All Forums | College Basketball

KENTUCKY DOESN'T FOUL

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1893
Posts: 38
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 3307
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by Stevie_Boy:



You do realize Kentucky can miss the last free throw on purpose and time would then expire, with no chance of a Michigan score

 There would be 2.4 seconds to advance the ball for a game winning shot.  


 Even middle school teams have hit 3/4 court game winning shots with regularity.  
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 5692
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by -29-:



UK fouls immediatley as the in bounds pass goes to Stauskas and that puts him on the line with 2.4 seconds left.

 He makes both free throws to cut the lead to 1 and then Michigan fouls Dakari Johnson before the ball is inbounded. Now UK has a 45% FT shooter shooting a one and one, nursing a one point lead with 2.4 seconds remaining.

Your dumber than I thought man your assuming the defensive player will immediately be in position to foul before Stauskas goes up. If you replay the last play you can see that Stauskas had a extra step on his defender got a dribble off before the defender was back in position. If Kentucky where to foul Stauskas would be shooting 3 free throws and the game would of gone to OT. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 1665
Posted: #28
2.4 seconds lol...there would be probably 1.0 second and i am being generous there
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 5692
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by -29-:



UK fouls immediatley as the in bounds pass goes to Stauskas and that puts him on the line with 2.4 seconds left.

 He makes both free throws to cut the lead to 1 and then Michigan fouls Dakari Johnson before the ball is inbounded. Now UK has a 45% FT shooter shooting a one and one, nursing a one point lead with 2.4 seconds remaining.

Your dumber than I thought man. With 2.6 secs left to go you would need to be in perfect defensive position to foul before the player goes into his shooting motion. Staukas clearly had a step on his defender and he even had time to take a extra dribble but he didn't he shot it right away. If kentucky took your advice this game would of gone to overtime. No coach in there right mind would advice his team up 3 with 2.6 secs left to go to foul thats just dumb. Worst case scenario the other team makes a 30 foot contested prayer and the game goes to overtime. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 3307
Posted: #30
[Quote: Originally Posted by its_1999_my]

Your dumber than I thought man. With 2.6 secs left to go you would need to be in perfect defensive position to foul before the player goes into his shooting motion. Staukas clearly had a step on his defender and he even had time to take a extra dribble but he didn't he shot it right away. If kentucky took your advice this game would of gone to overtime. No coach in there right mind would advice his team up 3 with 2.6 secs left to go to foul thats just dumb. Worst case scenario the other team makes a 30 foot contested prayer and the game goes to overtime. 
[/Quote}


 You're even dumber than you thought that I was. First of all, I am advocating that NOT fouling was the proper call and secondly, it's you're not your if you are striving for grammatical excellence. 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 10473
Posted: #31
get over it,,,,its gambling
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1553
Posted: #32
i think they did the right thing worse case it gets tied by a miracle 3 pointer at the buzzer from half court or beyond good call coach cal
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 3288
Posted: #33
It comes down to 2 scenarios.

You foul Michigan and take a chance they make first FT and then purposely miss 2nd FT and get rebound and make the put-back for the tie...................OR

You defend the entire length of the floor, defend the inbounds, and make Michigan take at best a half court shot for the tie.

Looks like an easy choice to me, and fouling is not the way to go there.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 7041
Posted: #34

Quote Originally Posted by atl4tigerfan:

It comes down to 2 scenarios.

You foul Michigan and take a chance they make first FT and then purposely miss 2nd FT and get rebound and make the put-back for the tie...................OR

You defend the entire length of the floor, defend the inbounds, and make Michigan take at best a half court shot for the tie.

Looks like an easy choice to me, and fouling is not the way to go there.


Agreed...its not about covering, its about winning the game for the teams playing..lets see a half court mircule shot or a made ft and a tip for the tie..easy choice there...plus mich just tied the game on a tip the poss before...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 337
Posted: #35
With 2 secs left, they wouldnt have time to get set for a good look
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 42
Posted: #36
Would be dumb to foul. You risk Stauskas in mid shooting motion to shoot 3 FTs. Or easily he could make the first and miss the second and see some fluke over the back foul/tie-up, or worst case scenario a tip in. Not to mention the refs have been atrocious and I would not want it to come down to that. With all that considered, I'd much rather take my chances on missing a half court shot instead. And you said that 2.6 sec is enough to get a good shot...Well he released the ball with 1.5 sec left so there may as well have only been 1.1 seconds. Also he shot it immediately so if they fouled it would have been 3 shots. So dumb. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 372
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by mikebdb:

cant win them all






Lol
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 3288
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by BlackMamba14:

Would be dumb to foul. You risk Stauskas in mid shooting motion to shoot 3 FTs. Or easily he could make the first and miss the second and see some fluke over the back foul/tie-up, or worst case scenario a tip in. Not to mention the refs have been atrocious and I would not want it to come down to that. With all that considered, I'd much rather take my chances on missing a half court shot instead. And you said that 2.6 sec is enough to get a good shot...Well he released the ball with 1.5 sec left so there may as well have only been 1.1 seconds. Also he shot it immediately so if they fouled it would have been 3 shots. So dumb. 


Just to clarify I don't think OP was talking about fouling on a 3 point shot.  He was talking about Kentucky fouling on the inbounds or before to put Michigan on the line for only 2 shots.

But you still don't do that in this scenario.
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.