Rough day yesterday.. 6-9, -3.9u... +19.7u in Feb.
NCAAB 2/20
Rutgers +8.5 1H
Louisville +115
Seton Hall -5
St Bonnies -4 1H / St Bonnies -8
Marquette -6
Nevada -7.5
Rough day yesterday.. 6-9, -3.9u... +19.7u in Feb.
NCAAB 2/20
Rutgers +8.5 1H
Louisville +115
Seton Hall -5
St Bonnies -4 1H / St Bonnies -8
Marquette -6
Nevada -7.5
Rough day yesterday.. 6-9, -3.9u... +19.7u in Feb.
NCAAB 2/20
Rutgers +8.5 1H
Louisville +115
Seton Hall -5
St Bonnies -4 1H / St Bonnies -8
Marquette -6
Nevada -7.5
Depends what you mean... If you are asking if this line is fishy, then no, San Diego State is a good team, who is 7-3 in their last 10 su, including 5-0 at home both SU and ATS. Laying points on the road is also difficult.
However, I see them covering 7.5 easily, so in that sense, yes I think the line is a little short.
@BlackwaterOP, appreciate your insight. I would lean grabbing those points as well, but with many other games on the board, I have no problem avoiding a wager against Zion and crew. Good play regardless I believe, BOL.
Depends what you mean... If you are asking if this line is fishy, then no, San Diego State is a good team, who is 7-3 in their last 10 su, including 5-0 at home both SU and ATS. Laying points on the road is also difficult.
However, I see them covering 7.5 easily, so in that sense, yes I think the line is a little short.
@BlackwaterOP, appreciate your insight. I would lean grabbing those points as well, but with many other games on the board, I have no problem avoiding a wager against Zion and crew. Good play regardless I believe, BOL.
FINAL CARD NCAAB 2/20
Tulsa -3
LSU -6
Nova -5.5
Rutgers +8.5 1H
Louisville +115
Seton Hall -5
St Bonnies -4 1H / St Bonnies -8
Marquette -6
Nevada -7.5
FINAL CARD NCAAB 2/20
Tulsa -3
LSU -6
Nova -5.5
Rutgers +8.5 1H
Louisville +115
Seton Hall -5
St Bonnies -4 1H / St Bonnies -8
Marquette -6
Nevada -7.5
I don't really believe in the "fishy" line concept. As you know, the object of line making is not necessarily to trick the player into one side. Anyhow, I just expected a double digit line
I don't really believe in the "fishy" line concept. As you know, the object of line making is not necessarily to trick the player into one side. Anyhow, I just expected a double digit line
That is tough, I would say LSU, Louisville, and Rutgers are my favorite plays today. I would not say there is one top dog today, hence the flat units.
@Johnny, I agree, but I see many on this forum converse about fishy lines, so was curious if that was your question. I can see Nevada covering 10+ today, as my own generated line for the game was 10.
BOL everyone. 10 plays for me today, risking 10.9u / 10.1u.
That is tough, I would say LSU, Louisville, and Rutgers are my favorite plays today. I would not say there is one top dog today, hence the flat units.
@Johnny, I agree, but I see many on this forum converse about fishy lines, so was curious if that was your question. I can see Nevada covering 10+ today, as my own generated line for the game was 10.
BOL everyone. 10 plays for me today, risking 10.9u / 10.1u.
Are you under the impression that volume betting cannot be successful? Losing nights can happen, whether you're betting 1 play or 100. I will have them just as anyone else will, but gambling is and always has been profitable for me. You do not have to tail, or even look at my plays. I am here to help the community, I dont see you posting your plays often.
BOL tonight.
Are you under the impression that volume betting cannot be successful? Losing nights can happen, whether you're betting 1 play or 100. I will have them just as anyone else will, but gambling is and always has been profitable for me. You do not have to tail, or even look at my plays. I am here to help the community, I dont see you posting your plays often.
BOL tonight.
It's about Money Management , betting a lot of games means one would bet Less because of the exposure. I know a bunch of professional gamblers and they do Not bet more than 3 games in a day and there are days they don't bet at all because they don't see value in any of the games and they have discipline. Lots of degenerate gamblers on this site , go figure. These games are great a $5 a pop
It's about Money Management , betting a lot of games means one would bet Less because of the exposure. I know a bunch of professional gamblers and they do Not bet more than 3 games in a day and there are days they don't bet at all because they don't see value in any of the games and they have discipline. Lots of degenerate gamblers on this site , go figure. These games are great a $5 a pop
I can understand this mentality, if youre gambling out of your own pocket, which I am not. You should never wager a lot if it is not out of the money you have allotted for gambling. Every play I play is wagered out of my WINNINGS. I joined Covers in a few days into February, and have profited around 20 units since. This is actually one of my slower months so far in terms of profit, and I am still doing somewhat well. Your point about them being great at "5$ a pop" makes no sense to me and seems irrelevant, since regardless if youre betting small wagers, or the 1,000$ units I wager, + units is + units no matter which way you slice it.
I have been doing this for a few years, and it pays. If you do not like it, you are welcome to fade or disregard any of my posts. Sharp betting has its advantages for sure, but things can happen, nothing is 100%, so if you can have an accurate read on the majority of games every night, you will make money. Volume betting is only unsuccessful for those who cannot get an accurate read on the board daily, or do not put in the time/effort to forming a strong card.
BOL
I can understand this mentality, if youre gambling out of your own pocket, which I am not. You should never wager a lot if it is not out of the money you have allotted for gambling. Every play I play is wagered out of my WINNINGS. I joined Covers in a few days into February, and have profited around 20 units since. This is actually one of my slower months so far in terms of profit, and I am still doing somewhat well. Your point about them being great at "5$ a pop" makes no sense to me and seems irrelevant, since regardless if youre betting small wagers, or the 1,000$ units I wager, + units is + units no matter which way you slice it.
I have been doing this for a few years, and it pays. If you do not like it, you are welcome to fade or disregard any of my posts. Sharp betting has its advantages for sure, but things can happen, nothing is 100%, so if you can have an accurate read on the majority of games every night, you will make money. Volume betting is only unsuccessful for those who cannot get an accurate read on the board daily, or do not put in the time/effort to forming a strong card.
BOL
"Bruv", Your last comment on one of my threads was "Realest Capper on Covers"... come on, you look foolish.
"Bruv", Your last comment on one of my threads was "Realest Capper on Covers"... come on, you look foolish.
Since I know how much the Covers community loves volume
ADD
Depaul -1
Northwestern +7.5
These will be my final 2 for today, 14 plays total... Will report later on the results.
GL everyone
Since I know how much the Covers community loves volume
ADD
Depaul -1
Northwestern +7.5
These will be my final 2 for today, 14 plays total... Will report later on the results.
GL everyone
Thanks as always R2BL, only simpletons think in terms of absolutes when it comes to volume and/or losing days. You’re the man.
Some professionals focus in on finding an angle on 1-3 plays, others are more systematic and bet volume. Whatever fucking works, talent is talent.
Thanks as always R2BL, only simpletons think in terms of absolutes when it comes to volume and/or losing days. You’re the man.
Some professionals focus in on finding an angle on 1-3 plays, others are more systematic and bet volume. Whatever fucking works, talent is talent.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.