am looking for a few good spots to increase my bank.
I use past data and history and what I know about the teams to compile my thoughts and come up with solid plays.
BC Lions @ - 2.5 and 50 at most shops
Montreal Alouettes.
BC was 13-5 ATS last regular season. Wally Buono has made a big difference since returning as head coach. The other thing is they had some really good lines last year. Evidence of this is their road schedule last year.
Their biggest road line last year was -4 to Saskatchewan, and since Saskatchewan Montreal and Toronto all had QB issues covering their road favored spreads was quite easy 3-0 ATS as road favorites laying 4 or less.
If you look back at BC's road lines last year you will be very surprised at how easy some of those looked. To give you a few examples:
@ Hamilton with no Zack Collaros +5.5
@ Saskatchewan +2.
Reason for this they were coming in off a down year missing the playoffs and that is why Buono was back on the field coaching.
Moving on to this year pretty much the same thing. Home favored to high score Edmonton and they lose the game. Last week they move on to Toronto and get a nice line of +3 and yup they do what they should and they take the game and pull away in the 4th Q.
The Alouettes play a slow game. With players Like Sutton running the ball and Nik Lewis catching short balls they can keep making those 1st downs. Durrant is and will be an up grade at QB, but none the less he is not elite. The Alouette D is pretty darn good so they keep the game plan is keep the ball on offense and play stout D. They do a nice job.
This line and total is right where it should be so my approach will be waiting to see any line moves.
My thoughts are to buck the strong under trend (overs are 4-25) the Alouettes have going when their totals are set at 51 or higher, but as it looks its just not a good idea.
I don't think it is wise to play BC laying road points against a pretty strong D and the Alouettes upgrading their QB. The Als also have a nice running game. If the Al's can get an early lead it could be a tough climb to get the lead. BC in its second straight road trip out East but I am not sure that will be any issue early in the year.
Lean Al's and the points, the more points the better. If the total drops I might consider an over but if you watch them play it might be hard to watch.
Calgary : After playing the RedBlacks 3 games in a row ( Including the final last year) I was really hoping that the total would be higher then 56. After looking back through Winnipegs data base it apprears to make more sense now. I am not interested in Winnipeg here and Calgary is on my regression list. I might make a play against Calgary just because they are on my regression list, but it is nothing that I would pass on to you as a stronger play. If the line moves then I may change my mind.
Winnipeg: At home I am expecting them to be better on D, but last weeks defensive effort was scary. I think part of that was they were getting Saskatchewan's best effort to win the game as it was a packed house home opener. I expect a different type of game this week. I think Calgary, after back to back high intensity games shows a little bit of a sluggish performance.
The thing that I really dig about this match-up is the previous totals.
If you made every total 56 in their past 10 head to head match-ups you would have cashed 6 times and pushed once and lost 3 times.
Not one of the past total lines has been above 54 so this is maxing out the line.
Small early position on under 56 but I am guessing I could do better at some point later in the week. If not I can keep what I have or add to a lesser #. With the way Ottawa and Calgary scored and Winnipeg scoring over 40 against Saskatchewan I don't for-see much pressure from under backers.
Under Stampeders Blue Bombers 56 and higher
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Stampeders -3.5 and 56
@ Blue Bombers
Calgary : After playing the RedBlacks 3 games in a row ( Including the final last year) I was really hoping that the total would be higher then 56. After looking back through Winnipegs data base it apprears to make more sense now. I am not interested in Winnipeg here and Calgary is on my regression list. I might make a play against Calgary just because they are on my regression list, but it is nothing that I would pass on to you as a stronger play. If the line moves then I may change my mind.
Winnipeg: At home I am expecting them to be better on D, but last weeks defensive effort was scary. I think part of that was they were getting Saskatchewan's best effort to win the game as it was a packed house home opener. I expect a different type of game this week. I think Calgary, after back to back high intensity games shows a little bit of a sluggish performance.
The thing that I really dig about this match-up is the previous totals.
If you made every total 56 in their past 10 head to head match-ups you would have cashed 6 times and pushed once and lost 3 times.
Not one of the past total lines has been above 54 so this is maxing out the line.
Small early position on under 56 but I am guessing I could do better at some point later in the week. If not I can keep what I have or add to a lesser #. With the way Ottawa and Calgary scored and Winnipeg scoring over 40 against Saskatchewan I don't for-see much pressure from under backers.
Even after the last 2 covers again the Stampeders I do not like the RedBlacks. The East was so bad this year that Edmonton came over from the West and advanced to play Ottawa in the Eastern braket. Edmonton's D was so bad it came down to an offensive show down. That is Ottawa's bread and butter. Ottawa started last year 3-1 and finished below .500. Ottawa are 2-7 ATS as chalk last 9.
I am not sold on Toronto being elite, but with Ricky Ray back that certainly helps. If you want to beat Ottawa you better bring an offense and be able to keep pace. Last year with Ray out they had no chance. This year they can. +6 is a nice price here the East is still weak and this is a nice line. Even if Ottawa gets the early lead the back door is open.
Argonauts +6 in and ready to go.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Argonauts @
RedBlacks -6
Even after the last 2 covers again the Stampeders I do not like the RedBlacks. The East was so bad this year that Edmonton came over from the West and advanced to play Ottawa in the Eastern braket. Edmonton's D was so bad it came down to an offensive show down. That is Ottawa's bread and butter. Ottawa started last year 3-1 and finished below .500. Ottawa are 2-7 ATS as chalk last 9.
I am not sold on Toronto being elite, but with Ricky Ray back that certainly helps. If you want to beat Ottawa you better bring an offense and be able to keep pace. Last year with Ray out they had no chance. This year they can. +6 is a nice price here the East is still weak and this is a nice line. Even if Ottawa gets the early lead the back door is open.
One of the reasons dogs are so good is because these teams are so inconsistent. I do feel as though Saskatchewan has more talent this year, but with K Glenn they are limited offensively. They cam out last week and took a 10 point lead and failed the rest of the way.
They are in the bottom defensively and very little running or even attempts at running. Cameron Marshall has 18 rushing attempts in 2 games. On the flip side K Glenn has thrown way more than he should 44 att. in game one, and 49 last week.
If they keep making Saskatchewan favorites I will be going with the dog in a dog league.
Hamilton +1.5 but I think Ican do better later in the week.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Hamilton @
Saskatchewan
One of the reasons dogs are so good is because these teams are so inconsistent. I do feel as though Saskatchewan has more talent this year, but with K Glenn they are limited offensively. They cam out last week and took a 10 point lead and failed the rest of the way.
They are in the bottom defensively and very little running or even attempts at running. Cameron Marshall has 18 rushing attempts in 2 games. On the flip side K Glenn has thrown way more than he should 44 att. in game one, and 49 last week.
If they keep making Saskatchewan favorites I will be going with the dog in a dog league.
Hamilton +1.5 but I think Ican do better later in the week.
Easy to agree with Toronto +6 as the best road underdog this week. So far, home teams are 2-6 ATS and dogs are 8-0 ATS. Old advice in gambling is to not go against trends until they change.
0
Easy to agree with Toronto +6 as the best road underdog this week. So far, home teams are 2-6 ATS and dogs are 8-0 ATS. Old advice in gambling is to not go against trends until they change.
Even after the last 2 covers again the Stampeders I do not like the RedBlacks. The East was so bad this year that Edmonton came over from the West and advanced to play Ottawa in the Eastern braket. Edmonton's D was so bad it came down to an offensive show down. That is Ottawa's bread and butter. Ottawa started last year 3-1 and finished below .500. Ottawa are 2-7 ATS as chalk last 9.
I am not sold on Toronto being elite, but with Ricky Ray back that certainly helps. If you want to beat Ottawa you better bring an offense and be able to keep pace. Last year with Ray out they had no chance. This year they can. +6 is a nice price here the East is still weak and this is a nice line. Even if Ottawa gets the early lead the back door is open.
Argonauts +6 in and ready to go.
There are concerns are evolving as we get closer to kickoff. I still like the Argo's, but here are a few the things.
Ottawa is winless. Ottawa has the better QB's and they have the better offense.
I am watching this line and even though -3 is not as strong as the NFL I still respect that number. The closer the number gets to -3.
The more I think about home field, better offensive personnel, winless and higher consensus on the dog.
Watching the line in case I decide to buy back. For now standing on my +6.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
Argonauts @
RedBlacks -6
Even after the last 2 covers again the Stampeders I do not like the RedBlacks. The East was so bad this year that Edmonton came over from the West and advanced to play Ottawa in the Eastern braket. Edmonton's D was so bad it came down to an offensive show down. That is Ottawa's bread and butter. Ottawa started last year 3-1 and finished below .500. Ottawa are 2-7 ATS as chalk last 9.
I am not sold on Toronto being elite, but with Ricky Ray back that certainly helps. If you want to beat Ottawa you better bring an offense and be able to keep pace. Last year with Ray out they had no chance. This year they can. +6 is a nice price here the East is still weak and this is a nice line. Even if Ottawa gets the early lead the back door is open.
Argonauts +6 in and ready to go.
There are concerns are evolving as we get closer to kickoff. I still like the Argo's, but here are a few the things.
Ottawa is winless. Ottawa has the better QB's and they have the better offense.
I am watching this line and even though -3 is not as strong as the NFL I still respect that number. The closer the number gets to -3.
The more I think about home field, better offensive personnel, winless and higher consensus on the dog.
Watching the line in case I decide to buy back. For now standing on my +6.
GL spottie - I watched Ricky ray short arm a lot of passes last week, I Know that the trestman offense if based on short passes but Ricky couldn't even get it down field 10 yrds.
Ottawa on the other hand was scoring at will on Calgary on the road - I was very impressed with Harris and that offense.
I thought this is spot for OTT to cream the Argos but will lay offf after seeing you on TO and line movement just dont get it.
Gl with all your plays
I like Montreal to cover vs my Lions tmr
0
GL spottie - I watched Ricky ray short arm a lot of passes last week, I Know that the trestman offense if based on short passes but Ricky couldn't even get it down field 10 yrds.
Ottawa on the other hand was scoring at will on Calgary on the road - I was very impressed with Harris and that offense.
I thought this is spot for OTT to cream the Argos but will lay offf after seeing you on TO and line movement just dont get it.
We are very early in the season, and having only beaten Hamilton my question is how good are the Argo's. I really expected the public darlings to be Ottawa here and the line has dropped. Like I said in my thread you are going to have to keep up with Ottawa if you can't stop them so its best to watch the lines and decide what is the best play or no play.
I took the +6 early and I expected to keep it. I didn't expect the Argo's to get so much respect and attention.
I have not updated my thoughts because there are other things on my mind before this game kicks off. I would consider a middle if the line falls to -3.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Powerz thank you for the comment
We are very early in the season, and having only beaten Hamilton my question is how good are the Argo's. I really expected the public darlings to be Ottawa here and the line has dropped. Like I said in my thread you are going to have to keep up with Ottawa if you can't stop them so its best to watch the lines and decide what is the best play or no play.
I took the +6 early and I expected to keep it. I didn't expect the Argo's to get so much respect and attention.
I have not updated my thoughts because there are other things on my mind before this game kicks off. I would consider a middle if the line falls to -3.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.