Wow wow you just committed a cardinal mistake, all these "we know bettet than you " will call you a tool or will tell you there is not such a thing as fixing a game or that it doesn't work that way and all this bs they say to not admit the true. The total was about 126 and it hit right there which made me think bets were pretty even and they were more than happy with the juice but where they made the big ducats was with second half bets by making sure it sailed over & Cal covering
0
Wow wow you just committed a cardinal mistake, all these "we know bettet than you " will call you a tool or will tell you there is not such a thing as fixing a game or that it doesn't work that way and all this bs they say to not admit the true. The total was about 126 and it hit right there which made me think bets were pretty even and they were more than happy with the juice but where they made the big ducats was with second half bets by making sure it sailed over & Cal covering
Wow wow you just committed a cardinal mistake, all these "we know bettet than you " will call you a tool or will tell you there is not such a thing as fixing a game or that it doesn't work that way and all this bs they say to not admit the true. The total was about 126 and it hit right there which made me think bets were pretty even and they were more than happy with the juice but where they made the big ducats was with second half bets by making sure it sailed over & Cal covering
Nice story...you really think Vegas had this is mind the whole time? Please use punctuation next time...makes for an easier read.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sergioscar:
Wow wow you just committed a cardinal mistake, all these "we know bettet than you " will call you a tool or will tell you there is not such a thing as fixing a game or that it doesn't work that way and all this bs they say to not admit the true. The total was about 126 and it hit right there which made me think bets were pretty even and they were more than happy with the juice but where they made the big ducats was with second half bets by making sure it sailed over & Cal covering
Nice story...you really think Vegas had this is mind the whole time? Please use punctuation next time...makes for an easier read.
Yes that appeared to be the case , cal called the TO to set up the foul, then did foul , twice, ref swallowed the whistle , true gag job, both by the refs ant the cuse
0
Yes that appeared to be the case , cal called the TO to set up the foul, then did foul , twice, ref swallowed the whistle , true gag job, both by the refs ant the cuse
Well probably not the whole time!!!!, but I also noticed, at least with my sportsbook, that they were offering "live bets" just on the side but not on the totals
0
Well probably not the whole time!!!!, but I also noticed, at least with my sportsbook, that they were offering "live bets" just on the side but not on the totals
Very possible. Why call foul with 2 seconds left and down 6! Refs who did the Ucla and Arizona game!!!!! I think it was them teams. Call foul with 1 second for a push
0
Very possible. Why call foul with 2 seconds left and down 6! Refs who did the Ucla and Arizona game!!!!! I think it was them teams. Call foul with 1 second for a push
Alright here is what happened!!! Take this as a joke but it is not far from reality. Vegas has a lot of action on the total , pretty even though, so they are happy with the big juice. Then comes second half bets, very large since it is the last game of the night, public is heavy on the under 69. So Vegas sees a great opportunity and makes the " call" and then you see all that happened to make it happen, hr throw, refs not calling fouls at the end , etc. Yes I am a tool !!!!! But i can't believe in all this coincidences!!!!!! And if you dont believe it please check the second half on the bulls/ indiana game, line set at 89 1/2 landed exactly at 88 after a whooping 52 3rd quarter hand stayed at 88 with almost a minute to go??
0
Alright here is what happened!!! Take this as a joke but it is not far from reality. Vegas has a lot of action on the total , pretty even though, so they are happy with the big juice. Then comes second half bets, very large since it is the last game of the night, public is heavy on the under 69. So Vegas sees a great opportunity and makes the " call" and then you see all that happened to make it happen, hr throw, refs not calling fouls at the end , etc. Yes I am a tool !!!!! But i can't believe in all this coincidences!!!!!! And if you dont believe it please check the second half on the bulls/ indiana game, line set at 89 1/2 landed exactly at 88 after a whooping 52 3rd quarter hand stayed at 88 with almost a minute to go??
My memory of fixes go es back a few decades. I remember several games when Allan Iverson was with Georgetown in the NCAAs and vs Princeton at the end of the game he went to the line just about every time for hand check fouls, just touching him; refs did it again vs Weber State. Georgetown won both games by a single point. refs have a mindset too about which team is "supposed to win" so I'm not sure it's all gambling and nefarious stuff, maybe just mental ly not being subjective and seperated from the emotuions of the game. Having opinions, etc. I hate it when refs have opinions--no place for that as a referee. Just call em.
Western Kentucky was screwed by a phantom foul that would've given them a chance to close within a single score. Bad whistle.
0
My memory of fixes go es back a few decades. I remember several games when Allan Iverson was with Georgetown in the NCAAs and vs Princeton at the end of the game he went to the line just about every time for hand check fouls, just touching him; refs did it again vs Weber State. Georgetown won both games by a single point. refs have a mindset too about which team is "supposed to win" so I'm not sure it's all gambling and nefarious stuff, maybe just mental ly not being subjective and seperated from the emotuions of the game. Having opinions, etc. I hate it when refs have opinions--no place for that as a referee. Just call em.
Western Kentucky was screwed by a phantom foul that would've given them a chance to close within a single score. Bad whistle.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.