You know my philosophy by now, gets. We look for the un-sexy and underperforming. We look for upside and we fade downside. South Carolina has been playing outside of itself this tournament. On the season they are 237th in 3 point % and 299th in 2 point %. Against Baylor, however, they hit 50% of their two-pointers and 40% of their three-pointers. Against Duke, they hit well above their season average in the second half and scored 88 points, 65 of them in the second half. Against Marquette they scored 93 points, hitting over 60% of their two-pointers. The key to South Carolina's success has been forcing turnovers more than anything. They forced Marquette in a virtual home game into 18, Duke, who lacks a true point guard, into 18 and they forced Baylor into 16. Even the last time these two teams played, an 81-66 win for Florida, they forced Florida to commit 16 turnovers. Almost every time South Carolina played a team again in conference play, they failed to force as many turnovers as they did the first time around. Vs Georgia: the first time they forced 16, the second time 15. Vs Ole miss: the first time they forced 21, the second time 17. Vs Tennessee: the first time they forced 22, the second time 20. Vs Alabama the first time they forced 24, the second time 13. The two exceptions: against Florida they forced 16 both times, and against Miss State they forced 19 the first time and 20 the second time. So, teams generally improve with ball security when they face South Carolina again. And now we are giving Florida a third try. When they have the confidence of having beat this team soundly the last time they played. Their first matchup they lost 57-53, going 0/17 from behind the arc. The second time they won 81-66. Florida actually does a better job with ball security away from home and they seem to be less careless when the game is tighter. If this game is close, I like Florida to take advantage of its improvement in ball control and its superiority in free throws to secure the cover. At all events, I think Florida vastly improved in their rematch against South Carolina and I think they build on that by also improving in ball security. I think they have the edge in athleticism. They are statistically vastly superior in half court offense. South Carolina has been playing outside itself so far, but I think that run grounds to a halt tomorrow. I think Florida has too much offense, but also at least as good defense, for South Carolina to handle. Take Florida -3
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
You know my philosophy by now, gets. We look for the un-sexy and underperforming. We look for upside and we fade downside. South Carolina has been playing outside of itself this tournament. On the season they are 237th in 3 point % and 299th in 2 point %. Against Baylor, however, they hit 50% of their two-pointers and 40% of their three-pointers. Against Duke, they hit well above their season average in the second half and scored 88 points, 65 of them in the second half. Against Marquette they scored 93 points, hitting over 60% of their two-pointers. The key to South Carolina's success has been forcing turnovers more than anything. They forced Marquette in a virtual home game into 18, Duke, who lacks a true point guard, into 18 and they forced Baylor into 16. Even the last time these two teams played, an 81-66 win for Florida, they forced Florida to commit 16 turnovers. Almost every time South Carolina played a team again in conference play, they failed to force as many turnovers as they did the first time around. Vs Georgia: the first time they forced 16, the second time 15. Vs Ole miss: the first time they forced 21, the second time 17. Vs Tennessee: the first time they forced 22, the second time 20. Vs Alabama the first time they forced 24, the second time 13. The two exceptions: against Florida they forced 16 both times, and against Miss State they forced 19 the first time and 20 the second time. So, teams generally improve with ball security when they face South Carolina again. And now we are giving Florida a third try. When they have the confidence of having beat this team soundly the last time they played. Their first matchup they lost 57-53, going 0/17 from behind the arc. The second time they won 81-66. Florida actually does a better job with ball security away from home and they seem to be less careless when the game is tighter. If this game is close, I like Florida to take advantage of its improvement in ball control and its superiority in free throws to secure the cover. At all events, I think Florida vastly improved in their rematch against South Carolina and I think they build on that by also improving in ball security. I think they have the edge in athleticism. They are statistically vastly superior in half court offense. South Carolina has been playing outside itself so far, but I think that run grounds to a halt tomorrow. I think Florida has too much offense, but also at least as good defense, for South Carolina to handle. Take Florida -3
gamecocks have been playing way in over their heads which makes them scary to bet against. always seem to be one lower seed that somehow sneaks into the final four. but Florida does have their number though. can they stop KeVaughn Allen? if they can't Florida wins no question
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
good write-up. couldn't agree more.
gamecocks have been playing way in over their heads which makes them scary to bet against. always seem to be one lower seed that somehow sneaks into the final four. but Florida does have their number though. can they stop KeVaughn Allen? if they can't Florida wins no question
Virginia 39 points...Thats a disgrace...not great defense. SC beat duke never mind what they did to Baylor. SC has the superior defense with a lot of momentum its been a long time for SC to get back to the dance.
South Carolina ML is the winner.
0
Virginia 39 points...Thats a disgrace...not great defense. SC beat duke never mind what they did to Baylor. SC has the superior defense with a lot of momentum its been a long time for SC to get back to the dance.
So SC will advance because of who they last beat and because they haven't been there in a while? Interestingly a total twist of scal's point that wiscy will beat florida because they made it so far last year lol
0
So SC will advance because of who they last beat and because they haven't been there in a while? Interestingly a total twist of scal's point that wiscy will beat florida because they made it so far last year lol
Usually u go with the hot teams ....SC is hot ...and damn good and have a great coach in my mind seems like everyone is on Florida which is why I like SC even better
0
Usually u go with the hot teams ....SC is hot ...and damn good and have a great coach in my mind seems like everyone is on Florida which is why I like SC even better
SC is absolutely the public play and I only know otherwise of Locks who is with me on Florida, we've been loyally riding them it seems lol. Hot teams get inflated spreads because the books know people will bet on them and people bet on them anyways. Long-term value lies with the un-sexy. That's why I backed Ducks and Zags yesterday. But maybe you're right today. BOL
0
SC is absolutely the public play and I only know otherwise of Locks who is with me on Florida, we've been loyally riding them it seems lol. Hot teams get inflated spreads because the books know people will bet on them and people bet on them anyways. Long-term value lies with the un-sexy. That's why I backed Ducks and Zags yesterday. But maybe you're right today. BOL
SC is absolutely the public play and I only know otherwise of Locks who is with me on Florida, we've been loyally riding them it seems lol. Hot teams get inflated spreads because the books know people will bet on them and people bet on them anyways. Long-term value lies with the un-sexy. That's why I backed Ducks and Zags yesterday. But maybe you're right today. BOL
South Carolina is not the public play. Florida has taken more bets and the money is essentially dead even. If anything though Florida would be the public play, small favorite, bigger name, coming off a win that everyone is talking about in probably the tournament's most entertaining game.
There's not really a true Public Joe play in this one, but Florida is definitely more of one than South Carolina is.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ProudJagsfan:
SC is absolutely the public play and I only know otherwise of Locks who is with me on Florida, we've been loyally riding them it seems lol. Hot teams get inflated spreads because the books know people will bet on them and people bet on them anyways. Long-term value lies with the un-sexy. That's why I backed Ducks and Zags yesterday. But maybe you're right today. BOL
South Carolina is not the public play. Florida has taken more bets and the money is essentially dead even. If anything though Florida would be the public play, small favorite, bigger name, coming off a win that everyone is talking about in probably the tournament's most entertaining game.
There's not really a true Public Joe play in this one, but Florida is definitely more of one than South Carolina is.
SC 62% of the money according to sportsinsights subscription and the majoriy of the wagers but trivial point imo. But SC is getting imo more hype as a cinderella after wrecking team after team so far. Kentucky, my other pick, also has 60% of money. Just cap
0
SC 62% of the money according to sportsinsights subscription and the majoriy of the wagers but trivial point imo. But SC is getting imo more hype as a cinderella after wrecking team after team so far. Kentucky, my other pick, also has 60% of money. Just cap
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.