All Forums | College Basketball

'pre' system week 2

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 35259
Posts: 297
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3020
Posted: #126

good morning guys- well...I should not even complain, but montana st fell short and ran out of gas 2nd half for our lone loss. but omg, we are rolling in money bags.   

full game 2-1

first halfs 3-0 money lines-0-3

another profitable night and system has yet to start.  be back in a few to update. gl ryno 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3020
Posted: #127

updated record: 14-4

first halfs - 14-4

moneyline winners-7-11 ( these moneylines are always +240 or more)

 

ok guys, there is a whole lotta loot in those above records for the pre system.  I see one play tonight=

siena +8   as always first halfs and full game and moneyline.

gl ryno

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 5612
Posted: #128
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3020
Posted: #129
guys, im off to casino for the day with a bud, ill be around later....gl tonight and keep the winners coming.  tomorrow there should be a good amount of plays...ryno
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 915
Posted: #130
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 104
Posted: #131
Ryno23.. read the thread and followed the picks last night and just gotta say AWESOME !!! Would've been 3-0, but Sac St made a pretty good run to close that game out. I'm on the follow train now and thank you for posting the "system" bets... What is it tho? haha..
All favorites rated +180 on the KPom rankings get faded ?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 32292
Posted: #132
nice work....bol bud
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 104
Posted: #133
I've got to be outta the loop on something...

or would Western Illinois +2.5 be a play against IUPUI as they are #241 on the KPom rankings..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 51
Posted: #134
Quote Originally Posted by NickyZ5er:

I've got to be outta the loop on something...

or would Western Illinois +2.5 be a play against IUPUI as they are #241 on the KPom rankings..


Not as +2.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 53
Posted: #135
Nice
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3020
Posted: #136
Quote Originally Posted by NickyZ5er:

I've got to be outta the loop on something...or would Western Illinois +2.5 be a play against IUPUI as they are #241 on the KPom rankings..

Nick, no offense, but please let us post the plays!, me or Norcal if I've missed something he usually finds it. Guys, this system is going to pick up steam and get a lot of people looking from here on out let's not list the parameters in the thread.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 3020
Posted: #137
Guys, I do hope you understand, there are going to be unwanted eyes on this thread from now on. Follow the place. Do not mention parameters. Message me your Norcal with any questions, but a lot of you know this will come into play soon. I hope you understand
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 104
Posted: #138
Quote Originally Posted by ryno23:

Guys, I do hope you understand, there are going to be unwanted eyes on this thread from now on. Follow the place. Do not mention parameters. Message me your Norcal with any questions, but a lot of you know this will come into play soon. I hope you understand


My bad, Ryno, my bad.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2014
Posts: 407
Posted: #139

I have a quick question, maybe it was already answered in the previous posts. If so, apologies. Siena is expected to lose 79-71.. I have the spread at +7.5.. How does this make It a worthy play to take?

thanks

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 90
Posted: #140
Quote Originally Posted by redtagboys:

I have a quick question, maybe it was already answered in the previous posts. If so, apologies. Siena is expected to lose 79-71.. I have the spread at +7.5.. How does this make It a worthy play to take?

thanks


Where did you see that Siena is expected to lose 79-71?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 14064
Posted: #141
Quote Originally Posted by redtagboys:

I have a quick question, maybe it was already answered in the previous posts. If so, apologies. Siena is expected to lose 79-71.. I have the spread at +7.5.. How does this make It a worthy play to take?

thanks


Some of you guys are amazing.  Do you even read anything in the thread?  Ryno specifically is stating clearly that he does NOT want to discuss the parameters of the system in this thread out in the open.  What exactly do you not understand about that concept?

Do you have a problem with the English language?

If you want to play the selection..play it.

If you do not want to play the selection...do not play it.

PM for the skinny on the down low
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2014
Posts: 407
Posted: #142

290 Siena at 215 Manhattan Manhattan 79-71 (78%)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 90
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by redtagboys:

290 Siena at 215 Manhattan Manhattan 79-71 (78%)



I hope I don't come off sounding rude, I'm honestly trying to save you thousands of dollars over the next few years.  Stop betting on sports.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2014
Posts: 407
Posted: #144
LOL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 1404
Posted: #145
Quote Originally Posted by redtagboys:

LOL

PM Ryno with a question if you have one about the sytem you brain-dead chimp.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 90
Posted: #146
I'm just saying, you shouldn't believe what some web site tells you they expect to happen in a game.  How in the heck could they predict this?  Some computer program??  And, if they are that good at expectations.  Why aren't you just playing all of their "expectations", especially if they claim there is a 75% of it happening? 

I will tell you this.  The line has nothing to with what is expected to happen in a game and everything to do with how bettors are expected to behave.

You should spend less time reading stats, expectations, %'s, etc. and more time looking at lines that don't make sense i.e. unranked teams giving points, teams with bad losing records giving points, etc. (Ohio St -8 last night).

You will be better off in the future and maybe even up a little $.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 1404
Posted: #147
Quote Originally Posted by thegetaway:

I'm just saying, you shouldn't believe what some web site tells you they expect to happen in a game.  How in the heck could they predict this?  Some computer program??  And, if they are that good at expectations.  Why aren't you just playing all of their "expectations", especially if they claim there is a 75% of it happening? 

I will tell you this.  The line has nothing to with what is expected to happen in a game and everything to do with how bettors are expected to behave.

You should spend less time reading stats, expectations, %'s, etc. and more time looking at lines that don't make sense i.e. unranked teams giving points, teams with bad losing records giving points, etc. (Ohio St -8 last night).

You will be better off in the future and maybe even up a little $.


Don't want to sound rude but this thread won't become a debate about the system. 

If you don't like it or feel it won make money your free not to tail it. Thanks
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 90
Posted: #148
Quote Originally Posted by nygjmap:



Don't want to sound rude but this thread won't become a debate about the system. 

If you don't like it or feel it won make money your free not to tail it. Thanks

You didn't sound rude, you sounded like you didn't understand.  And that's ok.  I get the system and I follow it.  It makes a lot of sense.

I was letting this person know that they should not take web sites that claim there is a 75% chance of a certain score in a game seriously.  It was NOT a debate of Kineprofessor's System.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 108
Posted: #149
Are you going to start a new thread every week or just keep this one going?
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2014
Posts: 108
Posted: #150
And btw thank you for the insite into some of these games been a lot of help. Keep up the good work and gl
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.