While grateful for the work, picks, and insight of a select few cappers here, why is it that the one game they give is usually a marquis game generally with tight margins and a sharp book line?
A few times we have had late line movement, reverse line movement, etc. Why is it never "Bellarmine to easily cover the 7 boys"? On a card with 20-30 games there has to be some woth no sweat, no.
Many of the games are a pass on my end, and this is to not dog any poster or play but stimulate some thought provoking discussion.
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
While grateful for the work, picks, and insight of a select few cappers here, why is it that the one game they give is usually a marquis game generally with tight margins and a sharp book line?
A few times we have had late line movement, reverse line movement, etc. Why is it never "Bellarmine to easily cover the 7 boys"? On a card with 20-30 games there has to be some woth no sweat, no.
Many of the games are a pass on my end, and this is to not dog any poster or play but stimulate some thought provoking discussion.
In general the big name matchups, typical are bigger schools, with better players (in general), have been watched more by the betting public>> therfore the public thinks they have an edge based on previous games they have watched.
Not to mention, books will allow much higher limits on 2 Big 10 or 2 ACC schools compared to say 2 Big Sky or Big South matchups. Then to take it a step further, a school such as Bellermine (who I don't believe turned D 1 until this yr), many books might have a max of just $500 on one of their games.
More Exposure=Bigger limits= More Intrigue= Bigger Action
0
Thats a good question,
In general the big name matchups, typical are bigger schools, with better players (in general), have been watched more by the betting public>> therfore the public thinks they have an edge based on previous games they have watched.
Not to mention, books will allow much higher limits on 2 Big 10 or 2 ACC schools compared to say 2 Big Sky or Big South matchups. Then to take it a step further, a school such as Bellermine (who I don't believe turned D 1 until this yr), many books might have a max of just $500 on one of their games.
More Exposure=Bigger limits= More Intrigue= Bigger Action
Thats a good question, In general the big name matchups, typical are bigger schools, with better players (in general), have been watched more by the betting public>> therfore the public thinks they have an edge based on previous games they have watched. Not to mention, books will allow much higher limits on 2 Big 10 or 2 ACC schools compared to say 2 Big Sky or Big South matchups. Then to take it a step further, a school such as Bellermine (who I don't believe turned D 1 until this yr), many books might have a max of just $500 on one of their games. More Exposure=Bigger limits= More Intrigue= Bigger Action
If even 20 % of the knuckle heads in some of these threads are betting 500 a play....God help them. But.....I just read that PA books had a 550 million handle in December....so maybe.
0
Quote Originally Posted by troy9828:
Thats a good question, In general the big name matchups, typical are bigger schools, with better players (in general), have been watched more by the betting public>> therfore the public thinks they have an edge based on previous games they have watched. Not to mention, books will allow much higher limits on 2 Big 10 or 2 ACC schools compared to say 2 Big Sky or Big South matchups. Then to take it a step further, a school such as Bellermine (who I don't believe turned D 1 until this yr), many books might have a max of just $500 on one of their games. More Exposure=Bigger limits= More Intrigue= Bigger Action
If even 20 % of the knuckle heads in some of these threads are betting 500 a play....God help them. But.....I just read that PA books had a 550 million handle in December....so maybe.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
