Housekeeping..... errors recording my results: After posting 7 - 0 on Thursday March 9, I was 88 - 43 (with 64 - 23 *BB) March 11: Vermont and Purdue wins, I was 90 -43 (with 64 - 23 *BB) March 12: no MENS bets March 13: no MENS bets March 14: Michigan *BB win and Liberty win = 92 - 43 (with 65 - 23 *BB) March 15: 3 wins and 2 losses (one was -575) = 95 - 45 (with 65 - 23 *BB) March 16: no MENS bets March 17: Baylor *BB, UCONN *BB, KY wins = 98 -45 (with 67 - 23 *BB) at end of Friday, March 17 I had errantly forgotten to add the March 11 winners. I also errantly added the 1 - 2 WOMENS results into my MENS. So 98 -45 (with 67 - 23 *BB) entering March 18 is now corrected.
i see no mention of how much money you have won or lost just you trying to brag about your percentages. i have no proof but im going to assume this is a losing thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Housekeeping..... errors recording my results: After posting 7 - 0 on Thursday March 9, I was 88 - 43 (with 64 - 23 *BB) March 11: Vermont and Purdue wins, I was 90 -43 (with 64 - 23 *BB) March 12: no MENS bets March 13: no MENS bets March 14: Michigan *BB win and Liberty win = 92 - 43 (with 65 - 23 *BB) March 15: 3 wins and 2 losses (one was -575) = 95 - 45 (with 65 - 23 *BB) March 16: no MENS bets March 17: Baylor *BB, UCONN *BB, KY wins = 98 -45 (with 67 - 23 *BB) at end of Friday, March 17 I had errantly forgotten to add the March 11 winners. I also errantly added the 1 - 2 WOMENS results into my MENS. So 98 -45 (with 67 - 23 *BB) entering March 18 is now corrected.
i see no mention of how much money you have won or lost just you trying to brag about your percentages. i have no proof but im going to assume this is a losing thread.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: "I may be climbing on rainbows, But baby here goes..." Crimson Tide -425 *Best Bet They are #1 seed for good reason. They were 19 - 2 in a very good conf. In a similarly very good conf, Terps were just 12 - 10. Home game for Bama -- where they are 12 - 0 ....plus 3 wins recently on neutral court all vs teams of about the same calibre as Maryland, except tonight's game will be a home game... Terps on the road in conf just 1 - 9.... 2 - 1 on neutral floor where the 10 pt loss was to Indiana and one of the 2 neutral court wins was to weakass Minnesota, then a very narrow 2 pt win over West Va.... And I've seen enough of this game flow to see the writing on the wall .....LIVE ACTION BET with 11:45 left, taking the superior team TEXAS -650 ....despite 0 for 11 from the arc -- which is a fluke in itself!
Gutsy call. But it worked out for you.
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: "I may be climbing on rainbows, But baby here goes..." Crimson Tide -425 *Best Bet They are #1 seed for good reason. They were 19 - 2 in a very good conf. In a similarly very good conf, Terps were just 12 - 10. Home game for Bama -- where they are 12 - 0 ....plus 3 wins recently on neutral court all vs teams of about the same calibre as Maryland, except tonight's game will be a home game... Terps on the road in conf just 1 - 9.... 2 - 1 on neutral floor where the 10 pt loss was to Indiana and one of the 2 neutral court wins was to weakass Minnesota, then a very narrow 2 pt win over West Va.... And I've seen enough of this game flow to see the writing on the wall .....LIVE ACTION BET with 11:45 left, taking the superior team TEXAS -650 ....despite 0 for 11 from the arc -- which is a fluke in itself!
"I may be climbing on rainbows, But baby here goes..."
Crimson Tide -425 *Best Bet They are #1 seed for good reason. They were 19 - 2 in a very good conf. In a similarly very good conf, Terps were just 12 - 10. Home game for Bama -- where they are 12 - 0 ....plus 3 wins recently on neutral court all vs teams of about the same calibre as Maryland, except tonight's game will be a home game... Terps on the road in conf just 1 - 9.... 2 - 1 on neutral floor where the 10 pt loss was to Indiana and one of the 2 neutral court wins was to weakass Minnesota, then a very narrow 2 pt win over West Va....
Gotta like that call on Alabama. If Miller can heal more they should be final 2
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
"I may be climbing on rainbows, But baby here goes..."
Crimson Tide -425 *Best Bet They are #1 seed for good reason. They were 19 - 2 in a very good conf. In a similarly very good conf, Terps were just 12 - 10. Home game for Bama -- where they are 12 - 0 ....plus 3 wins recently on neutral court all vs teams of about the same calibre as Maryland, except tonight's game will be a home game... Terps on the road in conf just 1 - 9.... 2 - 1 on neutral floor where the 10 pt loss was to Indiana and one of the 2 neutral court wins was to weakass Minnesota, then a very narrow 2 pt win over West Va....
Gotta like that call on Alabama. If Miller can heal more they should be final 2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: "I may be climbing on rainbows, But baby here goes..." Crimson Tide -425 *Best Bet They are #1 seed for good reason. They were 19 - 2 in a very good conf. In a similarly very good conf, Terps were just 12 - 10. Home game for Bama -- where they are 12 - 0 ....plus 3 wins recently on neutral court all vs teams of about the same calibre as Maryland, except tonight's game will be a home game... Terps on the road in conf just 1 - 9.... 2 - 1 on neutral floor where the 10 pt loss was to Indiana and one of the 2 neutral court wins was to weakass Minnesota, then a very narrow 2 pt win over West Va.... Gotta like that call on Alabama. If Miller can heal more they should be final 2
Thank you!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: "I may be climbing on rainbows, But baby here goes..." Crimson Tide -425 *Best Bet They are #1 seed for good reason. They were 19 - 2 in a very good conf. In a similarly very good conf, Terps were just 12 - 10. Home game for Bama -- where they are 12 - 0 ....plus 3 wins recently on neutral court all vs teams of about the same calibre as Maryland, except tonight's game will be a home game... Terps on the road in conf just 1 - 9.... 2 - 1 on neutral floor where the 10 pt loss was to Indiana and one of the 2 neutral court wins was to weakass Minnesota, then a very narrow 2 pt win over West Va.... Gotta like that call on Alabama. If Miller can heal more they should be final 2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: "I may be climbing on rainbows, But baby here goes..." Crimson Tide -425 *Best Bet They are #1 seed for good reason. They were 19 - 2 in a very good conf. In a similarly very good conf, Terps were just 12 - 10. Home game for Bama -- where they are 12 - 0 ....plus 3 wins recently on neutral court all vs teams of about the same calibre as Maryland, except tonight's game will be a home game... Terps on the road in conf just 1 - 9.... 2 - 1 on neutral floor where the 10 pt loss was to Indiana and one of the 2 neutral court wins was to weakass Minnesota, then a very narrow 2 pt win over West Va.... And I've seen enough of this game flow to see the writing on the wall .....LIVE ACTION BET with 11:45 left, taking the superior team TEXAS -650 ....despite 0 for 11 from the arc -- which is a fluke in itself! Gutsy call. But it worked out for you.
Thank you! GL with your bets this weekend
2
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: "I may be climbing on rainbows, But baby here goes..." Crimson Tide -425 *Best Bet They are #1 seed for good reason. They were 19 - 2 in a very good conf. In a similarly very good conf, Terps were just 12 - 10. Home game for Bama -- where they are 12 - 0 ....plus 3 wins recently on neutral court all vs teams of about the same calibre as Maryland, except tonight's game will be a home game... Terps on the road in conf just 1 - 9.... 2 - 1 on neutral floor where the 10 pt loss was to Indiana and one of the 2 neutral court wins was to weakass Minnesota, then a very narrow 2 pt win over West Va.... And I've seen enough of this game flow to see the writing on the wall .....LIVE ACTION BET with 11:45 left, taking the superior team TEXAS -650 ....despite 0 for 11 from the arc -- which is a fluke in itself! Gutsy call. But it worked out for you.
I don't understand the point of keeping a record when you have wagers at -600 or -800. It just doesn't make sense. Everyone on the planet would be winning at an 80% clip with those types of wagers.
2
I don't understand the point of keeping a record when you have wagers at -600 or -800. It just doesn't make sense. Everyone on the planet would be winning at an 80% clip with those types of wagers.
I'll be the first to oppose you detractors. He had no play on PU if you go look. Most of his ml wagers are in game only when the metrics line up. I can only vouch for myself but have made money following the last 3 days
5
@tryn2makeabuck
I'll be the first to oppose you detractors. He had no play on PU if you go look. Most of his ml wagers are in game only when the metrics line up. I can only vouch for myself but have made money following the last 3 days
wow! fubah2 has been posting his bets in this same thread every week and recapping the wins and losses ftr buttoday all of a sudden the jealousy comes crawling out from under the stove
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
6
wow! fubah2 has been posting his bets in this same thread every week and recapping the wins and losses ftr buttoday all of a sudden the jealousy comes crawling out from under the stove
I don't understand the point of keeping a record when you have wagers at -600 or -800. It just doesn't make sense. Everyone on the planet would be winning at an 80% clip with those types of wagers.
If that was the case with fubah2 then you would be right.
But that's not the case. Way off.
7
Quote Originally Posted by walbanger:
I don't understand the point of keeping a record when you have wagers at -600 or -800. It just doesn't make sense. Everyone on the planet would be winning at an 80% clip with those types of wagers.
If that was the case with fubah2 then you would be right.
…it only takes one large money line play to wipe out profits also.
Valid point.
I've been tracking Fubah2's picks. I track most of the covers posters who claim winning records. Same in football. Just an objective thing I do. Not intending insult.
In CBB Fubah2 mostly plays the favorites and mostly moneylines. Some are high vigs. He did similar in NFL but mostly using alt lines. Since only a handful of large juice losses can wipe out all the winning profits and worse, I see a valid reason to question his results. no insult intended. I have tracked his play of the day picks that he calls "*best bets" with particular interest. He claims his "*best bets" are 68-24. I made a list.
"@zircon, I appreciate you brother! You're a GOOD dude, anyone can see that!" -Wizerg
5
Quote Originally Posted by bj22:
…it only takes one large money line play to wipe out profits also.
Valid point.
I've been tracking Fubah2's picks. I track most of the covers posters who claim winning records. Same in football. Just an objective thing I do. Not intending insult.
In CBB Fubah2 mostly plays the favorites and mostly moneylines. Some are high vigs. He did similar in NFL but mostly using alt lines. Since only a handful of large juice losses can wipe out all the winning profits and worse, I see a valid reason to question his results. no insult intended. I have tracked his play of the day picks that he calls "*best bets" with particular interest. He claims his "*best bets" are 68-24. I made a list.
Quote Originally Posted by bj22: …it only takes one large money line play to wipe out profits also.
Valid point.
I've been tracking Fubah2's picks. I track most of the covers posters who claim winning records. Same in football. Just an objective thing I do. Not intending insult. In CBB Fubah2 mostly plays the favorites and mostly moneylines. Some are high vigs. He did similar in NFL but mostly using alt lines. Since only a handful of large juice losses can wipe out all the winning profits and worse, I see a valid reason to question his results. no insult intended.I have tracked his play of the day picks that he calls "*best bets" with particular interest. He claims his "*best bets" are 68-24. I made a list.
List?
0
Quote Originally Posted by zircon:
Quote Originally Posted by bj22: …it only takes one large money line play to wipe out profits also.
Valid point.
I've been tracking Fubah2's picks. I track most of the covers posters who claim winning records. Same in football. Just an objective thing I do. Not intending insult. In CBB Fubah2 mostly plays the favorites and mostly moneylines. Some are high vigs. He did similar in NFL but mostly using alt lines. Since only a handful of large juice losses can wipe out all the winning profits and worse, I see a valid reason to question his results. no insult intended.I have tracked his play of the day picks that he calls "*best bets" with particular interest. He claims his "*best bets" are 68-24. I made a list.
Handicappers appreciate the work Mr. fubah2 puts into his winning selections and is nice enough to share with anyone who is interested. His MLB selections are outstanding also. Looking forward to your baseball thread for some more good parlay action. Thank you sir!
5
Handicappers appreciate the work Mr. fubah2 puts into his winning selections and is nice enough to share with anyone who is interested. His MLB selections are outstanding also. Looking forward to your baseball thread for some more good parlay action. Thank you sir!
Personally fubah I’ve been waiting for these guys in forum to bust balls on the -400 etc wagers surprisingly it took this long but for me it helps me sometimes to decide which team I’ll add to my teaser so keep doing what your doing you’ve helped me in basketball and football
7
Personally fubah I’ve been waiting for these guys in forum to bust balls on the -400 etc wagers surprisingly it took this long but for me it helps me sometimes to decide which team I’ll add to my teaser so keep doing what your doing you’ve helped me in basketball and football
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.