All Forums | College Basketball

Saturday NCAAB

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2845
Posts: 32
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #1
My book only has 3 lines out so far

Leaning on

Michigan -1.5
Virginia -3
Tennessee +6


Tenn on an absolute tear and need this win for their tourney hopes. May wait till tomorrow as line likely rises to -6.5 or 7.

Trying to find a reason to not bet Michand really can't. Ohio State fighting for tourney position?No thats a hoopla shammockery excuse and its their 3rd game in 3 days. Michigan fighting for that 2 seed. If both teams play average games Michigan by about 7. Took a miracle for them to get by Nebraska after Nebraska did everything they could to give the game away.

Virginia is the scariest pick here IMO. Pitt playing extremely well but Virginia is playing better than or as good  anyone in the country
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 1255
Posted: #2
Florida being only a 6 point favorite smells fishy from the start. The line will go up like you said.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #3
Locked in


Michigan -2
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 49
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by bryanoens:

Florida being only a 6 point favorite smells fishy from the start. The line will go up like you said.

Went through last year's quarters and semis in the conf. tourneys and semis is where you see alot of good teams laying their eggs since they would rather be in their scivvies with their mates watching selection Sunday that being sore-assed and banged up after their game Sunday in the final.......

Make some loot......fade some teams like Duke......Florida......which is why Vegas is setting these juicy lines....Florida and Duke have nothing to prove, everything to lose (key injuries) and lots of eyes scouting them..... win, win, win if they lose from where they sit and where you go thank you....go back and have a look over the last two years.........

The only teams I really like are teams like Louisville who want a one seed and have been using their whole bench for half the game and still winning....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 4314
Posted: #5
I'm all over Michigan locked them in already at -2 its already up to -2.5 now in my book. Michigan should wipe the floor with Ohio St. This one jumped out at me. I feel like I should unload more on Michigan and make this one of my biggest plays of the year. I'm surprised the line is short seems like a gift. I think we are getting great value here because Mich squueaked the win over Illi today. But Illi played an amazing game Ohio St will not match that effort. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #6
Didnt lock in either Tenn or Virginia


Locked in:

Michigan -2
NC State +10
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 23104
Posted: #7
Mich   Good luck today VV
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 20468
Posted: #8
New Mexico today?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Jose_Reyes:

New Mexico today?


yea they are definitely a play. Missed out on plus money ML though.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 12260
Posted: #10
Good thing u didnt lock in tenn Lucky win for me
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #11
Locked in:

Michigan -2
NC State +10
Michigan State -2
New Mexico ML +100
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by cambyspree99:

Good thing u didnt lock in tenn Lucky win for me


yea no kidding wrong side wins in Tenn game. What else is new in these tourneys?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #13
Locked in:

Michigan -2
NC State +10
Michigan State -2
New Mexico ML +100
Kentucky -4 2nd half
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 343
Posted: #14
wsup VV. looks like u might need a broom today (sweep); can't back lobos, since sdsu has been good to me. i'll will be on the under; take a look @ mountain west tourney history
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 2999
Posted: #15
GL the rest of the day
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by lSHOTBlGGlE:

wsup VV. looks like u might need a broom today (sweep); can't back lobos, since sdsu has been good to me. i'll will be on the under; take a look @ mountain west tourney history


Duke giving me a big time though. SDSU has been good to me too but UNM has many times as well though. This play is a very multifactorial instinct/matchup/revenge/line status/other feeling/ play. I know it may not make sense but this type of thinking is what I think really wins the money IMO. bol to you
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #17
Locked in:

Michigan -2
NC State +10
Michigan State -2
New Mexico ML +100
Kentucky -4 2nd half
Louisville -3.5/New Mexico +6 tz


Leaning on

 CS Northridge +3/ML
Adding more to UNM ML
Louisville over 136
Providence +7,5

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #18
Locked in:

Michigan -2
NC State +10
Michigan State -2
New Mexico ML +100
New Mexico 1st half +0.5
Kentucky -4 2nd half
CS Northridge +3


I love this UCLA team and how they are playing but the more and more I look at that game, the more it has a sucker feel to UCLA +5. Depending on how these games go may be on AZ -5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 1349
Posted: #19
New Mexico ML 

How do you like the Over 126 in that game? 
Need that for a parlay 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by DWade9:

New Mexico ML 

How do you like the Over 126 in that game? 
Need that for a parlay 


UNM likes a grind it out slower type game usually and both defenses are pretty damn good. See around a 63-60 type game so really could go either way. Under if I had to play it though
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #21
Locked in:

Michigan -2
NC State +10
Michigan State -2
New Mexico ML +100
New Mexico 1st half +0.5
Kentucky -4 2nd half
CS Northridge +3
Creighton/Providence over 147
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 1349
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal:



UNM likes a grind it out slower type game usually and both defenses are pretty damn good. See around a 63-60 type game so really could go either way. Under if I had to play it though

alright thanks let's wait and see 
as long as UNM wins i'm fine 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 1067
Posted: #23
On fire Vegas... I'm a Sdst fan so I guess I will be paying to see them win by following your New Mexico ML play...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26739
Posted: #24
Locked in:

Michigan -2
NC State +10
Michigan State -2
New Mexico ML +100
New Mexico 1st half +0.5
Kentucky -4 2nd half
CS Northridge +3
Creighton/Providence over 147

maybe a play on the Idaho game later
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 22004
Posted: #25
Great day Vandal
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.