All Forums | College Basketball

Tuesday System Plays

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 64028
Posts: 453
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 724
Posted: #276
don't forget the excluded conferences.. some of the plays being suggested are from excluded conferences
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 617
Posted: #277
kine how come you said you won around 20 units last year in NCAABB when this system wins (won) much more than that last year? Is the 20 units only for your capped picks perhaps and you dont include the system plays?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 375
Posted: #278
no plays today?  :(
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1059
Posted: #279
BOARD:...this is AWESOME!....great flow of positive energy and everybody coming together to work on the plays of the day...thanks again for helping me and all others...all the best
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3823
Posted: #280
Quote Originally Posted by GetEveryDollar:

BOARD:...this is AWESOME!....great flow of positive energy and everybody coming together to work on the plays of the day...thanks again for helping me and all others...all the best




KP's system threads have got to be the most positive that I've ever seen on covers.  Maybe it's because the plays just keep on winning ;)  either way, you're right - and it's good to see this brotherhood around here.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #281
Quote Originally Posted by MILFHUNTER74:

kine how come you said you won around 20 units last year in NCAABB when this system wins (won) much more than that last year? Is the 20 units only for your capped picks perhaps and you dont include the system plays?


no offense to Kine, but no one paid much attention to him last year. There were a few of us who checked his plays out, but until this system, he wasn't getting much attention. He was the originator of the "alert plays". It's sad when someone who is as solid as Kine and Punkassmutha, get ignored. Glad Kine is getting his due now.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 26401
Posted: #282
I played alot of his plays last year,dont remember him doing the pre-system plays though,but I didnt start from the first play either.

Nice day on his plays yesterday,I did take Delaware and Tenn-Martin both at 6,plus Montana St in sec half -2,to bad I lost a few other thatr I picked,lol.

Im not sure why its a big deal when someone asks for the plays,there are at least a dozen guys that have them,so is it that big a problem if someone puts them out for everyone?
Just Saying
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #283
Hey, KP or anyone who cares to comment.  I am making some of thos "almost plays"  full plays.  For instance, making Pepperdine a play by buying a half point.  Does anyone see that as a mistake?  I will buy up to a point if necessary, and so far it 's been o.k.  I have read all of KP's beginning threads explaining the system and I don't recall the Prof. revealing why the cutoff is 61/2 pts.  Why not 5? Or 8?  Maybe I missed it, but I can't see passing up an opportunity with this system over 1/2pt. or 1 pt.  Comments welcome, and thanks a ton for showing us the way, Kine.
                                                 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 7432
Posted: #284
Pepperdine half a point from being a play.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 143
Posted: #285
Wendy please try not to post stuff that is that far off.All your gonna do is cause confusion.The people who are regulars might post what we call "Almost plays" but your way off.This is not my thread by an means but been in Kp's for a long time.Thank you.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 4717
Posted: #286
Quote Originally Posted by Snappa:

Hey, KP or anyone who cares to comment.  I am making some of thos "almost plays"  full plays.  For instance, making Pepperdine a play by buying a half point.  Does anyone see that as a mistake?  I will buy up to a point if necessary, and so far it 's been o.k.  I have read all of KP's beginning threads explaining the system and I don't recall the Prof. revealing why the cutoff is 61/2 pts.  Why not 5? Or 8?  Maybe I missed it, but I can't see passing up an opportunity with this system over 1/2pt. or 1 pt.  Comments welcome, and thanks a ton for showing us the way, Kine.
                                                 

The 6.5 was set as more than two possessions. But he said you can tweak the system as you want. You can try and see if +6, +5, +4 and +3.5 work. And you can try teams better than #180 on kenpom. One guys said it works just as good with teams starting at #170, and that it's still pretty good starting at #160. Hence the "Almost" plays. Go easy and see.

So what are the closest plays by rank and by line tonight?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 7432
Posted: #287
Has anyone looked into a similar system of maybe with every 5 spots in kenpom the spread must be a half higher.

IE #175 favored at home by 7 or more, #180 by 7.5 etc.

I know there would be a cut off at some point but may be worth some research.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 1339
Posted: #288
Quote Originally Posted by boatboatboat:

how hard can it be?

 

if a team is #180 or worse and playing at home, and they are a favorite of 6 1/2 pts or more, you bet on the team that is playing them.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 375
Posted: #289
taking pepperdine +6 tonight, should have locked it in at 6.5 at 12:30 this morning but oh well. a half point is only the difference between a push and a win.

good luck to everyone tonight
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1059
Posted: #290
Quote Originally Posted by Snappa:

Hey, KP or anyone who cares to comment.  I am making some of thos "almost plays"  full plays.  For instance, making Pepperdine a play by buying a half point.  Does anyone see that as a mistake?  I will buy up to a point if necessary, and so far it 's been o.k.  I have read all of KP's beginning threads explaining the system and I don't recall the Prof. revealing why the cutoff is 61/2 pts.  Why not 5? Or 8?  Maybe I missed it, but I can't see passing up an opportunity with this system over 1/2pt. or 1 pt.  Comments welcome, and thanks a ton for showing us the way, Kine.
                                                 

Good Point!
I think the "Almost System" Plays have done pretty good thus far.
Id like to know how many games actually required the 6.5 points?
Usually our team  WINS or keeps it really close.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 1059
Posted: #291
Quote Originally Posted by Barnstorm:


The 6.5 was set as more than two possessions. But he said you can tweak the system as you want. You can try and see if +6, +5, +4 and +3.5 work. And you can try teams better than #180 on kenpom. One guys said it works just as good with teams starting at #170, and that it's still pretty good starting at #160. Hence the "Almost" plays. Go easy and see.

So what are the closest plays by rank and by line tonight?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 629
Posted: #292
Hahahahaha I stopped following the Montana State game at halftime. I was pleasantly surprised when my local texted me my figure this morning. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1195
Posted: #293
Quote Originally Posted by GetEveryDollar:


Good Point!
I think the "Almost System" Plays have done pretty good thus far.
Id like to know how many games actually required the 6.5 points?
Usually our team  WINS or keeps it really close.

They have indeed. I bought up both almost system plays last night to 6.5 and won them both. I think we saw the more than 2 possesion rule reason last night with Evansville losing by 6, that half point was the deal breaker. Havent had time to run tonights games, but is anyone seeing any almost plays?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 46
Posted: #294

who's this bowhunter guy with the perfect 2 day picks ?, you guys should check him out, seems to know his stuff

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #295
Quote Originally Posted by BUCCK:

who's this bowhunter guy with the perfect 2 day picks ?, you guys should check him out, seems to know his stuff



hahaha fuck off
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #296
Quote Originally Posted by BUCCK:

who's this bowhunter guy with the perfect 2 day picks ?, you guys should check him out, seems to know his stuff



bowhunter must be desperate for someone to acknowledge him.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 46
Posted: #297
check out this bowhunter, new to the forum, but seems to have a system that works
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 218
Posted: #298
Jarrett - I am not sure what your issue is. Do you have a problem with me giving winners?  If you are jealous you can continue to pay your man.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 629
Posted: #299
I am going to play Georgia Southern, but no system plays it looks like. 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #300
Quote Originally Posted by bowhunter:

Jarrett - I am not sure what your issue is. Do you have a problem with me giving winners?  If you are jealous you can continue to pay your man.


my problem is you are making an alias up to come on someones thread who works hard, trying to leach off his publicity. Go talk to you alias in your own thread. Don't try to bite off someone else.
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.