We were very close to pulling the trigger on this one earlier today, and
now that the game has been moved up to a 4:05 Eastern tip-off we have
the edges to get over the top. For a Bradley team already struggling in
so many ways, losing at least half of the expected crowd, and likely
even more, makes it an atmosphere hardly conducive for an 0-11 Missouri
Valley free-fall to turn around.
It has been a rocky campaign all
the way for Jim Les, who lost Taylor Brown before the season started
and then Sam Maniscalo six games into the campaign. Now there are also
issues with leading scorer Andrew Warren, who left Saturday’s loss with a
head injury. Even with Warren scoring 22 pints the Braves were beaten
much worse than the 81-68 final score can show at Creighton earlier,
trailing by 25 points at halftime, when only one Blue Jay starter played
more than 27 minutes.
While Bradley fades, and gets stuck in a
lackluster environment today that does not create any energy to help,
Creighton is playing as well as anyone in the Valley. The Blue Jays have
won their last two home league games in double figures, and took
Missouri State and Northern Iowa both to the wire in their last two
trips. They have the depth to wear down the shallow host; the FT
shooting (73.9 percent) to close out with a lead; the confidence to know
that they can win on this court (seven wins in the last nine trips);
and having already made it to Peoria last night, starting early is
actually an advantage for them, instead of having to sit around all day.
0
We were very close to pulling the trigger on this one earlier today, and
now that the game has been moved up to a 4:05 Eastern tip-off we have
the edges to get over the top. For a Bradley team already struggling in
so many ways, losing at least half of the expected crowd, and likely
even more, makes it an atmosphere hardly conducive for an 0-11 Missouri
Valley free-fall to turn around.
It has been a rocky campaign all
the way for Jim Les, who lost Taylor Brown before the season started
and then Sam Maniscalo six games into the campaign. Now there are also
issues with leading scorer Andrew Warren, who left Saturday’s loss with a
head injury. Even with Warren scoring 22 pints the Braves were beaten
much worse than the 81-68 final score can show at Creighton earlier,
trailing by 25 points at halftime, when only one Blue Jay starter played
more than 27 minutes.
While Bradley fades, and gets stuck in a
lackluster environment today that does not create any energy to help,
Creighton is playing as well as anyone in the Valley. The Blue Jays have
won their last two home league games in double figures, and took
Missouri State and Northern Iowa both to the wire in their last two
trips. They have the depth to wear down the shallow host; the FT
shooting (73.9 percent) to close out with a lead; the confidence to know
that they can win on this court (seven wins in the last nine trips);
and having already made it to Peoria last night, starting early is
actually an advantage for them, instead of having to sit around all day.
We were very close to pulling the trigger on this one earlier today, and now that the game has been moved up to a 4:05 Eastern tip-off we have the edges to get over the top. For a Bradley team already struggling in so many ways, losing at least half of the expected crowd, and likely even more, makes it an atmosphere hardly conducive for an 0-11 Missouri Valley free-fall to turn around.
It has been a rocky campaign all the way for Jim Les, who lost Taylor Brown before the season started and then Sam Maniscalo six games into the campaign. Now there are also issues with leading scorer Andrew Warren, who left Saturday’s loss with a head injury. Even with Warren scoring 22 pints the Braves were beaten much worse than the 81-68 final score can show at Creighton earlier, trailing by 25 points at halftime, when only one Blue Jay starter played more than 27 minutes.
While Bradley fades, and gets stuck in a lackluster environment today that does not create any energy to help, Creighton is playing as well as anyone in the Valley. The Blue Jays have won their last two home league games in double figures, and took Missouri State and Northern Iowa both to the wire in their last two trips. They have the depth to wear down the shallow host; the FT shooting (73.9 percent) to close out with a lead; the confidence to know that they can win on this court (seven wins in the last nine trips); and having already made it to Peoria last night, starting early is actually an advantage for them, instead of having to sit around all day.
i hear you , but if that u said is the right situation ,,,,,,,,,,,, why is the line only 3.5 , i think its way too low , vegas knows something on these matchup to draw the public to grab creighton .............. i really think BRADLEY IS THE RIGHT PLAY
0
Quote Originally Posted by hdouglas:
We were very close to pulling the trigger on this one earlier today, and now that the game has been moved up to a 4:05 Eastern tip-off we have the edges to get over the top. For a Bradley team already struggling in so many ways, losing at least half of the expected crowd, and likely even more, makes it an atmosphere hardly conducive for an 0-11 Missouri Valley free-fall to turn around.
It has been a rocky campaign all the way for Jim Les, who lost Taylor Brown before the season started and then Sam Maniscalo six games into the campaign. Now there are also issues with leading scorer Andrew Warren, who left Saturday’s loss with a head injury. Even with Warren scoring 22 pints the Braves were beaten much worse than the 81-68 final score can show at Creighton earlier, trailing by 25 points at halftime, when only one Blue Jay starter played more than 27 minutes.
While Bradley fades, and gets stuck in a lackluster environment today that does not create any energy to help, Creighton is playing as well as anyone in the Valley. The Blue Jays have won their last two home league games in double figures, and took Missouri State and Northern Iowa both to the wire in their last two trips. They have the depth to wear down the shallow host; the FT shooting (73.9 percent) to close out with a lead; the confidence to know that they can win on this court (seven wins in the last nine trips); and having already made it to Peoria last night, starting early is actually an advantage for them, instead of having to sit around all day.
i hear you , but if that u said is the right situation ,,,,,,,,,,,, why is the line only 3.5 , i think its way too low , vegas knows something on these matchup to draw the public to grab creighton .............. i really think BRADLEY IS THE RIGHT PLAY
you need to be careful, i am from chicago, and we are awaiting a blizzard. 12-30 inches of snow to begin right around game time. i really doubt people are going to risk being out in a blizzard to watch a terrible basketball team!
0
you need to be careful, i am from chicago, and we are awaiting a blizzard. 12-30 inches of snow to begin right around game time. i really doubt people are going to risk being out in a blizzard to watch a terrible basketball team!
Can you give me a good reason why you betting on Bradley RSD ???
I dont see any angles supporting these boys..
always remember , the one you think the least to win is always a better chance of winning in gambling ............................. you just have to read the right team at the right situation ........................ bradley is not a guaranteed winner but it has a really good shot
0
Quote Originally Posted by PoRToRoKPuRo:
Can you give me a good reason why you betting on Bradley RSD ???
I dont see any angles supporting these boys..
always remember , the one you think the least to win is always a better chance of winning in gambling ............................. you just have to read the right team at the right situation ........................ bradley is not a guaranteed winner but it has a really good shot
resevoir, I totally feel you on the suspect line. Sometimes bettors overthink this angle IMO. The new tip time supports my side due to the crowd being taken out. This is for all intents/purposes a NEUTRAL court.
0
resevoir, I totally feel you on the suspect line. Sometimes bettors overthink this angle IMO. The new tip time supports my side due to the crowd being taken out. This is for all intents/purposes a NEUTRAL court.
you need to be careful, i am from chicago, and we are awaiting a blizzard. 12-30 inches of snow to begin right around game time. i really doubt people are going to risk being out in a blizzard to watch a terrible basketball team!
what r you talking about ....... midwestern people are well adjusted on these type of wheather , if that happen to california or western states that you should worry
0
Quote Originally Posted by 4allthemarbles:
you need to be careful, i am from chicago, and we are awaiting a blizzard. 12-30 inches of snow to begin right around game time. i really doubt people are going to risk being out in a blizzard to watch a terrible basketball team!
what r you talking about ....... midwestern people are well adjusted on these type of wheather , if that happen to california or western states that you should worry
As far as the line goes, I heard people saying the same thing yesterday about the Texas/Texas A&M line, referring to the blowout that happened on TX's homecourt and stating that the line was to suspicious. Yet, TX did it again at A&M last night. Point being, sometimes a team is just that much better than another and based on these two teams, and now the weather circumstance, I will have to side with Hdouglas. BOL anyway
0
As far as the line goes, I heard people saying the same thing yesterday about the Texas/Texas A&M line, referring to the blowout that happened on TX's homecourt and stating that the line was to suspicious. Yet, TX did it again at A&M last night. Point being, sometimes a team is just that much better than another and based on these two teams, and now the weather circumstance, I will have to side with Hdouglas. BOL anyway
I believe the line is way to low for the overall and conference records. When I see a line like that I take the dog. Take it for what it's worth. Looks to easy at only -3.5. Opinions are welcome.
0
I believe the line is way to low for the overall and conference records. When I see a line like that I take the dog. Take it for what it's worth. Looks to easy at only -3.5. Opinions are welcome.
As far as the line goes, I heard people saying the same thing yesterday about the Texas/Texas A&M line, referring to the blowout that happened on TX's homecourt and stating that the line was to suspicious. Yet, TX did it again at A&M last night. Point being, sometimes a team is just that much better than another and based on these two teams, and now the weather circumstance, I will have to side with Hdouglas. BOL anyway
0
well said. don't over-think it ppl.
Quote Originally Posted by awright22:
As far as the line goes, I heard people saying the same thing yesterday about the Texas/Texas A&M line, referring to the blowout that happened on TX's homecourt and stating that the line was to suspicious. Yet, TX did it again at A&M last night. Point being, sometimes a team is just that much better than another and based on these two teams, and now the weather circumstance, I will have to side with Hdouglas. BOL anyway
As far as the line goes, I heard people saying the same thing yesterday about the Texas/Texas A&M line, referring to the blowout that happened on TX's homecourt and stating that the line was to suspicious. Yet, TX did it again at A&M last night. Point being, sometimes a team is just that much better than another and based on these two teams, and now the weather circumstance, I will have to side with Hdouglas. BOL anyway
AS I SAID NOT ALL RESULTS ARE THE SAME ,,,,,,,,,, You just have to read closely a team or two out of a bunch ....................
0
Quote Originally Posted by awright22:
As far as the line goes, I heard people saying the same thing yesterday about the Texas/Texas A&M line, referring to the blowout that happened on TX's homecourt and stating that the line was to suspicious. Yet, TX did it again at A&M last night. Point being, sometimes a team is just that much better than another and based on these two teams, and now the weather circumstance, I will have to side with Hdouglas. BOL anyway
AS I SAID NOT ALL RESULTS ARE THE SAME ,,,,,,,,,, You just have to read closely a team or two out of a bunch ....................
I live 45 minutes away from Peoria and people are at work right or worrying about getting to the grocery store. The winds are already blowing 35 mph (predicting up to 2 feet of snow). The last thing I think people are trying to do is to a bradley bball game. Bradley has been struggling lately while Creighton always wins games they are suppose to do like this one. I respect the hope for Bradley but my money lies with Creighton! GL
0
I live 45 minutes away from Peoria and people are at work right or worrying about getting to the grocery store. The winds are already blowing 35 mph (predicting up to 2 feet of snow). The last thing I think people are trying to do is to a bradley bball game. Bradley has been struggling lately while Creighton always wins games they are suppose to do like this one. I respect the hope for Bradley but my money lies with Creighton! GL
IMO....... Texas man handled Texas A&M as a small favorite, but wouldn't you say that St. Johns manhandled a much better Duke team kinda in a similar situation. I'm not saying Bradley is the play, but I do have to agree, Creighton is the much better team, but they are in a letdown situation. Why get up for lowly Bradley.
0
IMO....... Texas man handled Texas A&M as a small favorite, but wouldn't you say that St. Johns manhandled a much better Duke team kinda in a similar situation. I'm not saying Bradley is the play, but I do have to agree, Creighton is the much better team, but they are in a letdown situation. Why get up for lowly Bradley.
Listen, Creighton was leading by 25 at the half. There is a difference between winning and DOMINATING! Even if Creighton isn't all that excited about the game I still think they have a good enough team to ease to a dd win.
0
Listen, Creighton was leading by 25 at the half. There is a difference between winning and DOMINATING! Even if Creighton isn't all that excited about the game I still think they have a good enough team to ease to a dd win.
As far as the line goes, I heard people saying the same thing yesterday about the Texas/Texas A&M line, referring to the blowout that happened on TX's homecourt and stating that the line was to suspicious. Yet, TX did it again at A&M last night. Point being, sometimes a team is just that much better than another and based on these two teams, and now the weather circumstance, I will have to side with Hdouglas. BOL anyway
You only have to go back two days to show how poorly this idea is....
Short lines are set all the time for a reason. Did you see Saturday? Square bettors got killed.
Last night? That was some cheese for them so they dont run away and quit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by awright22:
As far as the line goes, I heard people saying the same thing yesterday about the Texas/Texas A&M line, referring to the blowout that happened on TX's homecourt and stating that the line was to suspicious. Yet, TX did it again at A&M last night. Point being, sometimes a team is just that much better than another and based on these two teams, and now the weather circumstance, I will have to side with Hdouglas. BOL anyway
You only have to go back two days to show how poorly this idea is....
Short lines are set all the time for a reason. Did you see Saturday? Square bettors got killed.
Last night? That was some cheese for them so they dont run away and quit.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.