neil...thanks for the early thoughts on the illini......they look great at home..but ohio st is a beast to wrekon with right here..think im staying away and enjoying this one. also,siena...i liked this play out of the gate but after your thoughts on motivation factor....i got to put it on a dnp also....for years siena has beaten up on teams like st petes...paybak time?
ok bud..way to have dicipline tonight and stay away from small card.
btw...what ever happened to the ivy league games on friday nights? gl ryno
0
neil...thanks for the early thoughts on the illini......they look great at home..but ohio st is a beast to wrekon with right here..think im staying away and enjoying this one. also,siena...i liked this play out of the gate but after your thoughts on motivation factor....i got to put it on a dnp also....for years siena has beaten up on teams like st petes...paybak time?
ok bud..way to have dicipline tonight and stay away from small card.
btw...what ever happened to the ivy league games on friday nights? gl ryno
looking ahead to saturday, w/o the true lines, I like villa+5 at the dome, Colo-2,, Tamu-8, Tex+4 and ml, and Miss St.-7. Your thoughts and expert advice would help a great deal. Bol. Love your meaningful write-ups.
0
neil,
looking ahead to saturday, w/o the true lines, I like villa+5 at the dome, Colo-2,, Tamu-8, Tex+4 and ml, and Miss St.-7. Your thoughts and expert advice would help a great deal. Bol. Love your meaningful write-ups.
NROPP: "1/17 Results: 3-1 Yesterday. Appalachian State gets on the board with a win, now I need them to lay an egg at Citadel so I can catch double digits at COC Saturday. Kansas looked pretty good, Baylor looked like they have given up. COC lost at Chattanooga, pretty big upset."
NROPP: "1/17 Results: 3-1 Yesterday. Appalachian State gets on the board with a win, now I need them to lay an egg at Citadel so I can catch double digits at COC Saturday. Kansas looked pretty good, Baylor looked like they have given up. COC lost at Chattanooga, pretty big upset."
NROPP: "1/17 Results: 3-1 Yesterday. Appalachian State gets on the board with a win, now I need them to lay an egg at Citadel so I can catch double digits at COC Saturday. Kansas looked pretty good, Baylor looked like they have given up. COC lost at Chattanooga, pretty big upset."
NROPP: "1/17 Results: 3-1 Yesterday. Appalachian State gets on the board with a win, now I need them to lay an egg at Citadel so I can catch double digits at COC Saturday. Kansas looked pretty good, Baylor looked like they have given up. COC lost at Chattanooga, pretty big upset."
norpp do you have any thoughts on the st.johns under i think it should be in the mid 130s looks like a solid under also notre dame looks like a bounce back after marq killed them in wisconsin thanks.
0
norpp do you have any thoughts on the st.johns under i think it should be in the mid 130s looks like a solid under also notre dame looks like a bounce back after marq killed them in wisconsin thanks.
norpp do you have any thoughts on the st.johns under i think it should be in the mid 130s looks like a solid under also notre dame looks like a bounce back after marq killed them in wisconsin thanks.
You're probably right on the money with the mid 130's for STJ/Cincy. I won't even be interested in that game.
As for ND, it's a nice revenge angle. Sadly, they struggle to defend these types of attacking teams. Not sure I can back them here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bruuuuuuce:
norpp do you have any thoughts on the st.johns under i think it should be in the mid 130s looks like a solid under also notre dame looks like a bounce back after marq killed them in wisconsin thanks.
You're probably right on the money with the mid 130's for STJ/Cincy. I won't even be interested in that game.
As for ND, it's a nice revenge angle. Sadly, they struggle to defend these types of attacking teams. Not sure I can back them here.
Can you email me at crussell4498@aol.com? I have a proposal for you. It won't be a waste of time but i was hoping to email you a few thoughts privately. Thanks in advance.
0
Neil,
Can you email me at crussell4498@aol.com? I have a proposal for you. It won't be a waste of time but i was hoping to email you a few thoughts privately. Thanks in advance.
Can you email me at crussell4498@aol.com? I have a proposal for you. It won't be a waste of time but i was hoping to email you a few thoughts privately. Thanks in advance.
Not interested.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by InsideEdge:
Neil,
Can you email me at crussell4498@aol.com? I have a proposal for you. It won't be a waste of time but i was hoping to email you a few thoughts privately. Thanks in advance.
Considering playing St. Peters OVER 121 tonight. Thinking with Siena getting their main guy back they'll be able to put up 65 on St Peters and feel STP will play well enough to keep it close. Thinking 67-64 someone. Your thoughts?
0
Nropp...
Considering playing St. Peters OVER 121 tonight. Thinking with Siena getting their main guy back they'll be able to put up 65 on St Peters and feel STP will play well enough to keep it close. Thinking 67-64 someone. Your thoughts?
Do you have a media feed regarding the St. Peters coach thinking/saying this. Thanks because that is a huge determining factor and would like to know where you got that from.
0
Nropp-
Do you have a media feed regarding the St. Peters coach thinking/saying this. Thanks because that is a huge determining factor and would like to know where you got that from.
Found fact of it but I am not sure why it would change now? Only because of Jenkins? If you throw Jackson back in then I think that makes Jenkins a different player. I think revenge has been on St. Peters mind for 4 years now not just this year. Read as below..
STPE
0
Found fact of it but I am not sure why it would change now? Only because of Jenkins? If you throw Jackson back in then I think that makes Jenkins a different player. I think revenge has been on St. Peters mind for 4 years now not just this year. Read as below..
It didn't come up but Sieana has beaten St. Peters since 06... Just the same that St. Peters hasn't beaten Siena since 06 Siena has the mentality that they haven't lost to them since 06. I think I would take the team that players know they are the underdog (because they read the lines) to a team they haven't lost to in 4 years.
0
It didn't come up but Sieana has beaten St. Peters since 06... Just the same that St. Peters hasn't beaten Siena since 06 Siena has the mentality that they haven't lost to them since 06. I think I would take the team that players know they are the underdog (because they read the lines) to a team they haven't lost to in 4 years.
Neil .. Running down a few Sat Plays .. Need your opinion if possible ..
Like Ole Miss -2 at Lsu
Colorado -3 at Okla
This pick looks a bit too easy which scares me a bit
Tex a/m -5 vs an overrated K ST team ..
Port + 1 at Santa Clara ... Port off the upset loss and SC off upset win ..
I watch a ton of Big12 and circled the exact same games you've got highlighted. A&M plays great at home (but coming off road loss @ UT). Colorado is underrated and playing on road at very poor OU team.
I personally have those games capped at A&M -7 and Colo -6. But you're definitely right, something seems too good to be true here w/ the lines.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Upside:
Neil .. Running down a few Sat Plays .. Need your opinion if possible ..
Like Ole Miss -2 at Lsu
Colorado -3 at Okla
This pick looks a bit too easy which scares me a bit
Tex a/m -5 vs an overrated K ST team ..
Port + 1 at Santa Clara ... Port off the upset loss and SC off upset win ..
I watch a ton of Big12 and circled the exact same games you've got highlighted. A&M plays great at home (but coming off road loss @ UT). Colorado is underrated and playing on road at very poor OU team.
I personally have those games capped at A&M -7 and Colo -6. But you're definitely right, something seems too good to be true here w/ the lines.
It didn't come up but Sieana has beaten St. Peters since 06... Just the same that St. Peters hasn't beaten Siena since 06 Siena has the mentality that they haven't lost to them since 06. I think I would take the team that players know they are the underdog (because they read the lines) to a team they haven't lost to in 4 years.
St Peters is the play bud.... Like Nropp said, they are the more motivated team and the line reflects this... I know you WANT to take Siena, and you probably will and might be right, but any GOOD capper in the world is gonna tell you ST PETERS or NO PLAY
You should stop coming into this thread trying to get someone to confir m ur reasons for betting Siena. It is right there plain as day. Dont know what your trying to accomplish.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tkells1414:
It didn't come up but Sieana has beaten St. Peters since 06... Just the same that St. Peters hasn't beaten Siena since 06 Siena has the mentality that they haven't lost to them since 06. I think I would take the team that players know they are the underdog (because they read the lines) to a team they haven't lost to in 4 years.
St Peters is the play bud.... Like Nropp said, they are the more motivated team and the line reflects this... I know you WANT to take Siena, and you probably will and might be right, but any GOOD capper in the world is gonna tell you ST PETERS or NO PLAY
You should stop coming into this thread trying to get someone to confir m ur reasons for betting Siena. It is right there plain as day. Dont know what your trying to accomplish.
Was looking for a discussion. Im not trying to come in the room all mighty one. If you took it that way my apologies. I think auburn gets up for florida coming to town but it doesn't mean they are going to beat them.
0
Was looking for a discussion. Im not trying to come in the room all mighty one. If you took it that way my apologies. I think auburn gets up for florida coming to town but it doesn't mean they are going to beat them.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
