All Forums | College Basketball

NCAAB Tournament Spreadsheet

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 40379
Posts: 166
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #101
Now I don't know if I should still take UWV or not.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 198
Posted: #102
The formula is now 6-4.
The Def Eff is now 11-1 with the only loss was Harvard.
BYU Def Eff was not lower than Marq (BYU-25, Marq-19)

I just think that stat is just crazy. For the 7pm games:
KY (5) WKY (151)
Gonz (34)   WV (70)  I still like WV
WichitaSt (18)   VCU (26)
Baylor (33)    SDakSt (127)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #103

Props to both you and Kgc. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #104
Thank you
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 198
Posted: #105
Formula 8-4

Def Eff trend is 14-2(straight up) 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #106

Wow... It did better against the spread than I did in my bracket.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #107
I feel like an idiot.  I just now got what you are talking about.  I thought you were putting it into your formula and reworking the formula.  I am even more impressed.   Damn, I really used poor money management.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 198
Posted: #108
Final totals:  Formula 10-5 vs spread
                   Def. Eff.  17-3  straight up

Friday the Formula likes:
Cincy -2
NCSt -2.5
UVA +3.5
FSU -6.5
Belmont +4
UNC -15.5
Mizz -21.5
Duke -12
Purdue +2
Xav +2.5
SFla +3
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 198
Posted: #109
Def. Eff. likes: (All straight up)

Cincy  SD  Ala  UVA  FSU  Gtown  UNC  Mizz  StL
Duke  Ohio  Purdue  MichSt  ND  SFla  Kansas


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #110

I wonder if this will continue into the next round.  Also KGC has all of them, NIT, he extracted only the teams playing in the NCAA.  I'm amazed you found it and really surprised nobody seems to be responding.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 421
Posted: #111
Nice work, Dolphin.    Who you got for tomorrow?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1065
Posted: #112
Dolphin, Nice job with the formula using KGC stats.                              

KGC, Excellent work, nice sheet.

This is what i call people helping other people,gl & thank you both.

What are the system plays tomorrow?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 245
Posted: #113
WOW! Of the 8 DefEff plays that are same as formula plays, 5 are currently over 70% of picks on Covers Consensus.

Hmmmmmm?

Kinda scary....

MM
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #114

That's kind of scary MM... I'm considering jumping on these plays. I'm pretty sure that today over 70% of consensus picks though.. 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #115
best use of statistics in covers history
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 911
Posted: #116

Nice work KGC and DOLPHN

Thanks for your time and efforts regardless of outcomes!

FUPM (fukupayme)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1361
Posted: #117

Nice Stats work here. I noticed that when there is a big discrepancy in Def Eff (not just every time one team hasd a lower one), the lower team has won straight up.

So, for today:

Mich. St.
Virginia
Missouri
Florida St.
UNC
Alabama
USF
Georgetown
Kansas
Maybe SD St.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 198
Posted: #118
Quote Originally Posted by DOLPHN1210:

Final totals:  Formula 10-5 vs spread
                   Def. Eff.  17-3  straight up

Friday the Formula likes:
Cincy -2
NCSt -2.5
UVA +3.5
FSU -6.5
Belmont +4
UNC -15.5
Mizz -21.5
Duke -12
Purdue +2
Xav +2.5
SFla +3
These are the formula plays for today. I will admit I'm a little nervous on how good yesterday turned out. This formula also loved Cal and they got their shit pushed in. These games are a lot closer today, so that is why there are more dogs in today's picks. The games with the biggest margin in the formula is Mizz, Belmont, Mich St, ans FSU. Good luck to all 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 65
Posted: #119
Yesterday teams with better Off Eff,Def Eff and FT% were 7-0 ATS

Today Mizz and ND
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 198
Posted: #120
Damn Bailey that's even more impressive. I really like Mizz.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1361
Posted: #121

Quote Originally Posted by bailey314:

Yesterday teams with better Off Eff,Def Eff and FT% were 7-0 ATS

Today Mizz and ND

Yeah, that's not true.

Kentucky didn't cover, yet they were better in every category

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 53
Posted: #122
Quote Originally Posted by jbkizzle:

Yeah, that's not true.

Kentucky didn't cover, yet they were better in every category



Ended up going 6-2 ATS

W - Iowa St, Indiana, Baylor, New Mexico, Marquette, Wisconsin
L - Kentucky, Wichita State
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 1361
Posted: #123

Where are these stats from? What's your source?

I looked at another website for defenseive efficiency, and there numbers for about 80% of the teams are similar, but there are huge differences on others.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #124
It 16-4 if you count the first round.  Two of the four SYR and Kentucky would be great for point shaving given their ability and high spread.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 8
Posted: #125
This thing is scary good.  Last, night I had a hard time sleeping. 
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.