It called JUICE! More importantly why are you on a betting site. Are you writing a sociological term paper?
Beast-
I know you are a better gambler than that. First of all you can use internet and different books to get better than -110 juice. I was just looking at my last 100 plays I averaged -102 in spread. Secondly, it is about unit size not amount of plays on how much you win or lose... For example if you are are a 1000 bet guy and go 1-1 you'll lose -100 at -110 vig. If you bet 20 games at 100 and go 10-10 you will lose -100. That is the same amount that the guy who made two bets lost.
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEBEAST387:
It called JUICE! More importantly why are you on a betting site. Are you writing a sociological term paper?
Beast-
I know you are a better gambler than that. First of all you can use internet and different books to get better than -110 juice. I was just looking at my last 100 plays I averaged -102 in spread. Secondly, it is about unit size not amount of plays on how much you win or lose... For example if you are are a 1000 bet guy and go 1-1 you'll lose -100 at -110 vig. If you bet 20 games at 100 and go 10-10 you will lose -100. That is the same amount that the guy who made two bets lost.
Im not debating anything. Its curious to me that you and the near do wells constantly rush to runaway trains defense. As I said before, train69 is disingenuous or misleading about the 20 or more games he posts daily. Hes become a legend in his own mind and yours apparently as well.
How do you know for a fact that he is misleading us all about playing 20 or more games? Do you know his bet size? Besides betting on 20 games and going 50/50 only results in a 1 unit lose assuming -110 odds on spread or total. So if they guy is betting $100 per game then his investment is $2000 and his loses on a 50/50 day is $100.....
Is that really so hard to believe? I know guys that claim to bet more than that on one game and no one just assumes they are lying. Besides if you are just looking for opinion on picks why do you care how much he is betting? He is right about 60% of the time over a season and that was well documented in his football threads.
PS.... Just for curiosity sake I went back and looked at all his picks for the month of February and TOTALS record is about 60% not including last night and pretty much right on 50% ATS.
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEBEAST387:
Im not debating anything. Its curious to me that you and the near do wells constantly rush to runaway trains defense. As I said before, train69 is disingenuous or misleading about the 20 or more games he posts daily. Hes become a legend in his own mind and yours apparently as well.
How do you know for a fact that he is misleading us all about playing 20 or more games? Do you know his bet size? Besides betting on 20 games and going 50/50 only results in a 1 unit lose assuming -110 odds on spread or total. So if they guy is betting $100 per game then his investment is $2000 and his loses on a 50/50 day is $100.....
Is that really so hard to believe? I know guys that claim to bet more than that on one game and no one just assumes they are lying. Besides if you are just looking for opinion on picks why do you care how much he is betting? He is right about 60% of the time over a season and that was well documented in his football threads.
PS.... Just for curiosity sake I went back and looked at all his picks for the month of February and TOTALS record is about 60% not including last night and pretty much right on 50% ATS.
THEBEAST387, Again you are missing the point. Who cares if he bets 1000 bets a day. Why does that bother you so much? Can you make your own picks or are you saying its not fair that Train posts so many picks or that he doesnt actually bet these games. WHO CARES! NO ONE HAS A GUN TO YOUR HEAD FORCING YOU TO TAIL. The funny thing is if he sucks so bad why don't you fade him? Why does anyone on here have to prove anything? They dont. If you need to go on to covers for validation of your wagering skills you probably should focus on other things because it sounds like life might be tough right now for you.
Thanks for your concern doctor about things that are totally irellevant to a betting site. Im hoping your guy Hillary gets the job done or is it Bernie whose your guy? Im not debating anything. Its curious to me that you and the near do wells constantly rush to runaway trains defense. As I said before, train69 is disingenuous or misleading about the 20 or more games he posts daily. Hes become a legend in his own mind and yours apparently as well.
First of all you clown, as I told you before, I have no dog in this fight. To be honest I have followed you on here as well, and looked at you as one of the better cappers out of the bunch. If someone like Mystic was doing what he's doing on Trains threads to you, I would be saying the same thing. Secondly Im not a "near do well" and no I don't support Hilary or Bernie nor anyone on the left. Not as if that has ANYTHING to do with this conversation at all. Lastly what I said was actually very relevant, who cares how many picks someone posts on here or how many games they win or lose. The fact that you are even implying that I think ANYONE is a legend on here just shows how pathetic your life is you jerk off. Its a friggin bettors forum. You're not a legend neither am I or anyone on here. I bet for fun, not to pay bills. My job takes care of that part. So get Mystics balls off your chin and understand that hes trolling. Doesn't matter his reason, he's trolling. Period
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEBEAST387:
THEBEAST387, Again you are missing the point. Who cares if he bets 1000 bets a day. Why does that bother you so much? Can you make your own picks or are you saying its not fair that Train posts so many picks or that he doesnt actually bet these games. WHO CARES! NO ONE HAS A GUN TO YOUR HEAD FORCING YOU TO TAIL. The funny thing is if he sucks so bad why don't you fade him? Why does anyone on here have to prove anything? They dont. If you need to go on to covers for validation of your wagering skills you probably should focus on other things because it sounds like life might be tough right now for you.
Thanks for your concern doctor about things that are totally irellevant to a betting site. Im hoping your guy Hillary gets the job done or is it Bernie whose your guy? Im not debating anything. Its curious to me that you and the near do wells constantly rush to runaway trains defense. As I said before, train69 is disingenuous or misleading about the 20 or more games he posts daily. Hes become a legend in his own mind and yours apparently as well.
First of all you clown, as I told you before, I have no dog in this fight. To be honest I have followed you on here as well, and looked at you as one of the better cappers out of the bunch. If someone like Mystic was doing what he's doing on Trains threads to you, I would be saying the same thing. Secondly Im not a "near do well" and no I don't support Hilary or Bernie nor anyone on the left. Not as if that has ANYTHING to do with this conversation at all. Lastly what I said was actually very relevant, who cares how many picks someone posts on here or how many games they win or lose. The fact that you are even implying that I think ANYONE is a legend on here just shows how pathetic your life is you jerk off. Its a friggin bettors forum. You're not a legend neither am I or anyone on here. I bet for fun, not to pay bills. My job takes care of that part. So get Mystics balls off your chin and understand that hes trolling. Doesn't matter his reason, he's trolling. Period
Im not debating anything. Its curious to me that you and the near do wells constantly rush to runaway trains defense. As I said before, train69 is disingenuous or misleading about the 20 or more games he posts daily. Hes become a legend in his own mind and yours apparently as well.
How do you know for a fact that he is misleading us all about playing 20 or more games? Do you know his bet size? Besides betting on 20 games and going 50/50 only results in a 1 unit lose assuming -110 odds on spread or total. So if they guy is betting $100 per game then his investment is $2000 and his loses on a 50/50 day is $100.....Is that really so hard to believe? I know guys that claim to bet more than that on one game and no one just assumes they are lying. Besides if you are just looking for opinion on picks why do you care how much he is betting? He is right about 60% of the time over a season and that was well documented in his football threads.PS.... Just for curiosity sake I went back and looked at all his picks for the month of February and TOTALS record is about 60% not including last night and pretty much right on 50% ATS.
My point is the cumulative effect of losing as many games as train plays makes no sense when you factor in the juice. Guy I was born at night but not last night. Ya gotta be kidding me. Come on will ya give me a break anout your NONSENSE!
0
Quote Originally Posted by twestacott:
Quote Originally Posted by THEBEAST387:
Im not debating anything. Its curious to me that you and the near do wells constantly rush to runaway trains defense. As I said before, train69 is disingenuous or misleading about the 20 or more games he posts daily. Hes become a legend in his own mind and yours apparently as well.
How do you know for a fact that he is misleading us all about playing 20 or more games? Do you know his bet size? Besides betting on 20 games and going 50/50 only results in a 1 unit lose assuming -110 odds on spread or total. So if they guy is betting $100 per game then his investment is $2000 and his loses on a 50/50 day is $100.....Is that really so hard to believe? I know guys that claim to bet more than that on one game and no one just assumes they are lying. Besides if you are just looking for opinion on picks why do you care how much he is betting? He is right about 60% of the time over a season and that was well documented in his football threads.PS.... Just for curiosity sake I went back and looked at all his picks for the month of February and TOTALS record is about 60% not including last night and pretty much right on 50% ATS.
My point is the cumulative effect of losing as many games as train plays makes no sense when you factor in the juice. Guy I was born at night but not last night. Ya gotta be kidding me. Come on will ya give me a break anout your NONSENSE!
How do you know for a fact that he is misleading us all about playing 20 or more games? Do you know his bet size? Besides betting on 20 games and going 50/50 only results in a 1 unit lose assuming -110 odds on spread or total. So if they guy is betting $100 per game then his investment is $2000 and his loses on a 50/50 day is $100.....Is that really so hard to believe? I know guys that claim to bet more than that on one game and no one just assumes they are lying. Besides if you are just looking for opinion on picks why do you care how much he is betting? He is right about 60% of the time over a season and that was well documented in his football threads.PS.... Just for curiosity sake I went back and looked at all his picks for the month of February and TOTALS record is about 60% not including last night and pretty much right on 50% ATS.
My point is the cumulative effect of losing as many games as train plays makes no sense when you factor in the juice. Guy I was born at night but not last night. Ya gotta be kidding me. Come on will ya give me a break anout your NONSENSE!
If ya win 55% or better the juice dont matter
Stop being a mush.
0
Quote Originally Posted by THEBEAST387:
How do you know for a fact that he is misleading us all about playing 20 or more games? Do you know his bet size? Besides betting on 20 games and going 50/50 only results in a 1 unit lose assuming -110 odds on spread or total. So if they guy is betting $100 per game then his investment is $2000 and his loses on a 50/50 day is $100.....Is that really so hard to believe? I know guys that claim to bet more than that on one game and no one just assumes they are lying. Besides if you are just looking for opinion on picks why do you care how much he is betting? He is right about 60% of the time over a season and that was well documented in his football threads.PS.... Just for curiosity sake I went back and looked at all his picks for the month of February and TOTALS record is about 60% not including last night and pretty much right on 50% ATS.
My point is the cumulative effect of losing as many games as train plays makes no sense when you factor in the juice. Guy I was born at night but not last night. Ya gotta be kidding me. Come on will ya give me a break anout your NONSENSE!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
