All Forums | College Basketball

GENERAL MEMBERSHIP TO BE TOP CAPPER THREAD

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 9250
Posts: 194
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1715
Posted: #176
for example:
 
35-0 on unc       WIN
16-1  ecu           WIN
27-0    RI           WIN
 
anything lower than 15 cappers is not a good play.  This will limit the final card to only a few STRONG plays.....SHOULD GET AROUND 80%  WINNERS
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 114
Posted: #177
The problem with this format is that everyone in this thread want to be in the top capers thread. The only true way to run this is to have the top cappers email you there picks and you post the consenses at 6pm. Other than that the numbers get scued by everyone wanting to have the top pick in thier posts.

Love the idea and keep up the great work. Hope we all can make lots of cash.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 26
Posted: #178

Quote Originally Posted by juicethis:

The problem with this format is that everyone in this thread want to be in the top capers thread. The only true way to run this is to have the top cappers email you there picks and you post the consenses at 6pm. Other than that the numbers get scued by everyone wanting to have the top pick in thier posts.

Love the idea and keep up the great work. Hope we all can make lots of cash.

 

LISTEN TO THIS MAN!!! WITH EVERYONE CHIMING IN WITH THERE 2 CENTS IT SEEMS THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE JUST AGREEING WITH POPULAR PICKS WITHOUT EVEN CAPPING GAMES.

AN APPROPRIATE SYSTEM WOULD BE DONE JUST LIKE MANIFESTO'S COLLEGE FOOTBALL CONSENSUS THREADS (WHICH I KNOW YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH GOALLINEBOB).

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 13710
Posted: #179
 It should be 1 play, your best play. It will make the winning percentages alot better.
Second mouse gets the cheese.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 7903
Posted: #180
hey bob so i find you in the NCAAB now.  No more foots for you?  Hope all is well.  can i be one of your top cappers?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 958
Posted: #181
Quote Originally Posted by tommyjones24:

RI,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 27-0   (win)
ALR ,,,,,,,,,,,,11-1   (loss)
UNC ,,,,,,,,,,,,35-0   (win)
ECU,,,,,,,,,,,,,16-1   (win)
RIDER,,,,,,,,,,11-0   (loss)
SIENA ,,,,,,,,,10-0   (loss)
FSU ,,,,,,,,,,,11-0     (loss)
SF ,,,,,,,,,,,,,14-0      (loss)
RICH,,,,,,,,,, 11-0     (win)
 
ouch 4-5....not quite how it was supposed to work out I suppose. That sucks.

 

I think you can't play every match, pick one and wait.The more bet you did less percentage you got to win.Also you guys live in Usa, wait the end of the first match and then if you lose put more units on the next one, so even if  you are 1-2 you got a profit.
Use the schedule!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 958
Posted: #182
Quote Originally Posted by panabetting:

New Orleans Privateers -Tulane Green Wave
Over 126,5 @ 1.77 bet365
 
 
13-3 since the beginning of the season
 
 

 

bad call for me.

13-4 so far

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 206
Posted: #183
Thanks Bob!
 
Although I went 5-2, I hit a 4 teamer and loaded up on UNC and Rhode Island.
 
Yesterday alone + just over 19 units!!!!
 
Let's keep getting better
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4417
Posted: #184
Hey Bob, thanks for your efforts!  This thread's so long, no wonder it makes computer problems.
For what it's worth, I don't know why so many people WANT to be called a Top Capper, when they know they suck!
Please stick with just your original list, it's much more accurate and better for long term winning.  These fools w/ 0-0 ytd, wtf is that?  lol
Thanks again my friend, you're



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 206
Posted: #185
I agree, is it more important to be regarded as a "top capper" or have a shit ton of money in your wad at the end of the day.
 
Hell you can call me the most brain dead degenerate, but as long as I am winning I could care less.  One thing that doesn't bode well for gambling is EGO.  Leave the capping to the pros (yes I do believe that we have a few).
 
I agree with Dawgprint, in that I'd rather have about 5-10 solid games with good cappers rating them, vs 15-20 games with a bunch of guys who seem to be throwing darts or simply tailing other members' picks.
 
For those of you that are good at what you do, and put forth the effort to get your work in to Bob on a daily basis I personally would like to thank you all!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 20078
Posted: #186
some results
 
RI,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 27-0 ,
UNC ,,,,,,,,,,,,35-0 and OVER 2-0
ECU,,,,,,,,,,,,,16-1
ALR ,,,,,,,,,,,,, 11-0
RIDER,,,,,,,,,,11-0
SIENA ,,,,,,,,,10-0
FSU ,,,,,,,,,,,11-0
SF ,,,,,,,,,,,,,14-0
RICH,,,,,,,,,, 11-0
 
OUR 3 TOP PLAYS WON
UNC
ECU
RI
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1715
Posted: #187
Quote Originally Posted by goallinebob:

some results
 
RI,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 27-0 ,
UNC ,,,,,,,,,,,,35-0 and OVER 2-0
ECU,,,,,,,,,,,,,16-1
ALR ,,,,,,,,,,,,, 11-0
RIDER,,,,,,,,,,11-0
SIENA ,,,,,,,,,10-0
FSU ,,,,,,,,,,,11-0
SF ,,,,,,,,,,,,,14-0
RICH,,,,,,,,,, 11-0
 
OUR 3 TOP PLAYS WON
UNC
ECU
RI
 

 

Thats what I am talking about....

Take the TOP 3 strongest plays and then post them. I would post only plays with 15 or more consensus cappers.

Perfect example was UNC, ECU, and RI.

Each one of these easily won. It will also save you time.

Thank you

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1292
Posted: #188
Quote Originally Posted by goallinebob:

some results
 
RI,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 27-0 ,
UNC ,,,,,,,,,,,,35-0 and OVER 2-0
ECU,,,,,,,,,,,,,16-1
ALR ,,,,,,,,,,,,, 11-0
RIDER,,,,,,,,,,11-0
SIENA ,,,,,,,,,10-0
FSU ,,,,,,,,,,,11-0
SF ,,,,,,,,,,,,,14-0
RICH,,,,,,,,,, 11-0
 
OUR 3 TOP PLAYS WON
UNC
ECU
RI
 

thanks for all the hard work bob, you might have a winning strategy going.  Not that it matters much, but UNC went Under.  Looked like it would go over based off the first half, but thankfully for me both teams scored much less in the 2h.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 13
Posted: #189
Quote Originally Posted by PUNISHERPIX:

OHIO -1.5
UNC -9.5
ECU ML
CAVS -15
TOLEDO ML (BIG PLAY)
C. BOBCATS -8.5


5 OUT OF 6 AIN'T BAD........
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 148
Posted: #190

7-3 yesterday

uconn -16

youngstown-11/2

coll charleston -41/2

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 33714
Posted: #191
      2-0
St.Marys pk
Tn-Ma -1.5
Butler +4
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 3733
Posted: #192
UNCG -8
UCONN -15
St MARY's PK
COl Charleston -5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #193
Sotuhern conf fan made all money of that conf last year....local book always questioned my plays last year....he learned from davidson the hard way.... numbers get tougher on COChar remainder of year take the early gift
 
UNGG by 10
Col Of Char by 13
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #194
sorry southern
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.