@Bm1978
That’s really messed up, they voided my bet 9 minutes left in the game when Butler took the lead and I had 200 on them, but for them to not refund you is a scandal
@Bm1978
That’s really messed up, they voided my bet 9 minutes left in the game when Butler took the lead and I had 200 on them, but for them to not refund you is a scandal
@Bm1978
That’s really messed up, they voided my bet 9 minutes left in the game when Butler took the lead and I had 200 on them, but for them to not refund you is a scandal
I think it has to do with the winning team getting paid with an NIL. Players are getting "paid to play" which makes this not an amatuer event but a professional event.
I think it has to do with the winning team getting paid with an NIL. Players are getting "paid to play" which makes this not an amatuer event but a professional event.
Found this on legalsportsbetting.com
A wave of confusion and frustration swept across the legal sports betting community as major sportsbooks, including DraftKings, FanDuel, Circa, MGM, and BetRivers, abruptly removed betting lines for the College Basketball Crown Tournament.
The decision, which has sparked speculation and backlash from bettors, appears to be linked to concerns over player participation and potential regulatory issues.
Sudden Line Removal Raises Questions
Bettors first noticed the disappearance of Crown Tournament lines on Monday, with DraftKings and other sportsbooks quietly removing the markets. When pressed for an explanation, DraftKings’ support team responded that the markets were “currently unavailable due to regulatory reasons,” without specifying further.
FanDuel and other major operators followed suit, leaving bettors puzzled.
Many in the gambling community speculated that college basketball sportsbooks feared being exploited due to uncertainty over player availability. The transfer portal and last-minute lineup changes reportedly made it difficult for oddsmakers to confidently set lines, leading some to believe that sportsbooks acted to protect themselves from being “beaten” by sharp bettors with inside information.
The sudden removal of the lines led to an outcry on social media, with some users accusing sportsbooks of pulling the bets solely to protect their bottom line.
Others pointed to the possibility of suspicious betting activity prompting the decision.
Some legal online sportsbooks not only removed the lines but also voided already-placed bets. One bettor on X, @bburch22, reported that DraftKings voided a bet on Butler after the game was played, even though the money had already hit his account. The incident led to claims of “free rolling,” where sportsbooks seemingly void losing bets but keep winning ones.
Found this on legalsportsbetting.com
A wave of confusion and frustration swept across the legal sports betting community as major sportsbooks, including DraftKings, FanDuel, Circa, MGM, and BetRivers, abruptly removed betting lines for the College Basketball Crown Tournament.
The decision, which has sparked speculation and backlash from bettors, appears to be linked to concerns over player participation and potential regulatory issues.
Sudden Line Removal Raises Questions
Bettors first noticed the disappearance of Crown Tournament lines on Monday, with DraftKings and other sportsbooks quietly removing the markets. When pressed for an explanation, DraftKings’ support team responded that the markets were “currently unavailable due to regulatory reasons,” without specifying further.
FanDuel and other major operators followed suit, leaving bettors puzzled.
Many in the gambling community speculated that college basketball sportsbooks feared being exploited due to uncertainty over player availability. The transfer portal and last-minute lineup changes reportedly made it difficult for oddsmakers to confidently set lines, leading some to believe that sportsbooks acted to protect themselves from being “beaten” by sharp bettors with inside information.
The sudden removal of the lines led to an outcry on social media, with some users accusing sportsbooks of pulling the bets solely to protect their bottom line.
Others pointed to the possibility of suspicious betting activity prompting the decision.
Some legal online sportsbooks not only removed the lines but also voided already-placed bets. One bettor on X, @bburch22, reported that DraftKings voided a bet on Butler after the game was played, even though the money had already hit his account. The incident led to claims of “free rolling,” where sportsbooks seemingly void losing bets but keep winning ones.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.