Fordham @ Davidson (-18.5, 122) is our first game on board at 1PM et.
Leaning Davidson given their small, but favorable track record under McKillop as large favorites in conference matchups (Since 2012, 15-12 ATS as DD favorites, 3-0 when its expected to be a low scoring affair [<135])
Like what Fordham brings inside with Soriano, but Davidson's big men are pretty crafty and the athleticism gap isn't overwhelming. Fordham's success as a large dog has purely come from streaky 3 point shooting, which they've done a decent job at holding.
Any thoughts on the side or total?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Fordham @ Davidson (-18.5, 122) is our first game on board at 1PM et.
Leaning Davidson given their small, but favorable track record under McKillop as large favorites in conference matchups (Since 2012, 15-12 ATS as DD favorites, 3-0 when its expected to be a low scoring affair [<135])
Like what Fordham brings inside with Soriano, but Davidson's big men are pretty crafty and the athleticism gap isn't overwhelming. Fordham's success as a large dog has purely come from streaky 3 point shooting, which they've done a decent job at holding.
When Davidson's played like-tempo (slow) teams this year, 1H scores below.
Fordham's defense is pretty good at preventing transition opportunities so even if they shoot 15% like usual, Davidson's going to need to score in the half-court. Could see a potential 'wait-and-see' approach for the 1H and then a play on Davidson in the 2H
vs. Dayton (325th in tempo, 93rd in DRtg): 31 - 32
@ Duquesne (231st in tempo, 78th in DRtg): 25 - 26
vs Charlotte (354th in tempo, 138th in DRtg): 27 - 33
vs Georgia Southern (256th in tempo, 251st in DRtg) : 38 - 18
@ Providence (299th in tempo, 101st in DRtg): 31 - 35
0
@Memo22
When Davidson's played like-tempo (slow) teams this year, 1H scores below.
Fordham's defense is pretty good at preventing transition opportunities so even if they shoot 15% like usual, Davidson's going to need to score in the half-court. Could see a potential 'wait-and-see' approach for the 1H and then a play on Davidson in the 2H
vs. Dayton (325th in tempo, 93rd in DRtg): 31 - 32
@ Duquesne (231st in tempo, 78th in DRtg): 25 - 26
vs Charlotte (354th in tempo, 138th in DRtg): 27 - 33
vs Georgia Southern (256th in tempo, 251st in DRtg) : 38 - 18
@ Providence (299th in tempo, 101st in DRtg): 31 - 35
Looks like markets caught up with Davidson 1H value .
Going to go with 1H O57.5, and FG Fordham +19 with the thesis that Fordham trades some inside baskets with open 3s for Davidson early. Can see Davidson easing up and slowing tempo down 2H for a game in the 14-19 differential range.
BOL all
0
Looks like markets caught up with Davidson 1H value .
Going to go with 1H O57.5, and FG Fordham +19 with the thesis that Fordham trades some inside baskets with open 3s for Davidson early. Can see Davidson easing up and slowing tempo down 2H for a game in the 14-19 differential range.
I like Davidson over 34 fh. But I am somewhat tempted to take Fordham over 23??
Easy Good call on both- Really pissed I did'nt get in on it- I got a call from my lawyer 5 minutes before the game- I had it on the bet slip and just got caught up with the call
Godamit!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Memo22:
I like Davidson over 34 fh. But I am somewhat tempted to take Fordham over 23??
Easy Good call on both- Really pissed I did'nt get in on it- I got a call from my lawyer 5 minutes before the game- I had it on the bet slip and just got caught up with the call
1H overs (total or Davidson) both likely to hit here.
Have seen nothing sustainable from the Fordham offense - think Davidson makes the adjustments on fronting entry passes and doubling down low.
As Fordham's offense continues to bog down, expecting less TOs and transition opps for Davidson. With the tempo being extremely slow (when you exclude those random fastbreaks), anyone else liking the 2H under?
0
1H overs (total or Davidson) both likely to hit here.
Have seen nothing sustainable from the Fordham offense - think Davidson makes the adjustments on fronting entry passes and doubling down low.
As Fordham's offense continues to bog down, expecting less TOs and transition opps for Davidson. With the tempo being extremely slow (when you exclude those random fastbreaks), anyone else liking the 2H under?
It's up to -8.5 -115 (Live -17.5) for me. Like how Davidson's offenses has looked and I already have a position in Fordham +19 so going to stay away a side.
What's really telling is that Davidson had 3 PFs in the 1H. Fordham was getting nothing on dribble drive penetration and really benefited from hot shooting from an ordinarily poor shooting team. Got the U67.5 -110 so will ride that for the 2H.
0
@kvly
It's up to -8.5 -115 (Live -17.5) for me. Like how Davidson's offenses has looked and I already have a position in Fordham +19 so going to stay away a side.
What's really telling is that Davidson had 3 PFs in the 1H. Fordham was getting nothing on dribble drive penetration and really benefited from hot shooting from an ordinarily poor shooting team. Got the U67.5 -110 so will ride that for the 2H.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.