2h indiana state -2.5
+40 -44
+40 -44
+40 -44
I knew this tool posted a lot of plays but now that im grading them i'm like........
I knew this tool posted a lot of plays but now that im grading them i'm like........
+72.5 -33
+72.5 -33
10-0-1 +100
10-0-1 +100
+20 -33
+20 -33
Take your hockey to another forum son. +10
Take your hockey to another forum son. +10
6-0 +60
6-0 +60
+20 -68
+20 -68
+20 -33
+20 -33
+40 -22
+40 -22
+140 -80.5
+140 -80.5
I think the benefit of fading this guy is in the ml underdogs... also wait for runs...
ie- from ten ml -150 to Richmond ml -225 there were 11 losses in a row. he won seton hall +9 had two back to back losses... hit 3 in a row from iowa st -7, 1st h Indiana st -5, 1st h Evansville. then lost 6 in a row from : 1st h ten to 1st h lou. won two in a row then lost 4 in a row.
in his 1st 121 plays he went 46-74-1 for (-373) units ($186,500) (supposedly $500 is a unit) followed by 61-35-1 for (+213 units). the recent overall run in his last 100 or so plays can only be applicable to a fade system if this guy is truly picking teams vs throwing darts)
when he sees his recent run he obviously over exaggerates it but is somehow completely oblivious to the prior -373 unit run. since I don't think he's even keeping track of his plays I don't think even knows how bad it was. he actually thought it would help him break even or go up... no freakin clue.
I decided to keep track to see if there's runs to start fading but if this guy is flipping a coin to come up with his plays there's no benefit.
GL
I think the benefit of fading this guy is in the ml underdogs... also wait for runs...
ie- from ten ml -150 to Richmond ml -225 there were 11 losses in a row. he won seton hall +9 had two back to back losses... hit 3 in a row from iowa st -7, 1st h Indiana st -5, 1st h Evansville. then lost 6 in a row from : 1st h ten to 1st h lou. won two in a row then lost 4 in a row.
in his 1st 121 plays he went 46-74-1 for (-373) units ($186,500) (supposedly $500 is a unit) followed by 61-35-1 for (+213 units). the recent overall run in his last 100 or so plays can only be applicable to a fade system if this guy is truly picking teams vs throwing darts)
when he sees his recent run he obviously over exaggerates it but is somehow completely oblivious to the prior -373 unit run. since I don't think he's even keeping track of his plays I don't think even knows how bad it was. he actually thought it would help him break even or go up... no freakin clue.
I decided to keep track to see if there's runs to start fading but if this guy is flipping a coin to come up with his plays there's no benefit.
GL
+30 -11
+30 -11
+10 -11 will have Saturday total coming up shortly
+10 -11 will have Saturday total coming up shortly
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.