Coming off a solid NIT night picking up 7 units. Had zags locked in a couple days ago @ -7 -120 for 5 units. still looking at one more for today but i may wait until halftime to see how the game goes. will be back a little later. Good luck, everyone!
Zags -120 (5u)
MSU-6 (5U)
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
March - 24-20 (+25.3u)
5u - 11-5
Coming off a solid NIT night picking up 7 units. Had zags locked in a couple days ago @ -7 -120 for 5 units. still looking at one more for today but i may wait until halftime to see how the game goes. will be back a little later. Good luck, everyone!
It's a 5 unit type of day today I see... good luck
yea, man. games are thinning out,season wrapping up and i'm up a nice chunk. gotta start raising the stakes while the iron is hot. good luck today, mr. beef!
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
Quote Originally Posted by PhillyBEEF:
It's a 5 unit type of day today I see... good luck
yea, man. games are thinning out,season wrapping up and i'm up a nice chunk. gotta start raising the stakes while the iron is hot. good luck today, mr. beef!
dtown, dc, mak - thanks, fellas! good luck tonight!
michigan -1 -120 (5u)
this should be an amazing game. the one thing i am banking on here is that ttu will be stifled by the height that michigan's d offers. not only that, they tend to turn the ball over on the road a lot. i'm banking on turnovers turning into fouls and beilein capitalizing off of this. this should be an amazing game but i think michigan gets more physical off the boards and takes the w. the one thing i am unsure of is the point distribution from michigan. one michigan doesn't have a defined go to shooter. poole or matthews is really going to have to step up today and keep a good pace. we saw a glimpse from poole early on their last game but he then got cold very quick, which allowed florida to get a small taste of coming back into the game
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
Quote Originally Posted by OlDirtyBaztid:
dtown, dc, mak - thanks, fellas! good luck tonight!
michigan -1 -120 (5u)
this should be an amazing game. the one thing i am banking on here is that ttu will be stifled by the height that michigan's d offers. not only that, they tend to turn the ball over on the road a lot. i'm banking on turnovers turning into fouls and beilein capitalizing off of this. this should be an amazing game but i think michigan gets more physical off the boards and takes the w. the one thing i am unsure of is the point distribution from michigan. one michigan doesn't have a defined go to shooter. poole or matthews is really going to have to step up today and keep a good pace. we saw a glimpse from poole early on their last game but he then got cold very quick, which allowed florida to get a small taste of coming back into the game
well yesterday sucked. ttu completely dominant to michigan. beilein is going to have to do some serious offensive work with that team. zavier simpson gotta go. end of story. you can't have your guard afraid to shoot the ball like that. guy had the most minutes and not one point, he's too small to rebound, and to be honest, just not talented enough to be starting line up caliber.
i'm not sure what tot hink of virginia probably because you never get the same consistency from virginia in both halves of the game. one half they stinkl up the joint, the other they blow the competition away. unfortunately the dominating virginia team only showed up in the first half yesterday to kill both my full game and 2h play. i want to say purdue rocks them but i don't trust the reliability of edwards. that dude is amazing but he throws up a ton of garbage. i don't think haarms will have success because he's not that physical and that kid diakite is nails. really like watching him play. i think he is going to give haarms massive problems all night tomorrow. i've said it before and i'll say it again, if you can remove edwards from purdue, you don't have the purdue team we saw last night. they also got VERY lucky with the refs.
moving on to today.. got msu locked in from a few days ago still. plenty of opportunity to get back into the plus for the sweet sixteen and roll into profit for the elite 8.
gonna look into the rest of the card and have plays a little later. really itching to fire off on auburn if i can get 6. i do see that bovada is offering it right now. good luck today, everyone!
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
MTD - 26-23 (+21.9u)
5U - 12-6
well yesterday sucked. ttu completely dominant to michigan. beilein is going to have to do some serious offensive work with that team. zavier simpson gotta go. end of story. you can't have your guard afraid to shoot the ball like that. guy had the most minutes and not one point, he's too small to rebound, and to be honest, just not talented enough to be starting line up caliber.
i'm not sure what tot hink of virginia probably because you never get the same consistency from virginia in both halves of the game. one half they stinkl up the joint, the other they blow the competition away. unfortunately the dominating virginia team only showed up in the first half yesterday to kill both my full game and 2h play. i want to say purdue rocks them but i don't trust the reliability of edwards. that dude is amazing but he throws up a ton of garbage. i don't think haarms will have success because he's not that physical and that kid diakite is nails. really like watching him play. i think he is going to give haarms massive problems all night tomorrow. i've said it before and i'll say it again, if you can remove edwards from purdue, you don't have the purdue team we saw last night. they also got VERY lucky with the refs.
moving on to today.. got msu locked in from a few days ago still. plenty of opportunity to get back into the plus for the sweet sixteen and roll into profit for the elite 8.
gonna look into the rest of the card and have plays a little later. really itching to fire off on auburn if i can get 6. i do see that bovada is offering it right now. good luck today, everyone!
i can't quite figure out why this line is so generous other than the big name. this, with the coach, has cost me some profits a few times this year: kansas against auburn, michigan over ttu, wiscy over oregon. the big house hold names that dominate each year. books still showing them as favorites even though they haven't proved to be as the season passed. and i played right into it. so i'm going to lock this one up before i overthink it any further.
i believe the tides are turning and the big names we are used to seeing might begin to fade out closing out march. i was going back and forth on this one for a while mulling over the presence of pj washington. honestly, how long will he play even if he does play? this dude was in a hard cast and now he is qualified for a balls to the wall sweet 16 game? kentucky was not overly impressive against wofford, and for a while it appeared they weren't going to cover. they were very fortunate to have half of wofford's dynamic duo go cold, going 0-14 in that game. a couple three pointers and that game would've been completely different. houston's d is a notch about kentucky in almost every metric. one thing that worries me is the height as houston is much smaller but read above about pj washington. another thing that worries me about houston is the lack of caliber they played throughout the season, but experience should overcome that as they have been down this path before. armani brooks and corey davis should really be able to take advantage of the three point line, which is where kentucky's d lacks. if they can knock down their shots and have the same success that they had against an osu team, who's perimeter d was even better than kentucky's, there's no reason they shouldn't be able to secure the W
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
houston +2.5 (5u)
i can't quite figure out why this line is so generous other than the big name. this, with the coach, has cost me some profits a few times this year: kansas against auburn, michigan over ttu, wiscy over oregon. the big house hold names that dominate each year. books still showing them as favorites even though they haven't proved to be as the season passed. and i played right into it. so i'm going to lock this one up before i overthink it any further.
i believe the tides are turning and the big names we are used to seeing might begin to fade out closing out march. i was going back and forth on this one for a while mulling over the presence of pj washington. honestly, how long will he play even if he does play? this dude was in a hard cast and now he is qualified for a balls to the wall sweet 16 game? kentucky was not overly impressive against wofford, and for a while it appeared they weren't going to cover. they were very fortunate to have half of wofford's dynamic duo go cold, going 0-14 in that game. a couple three pointers and that game would've been completely different. houston's d is a notch about kentucky in almost every metric. one thing that worries me is the height as houston is much smaller but read above about pj washington. another thing that worries me about houston is the lack of caliber they played throughout the season, but experience should overcome that as they have been down this path before. armani brooks and corey davis should really be able to take advantage of the three point line, which is where kentucky's d lacks. if they can knock down their shots and have the same success that they had against an osu team, who's perimeter d was even better than kentucky's, there's no reason they shouldn't be able to secure the W
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.