ESPN host Pat McAfee has apologized for calling Caitlin Clark a “White b*tch” during a Monday show segment over whether race has played a factor in the WNBA rookie’s meteoric rise.
“I shouldn’t have used ‘white b*itch’ as a descriptor of Caitlin Clark. No matter the context.
ESPN host Pat McAfee has apologized for calling Caitlin Clark a “White b*tch” during a Monday show segment over whether race has played a factor in the WNBA rookie’s meteoric rise.
“I shouldn’t have used ‘white b*itch’ as a descriptor of Caitlin Clark. No matter the context.
ESPN host Pat McAfee has apologized for calling Caitlin Clark a “White b*tch” during a Monday show segment over whether race has played a factor in the WNBA rookie’s meteoric rise. “I shouldn’t have used ‘white b*itch’ as a descriptor of Caitlin Clark. No matter the context.
ESPN host Pat McAfee has apologized for calling Caitlin Clark a “White b*tch” during a Monday show segment over whether race has played a factor in the WNBA rookie’s meteoric rise. “I shouldn’t have used ‘white b*itch’ as a descriptor of Caitlin Clark. No matter the context.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: ESPN host Pat McAfee has apologized for calling Caitlin Clark a “White b*tch” during a Monday show segment over whether race has played a factor in the WNBA rookie’s meteoric rise. “I shouldn’t have used ‘white b*itch’ as a descriptor of Caitlin Clark. No matter the context. Crossed a line there for sure
@Zeus4par
Quite a bit of backlash too. Stephen Smith stuck his foot into it too. Don't like that big mouth at all.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: ESPN host Pat McAfee has apologized for calling Caitlin Clark a “White b*tch” during a Monday show segment over whether race has played a factor in the WNBA rookie’s meteoric rise. “I shouldn’t have used ‘white b*itch’ as a descriptor of Caitlin Clark. No matter the context. Crossed a line there for sure
@Zeus4par
Quite a bit of backlash too. Stephen Smith stuck his foot into it too. Don't like that big mouth at all.
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: ESPN host Pat McAfee has apologized for calling Caitlin Clark a “White b*tch” during a Monday show segment over whether race has played a factor in the WNBA rookie’s meteoric rise. “I shouldn’t have used ‘white b*itch’ as a descriptor of Caitlin Clark. No matter the context. Crossed a line there for sure @Zeus4par Quite a bit of backlash too. Stephen Smith stuck his foot into it too. Don't like that big mouth at all.
smith is a jerk
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: ESPN host Pat McAfee has apologized for calling Caitlin Clark a “White b*tch” during a Monday show segment over whether race has played a factor in the WNBA rookie’s meteoric rise. “I shouldn’t have used ‘white b*itch’ as a descriptor of Caitlin Clark. No matter the context. Crossed a line there for sure @Zeus4par Quite a bit of backlash too. Stephen Smith stuck his foot into it too. Don't like that big mouth at all.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I believe snubbing Caitlin Clark from the USA Olympic squad was an error. Clark continues to improve on her numbers - especially assists!! (ie, team player) - making that Olympic snub look really bad.
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I believe snubbing Caitlin Clark from the USA Olympic squad was an error. Clark continues to improve on her numbers - especially assists!! (ie, team player) - making that Olympic snub look really bad.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I believe snubbing Caitlin Clark from the USA Olympic squad was an error. Clark continues to improve on her numbers - especially assists!! (ie, team player) - making that Olympic snub look really bad.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I believe snubbing Caitlin Clark from the USA Olympic squad was an error. Clark continues to improve on her numbers - especially assists!! (ie, team player) - making that Olympic snub look really bad.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I believe snubbing Caitlin Clark from the USA Olympic squad was an error. Clark continues to improve on her numbers - especially assists!! (ie, team player) - making that Olympic snub look really bad. And her numbers almost seem to be accelerating!
matches a record with another 13 assists last night
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: I believe snubbing Caitlin Clark from the USA Olympic squad was an error. Clark continues to improve on her numbers - especially assists!! (ie, team player) - making that Olympic snub look really bad. And her numbers almost seem to be accelerating!
matches a record with another 13 assists last night
An official for the U.S. Department of Education, the federal enforcer of gender equity in sports, said Title IX rules will apply to future revenue dollars that schools share with college athletes, but the department declined to offer guidance on how schools should distribute the money between men and women to comply with the broad language of the law.
An official for the U.S. Department of Education, the federal enforcer of gender equity in sports, said Title IX rules will apply to future revenue dollars that schools share with college athletes, but the department declined to offer guidance on how schools should distribute the money between men and women to comply with the broad language of the law.
An official for the U.S. Department of Education, the federal enforcer of gender equity in sports, said Title IX rules will apply to future revenue dollars that schools share with college athletes, but the department declined to offer guidance on how schools should distribute the money between men and women to comply with the broad language of the law.
that is going to b interesting to see how they actually follow through
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
An official for the U.S. Department of Education, the federal enforcer of gender equity in sports, said Title IX rules will apply to future revenue dollars that schools share with college athletes, but the department declined to offer guidance on how schools should distribute the money between men and women to comply with the broad language of the law.
that is going to b interesting to see how they actually follow through
An official for the U.S. Department of Education, the federal enforcer of gender equity in sports, said Title IX rules will apply to future revenue dollars that schools share with college athletes, but the department declined to offer guidance on how schools should distribute the money between men and women to comply with the broad language of the law.
There are two new ways in which schools can help enrich their athletes. In addition to the potential upcoming revenue-share money, recent NCAA rule changes allow all schools to assist athletes in finding and fulfilling name, image and likeness deals funded by third parties.
An official for the U.S. Department of Education, the federal enforcer of gender equity in sports, said Title IX rules will apply to future revenue dollars that schools share with college athletes, but the department declined to offer guidance on how schools should distribute the money between men and women to comply with the broad language of the law.
There are two new ways in which schools can help enrich their athletes. In addition to the potential upcoming revenue-share money, recent NCAA rule changes allow all schools to assist athletes in finding and fulfilling name, image and likeness deals funded by third parties.
A new proposal to start the women's basketball season days earlier than the men's season could amplify the growing spotlight on the women's game.
The NCAA's men's and women's basketball oversight committees have proposed starting the women's basketball season on the Monday that falls 22 weeks before the women's Final Four each season, two days before the start of the men's season, beginning with the 2025-26 campaign.
A new proposal to start the women's basketball season days earlier than the men's season could amplify the growing spotlight on the women's game.
The NCAA's men's and women's basketball oversight committees have proposed starting the women's basketball season on the Monday that falls 22 weeks before the women's Final Four each season, two days before the start of the men's season, beginning with the 2025-26 campaign.
ESPN - A new proposal to start the women's basketball season days earlier than the men's season could amplify the growing spotlight on the women's game. The NCAA's men's and women's basketball oversight committees have proposed starting the women's basketball season on the Monday that falls 22 weeks before the women's Final Four each season, two days before the start of the men's season, beginning with the 2025-26 campaign.
With the women beginning their season on a Monday and the men commencing their season on a Wednesday, the women's game would "have increased marketing and promotional opportunities contributing to elevation of the sport at a campus level," per the NCAA's release.
ESPN - A new proposal to start the women's basketball season days earlier than the men's season could amplify the growing spotlight on the women's game. The NCAA's men's and women's basketball oversight committees have proposed starting the women's basketball season on the Monday that falls 22 weeks before the women's Final Four each season, two days before the start of the men's season, beginning with the 2025-26 campaign.
With the women beginning their season on a Monday and the men commencing their season on a Wednesday, the women's game would "have increased marketing and promotional opportunities contributing to elevation of the sport at a campus level," per the NCAA's release.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: ESPN - A new proposal to start the women's basketball season days earlier than the men's season could amplify the growing spotlight on the women's game. The NCAA's men's and women's basketball oversight committees have proposed starting the women's basketball season on the Monday that falls 22 weeks before the women's Final Four each season, two days before the start of the men's season, beginning with the 2025-26 campaign. With the women beginning their season on a Monday and the men commencing their season on a Wednesday, the women's game would "have increased marketing and promotional opportunities contributing to elevation of the sport at a campus level," per the NCAA's release.
The change would also help both sports avoid conflicts with Election Day and provide more flexibility for TV windows and venue demands.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: ESPN - A new proposal to start the women's basketball season days earlier than the men's season could amplify the growing spotlight on the women's game. The NCAA's men's and women's basketball oversight committees have proposed starting the women's basketball season on the Monday that falls 22 weeks before the women's Final Four each season, two days before the start of the men's season, beginning with the 2025-26 campaign. With the women beginning their season on a Monday and the men commencing their season on a Wednesday, the women's game would "have increased marketing and promotional opportunities contributing to elevation of the sport at a campus level," per the NCAA's release.
The change would also help both sports avoid conflicts with Election Day and provide more flexibility for TV windows and venue demands.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: ESPN - A new proposal to start the women's basketball season days earlier than the men's season could amplify the growing spotlight on the women's game. The NCAA's men's and women's basketball oversight committees have proposed starting the women's basketball season on the Monday that falls 22 weeks before the women's Final Four each season, two days before the start of the men's season, beginning with the 2025-26 campaign. With the women beginning their season on a Monday and the men commencing their season on a Wednesday, the women's game would "have increased marketing and promotional opportunities contributing to elevation of the sport at a campus level," per the NCAA's release.
sure ! hell why not ! good for the game !
the mens will always have their following and lose nothing if the women start a couple day earlier . no skin off their nose , but could help the womens profile even if only a little
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: ESPN - A new proposal to start the women's basketball season days earlier than the men's season could amplify the growing spotlight on the women's game. The NCAA's men's and women's basketball oversight committees have proposed starting the women's basketball season on the Monday that falls 22 weeks before the women's Final Four each season, two days before the start of the men's season, beginning with the 2025-26 campaign. With the women beginning their season on a Monday and the men commencing their season on a Wednesday, the women's game would "have increased marketing and promotional opportunities contributing to elevation of the sport at a campus level," per the NCAA's release.
sure ! hell why not ! good for the game !
the mens will always have their following and lose nothing if the women start a couple day earlier . no skin off their nose , but could help the womens profile even if only a little
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: The change would also help both sports avoid conflicts with Election Day and provide more flexibility for TV windows and venue demands. that should settle it as a win-win
Makes a lot of sense to me too......kudos to the WNCAA! Hope it is adopted!
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: The change would also help both sports avoid conflicts with Election Day and provide more flexibility for TV windows and venue demands. that should settle it as a win-win
Makes a lot of sense to me too......kudos to the WNCAA! Hope it is adopted!
The NCAA, its five power conferences and lawyers representing a class of Division I athletes filed the detailed terms of an antitrust lawsuit Friday that has the potential to reshape the business of college sports.
Friday's filing is the first of several important steps toward formalizing the agreement.
The new details outline how past athletes will share the $2.78 billion in damages that the NCAA has agreed to pay, sets up a new system for revenue sharing and outlines new roster limits for a long list of college sports, among other items.
The NCAA, its five power conferences and lawyers representing a class of Division I athletes filed the detailed terms of an antitrust lawsuit Friday that has the potential to reshape the business of college sports.
Friday's filing is the first of several important steps toward formalizing the agreement.
The new details outline how past athletes will share the $2.78 billion in damages that the NCAA has agreed to pay, sets up a new system for revenue sharing and outlines new roster limits for a long list of college sports, among other items.
HEADLINES today . . . The NCAA, its five power conferences and lawyers representing a class of Division I athletes filed the detailed terms of an antitrust lawsuit Friday that has the potential to reshape the business of college sports. Friday's filing is the first of several important steps toward formalizing the agreement. The new details outline how past athletes will share the $2.78 billion in damages that the NCAA has agreed to pay, sets up a new system for revenue sharing and outlines new roster limits for a long list of college sports, among other items.
Schools will be permitted for the first time to pay their athletes directly via name, image and likeness (NIL) deals under the terms of the settlement.
HEADLINES today . . . The NCAA, its five power conferences and lawyers representing a class of Division I athletes filed the detailed terms of an antitrust lawsuit Friday that has the potential to reshape the business of college sports. Friday's filing is the first of several important steps toward formalizing the agreement. The new details outline how past athletes will share the $2.78 billion in damages that the NCAA has agreed to pay, sets up a new system for revenue sharing and outlines new roster limits for a long list of college sports, among other items.
Schools will be permitted for the first time to pay their athletes directly via name, image and likeness (NIL) deals under the terms of the settlement.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HEADLINES today . . . The NCAA, its five power conferences and lawyers representing a class of Division I athletes filed the detailed terms of an antitrust lawsuit Friday that has the potential to reshape the business of college sports. Friday's filing is the first of several important steps toward formalizing the agreement. The new details outline how past athletes will share the $2.78 billion in damages that the NCAA has agreed to pay, sets up a new system for revenue sharing and outlines new roster limits for a long list of college sports, among other items. Schools will be permitted for the first time to pay their athletes directly via name, image and likeness (NIL) deals under the terms of the settlement.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: HEADLINES today . . . The NCAA, its five power conferences and lawyers representing a class of Division I athletes filed the detailed terms of an antitrust lawsuit Friday that has the potential to reshape the business of college sports. Friday's filing is the first of several important steps toward formalizing the agreement. The new details outline how past athletes will share the $2.78 billion in damages that the NCAA has agreed to pay, sets up a new system for revenue sharing and outlines new roster limits for a long list of college sports, among other items. Schools will be permitted for the first time to pay their athletes directly via name, image and likeness (NIL) deals under the terms of the settlement.
Plaintiffs' attorneys in a federal antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA that is not part of a recent $2.78 billion settlement agreement filed a motion Friday asking a judge to deny preliminary approval of the deal.
Attorneys in Fontenot v. the NCAA, which was filed in a Colorado District Court, say the agreement to three antitrust lawsuits facing the association and five major conferences is settling for "just pennies on the dollar."
The NCAA, Atlantic Coast Conference, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern Conference agreed in May to pay billions in damages to former and current college athletes who were denied the ability to earn money from their names, images and likeness, dating to 2016.
Plaintiffs' attorneys in a federal antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA that is not part of a recent $2.78 billion settlement agreement filed a motion Friday asking a judge to deny preliminary approval of the deal.
Attorneys in Fontenot v. the NCAA, which was filed in a Colorado District Court, say the agreement to three antitrust lawsuits facing the association and five major conferences is settling for "just pennies on the dollar."
The NCAA, Atlantic Coast Conference, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeastern Conference agreed in May to pay billions in damages to former and current college athletes who were denied the ability to earn money from their names, images and likeness, dating to 2016.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.