damn..........who the hell is this dude? Nice Record...........
quite the following.................
I'll tell you this,,,,i see where you played illinois at 2 different numbers,,,,thats more legit than most of these clowns,,,,the common phrase is................
"i bought off" (and than people just pull the switcherroooo with the number).........................
0
damn..........who the hell is this dude? Nice Record...........
quite the following.................
I'll tell you this,,,,i see where you played illinois at 2 different numbers,,,,thats more legit than most of these clowns,,,,the common phrase is................
"i bought off" (and than people just pull the switcherroooo with the number).........................
FWIW...UNC...NW is the ONLY team from a BCS conference to never make the "Baila" (dance). It wasn't too long ago NW athletics were worse than the Chicago public league high schools. Their football team was an absolute joke and b-ball wasn't far behind.
But, oh have times changed.
0
FWIW...UNC...NW is the ONLY team from a BCS conference to never make the "Baila" (dance). It wasn't too long ago NW athletics were worse than the Chicago public league high schools. Their football team was an absolute joke and b-ball wasn't far behind.
NO PLAY ON UTAH THEY HAVE NOT SHOWN ME ENOUGH THAT THEY CAN DEFEND THEIR HOME FLOOR.
Yea you're right UNC...I'm on UTAH, but as always, it is a dicey proposition when put coin on a team that clearly has less talent then their opponent. Usually I count on home court advantage to overcome those shortcomings...but like you said, UTAH's performance at home thus far has been less than impressive.
But my numbers show UTAH huge in this spot...what can I say...I'm going down with the ship.
BOL UNC
0
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:
NO PLAY ON UTAH THEY HAVE NOT SHOWN ME ENOUGH THAT THEY CAN DEFEND THEIR HOME FLOOR.
Yea you're right UNC...I'm on UTAH, but as always, it is a dicey proposition when put coin on a team that clearly has less talent then their opponent. Usually I count on home court advantage to overcome those shortcomings...but like you said, UTAH's performance at home thus far has been less than impressive.
But my numbers show UTAH huge in this spot...what can I say...I'm going down with the ship.
MR. UNC what da latest time u will post because i will not be able 2 check out ur post b 4 tip off. By da way NICE JOB on ur picks keep up da good work
0
MR. UNC what da latest time u will post because i will not be able 2 check out ur post b 4 tip off. By da way NICE JOB on ur picks keep up da good work
UNC, I responded to what you put in my thread but not sure if you were going to get a chance to read it or not...I actually am leaning to the under in that game a little more as the day goes on for the very reasons you gave. That game could easily have a couple 2-3 minute scoring droughts
0
UNC, I responded to what you put in my thread but not sure if you were going to get a chance to read it or not...I actually am leaning to the under in that game a little more as the day goes on for the very reasons you gave. That game could easily have a couple 2-3 minute scoring droughts
NO PLAYS ON MY SYCAMORES TONIGHT. WAS GOING TO BITE ON ISU. I SEE US PLAYING A LOT BETTER TONIGHT BUT I THINK THIS SPREAD IS VERY TIGHT. WAS ALSO LOOKING AT THE UNDER BUT THE MOVEMENT HAS PULLED ME OFF. WILL WAIT TO PLAY ISU WHEN WE RETURN HOME.
0
NO PLAYS ON MY SYCAMORES TONIGHT. WAS GOING TO BITE ON ISU. I SEE US PLAYING A LOT BETTER TONIGHT BUT I THINK THIS SPREAD IS VERY TIGHT. WAS ALSO LOOKING AT THE UNDER BUT THE MOVEMENT HAS PULLED ME OFF. WILL WAIT TO PLAY ISU WHEN WE RETURN HOME.
We’ve seen this story from Clemson before. Last year, the Tigers
started out the year with a 16-0 record. They were a sub .500 squad the
rest of the way. In 2008, Clemson started 12-1. They closed out the
back half of the season going 12-9. In ’07, it was a 17-0 start,
followed by an 8-11 finish. Half of those eight wins came in the NIT
tournament. In ’06, the Tigers won their first eleven games, then
proceeded to lose ten of their next 13. Oliver Purnell’s track record
is very clear – great starts, not so great finishes. Their 15-3 start
here in 2010 must be taken with a grain of salt.
Georgia Tech,
on the other hand, is the real deal. They are 8-1 at home this year,
including an outright upset as seven point home underdogs against Duke
last week. Their only home loss came in overtime against Florida State;
a game in which point guard Iman Shumpert was sitting on the sidelines
in street clothes. Shumpert is coming off a 30 point, six assist, four
rebound, three steal game against North Carolina, leading the Yellow
Jackets to an upset win over the Tar Heels in Chapel Hill. This is one
player whose ability we do not want to underestimate, particularly in
an uptempo game like this one.
Clemson’s starting point guard,
Demontez Stitt, has started every game this year. He’s the team’s
leading assist man and their second leading scorer. Stitt is doubtful
to play this evening with a foot injury, and even if he suits up, he’ll
be at less than 100%. That leaves untested sophomore Andre Young forced
to match up at the point against Shumpert. And let’s not forget that
this Georgia Tech defense forces more than 16 turnovers per game, while
holding opposing teams to 37% shooting, a difficult matchup for the
Tigers even if Stitt was healthy. The price here is cheap for the
better team in the better spot. 2* Take Georgia Tech
0
We’ve seen this story from Clemson before. Last year, the Tigers
started out the year with a 16-0 record. They were a sub .500 squad the
rest of the way. In 2008, Clemson started 12-1. They closed out the
back half of the season going 12-9. In ’07, it was a 17-0 start,
followed by an 8-11 finish. Half of those eight wins came in the NIT
tournament. In ’06, the Tigers won their first eleven games, then
proceeded to lose ten of their next 13. Oliver Purnell’s track record
is very clear – great starts, not so great finishes. Their 15-3 start
here in 2010 must be taken with a grain of salt.
Georgia Tech,
on the other hand, is the real deal. They are 8-1 at home this year,
including an outright upset as seven point home underdogs against Duke
last week. Their only home loss came in overtime against Florida State;
a game in which point guard Iman Shumpert was sitting on the sidelines
in street clothes. Shumpert is coming off a 30 point, six assist, four
rebound, three steal game against North Carolina, leading the Yellow
Jackets to an upset win over the Tar Heels in Chapel Hill. This is one
player whose ability we do not want to underestimate, particularly in
an uptempo game like this one.
Clemson’s starting point guard,
Demontez Stitt, has started every game this year. He’s the team’s
leading assist man and their second leading scorer. Stitt is doubtful
to play this evening with a foot injury, and even if he suits up, he’ll
be at less than 100%. That leaves untested sophomore Andre Young forced
to match up at the point against Shumpert. And let’s not forget that
this Georgia Tech defense forces more than 16 turnovers per game, while
holding opposing teams to 37% shooting, a difficult matchup for the
Tigers even if Stitt was healthy. The price here is cheap for the
better team in the better spot. 2* Take Georgia Tech
Yea you're right UNC...I'm on UTAH, but as always, it is a dicey proposition when put coin on a team that clearly has less talent then their opponent. Usually I count on home court advantage to overcome those shortcomings...but like you said, UTAH's performance at home thus far has been less than impressive.
But my numbers show UTAH huge in this spot...what can I say...I'm going down with the ship.
BOL UNC
Swizzol I'm going down with ya....lets drink to staying above water or drowning brotha!! BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by swizzol:
Yea you're right UNC...I'm on UTAH, but as always, it is a dicey proposition when put coin on a team that clearly has less talent then their opponent. Usually I count on home court advantage to overcome those shortcomings...but like you said, UTAH's performance at home thus far has been less than impressive.
But my numbers show UTAH huge in this spot...what can I say...I'm going down with the ship.
BOL UNC
Swizzol I'm going down with ya....lets drink to staying above water or drowning brotha!! BOL
UNC, I responded to what you put in my thread but not sure if you were going to get a chance to read it or not...I actually am leaning to the under in that game a little more as the day goes on for the very reasons you gave. That game could easily have a couple 2-3 minute scoring droughts
What game did where you capping?
0
Quote Originally Posted by HotRoute:
UNC, I responded to what you put in my thread but not sure if you were going to get a chance to read it or not...I actually am leaning to the under in that game a little more as the day goes on for the very reasons you gave. That game could easily have a couple 2-3 minute scoring droughts
We’ve seen this story from Clemson before. Last year, the Tigers started out the year with a 16-0 record. They were a sub .500 squad the rest of the way. In 2008, Clemson started 12-1. They closed out the back half of the season going 12-9. In ’07, it was a 17-0 start, followed by an 8-11 finish. Half of those eight wins came in the NIT tournament. In ’06, the Tigers won their first eleven games, then proceeded to lose ten of their next 13. Oliver Purnell’s track record is very clear – great starts, not so great finishes. Their 15-3 start here in 2010 must be taken with a grain of salt.
Georgia Tech, on the other hand, is the real deal. They are 8-1 at home this year, including an outright upset as seven point home underdogs against Duke last week. Their only home loss came in overtime against Florida State; a game in which point guard Iman Shumpert was sitting on the sidelines in street clothes. Shumpert is coming off a 30 point, six assist, four rebound, three steal game against North Carolina, leading the Yellow Jackets to an upset win over the Tar Heels in Chapel Hill. This is one player whose ability we do not want to underestimate, particularly in an uptempo game like this one.
Clemson’s starting point guard, Demontez Stitt, has started every game this year. He’s the team’s leading assist man and their second leading scorer. Stitt is doubtful to play this evening with a foot injury, and even if he suits up, he’ll be at less than 100%. That leaves untested sophomore Andre Young forced to match up at the point against Shumpert. And let’s not forget that this Georgia Tech defense forces more than 16 turnovers per game, while holding opposing teams to 37% shooting, a difficult matchup for the Tigers even if Stitt was healthy. The price here is cheap for the better team in the better spot. 2* Take Georgia Tech
Greta stuff
0
Quote Originally Posted by FIT410s:
We’ve seen this story from Clemson before. Last year, the Tigers started out the year with a 16-0 record. They were a sub .500 squad the rest of the way. In 2008, Clemson started 12-1. They closed out the back half of the season going 12-9. In ’07, it was a 17-0 start, followed by an 8-11 finish. Half of those eight wins came in the NIT tournament. In ’06, the Tigers won their first eleven games, then proceeded to lose ten of their next 13. Oliver Purnell’s track record is very clear – great starts, not so great finishes. Their 15-3 start here in 2010 must be taken with a grain of salt.
Georgia Tech, on the other hand, is the real deal. They are 8-1 at home this year, including an outright upset as seven point home underdogs against Duke last week. Their only home loss came in overtime against Florida State; a game in which point guard Iman Shumpert was sitting on the sidelines in street clothes. Shumpert is coming off a 30 point, six assist, four rebound, three steal game against North Carolina, leading the Yellow Jackets to an upset win over the Tar Heels in Chapel Hill. This is one player whose ability we do not want to underestimate, particularly in an uptempo game like this one.
Clemson’s starting point guard, Demontez Stitt, has started every game this year. He’s the team’s leading assist man and their second leading scorer. Stitt is doubtful to play this evening with a foot injury, and even if he suits up, he’ll be at less than 100%. That leaves untested sophomore Andre Young forced to match up at the point against Shumpert. And let’s not forget that this Georgia Tech defense forces more than 16 turnovers per game, while holding opposing teams to 37% shooting, a difficult matchup for the Tigers even if Stitt was healthy. The price here is cheap for the better team in the better spot. 2* Take Georgia Tech
NO PLAY ON UTAH THEY HAVE NOT SHOWN ME ENOUGH THAT THEY CAN DEFEND THEIR HOME FLOOR.
Glad to see yoiu off the Utes UNC. Had them earlier this year at home against Okla when Okla wasn't playing like they are now. Had the lead and the cover in a televised game that I watched my money burn in OT. Loving Ill at home tonight. They're a whole different team at home. BOL on all your plays.
0
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:
NO PLAY ON UTAH THEY HAVE NOT SHOWN ME ENOUGH THAT THEY CAN DEFEND THEIR HOME FLOOR.
Glad to see yoiu off the Utes UNC. Had them earlier this year at home against Okla when Okla wasn't playing like they are now. Had the lead and the cover in a televised game that I watched my money burn in OT. Loving Ill at home tonight. They're a whole different team at home. BOL on all your plays.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.