Spot play. Few of them actually within the same play, and a few spots that I have a tough time avoiding. First, Oregon just scored 100 points, the first time that’s happened since 2008 against a Division 1 opponent. They completed that feat in just 76 possessions. In fact, in both post-season NIT games, they have now scored 96 and 108 in a couple up-tempo ballgames. Tonight’s game should feature some up-tempo as well, or should it? Both meetings this year only hit 70 possessions. In each meeting, one team flat out tanked on the other’s home court and the games really weren’t close. Which leads me to the next spot – and it may not seem all that bad, but it holds value. Back in early February, Washington went into Oregon as a 1 point favorite and got waxed. Yes, you read that right. You want value? Washington was a 1 point favorite AT Oregon. If you watched the game, it was pretty obvious that Washington wasn’t all there. They looked terrible as they often did on the road (pointed out Washington’s road struggles quite a bit this year). They’re just a completely different team when they get away from Alaska Airlines Arena. Not only that, but they were faced with a difficult task in this one prior to the ball even being tipped in the air. The normal 10 minute drive from the team hotel took an hour as they were stuck in traffic caused by an accident, and they arrived just in time for the warm-up. Now most of you will say oh that isn’t all that big of a deal, yadda, yadda, OK, it probably isn’t. But on the mental side of things, it is. Players have pre-game rituals, routines, whatever you want to call it and it will affect teams from the mental standpoint. Enough of the Dr. Phil stuff and more focus on revenge. First place team runs into some trouble and shows up late and tanks, yet still ends up winning the conference. Getting the better defense with height in a revenge spot is key as well. Back to the value, the line just doesn’t make sense. Washington was a 9 point favorite in this spot earlier in the year. What’s changed? Oregon’s offense found its rhythm? They’re scoring more now, so they hold more value? I guess that could be true, but here’s what the defense has done in this same time frame in terms of how many points per possession they’ve given up:
1.28
1.03
1.02
0.75 (Utah – #317 offense)
1.16
1.09
So, while the Ducks have looked good offensively, they’ve looked just as bad defensively. This one should be a battle as both teams hate each other and everything depending on each other’s season comes down to a 3rd and final meeting between the two. The road or home team? The bad or good defense? The team coming into a letdown spot after just scoring 100+ or the team coming in having held a couple pretty good offenses well below a point per possession? Pretty simple spot play for me here tonight.
5* Washington -4.5
GL
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
November: 46-38, +5.20
November Leans: 39-38
December: 65-70, -9.45
December Leans: 67-79
January: 52-39, +15.80
January Leans: 40-37
February: 63-44, +65.90
February Leans: 56-49
March: 57-40, +82.65
March Leans: 34-35
Spot play. Few of them actually within the same play, and a few spots that I have a tough time avoiding. First, Oregon just scored 100 points, the first time that’s happened since 2008 against a Division 1 opponent. They completed that feat in just 76 possessions. In fact, in both post-season NIT games, they have now scored 96 and 108 in a couple up-tempo ballgames. Tonight’s game should feature some up-tempo as well, or should it? Both meetings this year only hit 70 possessions. In each meeting, one team flat out tanked on the other’s home court and the games really weren’t close. Which leads me to the next spot – and it may not seem all that bad, but it holds value. Back in early February, Washington went into Oregon as a 1 point favorite and got waxed. Yes, you read that right. You want value? Washington was a 1 point favorite AT Oregon. If you watched the game, it was pretty obvious that Washington wasn’t all there. They looked terrible as they often did on the road (pointed out Washington’s road struggles quite a bit this year). They’re just a completely different team when they get away from Alaska Airlines Arena. Not only that, but they were faced with a difficult task in this one prior to the ball even being tipped in the air. The normal 10 minute drive from the team hotel took an hour as they were stuck in traffic caused by an accident, and they arrived just in time for the warm-up. Now most of you will say oh that isn’t all that big of a deal, yadda, yadda, OK, it probably isn’t. But on the mental side of things, it is. Players have pre-game rituals, routines, whatever you want to call it and it will affect teams from the mental standpoint. Enough of the Dr. Phil stuff and more focus on revenge. First place team runs into some trouble and shows up late and tanks, yet still ends up winning the conference. Getting the better defense with height in a revenge spot is key as well. Back to the value, the line just doesn’t make sense. Washington was a 9 point favorite in this spot earlier in the year. What’s changed? Oregon’s offense found its rhythm? They’re scoring more now, so they hold more value? I guess that could be true, but here’s what the defense has done in this same time frame in terms of how many points per possession they’ve given up:
1.28
1.03
1.02
0.75 (Utah – #317 offense)
1.16
1.09
So, while the Ducks have looked good offensively, they’ve looked just as bad defensively. This one should be a battle as both teams hate each other and everything depending on each other’s season comes down to a 3rd and final meeting between the two. The road or home team? The bad or good defense? The team coming into a letdown spot after just scoring 100+ or the team coming in having held a couple pretty good offenses well below a point per possession? Pretty simple spot play for me here tonight.
I hate disagreeing with two of my favorite cappers here. I like Drexel against Umass opposite of oddsbuster and I like Oregon. Not betting it but I almost did until I saw you take Washington. Like I mentioned for the Drexel game I look deeper into reverse on no line movement as opposed to handycapping the game because I could never do that. By the way thanks alot for that Mercer Bet Saturday. I was on a St. Patty's day Pub Crawl, several hours into it, when I saw your POY #4 I dropped a dime on it (much larger than my normal bet) influenced by several hours of consuming green beverages, those damn green beverage get ya every time.
0
I hate disagreeing with two of my favorite cappers here. I like Drexel against Umass opposite of oddsbuster and I like Oregon. Not betting it but I almost did until I saw you take Washington. Like I mentioned for the Drexel game I look deeper into reverse on no line movement as opposed to handycapping the game because I could never do that. By the way thanks alot for that Mercer Bet Saturday. I was on a St. Patty's day Pub Crawl, several hours into it, when I saw your POY #4 I dropped a dime on it (much larger than my normal bet) influenced by several hours of consuming green beverages, those damn green beverage get ya every time.
i wish i woulda seen this play before i put in my picks for the day, gotta limit my action, nropp a former co worker of mine put me on to ya, so far what ive seen is impressive bol!
0
i wish i woulda seen this play before i put in my picks for the day, gotta limit my action, nropp a former co worker of mine put me on to ya, so far what ive seen is impressive bol!
Any thoughts on total in Rice-Oakland,160- Rice seems ok running but will they in this one?
Sounds like Rice wants to slow them down, but I'm not sure how beneficial it is to do so. If you look at the course of their season, the offense was non-existent in a slow setting. They need to play fast in order to score. Scary game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JEG53:
Any thoughts on total in Rice-Oakland,160- Rice seems ok running but will they in this one?
Sounds like Rice wants to slow them down, but I'm not sure how beneficial it is to do so. If you look at the course of their season, the offense was non-existent in a slow setting. They need to play fast in order to score. Scary game.
When looking at this
game I have found one area where UMASS has the obvious advantage and
that is height and rebounding ability. I believe UMASS will have the
edge on the glass which will create second chance points and keep this
game within reach of winning straightup or at least covering this rather
large game spread. Drexel's biggest guy on the floor during most of the
game will be Senior Forward Samme Givens who stands 6' 5" 220 Lbs. and
is there teams leading rebounder averaging only 7.8 rebounds per game.
The teams 2nd leading rebounder is 6' 9" Junior Daryl McCoy who doesn't
play enough minutes to make a huge impact in this game, but he only
averages 6.7 rebounds per game. McCoy has only had a total of 9 rebounds
in the past 3 games combined. Drexel is a short team, they average 35
rebounds per game this season. In this past game versus N Iowa they
struggled on the glass and it showed, it was the teams main problem in
that game which allowed N Iowa second chance opp's and Drexel barely
pulled out the win by 2 pts as a 7 pt home favorite. In that game N Iowa
out-rebounded Drexel 30 to 20, 7 to 3 in offensive boards, bc of that N
Iowa managed 4 more FG attempts in that game. On the flip side, UMASS
rebounds real well as a team, they average 40 rebounds per game. UMASS
features 6' 9" Soph Raphiael Putney who averages 6.1 rpg, 6' 9" Senior
Sean Carter who averages 6.6 rpg but has come on very strong lately and
is a difference maker on both sides of the court, he as a total of 39
rebounds in his past 4 games (11,12,8 & 8). 6' 7" Junior Terrell
Vinson averages 5 rpg, and the guards rebound well with 5' 9" PG
speedster Chazz Williams from Brooklyn, NY averaging 4.4 rpg, 6' 5"
Jessie Morgan averages 3 rpg. Morgan is from Philly, PA and will be
playing his 4th game this season in his hometown of Philly, look for him
to have a great game tonight in front of fam and friends, he averages
10.1 ppg and recently had 21 points in this huge win over Temple. In
UMASS' last games versus the tough and physical Miss State Bulldogs
UMASS controlled the glass and that imo was the eventual difference in
the game as UMASS won in 2 OT, they beat Miss St on the glass to the
tune of 51 to 38, on the offensive glass 19 to 10!! This gave UMASS 15
more FG attempts in the game! Last game out a huge win on the road again
@ Seton Hall they did the exact same thing to the fiesty and talented
Pirates, beating them on the glass 38 to 34. In that game Herb Pope had
his way downlow with 15 rebounds but even with that as a team they
out-rebounded the Pirates. Drexel is very good defensively, but they
prefer to keep possessions low and with the above mentioned rebounding
advantage for UMASS I see those extra possessions and shot attempts
playing a crucial role in UMASS' cover of the spread tonight. Drexel
wins 70-66 IMO.
Another sidenote:
Both UMASS coach Derek Kellogg and
Drexel's Bruiser Flint know eachother VERY well, Bruiser coached at
UMASS up until 11 years ago, Derek Kellogg played at UMASS and now HC. I
believe this game comes down to the wire.
0
UMASS +8 (-110) Game ...Risking 6 Units
When looking at this
game I have found one area where UMASS has the obvious advantage and
that is height and rebounding ability. I believe UMASS will have the
edge on the glass which will create second chance points and keep this
game within reach of winning straightup or at least covering this rather
large game spread. Drexel's biggest guy on the floor during most of the
game will be Senior Forward Samme Givens who stands 6' 5" 220 Lbs. and
is there teams leading rebounder averaging only 7.8 rebounds per game.
The teams 2nd leading rebounder is 6' 9" Junior Daryl McCoy who doesn't
play enough minutes to make a huge impact in this game, but he only
averages 6.7 rebounds per game. McCoy has only had a total of 9 rebounds
in the past 3 games combined. Drexel is a short team, they average 35
rebounds per game this season. In this past game versus N Iowa they
struggled on the glass and it showed, it was the teams main problem in
that game which allowed N Iowa second chance opp's and Drexel barely
pulled out the win by 2 pts as a 7 pt home favorite. In that game N Iowa
out-rebounded Drexel 30 to 20, 7 to 3 in offensive boards, bc of that N
Iowa managed 4 more FG attempts in that game. On the flip side, UMASS
rebounds real well as a team, they average 40 rebounds per game. UMASS
features 6' 9" Soph Raphiael Putney who averages 6.1 rpg, 6' 9" Senior
Sean Carter who averages 6.6 rpg but has come on very strong lately and
is a difference maker on both sides of the court, he as a total of 39
rebounds in his past 4 games (11,12,8 & 8). 6' 7" Junior Terrell
Vinson averages 5 rpg, and the guards rebound well with 5' 9" PG
speedster Chazz Williams from Brooklyn, NY averaging 4.4 rpg, 6' 5"
Jessie Morgan averages 3 rpg. Morgan is from Philly, PA and will be
playing his 4th game this season in his hometown of Philly, look for him
to have a great game tonight in front of fam and friends, he averages
10.1 ppg and recently had 21 points in this huge win over Temple. In
UMASS' last games versus the tough and physical Miss State Bulldogs
UMASS controlled the glass and that imo was the eventual difference in
the game as UMASS won in 2 OT, they beat Miss St on the glass to the
tune of 51 to 38, on the offensive glass 19 to 10!! This gave UMASS 15
more FG attempts in the game! Last game out a huge win on the road again
@ Seton Hall they did the exact same thing to the fiesty and talented
Pirates, beating them on the glass 38 to 34. In that game Herb Pope had
his way downlow with 15 rebounds but even with that as a team they
out-rebounded the Pirates. Drexel is very good defensively, but they
prefer to keep possessions low and with the above mentioned rebounding
advantage for UMASS I see those extra possessions and shot attempts
playing a crucial role in UMASS' cover of the spread tonight. Drexel
wins 70-66 IMO.
Another sidenote:
Both UMASS coach Derek Kellogg and
Drexel's Bruiser Flint know eachother VERY well, Bruiser coached at
UMASS up until 11 years ago, Derek Kellogg played at UMASS and now HC. I
believe this game comes down to the wire.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.