All Forums | College Basketball

Thursday 1/5 CBB Plays

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 18005
Posts: 100
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 5107
Posted: #51
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 5107
Posted: #52

Here's the latest on UCLA's Joshua Smith in the Cal game. Turnover FOUR TIMES IN THE FIRST 8 MIN!

Joshua Smith missed Layup

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 5107
Posted: #53

Here's the latest on UCLA's Joshua Smith in the Cal game. Turnover FOUR TIMES IN THE FIRST 8 MIN!

Joshua Smith missed Layup 3 times

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 5107
Posted: #54
310 lbs of BLUBBERBALL!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4616
Posted: #55
I emailed you a few thoughts on that Charleston/Wofford game
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1458
Posted: #56

Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:

I emailed you a few thoughts on that Charleston/Wofford game

Share with the rest of us how you feel about the game

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 191
Posted: #57
finally just going to follw you instead of going on my own hunches. My hunches don't do nearly as well as your picks. Love the breakdowns. Thanks JFen
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 5107
Posted: #58


 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 102
Posted: #59

As much as I hate to say this, I believe you are correct on the Oregon pick.  As a cardinals fan myself, I know that we are not good on the road, and tend to get colder and colder, as the years progress.  And I don't know what it is.  The lack of same sided cheers and hoorays?  Bad team chemistry, due to nerves being tangled?  I don't know.  All I know is that we don't play with confidence on the road. 

I really like this Oregon team.  Great team chemistry, followed by great ability to shoot 3's.  Add in the home game factor and you have a winner. 

Stanford will fight hard, but near the end, will give it up.  I simulation that Oregon wins this by 8-10 points.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 9003
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:

I emailed you a few thoughts on that Charleston/Wofford game



Do you charge people money now for your picks? Why have you gone underground like a Satanic cult.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4616
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by YACKER:

Share with the rest of us how you feel about the game



Don't want to hijack J-Fen's thread - between my bud's J-Fen and Riccio picks most covers members would be hard pressed to lose money if they just read and follow those guys (and heaven forbid began to use similar stats to angles to handicap the games on their own). 

SoCon is one of the conferences I follow closely and the C of C/Wofford game is a toss-up.  At this point of the season it is important to throw out season stats and begin to look more closely at: their last 5 games, any conference games from this season, and what happened in last seasons matchups if there isn't significant roster turnover or coaching change.  Over their last 5 games, Wofford's guards have really improved.  They are only committing 11 turnovers per game and have an assist to turnover ratio of 1.29.  They are also shooting 3's more effeciently while C of C has struggled in 3-point defense over their last 5 games.  Also, C of C uses the 3's point shot and free throws as the main sources of their points, and again, over their last five games - Wofford has limited their opponents 3-point ATTEMPTS (more reliable stat than percentage in this case) and aren't sending their opponents to the line very often. 

From a strictly stats/angles standpoint, C of C is worth a 1-unit play and there is value at the current line, but for me its a stay away as I can see this game playing out many different ways and I actually like how Wofford matches up in the game tonight (and please understand that I have cashed with C of C all season long so I'm being as objective as possible with this mini-writeup). 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4616
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by Kaka123:




Do you charge people money now for your picks? Why have you gone underground like a Satanic cult.


Unfortunately, life happens sometimes and I can't put in the time necessary to do writeups and post plays, I don't feel bad to the 98% of crybabies and jerks on this site but for the 2% of solid posters and lurkers that understand that we are all in this together, I'm sorry to not help more.  But if you look closely around this site you will see the influence of my old-school giant writeup, stats-based analysis with some of the posters and hopefully most should know the "types" of plays I would be in favor of (aka Citadel +12 tonight comes to mind as Texas Tech +11.5 did last night).  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 5107
Posted: #63

Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:

I emailed you a few thoughts on that Charleston/Wofford game

Why don't you keep that shit private!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1458
Posted: #64

KP you are missed around here for sure.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4616
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by gbpackman:

Why don't you keep that shit private!



Exhibit A(hole)
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 870
Posted: #66
Oregon
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 615
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:



Exhibit A(hole)




Good line KP , I remember your posts from a couple of years ago, I come in and out every few years..GL bud you do good work
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 615
Posted: #68
Great info JFen, I don;t read many people but I like your write-up's we have a very similar approach, I am just not as on the ball as you are in my older age..maybe I need to start drinking more again..

Anyway good luck tonight I am with you on a couple you have on your card.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 3149
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by CappingVet:

I am just not as on the ball as you are in my older age..maybe I need to start drinking more again..
or maybe you aren't bright in the first place, case in point
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 8308
Posted: #70
Current Card
Fordham @ UMASS Over 139 (1.5 units)
Stanford @ Oregon -1 (1.5 units)
Charleston -1 @ Wofford (1 unit)
Middle Tennessee @ Troy +8.5 (1 unit)
Michigan +8 @ Indiana (1 unit) -120
Weber State +3.5 @ Eastern Washington (1 unit)

Not playing UMASS with LaLanne, Carter, and Hill out of the lineup. Gaston could have a field day inside. Minutemen down to 8 players. No Penn State play, either. Love the spot, but just too risky.

Strong lean to the over in the Weber-EWU game.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4418
Posted: #71

Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:



Unfortunately, life happens sometimes and I can't put in the time necessary to do writeups and post plays, I don't feel bad to the 98% of crybabies and jerks on this site but for the 2% of solid posters and lurkers that understand that we are all in this together, I'm sorry to not help more.  But if you look closely around this site you will see the influence of my old-school giant writeup, stats-based analysis with some of the posters and hopefully most should know the "types" of plays I would be in favor of (aka Citadel +12 tonight comes to mind as Texas Tech +11.5 did last night).  

Totally understand that the real world beckons.  You don't have time for good write-ups and would rather write nothing than half-assed write-ups you're not happy with. I get that.

But why not just share your picks w/ no write-ups at all? I think you've garnered enough rep where people would be appreciative of that.

BTW, the crybabies and jerks may seem like 98% but are probably more like the 10%, but just more vocal.  Most of the thread views are probably lurkers that just want input from respected cappers when they decide their games.  Well, that's what I try to do. I try to be thankful w/ my comments, but I bet there's a silent majority out there.   

Regardless, GL w/ your picks.  

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 48
Posted: #72
I like the way you throw it down JFen.  I always check out your opinions before making a play.  Thanks for taking the time to give us your thoughts.  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33090
Posted: #73

Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:



Unfortunately, life happens sometimes and I can't put in the time necessary to do writeups and post plays, I don't feel bad to the 98% of crybabies and jerks on this site but for the 2% of solid posters and lurkers that understand that we are all in this together, I'm sorry to not help more.  But if you look closely around this site you will see the influence of my old-school giant writeup, stats-based analysis with some of the posters and hopefully most should know the "types" of plays I would be in favor of (aka Citadel +12 tonight comes to mind as Texas Tech +11.5 did last night).  

Love seeing you drop by threads myself. Stay true to yourself KP and pop in when you can. Your thoughts are always appreciated to most

Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 256
Posted: #74
 Good Luck tonight - thanks for sharing your thoughts
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2410
Posted: #75
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.