I like your basketball team and your football coach but you, my friend, are an idiot.
go page the taliban and kill some innocent woman while you are at it
I don't give a fuck what you think about me
I like your basketball team and your football coach but you, my friend, are an idiot.
go page the taliban and kill some innocent woman while you are at it
I don't give a fuck what you think about me
go page the taliban and kill some innocent woman while you are at it
I don't give a fuck what you think about me
I just kill the fuggin' worthless, lying Taliban. That is my job. As for you I have no real beef except that you can't spell. Doesn't really make any difference to me. Just playin'. If you want to kill women, join the Army...HeHeHe
go page the taliban and kill some innocent woman while you are at it
I don't give a fuck what you think about me
I just kill the fuggin' worthless, lying Taliban. That is my job. As for you I have no real beef except that you can't spell. Doesn't really make any difference to me. Just playin'. If you want to kill women, join the Army...HeHeHe
I just kill the fuggin' worthless, lying Taliban. That is my job. As for you I have no real beef except that you can't spell. Doesn't really make any difference to me. Just playin'. If you want to kill women, join the Army...HeHeHe
you are right...I cannot spell for shit
be safe over there
I just kill the fuggin' worthless, lying Taliban. That is my job. As for you I have no real beef except that you can't spell. Doesn't really make any difference to me. Just playin'. If you want to kill women, join the Army...HeHeHe
you are right...I cannot spell for shit
be safe over there
you are right...I cannot spell for shit
be safe over there
Thanks man!! This is my vacation. Talking to MoFo's like you. Go RockChalk Jay Hawk. Kansas wins it all this year.
you are right...I cannot spell for shit
be safe over there
Thanks man!! This is my vacation. Talking to MoFo's like you. Go RockChalk Jay Hawk. Kansas wins it all this year.
Thanks man!! This is my vacation. Talking to MoFo's like you. Go RockChalk Jay Hawk. Kansas wins it all this year.
Thanks man!! This is my vacation. Talking to MoFo's like you. Go RockChalk Jay Hawk. Kansas wins it all this year.
Guys, the plays i post are based on sharp action in vegas. I never said they were locks. I never said they are gauranteed. what I am saying is that sharp action do have a much higher win percentage than touts and the public. Im not telling anyone here they must bet my posted plays. All im posting is what I know a few sharps are betting down here is vegas sportsbooks. Last night was the first time i ever posted here and the play was the over in the bcs game. today the plays i am aware of that sharp money is going on is the nets and byu. By no means are they locks but IMO, the percentages are better for a win when you know your money is on the same side as the sharps. best of luck to all of you. Nets -1.5 byu -1.5 and rest knowing you are on the right side.
I assume you are making your plays based on the line movments here in Vegas??? By following how the lines move you can tell where the money is coming in on, this is also a fairly common practice so there should be nothing new here unless Nickel has anything to add...He is correct though in that significant line movements, either when the number is released or leading right up to game time, are largely influenced by significant influx of money on a given side...in Nickel's terms the move is showing the "money" or "sharps" getting in on that side. This is not always the case though...large or sudden line movements don't necessarily mean the "sharps" are on a side. You also have to take into account much more than just line movements as well. There are obviously many Pros & syndicates out there and they are not always on the same side and place varying amounts of wagers, you never know where the money is coming or how much (only the books have that info & they adjust accordingly)…the point is that he is not offering “guaranteed plays”, more so offering info/opinion based on where the money is going…critique & correct me need be, just my view on this topic.
Just a couple of recent examples of how this works & doesn’t work.
Tonights BYU/WF and Mich/Ind…BYU was seeing 61% of the action to begin with and the line moved ½ pt which by the outcome of the game looks like normal line movement (BYU lost this matchup). Indiana was seeing 75% following, the line moved ½ pt most spots up to –10…they rolled Michigan…I don’t see your following the Wolverines because of that movement.
Last nights LSU/OSU OVER 47.5…this line opened at 50 and had the UN pounded on it dropping it down to 47 where it stayed for about a week before game day…on game day the line moved ½ pt up to 47.5 where it stayed and hit OVER…if you were following the money you’d say there was large money going in on the OVER right before the game, causing that ½ pt move…the public I believe was on the OVER as well last night. Anyway, so that is successful example.
Here is a really fun example….earlier this CFB season Oregon was undefeated and traveling to Arizona as something like a 13 point favorite early in the week. The public was hammering the Ducks, something like 81% if I remember correctly…by game time the line had dropped to 10.5 or 11 most spots while Oregon was still seeing just as much action. Now usually when a favorite is seeing all the action the line moves upward accordingly, not so in this case, the line slowly dropped a little. This type of line movement is usually the one you look for, where the line moves the opposite of the public…that is a nice indicator of some large cash or “sharps” getting in on a side. And what happened in the game??? Dixon goes down early on some freak play and the Wildcats romped, covered & the books closed up happy that night…a very nice example of “some one” knowing some “info”. I hope I didn’t confuse too much, just trying to maybe shed some light on the thinking behind this thread…let me know if Im way off Nickel. With enough discussion this could be a fairly successful thread.
Guys, the plays i post are based on sharp action in vegas. I never said they were locks. I never said they are gauranteed. what I am saying is that sharp action do have a much higher win percentage than touts and the public. Im not telling anyone here they must bet my posted plays. All im posting is what I know a few sharps are betting down here is vegas sportsbooks. Last night was the first time i ever posted here and the play was the over in the bcs game. today the plays i am aware of that sharp money is going on is the nets and byu. By no means are they locks but IMO, the percentages are better for a win when you know your money is on the same side as the sharps. best of luck to all of you. Nets -1.5 byu -1.5 and rest knowing you are on the right side.
I assume you are making your plays based on the line movments here in Vegas??? By following how the lines move you can tell where the money is coming in on, this is also a fairly common practice so there should be nothing new here unless Nickel has anything to add...He is correct though in that significant line movements, either when the number is released or leading right up to game time, are largely influenced by significant influx of money on a given side...in Nickel's terms the move is showing the "money" or "sharps" getting in on that side. This is not always the case though...large or sudden line movements don't necessarily mean the "sharps" are on a side. You also have to take into account much more than just line movements as well. There are obviously many Pros & syndicates out there and they are not always on the same side and place varying amounts of wagers, you never know where the money is coming or how much (only the books have that info & they adjust accordingly)…the point is that he is not offering “guaranteed plays”, more so offering info/opinion based on where the money is going…critique & correct me need be, just my view on this topic.
Just a couple of recent examples of how this works & doesn’t work.
Tonights BYU/WF and Mich/Ind…BYU was seeing 61% of the action to begin with and the line moved ½ pt which by the outcome of the game looks like normal line movement (BYU lost this matchup). Indiana was seeing 75% following, the line moved ½ pt most spots up to –10…they rolled Michigan…I don’t see your following the Wolverines because of that movement.
Last nights LSU/OSU OVER 47.5…this line opened at 50 and had the UN pounded on it dropping it down to 47 where it stayed for about a week before game day…on game day the line moved ½ pt up to 47.5 where it stayed and hit OVER…if you were following the money you’d say there was large money going in on the OVER right before the game, causing that ½ pt move…the public I believe was on the OVER as well last night. Anyway, so that is successful example.
Here is a really fun example….earlier this CFB season Oregon was undefeated and traveling to Arizona as something like a 13 point favorite early in the week. The public was hammering the Ducks, something like 81% if I remember correctly…by game time the line had dropped to 10.5 or 11 most spots while Oregon was still seeing just as much action. Now usually when a favorite is seeing all the action the line moves upward accordingly, not so in this case, the line slowly dropped a little. This type of line movement is usually the one you look for, where the line moves the opposite of the public…that is a nice indicator of some large cash or “sharps” getting in on a side. And what happened in the game??? Dixon goes down early on some freak play and the Wildcats romped, covered & the books closed up happy that night…a very nice example of “some one” knowing some “info”. I hope I didn’t confuse too much, just trying to maybe shed some light on the thinking behind this thread…let me know if Im way off Nickel. With enough discussion this could be a fairly successful thread.
I assume you are making your plays based on the line movments here in Vegas??? By following how the lines move you can tell where the money is coming in on, this is also a fairly common practice so there should be nothing new here unless Nickel has anything to add...He is correct though in that significant line movements, either when the number is released or leading right up to game time, are largely influenced by significant influx of money on a given side...in Nickel's terms the move is showing the "money" or "sharps" getting in on that side. This is not always the case though...large or sudden line movements don't necessarily mean the "sharps" are on a side. You also have to take into account much more than just line movements as well. There are obviously many Pros & syndicates out there and they are not always on the same side and place varying amounts of wagers, you never know where the money is coming or how much (only the books have that info & they adjust accordingly)…the point is that he is not offering “guaranteed plays”, more so offering info/opinion based on where the money is going…critique & correct me need be, just my view on this topic.
Just a couple of recent examples of how this works & doesn’t work.
Tonights BYU/WF and Mich/Ind…BYU was seeing 61% of the action to begin with and the line moved ½ pt which by the outcome of the game looks like normal line movement (BYU lost this matchup). Indiana was seeing 75% following, the line moved ½ pt most spots up to –10…they rolled Michigan…I don’t see your following the Wolverines because of that movement.
Last nights LSU/OSU OVER 47.5…this line opened at 50 and had the UN pounded on it dropping it down to 47 where it stayed for about a week before game day…on game day the line moved ½ pt up to 47.5 where it stayed and hit OVER…if you were following the money you’d say there was large money going in on the OVER right before the game, causing that ½ pt move…the public I believe was on the OVER as well last night. Anyway, so that is successful example.
Here is a really fun example….earlier this CFB season Oregon was undefeated and traveling to Arizona as something like a 13 point favorite early in the week. The public was hammering the Ducks, something like 81% if I remember correctly…by game time the line had dropped to 10.5 or 11 most spots while Oregon was still seeing just as much action. Now usually when a favorite is seeing all the action the line moves upward accordingly, not so in this case, the line slowly dropped a little. This type of line movement is usually the one you look for, where the line moves the opposite of the public…that is a nice indicator of some large cash or “sharps” getting in on a side. And what happened in the game??? Dixon goes down early on some freak play and the Wildcats romped, covered & the books closed up happy that night…a very nice example of “some one” knowing some “info”. I hope I didn’t confuse too much, just trying to maybe shed some light on the thinking behind this thread…let me know if Im way off Nickel. With enough discussion this could be a fairly successful thread.
First post...didn't mean to quote the whole thing.
I assume you are making your plays based on the line movments here in Vegas??? By following how the lines move you can tell where the money is coming in on, this is also a fairly common practice so there should be nothing new here unless Nickel has anything to add...He is correct though in that significant line movements, either when the number is released or leading right up to game time, are largely influenced by significant influx of money on a given side...in Nickel's terms the move is showing the "money" or "sharps" getting in on that side. This is not always the case though...large or sudden line movements don't necessarily mean the "sharps" are on a side. You also have to take into account much more than just line movements as well. There are obviously many Pros & syndicates out there and they are not always on the same side and place varying amounts of wagers, you never know where the money is coming or how much (only the books have that info & they adjust accordingly)…the point is that he is not offering “guaranteed plays”, more so offering info/opinion based on where the money is going…critique & correct me need be, just my view on this topic.
Just a couple of recent examples of how this works & doesn’t work.
Tonights BYU/WF and Mich/Ind…BYU was seeing 61% of the action to begin with and the line moved ½ pt which by the outcome of the game looks like normal line movement (BYU lost this matchup). Indiana was seeing 75% following, the line moved ½ pt most spots up to –10…they rolled Michigan…I don’t see your following the Wolverines because of that movement.
Last nights LSU/OSU OVER 47.5…this line opened at 50 and had the UN pounded on it dropping it down to 47 where it stayed for about a week before game day…on game day the line moved ½ pt up to 47.5 where it stayed and hit OVER…if you were following the money you’d say there was large money going in on the OVER right before the game, causing that ½ pt move…the public I believe was on the OVER as well last night. Anyway, so that is successful example.
Here is a really fun example….earlier this CFB season Oregon was undefeated and traveling to Arizona as something like a 13 point favorite early in the week. The public was hammering the Ducks, something like 81% if I remember correctly…by game time the line had dropped to 10.5 or 11 most spots while Oregon was still seeing just as much action. Now usually when a favorite is seeing all the action the line moves upward accordingly, not so in this case, the line slowly dropped a little. This type of line movement is usually the one you look for, where the line moves the opposite of the public…that is a nice indicator of some large cash or “sharps” getting in on a side. And what happened in the game??? Dixon goes down early on some freak play and the Wildcats romped, covered & the books closed up happy that night…a very nice example of “some one” knowing some “info”. I hope I didn’t confuse too much, just trying to maybe shed some light on the thinking behind this thread…let me know if Im way off Nickel. With enough discussion this could be a fairly successful thread.
First post...didn't mean to quote the whole thing.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.