All Forums | College Basketball

Monday Hoops

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13527
Posts: 72
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 300
Posted: #26
GL Nropp
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 472
Posted: #27
oh no.... nropp11's SPECIAL losing picks are back everyoneeeeeee
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6583
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by canadianchamp10:

Hey nropp....are you now flat betting or just not posting units?

thanks Man!

Might be smart to start flat betting... he's 131-107 yet down, and all the profit is from early season totals when the lines move 5-10 points daily.

GL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 58493
Posted: #29
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 1
Posted: #30
[Quote: Originally Posted by coversROTHSTEIN]

 

 

 

lmao - you would follow a guy -20 units. go GB



If you really think being -20 units on ONE type of bet in ONE sport during ONE season is all that significant, I'll be laughing my ass off at the end of day much more than you will.  Just sayin'




 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 169
Posted: #31
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by bullmoose:

I know you hate heavy chalk, but Iona can name the score tomorrow

Matchup wise yes, they should control the game. Emotionally, I have no clue how they respond after a couple tough losses. Might not see the best out of this team until last game of the year w/ revenge on Fairfield, and then heading into the conference tourney.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

nropp … I've noticed you have been posting in different styles during your losing streak, now you are posting Mondays plays on Sundays. 

Whatever it takes … something will get you turned around 

GL 

Just having had enough time to devote and it has nothing to do with losing. Unfortunately, it's tough for some to realize the fact that just b/c I don't offer a write-up, the value on the selection is any different.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by JDubs800:

Like Both, NRopp    How about DETROIT at home versus Cleve. State? Can they come up big for once at Home tomorrow?

Depends on how CSU rebounds from the Butler loss. I think Detroit has a shot, just depends. I was able to catch the Butler/CSU game Saturday and CSU was extremely hesitant in just about every phase of the game. They looked scared.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 20963
Posted: #35
good luck neil, think pitt should still be favored here by a possession but i'm cold right now too
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:

No way in hell you can bet on Pitt in either road game this week at WVU and at Nova w/o Gibbs.

I did. Woodall has experience starting as a freshman last year, and he's been playing 20+ minutes this year. Doesn't shoot as well, but offensively, they'll be more "team" oriented which is the exact foundation that you need to take on WV and their defense. Woodall would be a starter on 95% of teams in the country.

99% of players are replaceable at this level.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by coversROTHSTEIN:

hmm, nropp- ever since you were called out on selling out to the books you've been terrible... you play like 10 games a day and don't do write ups? glad i caught you on ur hot streak lol...

just curious, you say you're all about talking college bball and getting input and what not, yet you don't do write ups any more and only post your stupid amount of picks these days with no explainations. seems sketchy to me.. it's like you do write ups 2 days a week (which are the only days you seem to do half good) lol. how much did are you getting paid to post your opposite picks lol?


Took time out of a busy saturday to post 8 games and mini-writeups. I went 5-3. I have stated it time and time again. I don't have the available time to post write-ups every day. I have a life outside of doing so.

As for the days that I haven't posted write-ups, they have more than likely occured on big cards, which I stated from day 1. On days with 100+ games, I would rather delegate myself to looking at each and every game than focusing on looking at 10 and taking the time to write them up.

Sometimes, things are out of my control. I had all the time in the world to post on Saturday, but a few things came up, and I think I explained myself to be clear.

Your conspiracy theories are false, although I find them to be humorous. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by coversROTHSTEIN:

 

 

 

lmao - you would follow a guy -20 units. go GB!


-2 units, unless my math is off.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by canadianchamp10:

Hey nropp....are you now flat betting or just not posting units?

thanks Man!


I did not know if I would have time today. I will have additions and unit designations by end of the day.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3131
Posted: #40
Thanks buddy, I know alot of people are going to be taking Cleveland State.... I'll throw in a small play on Detroit for entertainment purposes. BOL tonight, I am also going to play PIT and TEN ST.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by depressed:

Might be smart to start flat betting... he's 131-107 yet down, and all the profit is from early season totals when the lines move 5-10 points daily.

GL

Cap the Capper...Any other suggestions? If you were to go back and look, I believe there has been only four instances where a line move has affected the outcome of 238 plays. Opening Line/Closing Line has come into play 1.6% of the time. Furthermore, I've lost a ton of those plays straight up after a four or five point line-move. Line moves mean nothing. 

I'll stick to what I do and what I've done for years. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 1782
Posted: #42
GL nropp.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3020
Posted: #43

Quote Originally Posted by coversROTHSTEIN:

everyone take WVU tomorrow- NROPP sold out to the books... the public play is PITT getting 1 obvi against an unranked team. WVU wins. Esp if NROPP is on PITT... which everyone else is on lol. FADE him TRUST ME

rothstein,, why you gotta bash? if you dont like the picks play opposite and stay out of forum...grow up man.

gl neil...i think pitt hammers them myself. ill tail.

ryno

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #44
Thanks for all you do for us. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 888
Posted: #45
I don't know Neil personally, but I would suggest he change 'nropp' to 'zenropp' -

The way he deflects some of the low-lives in his threads is quite comical. Calm & cool. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6583
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


Cap the Capper...Any other suggestions? If you were to go back and look, I believe there has been only four instances where a line move has affected the outcome of 238 plays. Opening Line/Closing Line has come into play 1.6% of the time. Furthermore, I've lost a ton of those plays straight up after a four or five point line-move. Line moves mean nothing. 

I'll stick to what I do and what I've done for years. 
The point is when you are getting 5-10 points, you have more freedom to choose the under. If it were only 3 points from say your estimated line, you likely wouldn't play it. Make that 8-13 points, and well...

Why are you so hostile brother?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 12813
Posted: #47
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1890
Posted: #48
Thanx and GL Nropp

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #49

I thought WV was better than they showed in their last. I still think PITT is a much better team overall, and tonight stays within one possession at least.

PITT was pre-season top 10. WV is getting exposed.

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 888
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

I thought WV was better than they showed in their last. I still think PITT is a much better team overall, and tonight stays within one possession at least.

PITT was pre-season top 10. WV is getting exposed.


Very unclear series of thoughts...you claim tonight stays within one possession "at least" (what does that mean?) and yet, WVU is getting "exposed" ? ... and Pitt was "preseason top 10" - OK? - so was MSU? 
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright � 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.