1-2 ATS for the week, 7-6 ATS for the season. Saskatchewan has HUGE quarterback issues, and perhaps Montreal finally found a decent qb....if I am the GM I am cutting Drew Willy immediately and I am playing Matthews for the rest of the season....he looked poised and unafraid and he threw the ball down the field, and Willy looked like typical Willy, a scared rabbit, with no mobility who coughs up the ball. My lines for next week. Home line Road Total Saskatchewan +5 Hamilton 51 Montreal +8 Ottawa 47 (Ottawa always has trouble in Montreal) Toronto +3 Edmonton 56 Winnipeg -7' BC 55 .
What makes you think Ottawa has trouble with MONT
Ottawa is 8-1 ATS in its last 9 games when playing Montreal
Ottawa is 8-1 SU in its last 9 games when playing Montreal?
Favorites are off to an 8-4 start ...All these favs look juicy this week - I think something smells
Gl with your plays this week
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
1-2 ATS for the week, 7-6 ATS for the season. Saskatchewan has HUGE quarterback issues, and perhaps Montreal finally found a decent qb....if I am the GM I am cutting Drew Willy immediately and I am playing Matthews for the rest of the season....he looked poised and unafraid and he threw the ball down the field, and Willy looked like typical Willy, a scared rabbit, with no mobility who coughs up the ball. My lines for next week. Home line Road Total Saskatchewan +5 Hamilton 51 Montreal +8 Ottawa 47 (Ottawa always has trouble in Montreal) Toronto +3 Edmonton 56 Winnipeg -7' BC 55 .
What makes you think Ottawa has trouble with MONT
Ottawa is 8-1 ATS in its last 9 games when playing Montreal
Ottawa is 8-1 SU in its last 9 games when playing Montreal?
Favorites are off to an 8-4 start ...All these favs look juicy this week - I think something smells
That was my error Powerz......I put down Ottawa, which was correct but was thinking that Calgary, NOT Ottawa was at Montreal....so muddled thinking and incorrect information.
0
That was my error Powerz......I put down Ottawa, which was correct but was thinking that Calgary, NOT Ottawa was at Montreal....so muddled thinking and incorrect information.
James Franklin is the back-up....he's played some, super talented....he's light years better than what Montreal and Saskatchewan has been putting out onto the field or BC too for that matter.
He'll perform well, as Trestman is a quarterback whisperer.....he's presently a better quarterback than Ricky Ray, I'm not worried about him at all.
0
James Franklin is the back-up....he's played some, super talented....he's light years better than what Montreal and Saskatchewan has been putting out onto the field or BC too for that matter.
He'll perform well, as Trestman is a quarterback whisperer.....he's presently a better quarterback than Ricky Ray, I'm not worried about him at all.
I know virtually nothing about the CFL, so I bow to Indigo999's infinitely superior knowledge. However, this query is just too compelling for two Week 4 games:
HD and line > 6.2
ATS: 22-7-0 (8.12, 75.9%)
That query likes SAS and MON. I'll either take 'em or pass; I won't fade 'em.
0
I know virtually nothing about the CFL, so I bow to Indigo999's infinitely superior knowledge. However, this query is just too compelling for two Week 4 games:
HD and line > 6.2
ATS: 22-7-0 (8.12, 75.9%)
That query likes SAS and MON. I'll either take 'em or pass; I won't fade 'em.
Lines have moved and all of the totals have moved to within a point and half of where I had them to start the week.
Mine in parentheses
Saskatchewan +7 (+5) Hamilton 51 (51)
Montreal +7' (8/3') Ottawa 48' (47)
Toronto +3 (3') Edmonton 56 (56)
Winnipeg -4' (-7') BC 55 (55')
Montreal line was altered when I suffered a brain cramp as for some reason I thought the Als were playing Calgary, but had it listed correctly as Ottawa. Probably won't be the last time.....apologies for that.
Have strong leans to Argos, Peggers and the Riders, but haven't pulled any triggers on those games.
0
Lines have moved and all of the totals have moved to within a point and half of where I had them to start the week.
Mine in parentheses
Saskatchewan +7 (+5) Hamilton 51 (51)
Montreal +7' (8/3') Ottawa 48' (47)
Toronto +3 (3') Edmonton 56 (56)
Winnipeg -4' (-7') BC 55 (55')
Montreal line was altered when I suffered a brain cramp as for some reason I thought the Als were playing Calgary, but had it listed correctly as Ottawa. Probably won't be the last time.....apologies for that.
Have strong leans to Argos, Peggers and the Riders, but haven't pulled any triggers on those games.
Hi Bluenoser....a team playing their 3rd away game in 4 games as an away non-conference favorite, with their last game being a home favorite winning, has gone 6-0 straight up and 4-1-1 ATS.
I could not get my database to cooperate on the 4th straight non-divisional game parameter.
0
Hi Bluenoser....a team playing their 3rd away game in 4 games as an away non-conference favorite, with their last game being a home favorite winning, has gone 6-0 straight up and 4-1-1 ATS.
I could not get my database to cooperate on the 4th straight non-divisional game parameter.
Home non-divisional dogs that score >19 points have been 21-8 straight up in the first five weeks of the season. If the Sasquatches can win without a quarterback, certainly the Argos can win with one. Even if both teams score greater than 19, points, which looks very likely, the home dog has been 12-8 straight up.
These are my plays for the week.
1) Redblacks -6
2) Redblacks UNDER
3) Toronto +150
4) Toronto OVER 52'
One observation tonight....it's tough to win on the road in any sport....Saskatchewan played inspired football and made the plays towards the end of the game to get the W.
Hamilton is 2-2, having played 4 of the best teams in the league, 3 on the road....I expect they'll win their division, which will gets them a home playoff game, which is what I am hoping for with my Tiger Cats Grey Cup futures ticket. Their defense is stellar this year, which is like a night and day difference from last year. Ottawa will present a challenge maybe, and I don't think the other two teams will.
0
Play:
4) Argonauts moneyline +150
Home non-divisional dogs that score >19 points have been 21-8 straight up in the first five weeks of the season. If the Sasquatches can win without a quarterback, certainly the Argos can win with one. Even if both teams score greater than 19, points, which looks very likely, the home dog has been 12-8 straight up.
These are my plays for the week.
1) Redblacks -6
2) Redblacks UNDER
3) Toronto +150
4) Toronto OVER 52'
One observation tonight....it's tough to win on the road in any sport....Saskatchewan played inspired football and made the plays towards the end of the game to get the W.
Hamilton is 2-2, having played 4 of the best teams in the league, 3 on the road....I expect they'll win their division, which will gets them a home playoff game, which is what I am hoping for with my Tiger Cats Grey Cup futures ticket. Their defense is stellar this year, which is like a night and day difference from last year. Ottawa will present a challenge maybe, and I don't think the other two teams will.
The game was not televised in my area, but from looking at the statistics of the game, it looks like the Alouettes finally have a quarterback that they can live with. Mathews threw for over 9 yards/pass, which will win a good amount of games, if you can do that.
Hopefully they have moved on from the Drew Willy experiment, but coaches and GMs often don't see what spectators can see, which is one guy throws it down the field and the other is afraid to.
Having a higher yards per pass attempt than your opponent has the highest correlation to winning football games of any statistic with the exception of turnovers, so you'd hope that those making football decisions get coaches and quarterbacks that integrate more than 3 yard passes into their game planning. and execution.
I'd like to see Mathews play a game or two, but Montreal will now be on my radar, especially as a dog off a loss, whereas it'll be hard for me to back Saskatchewan and BC because neither of their offenses can throw the ball, I'll more than likely want to fade them off a win, especially on the road where one needs good quarterbacking.
Let's see if Toronto can get the win tomorrow.
0
The game was not televised in my area, but from looking at the statistics of the game, it looks like the Alouettes finally have a quarterback that they can live with. Mathews threw for over 9 yards/pass, which will win a good amount of games, if you can do that.
Hopefully they have moved on from the Drew Willy experiment, but coaches and GMs often don't see what spectators can see, which is one guy throws it down the field and the other is afraid to.
Having a higher yards per pass attempt than your opponent has the highest correlation to winning football games of any statistic with the exception of turnovers, so you'd hope that those making football decisions get coaches and quarterbacks that integrate more than 3 yard passes into their game planning. and execution.
I'd like to see Mathews play a game or two, but Montreal will now be on my radar, especially as a dog off a loss, whereas it'll be hard for me to back Saskatchewan and BC because neither of their offenses can throw the ball, I'll more than likely want to fade them off a win, especially on the road where one needs good quarterbacking.
I'm a bit bored so I'll throw some random database stats out there.
Away dogs the first 6 weeks of the season have been:
115-77 ATS, close to 60%
59-39 ATS versus non-divisional foes
56-39 ATS versus the division
Away non-playoff dogs after week six see their percentages drop from 60% to 52% to 196-176 ATS
Divisional away dogs 112-95 ATS
non-divisional dogs 84-81 ATS
Home dogs before week 6 have been 44-34, 56.4%
Home non-divisional dogs <week 6, 29-14 ATS
Home divisional dogs < week 6, 15-20 ATS
Home dogs after week 6, 85-85-6 ATS
Home divisional dogs after week 6, 45-49 ATS
Home non-divisional dogs after week 6, 40-36 ATS
And for all you esoteric types that believe that what happens ahead of us can influence what happens now....underdogs that will be underdogs their next game versus a team that will be a favorite next game, have been 85-117 ATS, 42%, all other underdogs have been 179-128 ATS, 58%, the exact opposite percentage.
0
I'm a bit bored so I'll throw some random database stats out there.
Away dogs the first 6 weeks of the season have been:
115-77 ATS, close to 60%
59-39 ATS versus non-divisional foes
56-39 ATS versus the division
Away non-playoff dogs after week six see their percentages drop from 60% to 52% to 196-176 ATS
Divisional away dogs 112-95 ATS
non-divisional dogs 84-81 ATS
Home dogs before week 6 have been 44-34, 56.4%
Home non-divisional dogs <week 6, 29-14 ATS
Home divisional dogs < week 6, 15-20 ATS
Home dogs after week 6, 85-85-6 ATS
Home divisional dogs after week 6, 45-49 ATS
Home non-divisional dogs after week 6, 40-36 ATS
And for all you esoteric types that believe that what happens ahead of us can influence what happens now....underdogs that will be underdogs their next game versus a team that will be a favorite next game, have been 85-117 ATS, 42%, all other underdogs have been 179-128 ATS, 58%, the exact opposite percentage.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.