I have these 2 parlays, both with only 1 open slot, all other plays already winners.
so, this begs the question, how do I maximize the payout?
Feb 16 11:32 AM Feb 16 04:03 PM Feb 16 06:15 PM Feb 17 04:02 PM Feb 16 12:03 PM
CBB
CBB CBB CBB CBB
[702] VILLANOVA -13½-170 (B+3) OPEN PLAY [704] VIRGINIA -8½-170 (B+3) [710] CREIGHTON +5½-170 (B+3) [1511] TOTAL o68½-110 (1H WAKE FOREST vrs 1H NOTRE DAME) [715] MIAMI FLORIDA -170
250 / 5547
Feb 16 06:15 PM Feb 16 06:04 PM Feb 16 12:03 PM Feb 16 11:32 AM Feb 16 04:03 PM
CBB CBB CBB CBB
CBB
[1511] TOTAL o68½-115 (1H WAKE FOREST vrs 1H NOTRE DAME) [710] CREIGHTON +5½-170 (B+3) [721] HAMPTON +5-170 (B+3) [715] MIAMI FLORIDA -170 OPEN PLAY [704] VIRGINIA -8½-170 (B+3)
250 / 5427
options, as I see them, are:
1- don't hedge and risk it all, on 2 plays that are close to -110. this would maximize the payout (except of course for taking 2 dogs, but that would be just dumb)
2-hedge by just taking opposite -110 plays, and guarantee myself roughly $5500 minimum
3- take a line, like evansville -10 and buy it down 3 points to -7 in 1 parlay and buy up drake in the other parlay from +10 to +13 and hope for a middle. this gives me the chance to hit both, but will lower payouts to roughly $4500 on each.
4-fill one parlay with a large favorite ml, like a -10 with a ML -500, which would lower the payout on that one to around $3400, and then buy up the +10 dog in the other parlay to +13 and hope to hit that middle.
any other ideas?
and if you were in my shoes, what would you do?
I have not decided, if I want to risk it all or play it safe. To me, the $500 risked is not a big deal, and winning $10-12k does not affect my lifestyle positively or negatively, so I am not basing any decisions on that. I simply want to do what is mathematically the ideal play.
Thanks covers brothers
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
so......
I have these 2 parlays, both with only 1 open slot, all other plays already winners.
so, this begs the question, how do I maximize the payout?
Feb 16 11:32 AM Feb 16 04:03 PM Feb 16 06:15 PM Feb 17 04:02 PM Feb 16 12:03 PM
CBB
CBB CBB CBB CBB
[702] VILLANOVA -13½-170 (B+3) OPEN PLAY [704] VIRGINIA -8½-170 (B+3) [710] CREIGHTON +5½-170 (B+3) [1511] TOTAL o68½-110 (1H WAKE FOREST vrs 1H NOTRE DAME) [715] MIAMI FLORIDA -170
250 / 5547
Feb 16 06:15 PM Feb 16 06:04 PM Feb 16 12:03 PM Feb 16 11:32 AM Feb 16 04:03 PM
CBB CBB CBB CBB
CBB
[1511] TOTAL o68½-115 (1H WAKE FOREST vrs 1H NOTRE DAME) [710] CREIGHTON +5½-170 (B+3) [721] HAMPTON +5-170 (B+3) [715] MIAMI FLORIDA -170 OPEN PLAY [704] VIRGINIA -8½-170 (B+3)
250 / 5427
options, as I see them, are:
1- don't hedge and risk it all, on 2 plays that are close to -110. this would maximize the payout (except of course for taking 2 dogs, but that would be just dumb)
2-hedge by just taking opposite -110 plays, and guarantee myself roughly $5500 minimum
3- take a line, like evansville -10 and buy it down 3 points to -7 in 1 parlay and buy up drake in the other parlay from +10 to +13 and hope for a middle. this gives me the chance to hit both, but will lower payouts to roughly $4500 on each.
4-fill one parlay with a large favorite ml, like a -10 with a ML -500, which would lower the payout on that one to around $3400, and then buy up the +10 dog in the other parlay to +13 and hope to hit that middle.
any other ideas?
and if you were in my shoes, what would you do?
I have not decided, if I want to risk it all or play it safe. To me, the $500 risked is not a big deal, and winning $10-12k does not affect my lifestyle positively or negatively, so I am not basing any decisions on that. I simply want to do what is mathematically the ideal play.
earthworm , you're a gambler and would take option 2?!?!, that's the safest option in my eyes...
jimmy, thanks for the feedback, I am leaning towards 3 or 4, however I am sure someone out there can figure out which of the two is a better mathematical play based on the odds of that outcome occuring and the payout.
0
earthworm , you're a gambler and would take option 2?!?!, that's the safest option in my eyes...
jimmy, thanks for the feedback, I am leaning towards 3 or 4, however I am sure someone out there can figure out which of the two is a better mathematical play based on the odds of that outcome occuring and the payout.
Option 3 is your best profitable mathematical outcome by 17.176%. bol buddy.
but what if I don't hit the middle? then i will get either a 3400 or 4500 payout, which would be less than option 2 and potentially less than option 4...... correct?
0
Quote Originally Posted by JimmyReebs:
Option 3 is your best profitable mathematical outcome by 17.176%. bol buddy.
but what if I don't hit the middle? then i will get either a 3400 or 4500 payout, which would be less than option 2 and potentially less than option 4...... correct?
Options 1 & 2 have an equal EV long term with 1 having more risk/reward.
Like he said before, option 3 is probably the best mathematically because you still guarantee a winning parlay without reducing the payout too much as in Option 4 while having a decent sized window to middle.
Regardless of what you choose, good luck!!
0
Options 1 & 2 have an equal EV long term with 1 having more risk/reward.
Like he said before, option 3 is probably the best mathematically because you still guarantee a winning parlay without reducing the payout too much as in Option 4 while having a decent sized window to middle.
Options 1 & 2 have an equal EV long term with 1 having more risk/reward.
Like he said before, option 3 is probably the best mathematically because you still guarantee a winning parlay without reducing the payout too much as in Option 4 while having a decent sized window to middle.
Regardless of what you choose, good luck!!
thank you
You guys both came up with pretty much what I did....which is good
I went ahead and filled it as it shows above...probably posted it as you were typing your reply...sort of a hybrid of 3 and 4, as I took a ML but not a huge juiced one and instead of a '6-pt-middle', I have a '7-pt-middle'
0
Quote Originally Posted by astrat108:
Options 1 & 2 have an equal EV long term with 1 having more risk/reward.
Like he said before, option 3 is probably the best mathematically because you still guarantee a winning parlay without reducing the payout too much as in Option 4 while having a decent sized window to middle.
Regardless of what you choose, good luck!!
thank you
You guys both came up with pretty much what I did....which is good
I went ahead and filled it as it shows above...probably posted it as you were typing your reply...sort of a hybrid of 3 and 4, as I took a ML but not a huge juiced one and instead of a '6-pt-middle', I have a '7-pt-middle'
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.