Posted:
#176
Quote Originally Posted by Marino1984:
Great post Miracling! Always a fan of your threads and your insights!
I got ya marino. I know you see how things going in here too as a whole. 
1
sharpie just hammered this play for FRIDAY!! Oh Smitten oh Smitten. It’s an I give you my word play!!
Posted:
#178
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Miracling...... To start I want you to know I have nothing but respect and love for you! i mock the 54%. Cappers. I do so ONLY because they are so egotistical, egotistical for absolutely nothing!! When I say egotistical what I mean is they believe that they are GOOD with those percentages. They aren’t good at all in the grand scheme of things. I’m fact they are a joke. Assclowns at their very best. Now I wouldn’t mock them if they were actually humble and were willing to learn something new that may help them increase from 54% to at minimum above 60% but they laugh, and they act as if anything above their 54% is impossible to achieve. In fact they view themselves as sharps because they hit 54% What pisses me off the most about their attitudes is their constant determination to make everyone else believe that 54% is top of the line capping! now I’m not a capper which is why you will never hear me ever proclaim I’m the best capper in the world. I am a forever student in life a sponge that makes sure I’m always getting rinsed in CLEAN waters What are clean waters? The WISE!! So as I FREELY receive I FREELY give But here at covers you got guys that have been considered gods while hitting less than even 54% And who walk around town at covers as if they are the shit oh they are THE SHIT alright It doesn’t get more dumb than betting 8 team-250 ml parlays! Sorry for venting I’m in middle of caffeine withdrawal and on way to cafe ASAP to get my 5th super large coffee already this morning Lol bol to you mate we can work as one it’s always best to do that sadly the others don’t feel that way
Miracling...... To start I want you to know I have nothing but respect and love for you! i mock the 54%. Cappers. I do so ONLY because they are so egotistical, egotistical for absolutely nothing!! When I say egotistical what I mean is they believe that they are GOOD with those percentages. They aren’t good at all in the grand scheme of things. I’m fact they are a joke. Assclowns at their very best. Now I wouldn’t mock them if they were actually humble and were willing to learn something new that may help them increase from 54% to at minimum above 60% but they laugh, and they act as if anything above their 54% is impossible to achieve. In fact they view themselves as sharps because they hit 54% What pisses me off the most about their attitudes is their constant determination to make everyone else believe that 54% is top of the line capping! now I’m not a capper which is why you will never hear me ever proclaim I’m the best capper in the world. I am a forever student in life a sponge that makes sure I’m always getting rinsed in CLEAN waters What are clean waters? The WISE!! So as I FREELY receive I FREELY give But here at covers you got guys that have been considered gods while hitting less than even 54% And who walk around town at covers as if they are the shit oh they are THE SHIT alright It doesn’t get more dumb than betting 8 team-250 ml parlays! Sorry for venting I’m in middle of caffeine withdrawal and on way to cafe ASAP to get my 5th super large coffee already this morning Lol bol to you mate we can work as one it’s always best to do that sadly the others don’t feel that way
very good post. follow the money and you go 65-70% at the very least
0
Posted:
#179
Quote Originally Posted by leafs1789:
H - W A - L A - W H - L H - W A - ? <= Tonight A @ Dartmouth A @ Brown A @ Yale About to start game 1 of 4 consecutive road games. The pattern of 2 Away then 2 Home is broken. The chop ends tonight? Wouldnt it be broken at brown?
H - W A - L A - W H - L H - W A - ? <= Tonight A @ Dartmouth A @ Brown A @ Yale About to start game 1 of 4 consecutive road games. The pattern of 2 Away then 2 Home is broken. The chop ends tonight? Wouldnt it be broken at brown?
Very good point. I have no idea. 
0
Posted:
#182
Quote Originally Posted by In2it:
this is what i've been saying'ignore these jack-offs
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
louisville very very very big Monday night! as for the haters ponder this.... 1. I have never trolled their threads 2. When I have gone in their threads I support them and their plays 3. I have never spoken bad about any of them whether my threads of anyone elses 4. I have never created a single thread that isn’t a play or isn’t sports betting related. 5. I have spoken highly of the very same people that constantly trash me 6. I have never once called myself the best capper not once 7. The chumps in their foolishness have challenged me to competitions which I have declined every time cause I’m not a child I’m a pro so now tell me- is it really that hard to see it’s jealousy driven?
The Trolls have a goal.......if you leave they win. It is so "clear and obvious" the throwaway accounts set up by bookies and touts for the sole purpose of trying to destroy threads, create drama and antagonize winning Posters until they chase them away. The reason the Moderators won't do anything about it is because some of these phantom accounts are made up by some of their paying advertisers/touts.Hang in there SB and keep doing what your are doing. You win....don't let them win.louisville very very very big Monday night! as for the haters ponder this.... 1. I have never trolled their threads 2. When I have gone in their threads I support them and their plays 3. I have never spoken bad about any of them whether my threads of anyone elses 4. I have never created a single thread that isn’t a play or isn’t sports betting related. 5. I have spoken highly of the very same people that constantly trash me 6. I have never once called myself the best capper not once 7. The chumps in their foolishness have challenged me to competitions which I have declined every time cause I’m not a child I’m a pro so now tell me- is it really that hard to see it’s jealousy driven?
cheech1972
0
Posted:
#185
Quote Originally Posted by bobo451:
Quote Originally Posted by leafs1789:
H - W A - L A - W H - L H - W A - ? <= Tonight A @ Dartmouth A @ Brown A @ Yale About to start game 1 of 4 consecutive road games. The pattern of 2 Away then 2 Home is broken. The chop ends tonight? Wouldnt it be broken at brown?
Very good point. I have no idea.H - W A - L A - W H - L H - W A - ? <= Tonight A @ Dartmouth A @ Brown A @ Yale About to start game 1 of 4 consecutive road games. The pattern of 2 Away then 2 Home is broken. The chop ends tonight? Wouldnt it be broken at brown?
Looks like SB has validated that you are correct. So does this odd numeric pattern mean to go throw the hammer down on Harvard -7.5?
0
Posted:
#187
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Miracling......
To start I want you to know I have nothing but respect and love for you!
i mock the 54%. Cappers. I do so ONLY because they are so egotistical, egotistical for absolutely nothing!! When I say egotistical what I mean is they believe that they are GOOD with those percentages. They aren’t good at all in the grand scheme of things. I’m fact they are a joke. Assclowns at their very best.
Now I wouldn’t mock them if they were actually humble and were willing to learn something new that may help them increase from 54% to at minimum above 60% but they laugh, and they act as if anything above their 54% is impossible to achieve. In fact they view themselves as sharps because they hit 54% What pisses me off the most about their attitudes is their constant determination to make everyone else believe that 54% is top of the line capping!
now I’m not a capper which is why you will never hear me ever proclaim I’m the best capper in the world. I am a forever student in life a sponge that makes sure I’m always getting rinsed in CLEAN waters What are clean waters? The WISE!! So as I FREELY receive I FREELY give But here at covers you got guys that have been considered gods while hitting less than even 54% And who walk around town at covers as if they are the garbage oh they are THE garbage alright It doesn’t get more dumb than betting 8 team-250 ml parlays!
Sorry for venting I’m in middle of caffeine withdrawal and on way to cafe ASAP to get my 5th super large coffee already this morning Lol
bol to you mate we can work as one it’s always best to do that sadly the others don’t feel that way
I got ya straightbets, i know where you are coming from, you are still well collected man, you should see how i vent man and go crazy sometimes on little things when im not in the mood lol. 
But hey, this your thread, like i said, i totally understand where you are coming from, and i think its funny when you bash those 54% capper, even if i, have those % too in ncaab lol i totally dont mind that.
You said it right, lets help each other and we might win a lot.
Each has its role in here, and i also gets a lot of information here too.
Give credit where credit is due and i think you have done a great job in 3 months in here man.
I see some guys too doing great i can see them yea... even the rare posters in here too, who come and go but when they post and give some info, high % its a knowledge.
And you as a new posters in here, i can say you have done a high level performance i dont care how you capped it or how you get the plays but you are the one who throw it in here its yours.
And all who got the piece of the pie has no one to thank but you thats a fact.
keep bringing funny stuff in here and a lot of knowledge, winning plays and entertainment ( of course your call and time ). Respect that.
Thanks for the love and respect. Same here i got ya man. Ayt ayt.
Buffalo win or lose, i can take the hit, but this is your play i capped it the same way and i can say i up my units credit to you man.
Lose? doesnt matter you are still the straightbets i see.
Win? Big Credits to you.
Lets win some.
2
Posted:
#188
Hey straight not sure you will see this, but question for you. For MLB I ran your golden rule through SI Build a system, it doesn't let me select pitchers but there were exactly 360 instances last year throughout the season where 1 team lost the first 2 games of a 3 game series. So if you take the 360 games how often would you say the first pitcher actually started the series ? About half the time or more ? I'm trying to figure out how many plays there will be approx in a season following this rule.
0
Posted:
#190
You guys do know you have a little problem with using the Chop on the Harvard game. Harvard has a chop as well. Two teams with 5 game chops that show both should cover? It’s a run away from this play There are better plays than this one. Tomorrow we will hit chop play or two together. Stay away from this one guys.
0
Posted:
#191
Bobo Looks like SB has validated that you are correct. So does this odd numeric pattern mean to go throw the hammer down on Harvard -7.5?
If my brain is working i would think princeton +7.5 tonight then dartmouth the next game then the next game is where its broken and id think it be a big bet on brown. But i am smoking on right now so maybe my brain is all funky.
0
Posted:
#193
Quote Originally Posted by detwin:
Hey straight not sure you will see this, but question for you. For MLB I ran your golden rule through SI Build a system, it doesn't let me select pitchers but there were exactly 360 instances last year throughout the season where 1 team lost the first 2 games of a 3 game series. So if you take the 360 games how often would you say the first pitcher actually started the series ? About half the time or more ? I'm trying to figure out how many plays there will be approx in a season following this rule.
Hey straight not sure you will see this, but question for you. For MLB I ran your golden rule through SI Build a system, it doesn't let me select pitchers but there were exactly 360 instances last year throughout the season where 1 team lost the first 2 games of a 3 game series. So if you take the 360 games how often would you say the first pitcher actually started the series ? About half the time or more ? I'm trying to figure out how many plays there will be approx in a season following this rule.
There's really no way because of injuries and off days that SOMETIMES push the start of the SP and now some teams employing an "opener". With that being said the easiest way to go about this is every 6th game of the team you should see the #1 pitcher go. Again, no good way to evaluate this if you have no data with specific pitchers. This is something you have to eye in real-time and not by analytics.
0
Posted:
#194
SB a little about me I am in my very early 50s I am a retired police detective I don't know if you know the show Prodigal Son but that's what my job was to an extent. Basically trying to figure out people and reading them and this is what I have to say about you. And you know since day one I have always supported you and still do till this day
Your profile is someone in their 20's highly intelligent but using his left side of his brain meaning able to dissect things and the need to do it and to do it with a twist as to make it a puzzle or riddle to find the answer. Also a whiz with numbers that falls into the left side. What that means is a person who thirsts for perfection with a twist. The perfect person to think look and act outside the box to feed his hunger to be DIFFERENT not necessarily better. The ideal job for one would be a physicist, Nuclear engineer or a professional gambler. Take all of that and mix it with someone on the spectrum and believe me nothing at all wrong with that my son is and you have created a special wrecking machine which is what I believe you are plus or minus some of what I said. I believe you are a unique individual and absolutely love how you are geared. Looking forward to learning from you in the future. Always all my best of luck to you
0
Posted:
#198
Quote Originally Posted by detwin:
Hey straight not sure you will see this, but question for you. For MLB I ran your golden rule through SI Build a system, it doesn't let me select pitchers but there were exactly 360 instances last year throughout the season where 1 team lost the first 2 games of a 3 game series. So if you take the 360 games how often would you say the first pitcher actually started the series ? About half the time or more ? I'm trying to figure out how many plays there will be approx in a season following this rule.
Hey straight not sure you will see this, but question for you. For MLB I ran your golden rule through SI Build a system, it doesn't let me select pitchers but there were exactly 360 instances last year throughout the season where 1 team lost the first 2 games of a 3 game series. So if you take the 360 games how often would you say the first pitcher actually started the series ? About half the time or more ? I'm trying to figure out how many plays there will be approx in a season following this rule.
i honestly have no clue. You will have cracks at it possibly opening week! After that and after few times around rotation it’s not rare but it’s not a daily thing either. There are many more things than just that in baseball. I just gave you guys a few things to work with.
If this happens which it won’t but if it does slam it
if degrom loses opening day
Syndergaard loses game 2
you slam the hell out of Stroman!!!
It won’t happen. It can I guess. But this year the Mets have a powerhouse team. They are going to run with this division.
1
Posted:
#199
Quote Originally Posted by Straightbets:
Quote Originally Posted by detwin:
Hey straight not sure you will see this, but question for you. For MLB I ran your golden rule through SI Build a system, it doesn't let me select pitchers but there were exactly 360 instances last year throughout the season where 1 team lost the first 2 games of a 3 game series. So if you take the 360 games how often would you say the first pitcher actually started the series ? About half the time or more ? I'm trying to figure out how many plays there will be approx in a season following this rule.
i honestly have no clue. You will have cracks at it possibly opening week! After that and after few times around rotation it’s not rare but it’s not a daily thing either. There are many more things than just that in baseball. I just gave you guys a few things to work with. If this happens which it won’t but if it does slam it if degrom loses opening day Syndergaard loses game 2 you slam the hell out of Stroman!!! It won’t happen. It can I guess. But this year the Mets have a powerhouse team. They are going to run with this division.Hey straight not sure you will see this, but question for you. For MLB I ran your golden rule through SI Build a system, it doesn't let me select pitchers but there were exactly 360 instances last year throughout the season where 1 team lost the first 2 games of a 3 game series. So if you take the 360 games how often would you say the first pitcher actually started the series ? About half the time or more ? I'm trying to figure out how many plays there will be approx in a season following this rule.
It's the Mets...anything can happen 
0
Hot Forum Topics
