All Forums | College Basketball

THURSDAY,, MEMBERS TO BE TOP CAPPER THREAD

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7841
Posts: 163
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 132
Posted: #126
OK guys chasclem will be the last one that will tabulate, everything after that you will have to add on your own
 

Scoot
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 629
Posted: #127

Totals and Halves

 

 Nothing Significant to report as far as totals for this consesus. The only multiple plays I see are.

Virginia Commonwealth O132

Texas O 129

St Mary's O 139

The only significant half play is

Uconn -9

 

Uconn also being the number 1 consensus pick.

Good luck no matter what you play. Please take these consensus picks for what they are worth and place your bets wisely.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 26
Posted: #128
Thanks to all!!! Good teamwork. Remember it is us against the books. LET'S KILL EM!!!
 
Scooter, are you going to be posting the results in this thread???
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 36
Posted: #129
dropping uncg adding wis-mill - 4
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2142
Posted: #130
*Some nuggets on the lines and games I am playing the reason I assign units is for a simple reason a game with 3-4 points I feel are off is a one unit play 5-7 is a two unit play and 3 unit is 8-10 and 4 unit is 10+  points off the line like RI last night I rarely use 5 unit plays but last year I hit 5-0 on those and makes my bankroll alot bigger only going to see a very few if not any this year of these. 
 
Austin Peay -6 for 2 units  I have this at 11-13
 
Charleston -4.5 for 2 units I have this at 10-12
 
Uconn -15 for 2 units I have this at 23-25
 
NC-Greensboro -6.5 for 1 unit  I had this at 10-12*
 
This is a quote from pimpdaddy, hope he don't mind but this could be your answer to the whether to post 2, 4 , 6 games etc.If this system is used it could elimanate some mystery,IMO. By the way, Great job guys, just my 2 cents worth.and great job to you as well Pimp
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 673
Posted: #131
Coll Char.-5
St marys +1
Under 162 ok st/wash
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 132
Posted: #132
1.            Charleston       10-0            100

2.         Austin Peay     9-0            100

3.         Texas               6-0            100

4.         Tenn. St.        5-0            100

5.         VCU                3-0            100

6.         Wisc.-GB       1-0            100

7.            Morehead St    1-0            100

8.            Montana          1-0            100

9.            UCONN         28-1            97

10.            Youngstown     5-1            83

11.       East Kent     5-1            83

12.       UNC-Green   4-1            80

13.            Washington      7-2            78

14.       Kent St.        11-4            73

15.       OU                  5-2            71

16.       Detroit              3-2            60

17.       Butler               10-9            53
 
GL
 
SCOOT
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 132
Posted: #133
Hopefully in the next couple of days I can cut and paste better so it is easier to read.  I kept getting error message that I was using to many characters.  Oh well, I hope this helps.
 
Scoot
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 40
Posted: #134
goallinebob good job with thread. ive been following the thread but havent posted. i think the biggest problem is that i gaurantee that a lot of the picks we see are people copying other peoples picks without evaluating the game for themselves and that will give a false talley. i think u have to have the top cappers and only count theres and then according to how someone is doing. continue to count there picks or drop them and bring in someone else. otherwise i think you will be counting the same picks over and over.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 40
Posted: #135
cont.... i'm not really sure what the the solution is but the winning % will def go down if random picks are counted. just a suggestion
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 773
Posted: #136

and the picks are....................................
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 26
Posted: #137
Quote Originally Posted by ad123:

goallinebob good job with thread. ive been following the thread but havent posted. i think the biggest problem is that i gaurantee that a lot of the picks we see are people copying other peoples picks without evaluating the game for themselves and that will give a false talley. i think u have to have the top cappers and only count theres and then according to how someone is doing. continue to count there picks or drop them and bring in someone else. otherwise i think you will be counting the same picks over and over.

AGREED!!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1251
Posted: #138
 Charl +Texas+  Austin Peay 3 team parlay of the day
Im gonna try it
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 11646
Posted: #139

Season 8-2

Tonight- USC +8.5 OVER Oklahoma

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 3381
Posted: #140
AF's Plays, all are Risking 5.5 Units to Win 5

Butler +2

The Citadel +6.5

Detroit +4

Those are my top Plays
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 4058
Posted: #141
Quote Originally Posted by ad123:

goallinebob good job with thread. ive been following the thread but havent posted. i think the biggest problem is that i gaurantee that a lot of the picks we see are people copying other peoples picks without evaluating the game for themselves and that will give a false talley. i think u have to have the top cappers and only count theres and then according to how someone is doing. continue to count there picks or drop them and bring in someone else. otherwise i think you will be counting the same picks over and over.

 

Either that, or just say "look, if you didn't cap it yourself, post it in a different thread PLEASE".

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2142
Posted: #142
This is a Quote from Pimpdaddy>>> *Some nuggets on the lines and games I am playing the reason I assign units is for a simple reason a game with 3-4 points I feel are off is a one unit play 5-7 is a two unit play and 3 unit is 8-10 and 4 unit is 10+  points off the line like RI last night I rarely use 5 unit plays but last year I hit 5-0 on those and makes my bankroll alot bigger only going to see a very few if not any this year of these. 
 
Austin Peay -6 for 2 units  I have this at 11-13
 
Charleston -4.5 for 2 units I have this at 10-12
 
Uconn -15 for 2 units I have this at 23-25
 
NC-Greensboro -6.5 for 1 unit  I had this at 10-12* End Quote!!!
 
, Hope he don't mind but this could be your answer to the whether to post 2, 4 , 6 games etc.If this system is used it could elimanate some mystery,IMO. By the way, Great job guys, just my 2 cents worth.and great job to you as well Pimp
[/Quote]
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 40
Posted: #143
people arent that honest.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 124
Posted: #144
Uconn  -14.5

Cleve St  -2
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 494
Posted: #145
6-3 in these threads.

Tonight:
Butler +3.5
UConn -15.5
UConn -9 1H
Okla -4.5 1H
UCLA/UT Over 129.5


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1402
Posted: #146
1-2 ytd

UCLA/TEX OVER 129.5
UCONN 1H -8.5
SC/OK OVER 140
Citadel +6.5
KENT ST +1
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 608
Posted: #147
U Conn - 14 1/2
Wash - 4
Detroit +4
 
Good Luck Everyone
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 20078
Posted: #148
FINAL RESULTS for Thursday
Thanks Scooter for your assistance
 
 

 
 12/4/2008 2:21:01 PM
 
1.         Charleston       10-0  W

2.         Austin Peay     9-0    W

3.         Texas              6-0   L

4.         Tenn. St.         5-0    L

5.         VCU               3-0   W 

6.         Wisc.-GB       1-0    W  

7.         Morehead St   1-0    W  

8.         Montana          1-0   W      

9.          UCONN        28-1  ,,,,one guy had it right

10.       Youngstown     5-1   L      

11.       East Kent         5-1   L      

12.       UNC-Green    4-1    L    

13.       Washington     7-2    W

14.       Kent St.        11-4    L

15.       OU                5-2     L

16.       Detroit           3-2     L

17.       Butler           10-9     W
 
 
 
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 20078
Posted: #149
As you can see we did not do well as a body overall 8-8
 
The 3 TOP Plays went 2-1
 
 
Charleston       10-0  
 Austin Peay     9-0    
 
How could we be so wrong on UCONN
 
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 20078
Posted: #150
sorry 8-9
 
If someone has an opinion on how to better this approach "SPEAK"
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.