All Forums | College Basketball

***GWarner27's 1/17 CB Picks (67-35-3 65.7% YTD)***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 8579
Posts: 39
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #1
+29.385

Dogs: 33-16-3 +15.865
Favorites: 26-16 +8.82
Over: 4-1 +2.90
Under: 0-1 -1.10
First Half: 2-0 +2.00
Halftimes: 2-1 +0.90

November: 26-7 +18.465
December: 24-21-2 +1.40
January: 17-7-1 +9.52
February: 0-0 +0.00
March: 0-0 +0.00
April: 0-0 +0.00

2006-07: 68-70 (49.3%) -1.979
2007-08: 153-142-4 (51.9%) -4.141
2008-09: 144-142-2 (50.3%) -7.657
2009-10: 141-136-4 (50.9%) +1.294
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 11636
Posted: #2
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #3
Dogs winning SU: 23

Meaningless 3-pt at the buzzer: 2
OT screwjobs: 2
Losses by 1 or 1/2: 6
Chase record (trying to stop): 0-1

Yesterday: 2-0
-Providence with a major, Vanderbilt-like collapse so it's nice to see that things even out although I would much rather have had Vandy hold on and PC win, but it is what it is. St. John's won the foulfest at MSG thanks to ND not being able to make a perimeter shot to save their life, which was exactly what I predicted.

Monday notes:
uconn (dog) 1-2, mizzou 3-5, pitt 1-3, bay 7-9

leans:
Nova +2
Syracuse +5
KU -4
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 299
Posted: #4
Thanks for the picks yesterday. GL today!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 1202
Posted: #5
GL ON YOUR PICKS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1857
Posted: #6
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 22212
Posted: #7
Nova coming off a hard fought battle... but I still think UConn is a joke... should be an interesting game.

GL tonight
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by woopdurritis:

Nova coming off a hard fought battle... but I still think UConn is a joke... should be an interesting game.

GL tonight


Agree and I think Villanova is a joke also, but slightly less of a joke.

Fisher/Wayns should handle Kemba/Napier so it's all about the UConn bigs controlling the glass. They should do it, but they won't be able to score like the Nova frontcourt.

Excited to watch it while at work and look for a 2H play
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 4956
Posted: #9
bol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 24
Posted: #10

Nice Record!!! When does Warner tend to post his picks?

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by joshv9:

Nice Record!!! When does Warner tend to post his picks?



as soon as I lock 'em in
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 308
Posted: #12

gotta love this

Nova up to +2.5 , Cuse up to +6

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 3490
Posted: #13
I love the KU lean.  Baylor is 0-4 against top 100 RPI teams this year.  It is ridiculous a team with as much talent as the Bears isn't even sniffing the top 25.  Scott Drew might be doing less with more than any team in the nation this season.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 97
Posted: #14
looks like you stay on the Right Side of Vegas huh, The Under World doesn't like that. just kidding.stack those dollas up
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1890
Posted: #15

BOL Warner

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by aggieaccountant:

I love the KU lean.  Baylor is 0-4 against top 100 RPI teams this year.  It is ridiculous a team with as much talent as the Bears isn't even sniffing the top 25.  Scott Drew might be doing less with more than any team in the nation this season.


it's funny cuz he did such a great job building the team from scratch, literally, but he forgot to get a PG for this season. A.J. Walton is garbage, and they clearly miss Tweety Carter. I like Kansas, but this line stinks being so low considering KU was -8 @Iowa State and this Iowa State team blew BU out of the water just last game.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #17

I say "Lock in your leans!"

Nova and KU are solid. Pitt is scary good. "Undefeated" may be a past tense after tonight. BUT 6 POINTS...

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 33714
Posted: #18
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 66756
Posted: #19
GL.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1458
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by GWarner27:



it's funny cuz he did such a great job building the team from scratch, literally, but he forgot to get a PG for this season. A.J. Walton is garbage, and they clearly miss Tweety Carter. I like Kansas, but this line stinks being so low considering KU was -8 @Iowa State and this Iowa State team blew BU out of the water just last game.

I think Baylor is obviously getting a lot of respect from the run they had last year. This isn't a great Kansas team either but I think they match up well tonight and the lack of PG play like you mentioned is the reason why.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 308
Posted: #21
any official plays?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 688
Posted: #22
gl
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

I say "Lock in your leans!"

Nova and KU are solid. Pitt is scary good. "Undefeated" may be a past tense after tonight. BUT 6 POINTS...



i don't want to be the fish taking an undefeated team getting 6 on the road, but that's a substantial number considering Pitt's FT woes. Think about this: UConn was +7.5 in the Zoo and I really think I'd favor Syracuse by at least 8 on a neutral.

Don't trust Nova as I think they're overrated, and something smells about the KU line opening so low and then going down for a bit.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 135
Posted: #24
Yes I agree but both teams have some serious FT woes.
Is this line closer to Cuse +3 with Joseph?
Seems like Pitt can always find holes and have success attacking this zone.
How is the zone affected with Southerland instead of Joesph?
I think I lean on this under.
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by TheLiability:

Yes I agree but both teams have some serious FT woes.
Is this line closer to Cuse +3 with Joseph?
Seems like Pitt can always find holes and have success attacking this zone.
How is the zone affected with Southerland instead of Joesph?
I think I lean on this under.


Losing Joseph's versatility/athleticism is a problem, but they have a ton of size and length behind him.

I think his 3pt shot is the greatest absence, but this should be a low-scoring game and I just don't think a team that lives off of offensive rebounds is big enough to get them from such a deep frontcourt
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.