If you bet every underdog in the Tourney

I'm gonna try and track this for the entire tournament.  Seen that this is profitable. Betting ML for all underdogs. (Gonna use FanDuel as the book) Using $100 bets.

Day 1

Maryland +114 WINNER +$114

Furman +184 WINNER +$184

Missouri +102 WINNER +$102

Howard +2000 LOSER -$100

Texas A&M CC +2400 LOSER -$100

Charleston +210 LOSER -$100

Princeton +890 WINNER $+890

Illinois +115 LOSER -$100

Iowa +102 LOSER -$100

Oral Roberts +202 LOSER -$100

Boise St. +115 LOSER -$100

Colgate +660 LOSER -$100

Lafayette +580 LOSER -$100

Northern Kentucky +1600 LOSER -$100

UNC Asheville +1280 LOSER -$100

Penn State +125 WINNER +$125

Profit $315  Record 5-9

GL 

Take Princeton out and you’d be down big. Just pure luck on that game 

@PublicJoe

 ?? But that’s not what happened? If that’s the case, take out all the dogs who lost and you’ll be up big…a win is a win 

Tomorrow is a good day to bet dogs.  You get good teams + money on neutral courts 

Uhhhh....

If every underdog who wins is pure luck - nobody would ever bet an underdog.

The idea of betting dogs at +900ish is that you only have to win 1 out of 9 to be profitable.  You dont actually expect to win an individual bet.  So you could say every 9-1 dog that hits is "lucky"

Where was your day 1 post? 

I believe if you did this last year you would've finished up around $1100 but that's why I want to track it.  

@vanzack

 Like vanzack said you only need to win a couple, yea its probably a waste to bet the 16's but you are getting 20 to 1 on those. If you hit that off the get go you are almost sure to be in big profit after betting the rest of the tournament, heck that would pay for 20 of the losses.  

Betting all the unders would had been profitable too

8-8 ats

Use to be able to bet dogs heavy and win

Not anymore

Not for years

Only dog you need Auburn +200.  All in