Guys if you all follow my top plays you too would be killing it this year. Yes my record is the best here on covers but the main thing is too make money at the end of the night regardless if some nights are on the loss side record wise and by the way isn't too many
0
Guys if you all follow my top plays you too would be killing it this year. Yes my record is the best here on covers but the main thing is too make money at the end of the night regardless if some nights are on the loss side record wise and by the way isn't too many
The juice does not matter when you continue to hammer the top plays look at that record and bankroll even if it makes you feel better taking 00 off it. I HAVE the best record here on covers hands down
0
The juice does not matter when you continue to hammer the top plays look at that record and bankroll even if it makes you feel better taking 00 off it. I HAVE the best record here on covers hands down
Bro I think the point is anyones record can be inflated constantly taking -170 to -220 ML favs .. Although you rnet profit I agree if actually risked is what it is
0
Bro I think the point is anyones record can be inflated constantly taking -170 to -220 ML favs .. Although you rnet profit I agree if actually risked is what it is
I am always intrigued by Diver's antics, and definitely do not agree with a lot of it, but even if you flat bet every one of his plays (including the big ML faves and buying points as he does) you would be up on there.
I show his record at 131-91-4 and up 19.7 units with a flat bet strategy. (I certainly could have made an error or missed a game here or there, but as you can see, my record for him is very different from his own)
This is no way shape or form means I condone playing big ML's and I certainly do not condone buying points on a basketball wager like he does.
What I don't get, and what I find silly is to include a "small" 20 million wager when you have a ML wager on your card that is risking 1 billion. That's the equivalent of someone risking $5000 on a game, but also throwing in a $100 play they are making. Not to mention, most of his "units" up until mid-Jan were less than 1mm.
But anyway, I've been on his case in the past, which is why I started tracking his numbers. I'm over going around in circles with him on it, but will give him credit for having a good season, even if it is with an very unorthodox method.
He likes the attention, but it's entertaining, so I will just roll with it, and wish him luck.
bk
0
I am always intrigued by Diver's antics, and definitely do not agree with a lot of it, but even if you flat bet every one of his plays (including the big ML faves and buying points as he does) you would be up on there.
I show his record at 131-91-4 and up 19.7 units with a flat bet strategy. (I certainly could have made an error or missed a game here or there, but as you can see, my record for him is very different from his own)
This is no way shape or form means I condone playing big ML's and I certainly do not condone buying points on a basketball wager like he does.
What I don't get, and what I find silly is to include a "small" 20 million wager when you have a ML wager on your card that is risking 1 billion. That's the equivalent of someone risking $5000 on a game, but also throwing in a $100 play they are making. Not to mention, most of his "units" up until mid-Jan were less than 1mm.
But anyway, I've been on his case in the past, which is why I started tracking his numbers. I'm over going around in circles with him on it, but will give him credit for having a good season, even if it is with an very unorthodox method.
He likes the attention, but it's entertaining, so I will just roll with it, and wish him luck.
I guess at the end of the day if you have $1 in your pocket and don't owe that $1, that is success in betting. What doesn't matter is what or how you make a wager, winning is winning.
0
I guess at the end of the day if you have $1 in your pocket and don't owe that $1, that is success in betting. What doesn't matter is what or how you make a wager, winning is winning.
I enjoy your picks Holydiver, but I will have to say that the only thing that matters is Win/Loss on here. Everyone has their own unit bet amount. The fact that you show a winning day monetarily, but have a losing card isn't that impressive to the people here who are looking for consistent winning percentages. It is more impressive to show your winning percentage than any real or pretend monetary winnings.
0
I enjoy your picks Holydiver, but I will have to say that the only thing that matters is Win/Loss on here. Everyone has their own unit bet amount. The fact that you show a winning day monetarily, but have a losing card isn't that impressive to the people here who are looking for consistent winning percentages. It is more impressive to show your winning percentage than any real or pretend monetary winnings.
I am always intrigued by Diver's antics, and definitely do not agree with a lot of it, but even if you flat bet every one of his plays (including the big ML faves and buying points as he does) you would be up on there.
I show his record at 131-91-4 and up 19.7 units with a flat bet strategy. (I certainly could have made an error or missed a game here or there, but as you can see, my record for him is very different from his own)
This is no way shape or form means I condone playing big ML's and I certainly do not condone buying points on a basketball wager like he does.
What I don't get, and what I find silly is to include a "small" 20 million wager when you have a ML wager on your card that is risking 1 billion. That's the equivalent of someone risking $5000 on a game, but also throwing in a $100 play they are making. Not to mention, most of his "units" up until mid-Jan were less than 1mm.
But anyway, I've been on his case in the past, which is why I started tracking his numbers. I'm over going around in circles with him on it, but will give him credit for having a good season, even if it is with an very unorthodox method.
He likes the attention, but it's entertaining, so I will just roll with it, and wish him luck.
bk
Cool story bro..... Big up hater!
0
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:
I am always intrigued by Diver's antics, and definitely do not agree with a lot of it, but even if you flat bet every one of his plays (including the big ML faves and buying points as he does) you would be up on there.
I show his record at 131-91-4 and up 19.7 units with a flat bet strategy. (I certainly could have made an error or missed a game here or there, but as you can see, my record for him is very different from his own)
This is no way shape or form means I condone playing big ML's and I certainly do not condone buying points on a basketball wager like he does.
What I don't get, and what I find silly is to include a "small" 20 million wager when you have a ML wager on your card that is risking 1 billion. That's the equivalent of someone risking $5000 on a game, but also throwing in a $100 play they are making. Not to mention, most of his "units" up until mid-Jan were less than 1mm.
But anyway, I've been on his case in the past, which is why I started tracking his numbers. I'm over going around in circles with him on it, but will give him credit for having a good season, even if it is with an very unorthodox method.
He likes the attention, but it's entertaining, so I will just roll with it, and wish him luck.
LOL...hey, I'd rather you label me a "hater" and be doing my due diligence and finding out the truth, than just believe his record and follow him blindly!! Just figured I'd share my point of view.
Martingalers gonna Martingale. BOL.
0
Quote Originally Posted by elgallo9:
Cool story bro..... Big up hater!
LOL...hey, I'd rather you label me a "hater" and be doing my due diligence and finding out the truth, than just believe his record and follow him blindly!! Just figured I'd share my point of view.
LOL...hey, I'd rather you label me a "hater" and be doing my due diligence and finding out the truth, than just believe his record and follow him blindly!! Just figured I'd share my point of view.
Martingalers gonna Martingale. BOL.
Come on bk you are so wrong my record is correct and you are way off I am not going to argue with you and post it everyday bol to you and again the best record here period
0
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:
LOL...hey, I'd rather you label me a "hater" and be doing my due diligence and finding out the truth, than just believe his record and follow him blindly!! Just figured I'd share my point of view.
Martingalers gonna Martingale. BOL.
Come on bk you are so wrong my record is correct and you are way off I am not going to argue with you and post it everyday bol to you and again the best record here period
Histrionic personality disorder (HPD) is defined by the American Psychiatric Association as a personality disorder characterized by a pattern of excessive emotions and attention-seeking, including an excessive need for approval, usually beginning in early adulthood. HPD affects four times as many women as men.[1]
0
Histrionic personality disorder (HPD) is defined by the American Psychiatric Association as a personality disorder characterized by a pattern of excessive emotions and attention-seeking, including an excessive need for approval, usually beginning in early adulthood. HPD affects four times as many women as men.[1]
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
