@KingScorpio
LOL... I've followed you from time to time throughout the years, and you've never achieved what KC is doing right now... Not close... Take a hike bro
@KingScorpio
LOL... I've followed you from time to time throughout the years, and you've never achieved what KC is doing right now... Not close... Take a hike bro
@KingScorpio
LOL... I've followed you from time to time throughout the years, and you've never achieved what KC is doing right now... Not close... Take a hike bro
@jaybucko
I have been here for many years. He is not respected at all. He is ignorant and I have read many of his posts. The fact you are supporting him after what he said about a true respected capper in KC (not having a real record) shocks me but tells me about you.
@jaybucko
I have been here for many years. He is not respected at all. He is ignorant and I have read many of his posts. The fact you are supporting him after what he said about a true respected capper in KC (not having a real record) shocks me but tells me about you.
Who said anything about respect? I mentioned he’s a solid capper, which he is. Don’t take the internet so serious bud. Now, log back out.
Who said anything about respect? I mentioned he’s a solid capper, which he is. Don’t take the internet so serious bud. Now, log back out.
Appreciate the support fellas, can’t please everyone. I just post what I bet, and to me that’s integrity. I posted UCF -3 last week, but laying points on a short favorite has bit me many times due to a meaningless shot at the buzzer. For me, it really just depends on the game how I play it. I know not everyone will approve of that approach, but to each their own
Appreciate the support fellas, can’t please everyone. I just post what I bet, and to me that’s integrity. I posted UCF -3 last week, but laying points on a short favorite has bit me many times due to a meaningless shot at the buzzer. For me, it really just depends on the game how I play it. I know not everyone will approve of that approach, but to each their own
@KingScorpio
Lol ummmm you do realize that if you bet the ml when he put his play out the ml would have been like -125 which isn't that bad at all... how are you in hall of fame on covers if you dont understand stuff like that... do you always play ml on small underdogs. Because those points are meaningless? If you're confident they'll cover 2, just bet the ml I mean its the exact same thing, right? Hey am I right? Look at me, look at me! Ignore his record and focus on me! I'll win you more money just commenting on other peoples posts! Weeeeee
@KingScorpio
Lol ummmm you do realize that if you bet the ml when he put his play out the ml would have been like -125 which isn't that bad at all... how are you in hall of fame on covers if you dont understand stuff like that... do you always play ml on small underdogs. Because those points are meaningless? If you're confident they'll cover 2, just bet the ml I mean its the exact same thing, right? Hey am I right? Look at me, look at me! Ignore his record and focus on me! I'll win you more money just commenting on other peoples posts! Weeeeee
KS is who he is...he's a very solid cbb capper but also has a bit of a green streak. Last year he and I were both hitting a great % of our plays, we were 2 of maybe 10-15 guys who posted daily, he never came in my threads, I never came in his...
Then i had my first losing streak of year (I believe it was an L3 or maybe L4), all of a sudden he was in my threads giving me the business...
I hear what he's saying here in regards to the ML play, but it's KCs thread, he can bet however he wants...bol to everyone
KS is who he is...he's a very solid cbb capper but also has a bit of a green streak. Last year he and I were both hitting a great % of our plays, we were 2 of maybe 10-15 guys who posted daily, he never came in my threads, I never came in his...
Then i had my first losing streak of year (I believe it was an L3 or maybe L4), all of a sudden he was in my threads giving me the business...
I hear what he's saying here in regards to the ML play, but it's KCs thread, he can bet however he wants...bol to everyone
Good post Eddy and agree completely. A win is a win, even if laying -1000000000000000... doesn't mean I have to follow, but most people get the point.
Good post Eddy and agree completely. A win is a win, even if laying -1000000000000000... doesn't mean I have to follow, but most people get the point.
@KC_4_LIFE
Amazing...so the standard for being a successful capper is no longer a guy's capping record according to "The Azzzterisk King"...
now if you don't lay the points a W doesn't count...LmFaO. And just like you mentioned about MLB...funny if he wasn't so sad.
How many times we see really good cappers take the ML on a tough game?
@KC_4_LIFE
Amazing...so the standard for being a successful capper is no longer a guy's capping record according to "The Azzzterisk King"...
now if you don't lay the points a W doesn't count...LmFaO. And just like you mentioned about MLB...funny if he wasn't so sad.
How many times we see really good cappers take the ML on a tough game?
KS has a standing issue with folks betting money lines who report their record with W/L. Not sure why he's asking KC to lay the points. What he should be asking, politely, is if KC is tracking himself from a +/- units perspective and if he cares to share that.
Obviously KC is not and of course KC and any caper here can do whatever the heck they want, track themselves however they want. No one owes anyone anything.
For the folks unsure of what this all means (Captain obvious alert!):
For money line (not spread) betting why this matters:
If a $100 risking bettor has a "record" of 13-16 and is playing +180 avg dogs that 13-16 losing "record", 45%, is really +$740 - a very winning "record".
And then you have $100 to win bettors laying money, say -180 avg and have a "record" of 16-13 hitting a nice 55% but are actually down -$740 - despite the winning "record".
The argument here is Money Line players should be tracking +/- money - and spread bettors should be tracking W/L. Mixing the two can be a bit misleading.
Hopefully that sheds a little light on the hoo ha.
KS has a standing issue with folks betting money lines who report their record with W/L. Not sure why he's asking KC to lay the points. What he should be asking, politely, is if KC is tracking himself from a +/- units perspective and if he cares to share that.
Obviously KC is not and of course KC and any caper here can do whatever the heck they want, track themselves however they want. No one owes anyone anything.
For the folks unsure of what this all means (Captain obvious alert!):
For money line (not spread) betting why this matters:
If a $100 risking bettor has a "record" of 13-16 and is playing +180 avg dogs that 13-16 losing "record", 45%, is really +$740 - a very winning "record".
And then you have $100 to win bettors laying money, say -180 avg and have a "record" of 16-13 hitting a nice 55% but are actually down -$740 - despite the winning "record".
The argument here is Money Line players should be tracking +/- money - and spread bettors should be tracking W/L. Mixing the two can be a bit misleading.
Hopefully that sheds a little light on the hoo ha.
Can’t wrap my head around OSU shooting 20 more free throws tonight. Tech is a very aggressive team. How they only shot 12 free throws is mind baffling to me. That loose whistle technical foul changed the game. That’s what comes with the college game I suppose.
Texas Tech
25-8
Can’t wrap my head around OSU shooting 20 more free throws tonight. Tech is a very aggressive team. How they only shot 12 free throws is mind baffling to me. That loose whistle technical foul changed the game. That’s what comes with the college game I suppose.
Texas Tech
25-8
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.