This is off topic (and I am embarrassed to post this pick), but I have been pretty solid betting awards this year. I hit Tim L to win the Cy Young, Colt McCoy to not win the Heisman, Nate Robinson to win slam dunk title, hit a grammy win with Beyonce.
Anyway, if you have matchbook there is -212 on Sandra Bullock to win the best actress Oscar, I already have 1-unit on it and would be very surprised if Meryl Streep upsets her. -212 is pretty nice value on someone who has won a ton of honors this award season already and is a solid favorite and the Academy has a history of rewarding someone as an almost "lifetime acheivement" award in these types of situations.
I will now attempt to regain my manhood by studying more college hoops
0
This is off topic (and I am embarrassed to post this pick), but I have been pretty solid betting awards this year. I hit Tim L to win the Cy Young, Colt McCoy to not win the Heisman, Nate Robinson to win slam dunk title, hit a grammy win with Beyonce.
Anyway, if you have matchbook there is -212 on Sandra Bullock to win the best actress Oscar, I already have 1-unit on it and would be very surprised if Meryl Streep upsets her. -212 is pretty nice value on someone who has won a ton of honors this award season already and is a solid favorite and the Academy has a history of rewarding someone as an almost "lifetime acheivement" award in these types of situations.
I will now attempt to regain my manhood by studying more college hoops
Kine I would really appreciate your thoughts on the Fairfield vs Niagara game. Can't understand why a team that beat another by 6 points, granted at home, are 1 1/2 point underdogs. Already locked in Fairfield large so hopefully you won't have an obvious reason that I missed. The opener at Legends was -5 Fairfield, which really threw me for a loop when I saw + 1 to +1 1/2 and even + 2 everywhere else. Didn't find any injuries or suspensions so just wondering what gives. Did I fall into a trap or is this just because Nia. always seems to be in the finals of this tourney? Thoughts appreciated and thanks for the N Ill. win. Keep up the good work.
0
Kine I would really appreciate your thoughts on the Fairfield vs Niagara game. Can't understand why a team that beat another by 6 points, granted at home, are 1 1/2 point underdogs. Already locked in Fairfield large so hopefully you won't have an obvious reason that I missed. The opener at Legends was -5 Fairfield, which really threw me for a loop when I saw + 1 to +1 1/2 and even + 2 everywhere else. Didn't find any injuries or suspensions so just wondering what gives. Did I fall into a trap or is this just because Nia. always seems to be in the finals of this tourney? Thoughts appreciated and thanks for the N Ill. win. Keep up the good work.
ESPN simulations has Niagara by 4 Kenpom has Fairfield by 1
I think Fairfield wins a tight one, but the uptempo of Niagara has me a bit worried because if they get out to a hot start, it could change the dynamic of the whole game. I watched the Niagara game they played at home when they blew out Siena so I have seen what their best is and its scary. That was also a nice win against a tough Iona team last night so their confidence should be high. This is going to be a close, tough game probably decided at the end. If that is the case, I would rather be backing Fairfield
0
ESPN simulations has Niagara by 4 Kenpom has Fairfield by 1
I think Fairfield wins a tight one, but the uptempo of Niagara has me a bit worried because if they get out to a hot start, it could change the dynamic of the whole game. I watched the Niagara game they played at home when they blew out Siena so I have seen what their best is and its scary. That was also a nice win against a tough Iona team last night so their confidence should be high. This is going to be a close, tough game probably decided at the end. If that is the case, I would rather be backing Fairfield
I know the system worked in Februrary. I have a couple of questions, please let us know what you think.
1.. How early can this system be applied, a few weeks after the beginning of the season, or January etc.
2. Do think, this system will be will ever change? or do you think Vegas will adjust, have you ever compared the Vegas lines vs kenpom's lines when using the system?
3. Do you have other systems for other sports? anyone who reads this can answer to help us all
Thanks!
0
Professor!
I know the system worked in Februrary. I have a couple of questions, please let us know what you think.
1.. How early can this system be applied, a few weeks after the beginning of the season, or January etc.
2. Do think, this system will be will ever change? or do you think Vegas will adjust, have you ever compared the Vegas lines vs kenpom's lines when using the system?
3. Do you have other systems for other sports? anyone who reads this can answer to help us all
I know the system worked in Februrary. I have a couple of questions, please let us know what you think.
1.. How early can this system be applied, a few weeks after the beginning of the season, or January etc.
2. Do think, this system will be will ever change? or do you think Vegas will adjust, have you ever compared the Vegas lines vs kenpom's lines when using the system?
3. Do you have other systems for other sports? anyone who reads this can answer to help us all
Thanks!
1. I chose mid-Feb because the games that we are betting with this system are all sucky. The home team has to be 180 or worse and to have that team a more than 6 point favorite they have to really be playing someone sucky. The thing with these sucky teams are they, for the most part, they are just playing out the string of what is a terrible season and we are trying to take advantage of the teams "giving up on the season" so to speak. You could use this strategy of taking the road dog when playing a mediocre team anytime and I feel like it will be successful, but mid-Feb seems like the sweet spot to catch those teams ready to quit.
2. The system will be ever-changing and we will try to see if we can pro-create some siblings so that its not lonely! Vegas doesn't need to adjust because people still bet Northern Illinois -11 against Toledo (epic ATS loss) and then bet Eastern Michigan -8.5 against that Northern Illinois team that they think sucks (epic ATS loss). This is a fairly contrarian system as most people don't like the plays. I wouldn't worry about what kenpom says the final score will be - we can gauge enough value from the rankings themselves.
3. None yet, besides my "Do anything Gamehunter tells me to do in baseball" system.
0
Quote Originally Posted by pinerider:
Professor!
I know the system worked in Februrary. I have a couple of questions, please let us know what you think.
1.. How early can this system be applied, a few weeks after the beginning of the season, or January etc.
2. Do think, this system will be will ever change? or do you think Vegas will adjust, have you ever compared the Vegas lines vs kenpom's lines when using the system?
3. Do you have other systems for other sports? anyone who reads this can answer to help us all
Thanks!
1. I chose mid-Feb because the games that we are betting with this system are all sucky. The home team has to be 180 or worse and to have that team a more than 6 point favorite they have to really be playing someone sucky. The thing with these sucky teams are they, for the most part, they are just playing out the string of what is a terrible season and we are trying to take advantage of the teams "giving up on the season" so to speak. You could use this strategy of taking the road dog when playing a mediocre team anytime and I feel like it will be successful, but mid-Feb seems like the sweet spot to catch those teams ready to quit.
2. The system will be ever-changing and we will try to see if we can pro-create some siblings so that its not lonely! Vegas doesn't need to adjust because people still bet Northern Illinois -11 against Toledo (epic ATS loss) and then bet Eastern Michigan -8.5 against that Northern Illinois team that they think sucks (epic ATS loss). This is a fairly contrarian system as most people don't like the plays. I wouldn't worry about what kenpom says the final score will be - we can gauge enough value from the rankings themselves.
3. None yet, besides my "Do anything Gamehunter tells me to do in baseball" system.
ESPN simulations has Niagara by 4 Kenpom has Fairfield by 1
I think Fairfield wins a tight one, but the uptempo of Niagara has me a bit worried because if they get out to a hot start, it could change the dynamic of the whole game. I watched the Niagara game they played at home when they blew out Siena so I have seen what their best is and its scary. That was also a nice win against a tough Iona team last night so their confidence should be high. This is going to be a close, tough game probably decided at the end. If that is the case, I would rather be backing Fairfield
Thanks Kine, at least I feel a little better knowing you see it the way I do. Saw Fairfield in person at Rhodys home "pit" the Ryan Center and thought the coach did an outstanding job of controlling the tempo of that game. Have to believe that Rhody's got every bit as much fire power as Nia does, that's why I like the Stags in this one. Another of my larger plays so hopefully we're both right. BOL and keep up the good work.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
ESPN simulations has Niagara by 4 Kenpom has Fairfield by 1
I think Fairfield wins a tight one, but the uptempo of Niagara has me a bit worried because if they get out to a hot start, it could change the dynamic of the whole game. I watched the Niagara game they played at home when they blew out Siena so I have seen what their best is and its scary. That was also a nice win against a tough Iona team last night so their confidence should be high. This is going to be a close, tough game probably decided at the end. If that is the case, I would rather be backing Fairfield
Thanks Kine, at least I feel a little better knowing you see it the way I do. Saw Fairfield in person at Rhodys home "pit" the Ryan Center and thought the coach did an outstanding job of controlling the tempo of that game. Have to believe that Rhody's got every bit as much fire power as Nia does, that's why I like the Stags in this one. Another of my larger plays so hopefully we're both right. BOL and keep up the good work.
Wow Kine, just looked at the box score of the Rhody game which was played early in the year. For the life of me I can't believe the final was 89 - 84 Rhody, a Fairfield cover. Just didn't, until I refreshed my memory, remember that kind of game. I think it was how efficient they were that made it look a little more casual than the final score would indicate. Still not worried because at least I know now they can stand up and take some punches and still hang in, in a high scoring game. Again BOL
0
Wow Kine, just looked at the box score of the Rhody game which was played early in the year. For the life of me I can't believe the final was 89 - 84 Rhody, a Fairfield cover. Just didn't, until I refreshed my memory, remember that kind of game. I think it was how efficient they were that made it look a little more casual than the final score would indicate. Still not worried because at least I know now they can stand up and take some punches and still hang in, in a high scoring game. Again BOL
1. I chose mid-Feb because the games that we are betting with this system are all sucky. The home team has to be 180 or worse and to have that team a more than 6 point favorite they have to really be playing someone sucky. The thing with these sucky teams are they, for the most part, they are just playing out the string of what is a terrible season and we are trying to take advantage of the teams "giving up on the season" so to speak. You could use this strategy of taking the road dog when playing a mediocre team anytime and I feel like it will be successful, but mid-Feb seems like the sweet spot to catch those teams ready to quit.
2. The system will be ever-changing and we will try to see if we can pro-create some siblings so that its not lonely! Vegas doesn't need to adjust because people still bet Northern Illinois -11 against Toledo (epic ATS loss) and then bet Eastern Michigan -8.5 against that Northern Illinois team that they think sucks (epic ATS loss). This is a fairly contrarian system as most people don't like the plays. I wouldn't worry about what kenpom says the final score will be - we can gauge enough value from the rankings themselves.
3. None yet, besides my "Do anything Gamehunter tells me to do in baseball" system.
Amen to that Bro. Can't wait for bases.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
1. I chose mid-Feb because the games that we are betting with this system are all sucky. The home team has to be 180 or worse and to have that team a more than 6 point favorite they have to really be playing someone sucky. The thing with these sucky teams are they, for the most part, they are just playing out the string of what is a terrible season and we are trying to take advantage of the teams "giving up on the season" so to speak. You could use this strategy of taking the road dog when playing a mediocre team anytime and I feel like it will be successful, but mid-Feb seems like the sweet spot to catch those teams ready to quit.
2. The system will be ever-changing and we will try to see if we can pro-create some siblings so that its not lonely! Vegas doesn't need to adjust because people still bet Northern Illinois -11 against Toledo (epic ATS loss) and then bet Eastern Michigan -8.5 against that Northern Illinois team that they think sucks (epic ATS loss). This is a fairly contrarian system as most people don't like the plays. I wouldn't worry about what kenpom says the final score will be - we can gauge enough value from the rankings themselves.
3. None yet, besides my "Do anything Gamehunter tells me to do in baseball" system.
Good luck to you
as well, I always look for your threads. The utah st/nmsu under from
yesterday would have been right in your wheelhouse!
Thanks
I don't have time tonight to do a full write up, but I'll be on the
Portland/St Mary's Over 140. I know that Portland plays at a relatively
slow pace, but I love how efficient both teams are on the offensive
end. And with both teams desperately needing to get to the WCC finals,
I can see a close game with plenty of end game fouling.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
Good luck to you
as well, I always look for your threads. The utah st/nmsu under from
yesterday would have been right in your wheelhouse!
Thanks
I don't have time tonight to do a full write up, but I'll be on the
Portland/St Mary's Over 140. I know that Portland plays at a relatively
slow pace, but I love how efficient both teams are on the offensive
end. And with both teams desperately needing to get to the WCC finals,
I can see a close game with plenty of end game fouling.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.