Why Irvine, St2ee? I was leaning K State, so I'd be interested to hear perspective from the other side.
As I see it... K State obviously no Wade, but they still played tough without him in the Big 12 tourney. Irvine won 30 games (impressive), but I see only one win among those that impresses me, 80-75 against SMC - though, SMC did go through some growing pains to start the year. Beyond that, Irvine lost to Toldeo (60-67), Utah St (65-89), and Butler (54-71). They did beat a couple of MC bottom feeders in T A&M and Tulane, but... meh. Irvine seems ripe for a fade - the pre-ordained public dogs never seem to do well in the tourney.
Not a strong opinion on this one, but I'm curious to hear from someone who's seeing it differently.
Why Irvine, St2ee? I was leaning K State, so I'd be interested to hear perspective from the other side.
As I see it... K State obviously no Wade, but they still played tough without him in the Big 12 tourney. Irvine won 30 games (impressive), but I see only one win among those that impresses me, 80-75 against SMC - though, SMC did go through some growing pains to start the year. Beyond that, Irvine lost to Toldeo (60-67), Utah St (65-89), and Butler (54-71). They did beat a couple of MC bottom feeders in T A&M and Tulane, but... meh. Irvine seems ripe for a fade - the pre-ordained public dogs never seem to do well in the tourney.
Not a strong opinion on this one, but I'm curious to hear from someone who's seeing it differently.
With the exceptions, of course, of the two who covered yesterday in Yale and Murray St haha.
With the exceptions, of course, of the two who covered yesterday in Yale and Murray St haha.
Why Irvine, St2ee? I was leaning K State, so I'd be interested to hear perspective from the other side.
As I see it... K State obviously no Wade, but they still played tough without him in the Big 12 tourney. Irvine won 30 games (impressive), but I see only one win among those that impresses me, 80-75 against SMC - though, SMC did go through some growing pains to start the year. Beyond that, Irvine lost to Toldeo (60-67), Utah St (65-89), and Butler (54-71). They did beat a couple of MC bottom feeders in T A&M and Tulane, but... meh. Irvine seems ripe for a fade - the pre-ordained public dogs never seem to do well in the tourney.
Not a strong opinion on this one, but I'm curious to hear from someone who's seeing it differently.
Why Irvine, St2ee? I was leaning K State, so I'd be interested to hear perspective from the other side.
As I see it... K State obviously no Wade, but they still played tough without him in the Big 12 tourney. Irvine won 30 games (impressive), but I see only one win among those that impresses me, 80-75 against SMC - though, SMC did go through some growing pains to start the year. Beyond that, Irvine lost to Toldeo (60-67), Utah St (65-89), and Butler (54-71). They did beat a couple of MC bottom feeders in T A&M and Tulane, but... meh. Irvine seems ripe for a fade - the pre-ordained public dogs never seem to do well in the tourney.
Not a strong opinion on this one, but I'm curious to hear from someone who's seeing it differently.
Makes sense to me. And like I said, only a lean for me - haven't played the other side. Looks like you got a good number, with the line down to 3.5, and it's helpful to hear what you're seeing on it, thanks.
Sweep your card today, man - let's get it!
Makes sense to me. And like I said, only a lean for me - haven't played the other side. Looks like you got a good number, with the line down to 3.5, and it's helpful to hear what you're seeing on it, thanks.
Sweep your card today, man - let's get it!
Makes sense to me. And like I said, only a lean for me - haven't played the other side. Looks like you got a good number, with the line down to 3.5, and it's helpful to hear what you're seeing on it, thanks.
Sweep your card today, man - let's get it!
Makes sense to me. And like I said, only a lean for me - haven't played the other side. Looks like you got a good number, with the line down to 3.5, and it's helpful to hear what you're seeing on it, thanks.
Sweep your card today, man - let's get it!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.