LEANS Sunday: L San FranciscoL STANFORD W Illinois StateW N.Texas W Irvine ("Irvine might be the best of these")L Santa Clara NCAA Tournament recommended: W Florida W MarylandW AlabamaW SPARTY
@fubah2
Your leans the past week have been successful so maybe the regression is over and it's safe to bet again?!
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
LEANS Sunday: L San FranciscoL STANFORD W Illinois StateW N.Texas W Irvine ("Irvine might be the best of these")L Santa Clara NCAA Tournament recommended: W Florida W MarylandW AlabamaW SPARTY
@fubah2
Your leans the past week have been successful so maybe the regression is over and it's safe to bet again?!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: LEANS Sunday: L San FranciscoL STANFORD W Illinois StateW N.Texas W Irvine ("Irvine might be the best of these")L Santa Clara NCAA Tournament recommended: W Florida W MarylandW AlabamaW SPARTY
@fubah2 Your leans the past week have been successful so maybe the regression is over and it's safe to bet again?!
@Zeus4par
Possibly. Maybe.
2
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: LEANS Sunday: L San FranciscoL STANFORD W Illinois StateW N.Texas W Irvine ("Irvine might be the best of these")L Santa Clara NCAA Tournament recommended: W Florida W MarylandW AlabamaW SPARTY
@fubah2 Your leans the past week have been successful so maybe the regression is over and it's safe to bet again?!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: LEANS Sunday: L San FranciscoL STANFORD W Illinois StateW N.Texas W Irvine ("Irvine might be the best of these")L Santa Clara NCAA Tournament recommended: W Florida W MarylandW AlabamaW SPARTY @fubah2 Your leans the past week have been successful so maybe the regression is over and it's safe to bet again?!
No begging…let the process do its thing, and the selections come to you.
“I’m Winston Wolfe, I solve problems”
0
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: LEANS Sunday: L San FranciscoL STANFORD W Illinois StateW N.Texas W Irvine ("Irvine might be the best of these")L Santa Clara NCAA Tournament recommended: W Florida W MarylandW AlabamaW SPARTY @fubah2 Your leans the past week have been successful so maybe the regression is over and it's safe to bet again?!
No begging…let the process do its thing, and the selections come to you.
Quote Originally Posted by Multiport: @fubah2 That covers the South and East. How about who’s coming out of the West and Midwest!!?? Yep, I'm getting to that. Houston, Florida, Texas Tech and Kentucky Duke, Auburn, Alabama, and SPARTY Now from those 8 it's a CRAP SHOOT for the final 4.
He already made his prediction a week ago for his final 8.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Multiport: @fubah2 That covers the South and East. How about who’s coming out of the West and Midwest!!?? Yep, I'm getting to that. Houston, Florida, Texas Tech and Kentucky Duke, Auburn, Alabama, and SPARTY Now from those 8 it's a CRAP SHOOT for the final 4.
He already made his prediction a week ago for his final 8.
Earlier today I had hoped to LEAN to Bradley at home. But when I discovered two KEY starters would likely be OUT, I backed off. Bradley were the favs but lost by 2, despite nobody in foul trouble, even after a big HT lead.
Likewise with Oklahoma State, Avery, one of their TOP 3 players is OUT, so I backed off. Don't need the stress hoping his replacement will match his solid numbers
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Earlier today I had hoped to LEAN to Bradley at home. But when I discovered two KEY starters would likely be OUT, I backed off. Bradley were the favs but lost by 2, despite nobody in foul trouble, even after a big HT lead.
Likewise with Oklahoma State, Avery, one of their TOP 3 players is OUT, so I backed off. Don't need the stress hoping his replacement will match his solid numbers
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Earlier today I had hoped to LEAN to Bradley at home. But when I discovered two KEY starters would likely be OUT, I backed off. Bradley were the favs but lost by 2, despite nobody in foul trouble, even after a big HT lead. Likewise with Oklahoma State, Avery, one of their TOP 3 players is OUT, so I backed off. Don't need the stress hoping his replacement will match his solid numbers
@fubah2
Two good "no bets" calls
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Earlier today I had hoped to LEAN to Bradley at home. But when I discovered two KEY starters would likely be OUT, I backed off. Bradley were the favs but lost by 2, despite nobody in foul trouble, even after a big HT lead. Likewise with Oklahoma State, Avery, one of their TOP 3 players is OUT, so I backed off. Don't need the stress hoping his replacement will match his solid numbers
I b et them +4 for game then again at +9.5 was happy they came back very poor shooting night by both, Chatt was like 2/15 from 3 1st half I do write ups on every game almost
0
@fubah2
I b et them +4 for game then again at +9.5 was happy they came back very poor shooting night by both, Chatt was like 2/15 from 3 1st half I do write ups on every game almost
@fubah2 I b et them +4 for game then again at +9.5 was happy they came back very poor shooting night by both, Chatt was like 2/15 from 3 1st half I do write ups on every game almost
@RUM151
Excellent call on that dog!!
Yes, you do and one of the very few! Keep up the good work!
1
Quote Originally Posted by RUM151:
@fubah2 I b et them +4 for game then again at +9.5 was happy they came back very poor shooting night by both, Chatt was like 2/15 from 3 1st half I do write ups on every game almost
@RUM151
Excellent call on that dog!!
Yes, you do and one of the very few! Keep up the good work!
@fubah2 thoughts on the anteaters taking care of business tonight against UAB?
@uptownrep
Hi, don't believe we've met before, so WELCOME!
I'm not likely betting that game as it is a close call. However, UAB Blazers appear to hold stronger edges at covering +4 pts based on comparing performances since Feb 01. Lots of height in each lineup, and no apparent injuries/absences.
UAB's 2 most recent performances yielded 2 outright wins, ON THE ROAD, against decent opponents (though not quite as good as Irvine).
IRVINE's 2 most recent performances also yielded 2 wins, AT HOME, but against teams far weaker than UAB and one of those was close!
If I had the proverbial gun to my head, I would likely take UAB on an alt-line at +6 (preferred) or +5 (2nd best choice) - choosing to risk a little more juice in favor of significantly increasing my odds of covering.
I have UAB with approximately 43% - 46% chance of winning SU...but about 72 - 74% chance of covering a +6 -160 alt-line
4
Quote Originally Posted by uptownrep:
@fubah2 thoughts on the anteaters taking care of business tonight against UAB?
@uptownrep
Hi, don't believe we've met before, so WELCOME!
I'm not likely betting that game as it is a close call. However, UAB Blazers appear to hold stronger edges at covering +4 pts based on comparing performances since Feb 01. Lots of height in each lineup, and no apparent injuries/absences.
UAB's 2 most recent performances yielded 2 outright wins, ON THE ROAD, against decent opponents (though not quite as good as Irvine).
IRVINE's 2 most recent performances also yielded 2 wins, AT HOME, but against teams far weaker than UAB and one of those was close!
If I had the proverbial gun to my head, I would likely take UAB on an alt-line at +6 (preferred) or +5 (2nd best choice) - choosing to risk a little more juice in favor of significantly increasing my odds of covering.
I have UAB with approximately 43% - 46% chance of winning SU...but about 72 - 74% chance of covering a +6 -160 alt-line
If I was betting, which I am not, I would likely LEAN to CLEVELAND to cover the new game spread now(down 31 - 40 but getting lots of points now at HT!)....just sayin....
1
If I was betting, which I am not, I would likely LEAN to CLEVELAND to cover the new game spread now(down 31 - 40 but getting lots of points now at HT!)....just sayin....
OY! Vikings closed the gap to 5 pts and had the ball with a chance to narrow it to a one possession game.....then allowed Red Birds to go on a quick 10 - 0 run......they trail by 14now
0
OY! Vikings closed the gap to 5 pts and had the ball with a chance to narrow it to a one possession game.....then allowed Red Birds to go on a quick 10 - 0 run......they trail by 14now
OY! Vikings closed the gap to 5 pts and had the ball with a chance to narrow it to a one possession game.....then allowed Red Birds to go on a quick 10 - 0 run......they trail by 14 now
no way they cover +8.5 now
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
OY! Vikings closed the gap to 5 pts and had the ball with a chance to narrow it to a one possession game.....then allowed Red Birds to go on a quick 10 - 0 run......they trail by 14 now
Quote Originally Posted by uptownrep: @fubah2 thoughts on the anteaters taking care of business tonight against UAB? @uptownrep Hi, don't believe we've met before, so WELCOME! I'm not likely betting that game as it is a close call. However, UAB Blazers appear to hold stronger edges at covering +4 pts based on comparing performances since Feb 01. Lots of height in each lineup, and no apparent injuries/absences. UAB's 2 most recent performances yielded 2 outright wins, ON THE ROAD, against decent opponents (though not quite as good as Irvine). IRVINE's 2 most recent performances also yielded 2 wins, AT HOME, but against teams far weaker than UAB and one of those was close! If I had the proverbial gun to my head, I would likely take UAB on an alt-line at +6 (preferred) or +5 (2nd best choice) - choosing to risk a little more juice in favor of significantly increasing my odds of covering. I have UAB with approximately 43% - 46% chance of winning SU...but about 72 - 74% chance of covering a +6 -160 alt-line
77-81
goldfinger 1964
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by uptownrep: @fubah2 thoughts on the anteaters taking care of business tonight against UAB? @uptownrep Hi, don't believe we've met before, so WELCOME! I'm not likely betting that game as it is a close call. However, UAB Blazers appear to hold stronger edges at covering +4 pts based on comparing performances since Feb 01. Lots of height in each lineup, and no apparent injuries/absences. UAB's 2 most recent performances yielded 2 outright wins, ON THE ROAD, against decent opponents (though not quite as good as Irvine). IRVINE's 2 most recent performances also yielded 2 wins, AT HOME, but against teams far weaker than UAB and one of those was close! If I had the proverbial gun to my head, I would likely take UAB on an alt-line at +6 (preferred) or +5 (2nd best choice) - choosing to risk a little more juice in favor of significantly increasing my odds of covering. I have UAB with approximately 43% - 46% chance of winning SU...but about 72 - 74% chance of covering a +6 -160 alt-line
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by uptownrep: @fubah2 thoughts on the anteaters taking care of business tonight against UAB?
@uptownrep Hi, don't believe we've met before, so WELCOME! I'm not likely betting that game as it is a close call. However, UAB Blazers appear to hold stronger edges at covering +4 pts based on comparing performances since Feb 01. Lots of height in each lineup, and no apparent injuries/absences. UAB's 2 most recent performances yielded 2 outright wins, ON THE ROAD, against decent opponents (though not quite as good as Irvine). IRVINE's 2 most recent performances also yielded 2 wins, AT HOME, but against teams far weaker than UAB and one of those was close!
If I had the proverbial gun to my head, I would likely take UAB on an alt-line at +6 (preferred) or +5 (2nd best choice) - choosing to risk a little more juice in favor of significantly increasing my odds of covering. I have UAB with approximately 43% - 46% chance of winning SU...but about 72 - 74% chance of covering a +6 -160 alt-line
77-81
@PUSSYGALORE333
Ahh Good news, PG! In the possible event that one guy out there may have followed my suggestion of risking a little more juice and buying a point or two for a significantly higher chance of covering, he would have avoided a push and gained a win!
2 - 1 with LEANS/suggestions today
1
Quote Originally Posted by PUSSYGALORE333:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by uptownrep: @fubah2 thoughts on the anteaters taking care of business tonight against UAB?
@uptownrep Hi, don't believe we've met before, so WELCOME! I'm not likely betting that game as it is a close call. However, UAB Blazers appear to hold stronger edges at covering +4 pts based on comparing performances since Feb 01. Lots of height in each lineup, and no apparent injuries/absences. UAB's 2 most recent performances yielded 2 outright wins, ON THE ROAD, against decent opponents (though not quite as good as Irvine). IRVINE's 2 most recent performances also yielded 2 wins, AT HOME, but against teams far weaker than UAB and one of those was close!
If I had the proverbial gun to my head, I would likely take UAB on an alt-line at +6 (preferred) or +5 (2nd best choice) - choosing to risk a little more juice in favor of significantly increasing my odds of covering. I have UAB with approximately 43% - 46% chance of winning SU...but about 72 - 74% chance of covering a +6 -160 alt-line
77-81
@PUSSYGALORE333
Ahh Good news, PG! In the possible event that one guy out there may have followed my suggestion of risking a little more juice and buying a point or two for a significantly higher chance of covering, he would have avoided a push and gained a win!
Teasing Duke w NBA all week! I need Duke to win by 3 ! BYU vs Bama should be high scoring - BYU has been playing well but I don’t think they win. Florida should win. Good luck “ DUKE “
0
Teasing Duke w NBA all week! I need Duke to win by 3 ! BYU vs Bama should be high scoring - BYU has been playing well but I don’t think they win. Florida should win. Good luck “ DUKE “
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.