a large play

I shouldn't have to say this, but play at your own risk and do your own homework.......... that said, i have a 3 unit play on harvard -points. Harvard -12½ -115 For Game $1,150.00 Ticket Number: 745606951-1 Accepted Date: 12/08/23 01:27 GMT-8 Amount: $1,150.00 Status: Pending To win: $1,000.00 ................................... Harvard -13 -110 For Game $1,100.00 Ticket Number: 745610033-1 Accepted Date: 12/08/23 01:44 GMT-8 Amount: $1,100.00 Status: Pending To win: $1,000.00 ................................... Harvard -12½ -105 For Game $1,050.00 Ticket Number: 745613583-1 Accepted Date: 12/08/23 02:01 GMT-8 Amount: $1,050.00 Amount: $1,050.00 Status: Pending To win: $1,000.00 .................................. Harvard -12½ -105 For Game $250.00 Ticket Number: 745614069-1 Accepted Date: 12/08/23 02:04 GMT-8 Amount: $250.00 Status: Pending To win: $238.10

i will never understand why this site and formatting, my gosh.... terrible

that's $3,550 risk to win $3,238.10

Thanks for posting & BOL tonight!  

This line is 5-7 points short to me. And I'd probably still play it at -17.5. Harvard is the epitome of AVERAGE. they are 169 and 155 in offensive and defensive efficiencies respectively. However, Army is flat out awful at 360th in Off Eff and 256th in DEf, and that is against one of the easiest SoS's in the nation thus far. Army is also tiny at 358th effective height out of 362 teams in D1. Harvard isn't super tall but at 92nd and taller at every position by a few inches, the length and interior should get to Army. No edge on experience or continuity. Army does go deeper into the bench, however their talent is pitiful so that's not a pro/con for either. I do worry a bit about Harvard's youth and inexperience, but the talent gap is so wide it shouldn't matter. As far as points go: Harvard is very balanced on Off and does get 35%+ of points from deep where they shoot almost 40% from 3!! THey are avg at 2 pt and FT %'s but those should go up against a tiny Army team. On the other hand is where the 'rub' and 'value' is. Army gets 40%+ of points from 3 but they shoot sub 30% and Harvard does not give up 3's. Harvards weakness is the interior but Army can't take advantage bc of the height disadvantage so Harvards def weakness is moot this game and that allows them to close out on the 3-ball here. ALso, Army is dreaful shooting across the board and is even 60% at the FT stripe........... bottom line: Harvard should get points however they want in this one and will have easy looks from 3 and 1:1 inside matchups if they play the inside-out game and isolate on the inside then kick to the long ball when Army collapses to double on the interior. Army should get run out of the gym UNLESS they are sniping at 40% from 3. I'll take my chances that a team shooting 29% can't get it together on the road in Cambridge. good luck all

all lines and plays at Betonline. it's an extra game so circled and $1k win max. Line kept changing so I kept adding. you can see the date/time stamps of my plays.

Here's what I don't understand and any help or advice would be appreciated.  When I did my capping yesterday I loved two plays, UIC and Harvard -14.  I really didn't expect the Harvard line to drop, let alone to -11 at my book at one point.  How could I have forecasted this line dropping before placing my wager?  It was a terrible feeling seeing -11 today, although I do expect them to win by more than 20.

Nice to see you post. Good luck today

Who is GMT

GMT  Greenwich Mean Time

 

@pederson16

BOL  I'm playing them at -11.5

did 3tmlp with balt and mia nfl...(-170)  thanks either way   

@pederson16

Great analysis. Thank you for posting.  

Rough day for your pocketbook 

Harvard playing hungover ? 

That’s college basketball for you……. Army is who we thought they were. Harvard is not ….. take notes and move on…. Smdh

Not for me Malcolm. For you, it’s a months earnings. For me, it’s 1 bad play and a drop in the bucket .

Harvard seriously they didn't know how to play ball...

Ah, take jabs at someone you know nothing about. I made more than your bet in less than 8 hours today. You have no idea. Message me son. 

You both are so full of shit it’s unreal. 

anyone who knows Pederson16 knows he bets big like this and he is very streaky. He can win 10 in a row or go 18-5 in a week, and he can also lose 5-6 in a row. It’s gambling. 

but if you make 3500 in8 hours (which you don’t) than why would you. Be mad about losing this play? 

have seen you post MANY winners...thanks for posting .   down the road  

@steponaduck

 

Hi duck ! How you doin buddy ? Good to see you around man  

And about that matter i can not be more agree with you . What pisses me off is that when someone wins good its all love ohh ! But you lose 1 fkn play , its all hate and complaining . There is people that has to learn to lose cause nothing in this life is as easy as many morons thinks .

Hope to see you around more often buddy 

 

Tip

@pederson16

Thank you very much for posting your plaus man , i really apreciate it and i dont give a damn if you lose some , nobody wins em all ever . 

 

Tip