• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Basketball

    Wednesday Night Hoops

    12 Next Last»
    nropp11
    composite
    nbafan88
    bigbozo
    jeffscottsports
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 5036
    Posts: 28
    12 Next Last»
     
    nropp11
    nropp11
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 7963
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 5:43 PM ET #1

    November: 46-38, +5.20
    November Leans: 39-38
    December: 65-70, -9.45
    December Leans: 67-79
    January: 52-39, +15.80
    January Leans: 40-37
    February: 59-43, +58.40
    February Leans: 55-46


    Running short on time which is why some of these have a little less info than others…

    I’m playing Tulane. If you remember the analysis from the Delaware/UNC Wilmington match-up, Buzz Peterson is the type of coach who thrives on sagging help defenses as he’s an offensive mastermind. Bring in Ed Conroy. Same type of guy. And a big reason why Tulane posted such a high offensive total in the first meeting this year. The offense just simply is not good, but if you give them open shots, they’re going to fall. This is a revenge spot for Houston, but an ugly one at best. They’re coming off snail SMU, into a faster Tulane team than they seen the first time around, and they also have in-state rival Rice on tap. Tulane sucks something fierce on the road (only win is at Navy and Texas Pan American lol). I don’t care. If they get chances tonight to score (and they should have plenty) I value that and a better defense in this spot much better. Houston offense has looked non-existent against teams that pressure the guards well. If they beat me from the perimeter, OK with that. Tulane’s been much faster with the injuries, and the offense has benefited from it. And that’s exactly what I want going into this game, tonight. It doesn’t show against the Marshall’s, and UTEP’s, and Memphis or any of their recent results because there is simply no comparison to how those teams and a greater majority of the teams from C-USA defend to how Houston defends. 

    5* Tulane +2

    Really interesting game between Liberty and Charleston Southern. A couple upsets early already today, and I think it is entirely possible for Liberty to win this game, but I’m pointing to the total going over instead as I think there is a bit more value. First, the adrenaline of getting the chance to play UNC Asheville should push this pace a bit faster than each would like, but not only that, the match-ups and scheme’s of how each prepare should cause a pretty hectic pace as well. These two split in the regular season, but I’d peg Charleston Southern with the immediate revenge as Liberty hit a buzzer beater to win the most recent game. Back to the scheme, Charleston Southern gets after it defensively, and I’d probably relate it to a style that mirrors Depaul, only they can shoot as well. They pressure in most instances in the full court, they force a ton of turnovers, and in return, they can score off of them. When they can’t score in transition, they have enough weapons in the half court to make a difference and anyone can score. They’re a balanced team that relies on everyone being on the same page and they’ve put up some high point totals even in low possession games, which is what I like in case this gets slowed down. Again, this team likes to push it, and they’ll shoot a ton of three’s. They’re tiny (tallest player is 6’6”), and at times, they will throw 5 guards on the court and let them beat you on the inside. They don’t care. They feel like they can turn you over and distract you enough defensively that the easy buckets won’t make a difference. It’s been a staple of Radebaugh’s scheme throughout his current tenure. He’s just doing it a bit more this year b/c he doesn’t have a bigger lineup to go with. Now, with Liberty, they had a few injuries occur before the season that really threw a wrench in things as they lost their post players and they struggled early on in the season b/c of it. Layer’s been an up and down coach, in fact, this is the slowest pace team he has had at Liberty. They’ve played a handful of really, extremely, lathargicly low games this year against teams like Richmond, Presbyterian, Gardner Webb, and Campbell. All of those games fell below the 60 possession mark. Three of them run a modified Princeton, and the most recent game with Campbell (a 49-41 victory) only hit 53 possessions. It’s certainly alarming that Liberty comes into this game having played their best two defensive games of the season, and a couple of the slowest, but those games were at home, and what exactly have you seen from Coastal Carolina and Campbell in today’s games to think anything different? Neither of the teams pressure all that well, in fact, they don’t pressure anywhere near the way that Charleston Southern will. They could run their offensive zone sets and slow the game down against both of those teams. Actually, they had to, b/c they had matchup advantages as well and they don’t shoot it all that great against zones and taller teams. As far as an offensive style for Liberty, they run a ton of set plays, and look to get the ball inside as much as they can even though they’re guard oriented, and they score a ton from the inside. They have a few shooters on the outside having below average years. Going back to this tourney, the first two games both teams that won are horrendous at shooting from the outside and they hit an unreal # of three’s. So, in the grand scheme of things, I don’t think either team is concerned with slowing the tempo tonight. There will be seven, sometimes eight, sometimes nine guards on the court at a time...
    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    November: 46-38, +5.20
    November Leans: 39-38
    December: 65-70, -9.45
    December Leans: 67-79
    January: 52-39, +15.80
    January Leans: 40-37
    February: 59-43, +58.40
    February Leans: 55-46


    Running short on time which is why some of these have a little less info than others…

    I’m playing Tulane. If you remember the analysis from the Delaware/UNC Wilmington match-up, Buzz Peterson is the type of coach who thrives on sagging help defenses as he’s an offensive mastermind. Bring in Ed Conroy. Same type of guy. And a big reason why Tulane posted such a high offensive total in the first meeting this year. The offense just simply is not good, but if you give them open shots, they’re going to fall. This is a revenge spot for Houston, but an ugly one at best. They’re coming off snail SMU, into a faster Tulane team than they seen the first time around, and they also have in-state rival Rice on tap. Tulane sucks something fierce on the road (only win is at Navy and Texas Pan American lol). I don’t care. If they get chances tonight to score (and they should have plenty) I value that and a better defense in this spot much better. Houston offense has looked non-existent against teams that pressure the guards well. If they beat me from the perimeter, OK with that. Tulane’s been much faster with the injuries, and the offense has benefited from it. And that’s exactly what I want going into this game, tonight. It doesn’t show against the Marshall’s, and UTEP’s, and Memphis or any of their recent results because there is simply no comparison to how those teams and a greater majority of the teams from C-USA defend to how Houston defends. 

    5* Tulane +2

    Really interesting game between Liberty and Charleston Southern. A couple upsets early already today, and I think it is entirely possible for Liberty to win this game, but I’m pointing to the total going over instead as I think there is a bit more value. First, the adrenaline of getting the chance to play UNC Asheville should push this pace a bit faster than each would like, but not only that, the match-ups and scheme’s of how each prepare should cause a pretty hectic pace as well. These two split in the regular season, but I’d peg Charleston Southern with the immediate revenge as Liberty hit a buzzer beater to win the most recent game. Back to the scheme, Charleston Southern gets after it defensively, and I’d probably relate it to a style that mirrors Depaul, only they can shoot as well. They pressure in most instances in the full court, they force a ton of turnovers, and in return, they can score off of them. When they can’t score in transition, they have enough weapons in the half court to make a difference and anyone can score. They’re a balanced team that relies on everyone being on the same page and they’ve put up some high point totals even in low possession games, which is what I like in case this gets slowed down. Again, this team likes to push it, and they’ll shoot a ton of three’s. They’re tiny (tallest player is 6’6”), and at times, they will throw 5 guards on the court and let them beat you on the inside. They don’t care. They feel like they can turn you over and distract you enough defensively that the easy buckets won’t make a difference. It’s been a staple of Radebaugh’s scheme throughout his current tenure. He’s just doing it a bit more this year b/c he doesn’t have a bigger lineup to go with. Now, with Liberty, they had a few injuries occur before the season that really threw a wrench in things as they lost their post players and they struggled early on in the season b/c of it. Layer’s been an up and down coach, in fact, this is the slowest pace team he has had at Liberty. They’ve played a handful of really, extremely, lathargicly low games this year against teams like Richmond, Presbyterian, Gardner Webb, and Campbell. All of those games fell below the 60 possession mark. Three of them run a modified Princeton, and the most recent game with Campbell (a 49-41 victory) only hit 53 possessions. It’s certainly alarming that Liberty comes into this game having played their best two defensive games of the season, and a couple of the slowest, but those games were at home, and what exactly have you seen from Coastal Carolina and Campbell in today’s games to think anything different? Neither of the teams pressure all that well, in fact, they don’t pressure anywhere near the way that Charleston Southern will. They could run their offensive zone sets and slow the game down against both of those teams. Actually, they had to, b/c they had matchup advantages as well and they don’t shoot it all that great against zones and taller teams. As far as an offensive style for Liberty, they run a ton of set plays, and look to get the ball inside as much as they can even though they’re guard oriented, and they score a ton from the inside. They have a few shooters on the outside having below average years. Going back to this tourney, the first two games both teams that won are horrendous at shooting from the outside and they hit an unreal # of three’s. So, in the grand scheme of things, I don’t think either team is concerned with slowing the tempo tonight. There will be seven, sometimes eight, sometimes nine guards on the court at a time...
     
    nropp11
    nropp11
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 7963
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 5:43 PM ET #2

    ... Liberty will have ample opportunities to score on the inside, and anything they hit from the outside is a bonus. Charleston Southern’s balanced offense should produce against a porous Liberty defense (if you take away the last two games), and Charleston Southern will get extra opportunities within the pressure. When Liberty doesn’t turn the ball over, they will have open lanes to the basket against smaller defenders. Granted, I’m putting a ton of emphasis in thinking this one is gonna get up and down. I realize that, so other things that helped me point this way. First, both teams get to the foul line enough (combined 90 attempts in two games this year). Both teams bring in momentum (Liberty had to win last game to avoid playing in day 1 of this tourney). Both teams enter this having shot under the 40% mark in their previous game.  Liberty scored 75 in this gym this year. Charleston Southern scored 93 in this gym this year. The last couple years, Charleston Southern has played to 68 and 71 possessions in the conference tourney setting (even as a slow pace), Liberty has averaged 69 in the setting the last 5 years. And, of course in a tourney setting and what should be a close game with two evenly matched and two teams that have advantages in both directions, foul shooting at the end of a game might help. Again, I’m going to lean Liberty with their ability to beat the pressure, take care of the ball, and dominate the interior, but I think the total holds more value. These teams are too young, and too inexperienced to slow this one down if they tried. 

    5* Liberty/Charleston Southern Over 138

    LSU tiny guards going against size. LSU good at home, but this will be the toughest test out of those 6 victories they own in conference. LSU hasn’t scored more than 54 last three meetings.

    3* Tennessee +1.5

    Iowa with revenge against a team I’m not expecting to take as good of care of the basketball as they did in the first meeting. Iowa also built a lead and got away from the pressure in that game (Franny won’t do that again, tonight). No Diaz this meeting leading to easier Iowa buckets, and an unhealthy Bo Spencer against pressure, well, you see how that turned out for Nebraska at Michigan State where they scored 35. Throw out the Illinois game where Nebraska made the miraculous 43-7 run, and they’ve been nothing special. 

    3* Iowa +2 

    Thad off a loss the last couple years: 83, 78, 80, 71, 82, 71, 89, 76, 78, 79, 70, 65, 74. These two teams played a 49 possession game last year. Both teams are faster, especially Ohio State. Northwestern matches up horribly, but they have motivation of getting a key win for tourney hopes in a HUGE home game for them. If they want to win, they’ll have to do so by outscoring rather than defending. Ohio State shooters against 1-3-1 zone (can also throw in Sullinger basically in a 1-on-1 every trip down the court with the bottom guy on that zone), and I’m sure Shurna doesn’t shoot 5/18 like he did the first meeting where Northwestern put up an ugly 54. Hunch more than anything.

    2* Ohio State/Northwestern Over 131.5

    Other Notes: I like Kent State with revenge, not enough to play it. Home teams in that division of the MAC East are something like 24-5. Catching a ton of value on Kent State at home considering they are 9-0 in the conference as long as the game isn’t played on the road against the MAC East where they are 0-5. Ohio owns one of those wins on the road in the conference but if you remember I played Ohio in that spot against a weak Buffalo zone. Kent State’s traditionally not a zone team, although they show it at times, so no concern there. Only concern and a big part of why I’m leaning is that Kent State has Akron on tap, and that’s as big of a rivalry as you will see in the MAC. Kent State’s been getting killed on the offensive glass, and was a big reason they dropped this first meeting this year (shot 50+% and still lost by 22). Sort of a sandwich spot for Bowling Green as they welcome in a Miami OH team that’s going to launch three’s against a BG zone. Fordham’s a single digit dog on the road in conference for the first time since March 2008 and it comes in a spot against a Rhode Island team who is coming off their best win in recent years, and has rival Umass on tap. Bad spot for Rhode Island, but is Fordham trustworthy? They did win the first meeting this year by 2 in a game that only saw 63 possessions. Why so low? I have no idea. Both push and play up-tempo, and they did put up a 78 in the 1H (52 2H). Fordham probably plays a zone and Rhode Island will probably be complacent given the situation and they’re one of the worst shooting teams in the country and...
    Reply
    ... Liberty will have ample opportunities to score on the inside, and anything they hit from the outside is a bonus. Charleston Southern’s balanced offense should produce against a porous Liberty defense (if you take away the last two games), and Charleston Southern will get extra opportunities within the pressure. When Liberty doesn’t turn the ball over, they will have open lanes to the basket against smaller defenders. Granted, I’m putting a ton of emphasis in thinking this one is gonna get up and down. I realize that, so other things that helped me point this way. First, both teams get to the foul line enough (combined 90 attempts in two games this year). Both teams bring in momentum (Liberty had to win last game to avoid playing in day 1 of this tourney). Both teams enter this having shot under the 40% mark in their previous game.  Liberty scored 75 in this gym this year. Charleston Southern scored 93 in this gym this year. The last couple years, Charleston Southern has played to 68 and 71 possessions in the conference tourney setting (even as a slow pace), Liberty has averaged 69 in the setting the last 5 years. And, of course in a tourney setting and what should be a close game with two evenly matched and two teams that have advantages in both directions, foul shooting at the end of a game might help. Again, I’m going to lean Liberty with their ability to beat the pressure, take care of the ball, and dominate the interior, but I think the total holds more value. These teams are too young, and too inexperienced to slow this one down if they tried. 

    5* Liberty/Charleston Southern Over 138

    LSU tiny guards going against size. LSU good at home, but this will be the toughest test out of those 6 victories they own in conference. LSU hasn’t scored more than 54 last three meetings.

    3* Tennessee +1.5

    Iowa with revenge against a team I’m not expecting to take as good of care of the basketball as they did in the first meeting. Iowa also built a lead and got away from the pressure in that game (Franny won’t do that again, tonight). No Diaz this meeting leading to easier Iowa buckets, and an unhealthy Bo Spencer against pressure, well, you see how that turned out for Nebraska at Michigan State where they scored 35. Throw out the Illinois game where Nebraska made the miraculous 43-7 run, and they’ve been nothing special. 

    3* Iowa +2 

    Thad off a loss the last couple years: 83, 78, 80, 71, 82, 71, 89, 76, 78, 79, 70, 65, 74. These two teams played a 49 possession game last year. Both teams are faster, especially Ohio State. Northwestern matches up horribly, but they have motivation of getting a key win for tourney hopes in a HUGE home game for them. If they want to win, they’ll have to do so by outscoring rather than defending. Ohio State shooters against 1-3-1 zone (can also throw in Sullinger basically in a 1-on-1 every trip down the court with the bottom guy on that zone), and I’m sure Shurna doesn’t shoot 5/18 like he did the first meeting where Northwestern put up an ugly 54. Hunch more than anything.

    2* Ohio State/Northwestern Over 131.5

    Other Notes: I like Kent State with revenge, not enough to play it. Home teams in that division of the MAC East are something like 24-5. Catching a ton of value on Kent State at home considering they are 9-0 in the conference as long as the game isn’t played on the road against the MAC East where they are 0-5. Ohio owns one of those wins on the road in the conference but if you remember I played Ohio in that spot against a weak Buffalo zone. Kent State’s traditionally not a zone team, although they show it at times, so no concern there. Only concern and a big part of why I’m leaning is that Kent State has Akron on tap, and that’s as big of a rivalry as you will see in the MAC. Kent State’s been getting killed on the offensive glass, and was a big reason they dropped this first meeting this year (shot 50+% and still lost by 22). Sort of a sandwich spot for Bowling Green as they welcome in a Miami OH team that’s going to launch three’s against a BG zone. Fordham’s a single digit dog on the road in conference for the first time since March 2008 and it comes in a spot against a Rhode Island team who is coming off their best win in recent years, and has rival Umass on tap. Bad spot for Rhode Island, but is Fordham trustworthy? They did win the first meeting this year by 2 in a game that only saw 63 possessions. Why so low? I have no idea. Both push and play up-tempo, and they did put up a 78 in the 1H (52 2H). Fordham probably plays a zone and Rhode Island will probably be complacent given the situation and they’re one of the worst shooting teams in the country and...
     
    nropp11
    nropp11
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2006
    Posts: 7963
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 5:44 PM ET #3

    ...they don’t attack much either. I will trust Fordham, with a lean only. No feel on St. John’s, think letdown, not worth trusting Pitt, but this is the Seniors last home game, but Senior Day was this past Sunday. Awkward. Speaking of awkward, Umass has been apart of three two-game roadies this year. Tonight ends two game roady #4. In the first three, they lost the first game of the two game roady, and won the second game (beat Richmond, George Washington and ECU). Value on them tonight? Nah, Temple hasn’t lost two games in a row in more than 3 years. Weird Maryland/UNC Matchup. Spot favors Maryland as UNC has a massive on-decker with Duke and UNC comes off a snail into fast tempo here. Maryland’s coming in the same way and on the second of a roady, so I’m going to pass. If this game gets anywhere near the first game’s 76 possessions, the 17 or so doesn’t seem like much even in a letdown. I lean South Carolina but I have no interest in trusting them, and probably more of a fade on Mississippi State. This team is favored on the road against a team they struggled with mightily at home, and they’ve dropped five in a row with the first two coming in OT. Complete tailspin right now, and I’m not sure it gets better on the back end of a two game roady. They’ve won two games on the road all year. They beat Vandy by 1 in OT, and beat Detroit late on a few lucky bounces. The team has talent, but without Hood they are without one of their best outside shooters and all around combo guard whose size presents other teams tremendously large matchup problems. Now, South Carolina sucks. I’m aware of that. But this will be the easiest home test in terms of defenses they will have faced in the SEC this year. The only thing remotely close would be Georgia’s defense, and they won that game outright. South Carolina will probably play zone, and that brings in an MSU team that has lost five straight that will probably settle for jumpers seeing that they don’t attack all that often. Again, fade of Mississippi State rather than South Carolina, but there will certainly be opportunities for SC to score tonight. I lean Boise State, as they were held without a FG for about 13 minutes in the first meeting and I’m expecting that not to happen again (two point loss). Really interesting dynamic with San Diego State right now. Remember when all their players were tweeting about being an underdog and not getting respect yadda yadda yadda. Well, every game since, they have yet to cover as a favorite and haven’t looked great in doing so. Is the motivation not there? I take that back, they did cover miraculously (thank you) in OT w/ Wyoming. Also sandwiched in between a revenge spot they just took care of business in, and travel to MWC darling TCU next. 

    Too many road teams tonight, just hoping to survive…

    Lean: Kent State -2
    Lean: Fordham +6
    Lean: Liberty +6
    Lean: Boise State +3

    GL
    Reply
    ...they don’t attack much either. I will trust Fordham, with a lean only. No feel on St. John’s, think letdown, not worth trusting Pitt, but this is the Seniors last home game, but Senior Day was this past Sunday. Awkward. Speaking of awkward, Umass has been apart of three two-game roadies this year. Tonight ends two game roady #4. In the first three, they lost the first game of the two game roady, and won the second game (beat Richmond, George Washington and ECU). Value on them tonight? Nah, Temple hasn’t lost two games in a row in more than 3 years. Weird Maryland/UNC Matchup. Spot favors Maryland as UNC has a massive on-decker with Duke and UNC comes off a snail into fast tempo here. Maryland’s coming in the same way and on the second of a roady, so I’m going to pass. If this game gets anywhere near the first game’s 76 possessions, the 17 or so doesn’t seem like much even in a letdown. I lean South Carolina but I have no interest in trusting them, and probably more of a fade on Mississippi State. This team is favored on the road against a team they struggled with mightily at home, and they’ve dropped five in a row with the first two coming in OT. Complete tailspin right now, and I’m not sure it gets better on the back end of a two game roady. They’ve won two games on the road all year. They beat Vandy by 1 in OT, and beat Detroit late on a few lucky bounces. The team has talent, but without Hood they are without one of their best outside shooters and all around combo guard whose size presents other teams tremendously large matchup problems. Now, South Carolina sucks. I’m aware of that. But this will be the easiest home test in terms of defenses they will have faced in the SEC this year. The only thing remotely close would be Georgia’s defense, and they won that game outright. South Carolina will probably play zone, and that brings in an MSU team that has lost five straight that will probably settle for jumpers seeing that they don’t attack all that often. Again, fade of Mississippi State rather than South Carolina, but there will certainly be opportunities for SC to score tonight. I lean Boise State, as they were held without a FG for about 13 minutes in the first meeting and I’m expecting that not to happen again (two point loss). Really interesting dynamic with San Diego State right now. Remember when all their players were tweeting about being an underdog and not getting respect yadda yadda yadda. Well, every game since, they have yet to cover as a favorite and haven’t looked great in doing so. Is the motivation not there? I take that back, they did cover miraculously (thank you) in OT w/ Wyoming. Also sandwiched in between a revenge spot they just took care of business in, and travel to MWC darling TCU next. 

    Too many road teams tonight, just hoping to survive…

    Lean: Kent State -2
    Lean: Fordham +6
    Lean: Liberty +6
    Lean: Boise State +3

    GL
     
    composite
    composite
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 4418
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 5:45 PM ET #4

    Thanks again for that Winthrop play!
    Reply
    Thanks again for that Winthrop play!
     
    nbafan88
    nbafan88
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 26899
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 5:53 PM ET #5

    Reply
     
    bigbozo
    bigbozo
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2007
    Posts: 457
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:00 PM ET #6

    Nropp, how about SF and Louisville under?  Seems like a game you would like, why not tonight?  Thanks for your write-ups, you are the best!
    Reply
    Nropp, how about SF and Louisville under?  Seems like a game you would like, why not tonight?  Thanks for your write-ups, you are the best!
     
    jeffscottsports
    jeffscottsports
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 215
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:05 PM ET #7

    awesome job once again Sir!!!! Much Respect
    Reply
    awesome job once again Sir!!!! Much Respect
     
    JoeyPublic
    JoeyPublic
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 1825
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:09 PM ET #8

    solid numbers as usual.. keep up the great work 
    Reply
    solid numbers as usual.. keep up the great work 
     
    lv2ftfire
    lv2ftfire
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 305
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:12 PM ET #9

    Thanks nropp!   
    Reply
    Thanks nropp!   
     
    Yankees042
    Yankees042
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 894
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:13 PM ET #10

    BOL
    Reply
    BOL
     
    pioneerpossee
    pioneerpossee
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 352
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:14 PM ET #11

    BOL nropp
    Reply
    BOL nropp
     
    dougiemac
    dougiemac
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2011
    Posts: 369
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:15 PM ET #12

    Hey Neil,

    Any thoughts on Marquette tonight. I like them in a high scoring game.

    Reply

    Hey Neil,

    Any thoughts on Marquette tonight. I like them in a high scoring game.

     
    camby700
    camby700
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 34179
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:15 PM ET #13

    TENN
    Reply
    TENN
     
    SuperflySnuka
    SuperflySnuka
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 1349
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:18 PM ET #14

    You are silly.



    I hit a 3 team WV, over, Memphis over.  Ha. Thanks.
    Reply
    You are silly.



    I hit a 3 team WV, over, Memphis over.  Ha. Thanks.
     
    gynecologist
    gynecologist
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 394
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:19 PM ET #15

    thanks
    Reply
    thanks
     
    earl1932
    earl1932
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 1216
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:29 PM ET #16

    Reply
     
    evilelvis
    evilelvis
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2010
    Posts: 2852
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:30 PM ET #17

    Reply
     
    mtndew146
    mtndew146
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2012
    Posts: 2450
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:31 PM ET #18

    any opinion on this highpoint 2nd half under looking real good with the low 1st half score
    Reply
    any opinion on this highpoint 2nd half under looking real good with the low 1st half score
     
    rokisky
    rokisky
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 1487
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:31 PM ET #19

    great read as usual
    Reply
    great read as usual
     
    ac_bum
    ac_bum
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2011
    Posts: 22968
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:32 PM ET #20

     GL TODAY NEIL
    Reply
     GL TODAY NEIL
     
    jacksteppin
    jacksteppin
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 885
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:37 PM ET #21

    GL today
    Reply
    GL today
     
    trajan21
    trajan21
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 79
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 6:49 PM ET #22

    Keep up the good work Nropp.  And please don't act like Nebraska is not capable of another 43-7 run....actually we are not, sorry it was against Illinois.
    Reply
    Keep up the good work Nropp.  And please don't act like Nebraska is not capable of another 43-7 run....actually we are not, sorry it was against Illinois.
     
    TexasTman
    TexasTman
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 221
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 7:06 PM ET #23

    Neil:

    Can you give me some insight on the Toledo/N. Ill game?

    N.ill looks pretty crummy...only 3 wins on the season. Their only conference win is against the other cellar dweller. They have been beaten almost every game by more than what the line is tonight.

    Something looks fishy about such a short line on this game.

    Appreciate your thoughts.

    Reply

    Neil:

    Can you give me some insight on the Toledo/N. Ill game?

    N.ill looks pretty crummy...only 3 wins on the season. Their only conference win is against the other cellar dweller. They have been beaten almost every game by more than what the line is tonight.

    Something looks fishy about such a short line on this game.

    Appreciate your thoughts.

     
    dougiemac
    dougiemac
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2011
    Posts: 369
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 8:39 PM ET #24

    Neil:

    Can't win them all.

    Reply

    Neil:

    Can't win them all.

     
     
    rangersmets
    rangersmets
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2009
    Posts: 3768
    Posted: Feb. 29, 2012 - 8:57 PM ET #25

    Normally never go against Neil but I did with Houston over Tulane. Looks like I "might" be right this time. I did go with Tennessee and Iowa in a parlay though.

    Reply

    Normally never go against Neil but I did with Houston over Tulane. Looks like I "might" be right this time. I did go with Tennessee and Iowa in a parlay though.

    All Forums | College Basketball
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 450,321
    • Friday 09/25/2026 688
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 261,890
    • PART DEUX 167
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 100,476
    • Happening just recently . . . 34,767
    • POY: Clemson +1 at Cal 5,410
    • 9/25 🥩🥩🥩 2,490
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 26,209
    • **$$$ MD Friday 9/25 $$$** 3,580

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.