ANOTHER GREAT DAY YESTERDAY ON A TOUGH WAGERING DAY WITH MANY UPSETS. I HIT MANY TOP PLAYS YESTERDAY AND LOOKING TO CONTINUE TODAY WITH PINPOINT ACCURACY
7 - 5 YESTERDAY
14 - 7 PAST 2 DAYS
68 - 39 PAST 11 DAYS
+690,000,000,000* YESTERDAY
233 - 154 - 4 YTD
+1,731,272,664,000* BANKROLL
CINCY (ML) -150 (500,000,000,000*)
DAYTON +8.5 -150 (100,000,000,000*)
AMERICAN +14.5 -130 (40,000,000,000*)
COLORADO +8.5 -150 (20,000,000,000*)
SYRACUSE (ML) -1000 (500,000,000,000*)
BYU +7 -150 (20,000,000,000*)
ALBANY +22 -130 (10,000,000,000*)
UCONN (ML) -220 (100,000,000,000*)
OKLAHOMA (ML) -170 (40,000,000,000*)
MANHATTAN +18.5 -150 (10,000,000,000*)
NEW MEXICO ST +9 -150 (100,000,000,000*)
MICHIGAN (ML) -1800 (800,000,000,000*)
I AM LOOKING INTO TODAYS CARD AND LOVE 2 GAMES AGAIN FOR SURE. I WILL POST AS SOON AS I CAN.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
ANOTHER GREAT DAY YESTERDAY ON A TOUGH WAGERING DAY WITH MANY UPSETS. I HIT MANY TOP PLAYS YESTERDAY AND LOOKING TO CONTINUE TODAY WITH PINPOINT ACCURACY
7 - 5 YESTERDAY
14 - 7 PAST 2 DAYS
68 - 39 PAST 11 DAYS
+690,000,000,000* YESTERDAY
233 - 154 - 4 YTD
+1,731,272,664,000* BANKROLL
CINCY (ML) -150 (500,000,000,000*)
DAYTON +8.5 -150 (100,000,000,000*)
AMERICAN +14.5 -130 (40,000,000,000*)
COLORADO +8.5 -150 (20,000,000,000*)
SYRACUSE (ML) -1000 (500,000,000,000*)
BYU +7 -150 (20,000,000,000*)
ALBANY +22 -130 (10,000,000,000*)
UCONN (ML) -220 (100,000,000,000*)
OKLAHOMA (ML) -170 (40,000,000,000*)
MANHATTAN +18.5 -150 (10,000,000,000*)
NEW MEXICO ST +9 -150 (100,000,000,000*)
MICHIGAN (ML) -1800 (800,000,000,000*)
I AM LOOKING INTO TODAYS CARD AND LOVE 2 GAMES AGAIN FOR SURE. I WILL POST AS SOON AS I CAN.
So to win your Michigan ML (-1800) bet of 800,000,000,000 (800 billion), you had to bet 14,400,000,000,000 (14.4 trillion), correct? Impressive.
Today you're risking 6,000,000,000,000 (6 trillion) to win 500,000,000,000 (500 billion) on Duke ML (-1200). Also very impressive.
You're risking risking 710 billion on your remaining 5 bets for today (most of which are -150 spreads, which is fine) so even if they were to do poorly (1-4 or 2-3), you would still manage to be up for the day all thanks to your ridiculously obscure, highly-juiced money line plays (-1200, -1800, etc.) and your infinite bankroll.
Give this man a round of applause everyone.
0
holydiver...
So to win your Michigan ML (-1800) bet of 800,000,000,000 (800 billion), you had to bet 14,400,000,000,000 (14.4 trillion), correct? Impressive.
Today you're risking 6,000,000,000,000 (6 trillion) to win 500,000,000,000 (500 billion) on Duke ML (-1200). Also very impressive.
You're risking risking 710 billion on your remaining 5 bets for today (most of which are -150 spreads, which is fine) so even if they were to do poorly (1-4 or 2-3), you would still manage to be up for the day all thanks to your ridiculously obscure, highly-juiced money line plays (-1200, -1800, etc.) and your infinite bankroll.
So to win your Michigan ML (-1800) bet of 800,000,000,000 (800 billion), you had to bet 14,400,000,000,000 (14.4 trillion), correct? Impressive.
Today you're risking 6,000,000,000,000 (6 trillion) to win 500,000,000,000 (500 billion) on Duke ML (-1200). Also very impressive.
You're risking risking 710 billion on your remaining 5 bets for today (most of which are -150 spreads, which is fine) so even if they were to do poorly (1-4 or 2-3), you would still manage to be up for the day all thanks to your ridiculously obscure, highly-juiced money line plays (-1200, -1800, etc.) and your infinite bankroll.
Give this man a round of applause everyone.
That is a LOT of money.
Glad it is only half his estate
0
Quote Originally Posted by FullyLoaded:
holydiver...
So to win your Michigan ML (-1800) bet of 800,000,000,000 (800 billion), you had to bet 14,400,000,000,000 (14.4 trillion), correct? Impressive.
Today you're risking 6,000,000,000,000 (6 trillion) to win 500,000,000,000 (500 billion) on Duke ML (-1200). Also very impressive.
You're risking risking 710 billion on your remaining 5 bets for today (most of which are -150 spreads, which is fine) so even if they were to do poorly (1-4 or 2-3), you would still manage to be up for the day all thanks to your ridiculously obscure, highly-juiced money line plays (-1200, -1800, etc.) and your infinite bankroll.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.