Been a while since I’ve posted a play. Been on a serious run since the Holiday season. All sports like always. Outside of the NFL , CBB is my next favorite sport to watch and wager on. There are so many factors why , I’m fading Bama and going Really large on the Tigers. Here are a few stats and trends I’ve found along with the best capping tool , the ( eye test ) . Elite 8 teams favs are 37.5 % ATS %. Elite 8 teams are 2 - 10 SU & 1-10 - 1 ATS of 4 pts or fewer since 1998. That’s a % of only ( 9.1 % cover rate ) Also when both seeds are playing against each other and their both lower than a 3 seed, the lowest seed is 7-3 SU & 8-2 ATS. The ACC league is 32-11 SU and 32 - 10 - 1 ATS in the Last 2 seasons. Tigers are 3-0 SU vs Bama L 3 games. 5 of 6 of those games went under as well. Will also be on the under but not as heavy. Clemson is ranked inside 32nd or better in defense, where as Bama ranks outside the top 100 defensively. Clemson are the more experienced team and the taller team that can also score inside and out. Bama is similar to Creighton, they want to run wild a hoist a ton of 3’s. ACC is also the stronger/ smarter conference. Clemson + 3.5 5500/5000 Good luck
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Been a while since I’ve posted a play. Been on a serious run since the Holiday season. All sports like always. Outside of the NFL , CBB is my next favorite sport to watch and wager on. There are so many factors why , I’m fading Bama and going Really large on the Tigers. Here are a few stats and trends I’ve found along with the best capping tool , the ( eye test ) . Elite 8 teams favs are 37.5 % ATS %. Elite 8 teams are 2 - 10 SU & 1-10 - 1 ATS of 4 pts or fewer since 1998. That’s a % of only ( 9.1 % cover rate ) Also when both seeds are playing against each other and their both lower than a 3 seed, the lowest seed is 7-3 SU & 8-2 ATS. The ACC league is 32-11 SU and 32 - 10 - 1 ATS in the Last 2 seasons. Tigers are 3-0 SU vs Bama L 3 games. 5 of 6 of those games went under as well. Will also be on the under but not as heavy. Clemson is ranked inside 32nd or better in defense, where as Bama ranks outside the top 100 defensively. Clemson are the more experienced team and the taller team that can also score inside and out. Bama is similar to Creighton, they want to run wild a hoist a ton of 3’s. ACC is also the stronger/ smarter conference. Clemson + 3.5 5500/5000 Good luck
clemson should win simply for being the smarter team. very smart team that plays smart basketball and know who they are. still can't let bama get hot from 3.
0
clemson should win simply for being the smarter team. very smart team that plays smart basketball and know who they are. still can't let bama get hot from 3.
Tigers defend inside 33% guarding the 3 line. Bama will make a few but, Clemson plays sound basketball all around. They know what’s coming.
that percentage doesnt mean as much to me as the fact that 41% of the shots opponents take against clemson are 3's and that's a lot when we know that's what bama does anyway, 46% of bama's fg attempts are 3's. Best advice I've ever heard in that regard was "the best defense against the 3 is to not allow your opponent to take them".
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rolexsports:
Tigers defend inside 33% guarding the 3 line. Bama will make a few but, Clemson plays sound basketball all around. They know what’s coming.
that percentage doesnt mean as much to me as the fact that 41% of the shots opponents take against clemson are 3's and that's a lot when we know that's what bama does anyway, 46% of bama's fg attempts are 3's. Best advice I've ever heard in that regard was "the best defense against the 3 is to not allow your opponent to take them".
Tigers allow a little over 24 per game. Bama allow right under 24. Clemson shoots a better % @ the 3 line than Bama . They take less shots but , the % is better. I like teams that are smart and don’t burn opportunities.
0
Tigers allow a little over 24 per game. Bama allow right under 24. Clemson shoots a better % @ the 3 line than Bama . They take less shots but , the % is better. I like teams that are smart and don’t burn opportunities.
24 against everybody not named bama. when they played bama earlier in the year bama shot 35 3's which was 52% of their total fg attemnpts, tied for 2nd most attempts against clemson this year.
0
24 against everybody not named bama. when they played bama earlier in the year bama shot 35 3's which was 52% of their total fg attemnpts, tied for 2nd most attempts against clemson this year.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.