rvm,,, the only JOKE here is you,,,,,,,,Congrats on your 160-0,,, nice play,,,,,,,,,,,,
Yes only system play is Ill to cover,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
in the nba detroit is at it again trying to break their ridiculous streak... they have lost either 9 or 10 in a row SU and ATS, plus its their first game of the new year while its dallas's 3rd game in 4 days and their next game is @ san antonio... lots of good signs pointing towards detroit here
in the nba detroit is at it again trying to break their ridiculous streak... they have lost either 9 or 10 in a row SU and ATS, plus its their first game of the new year while its dallas's 3rd game in 4 days and their next game is @ san antonio... lots of good signs pointing towards detroit here
cgd,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,detroit is 0-9,,,,,,,,,,,per covers sheets,,,,
I have placed NBA out of streak plays but your thoughts appear JUSTIFIED,,,,,,,,its a NP for me but could very well be a play but i just don't have the heart or cash to waste,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I'll waste it on a level 4 play and look to win it sometime if team should not W or L
It was a great night last night to break those two 7-0 plays and to see both win on the ML,,,,,,,,
Need N Iowa to do the same tomorrow,,,,,,,,,
cgd,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,detroit is 0-9,,,,,,,,,,,per covers sheets,,,,
I have placed NBA out of streak plays but your thoughts appear JUSTIFIED,,,,,,,,its a NP for me but could very well be a play but i just don't have the heart or cash to waste,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I'll waste it on a level 4 play and look to win it sometime if team should not W or L
It was a great night last night to break those two 7-0 plays and to see both win on the ML,,,,,,,,
Need N Iowa to do the same tomorrow,,,,,,,,,
Bandos ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
where u been,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Taking a lot of heat in thread but it does not bother me as i have a lot of ,,,,,,
Just booked a maui trip,,,,,,,,,,on these stupid plays,,,,,
Thank You SYSTEM,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Bandos ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
where u been,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Taking a lot of heat in thread but it does not bother me as i have a lot of ,,,,,,
Just booked a maui trip,,,,,,,,,,on these stupid plays,,,,,
Thank You SYSTEM,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
This is not system play but i can't see why S Miss who at one streak was 6-0 before not covering on 12/22/09 does not win t night,,,,,they also are at current streak of 0-3,,,,so could very well be ready to turn it around,,,,,,,,,,,
Additionally how in the world can IOWA cover this game,,with a covers ranking of #292 and record of 3/10 ATS,,,,,,,,,,,,and add ILL as a need to cover and a system play,, i may need to play this one stronger,,,,,,,,
Texas at 3-0 is also to repeat to a level 4 if can cover t night and match their #4 level of early december before failing,,,,
Lou Holtz loves geo tech in ncaaf,,,,,,,,,,,
Due to the limited # of plays i will be on these other two plays tonight,,,,,,,,,,,,,
It appears some of these teams are returning to seek another #4 level and bear watching,,,,,,,Like St Marys when they play again on 01/08 vs San Fran,with a great ATS ranking and with another 3-0 streak building,,,,,,
This is not system play but i can't see why S Miss who at one streak was 6-0 before not covering on 12/22/09 does not win t night,,,,,they also are at current streak of 0-3,,,,so could very well be ready to turn it around,,,,,,,,,,,
Additionally how in the world can IOWA cover this game,,with a covers ranking of #292 and record of 3/10 ATS,,,,,,,,,,,,and add ILL as a need to cover and a system play,, i may need to play this one stronger,,,,,,,,
Texas at 3-0 is also to repeat to a level 4 if can cover t night and match their #4 level of early december before failing,,,,
Lou Holtz loves geo tech in ncaaf,,,,,,,,,,,
Due to the limited # of plays i will be on these other two plays tonight,,,,,,,,,,,,,
It appears some of these teams are returning to seek another #4 level and bear watching,,,,,,,Like St Marys when they play again on 01/08 vs San Fran,with a great ATS ranking and with another 3-0 streak building,,,,,,
looking at Geo tech in ncaab too,, they at one time went to 5-0 before failing on 12/20 and now are playing t nite with a ATS rec of 1-0 to date but more so against Georgia at 0-1 who allowed itself to rise to a 0-4 level before covering a play,,,,,,,,,,,,
Taking GT in both sports,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
looking at Geo tech in ncaab too,, they at one time went to 5-0 before failing on 12/20 and now are playing t nite with a ATS rec of 1-0 to date but more so against Georgia at 0-1 who allowed itself to rise to a 0-4 level before covering a play,,,,,,,,,,,,
Taking GT in both sports,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Can you post ur spreadsheets for each level and percentages again?
I want to put larger amounts on these plays, but if I start at 4 when they get to 8 the amount is too high for me to risk...
I was going to start at 6 and increase my wagers. I was wondering the amount of teams to hit 0-6 and 6-0 and the percentage of teams that ended here or went to 8-0 or 0-8
Can you post ur spreadsheets for each level and percentages again?
I want to put larger amounts on these plays, but if I start at 4 when they get to 8 the amount is too high for me to risk...
I was going to start at 6 and increase my wagers. I was wondering the amount of teams to hit 0-6 and 6-0 and the percentage of teams that ended here or went to 8-0 or 0-8
I posted all winners for year back in page one,,,,,,,,,,
Bet small and if lose its ok you need not double as much,,,,
1,1 unit,, could be anything 11,,22,,33,44,55,66,77,88,,,play with in your bankroll and look that every play you will need to go to #8 level that is worst sinario to date
I posted all winners for year back in page one,,,,,,,,,,
Bet small and if lose its ok you need not double as much,,,,
1,1 unit,, could be anything 11,,22,,33,44,55,66,77,88,,,play with in your bankroll and look that every play you will need to go to #8 level that is worst sinario to date
6-0 system plays had to wager 3 times to win,,,,,,,,,,,
teams unable to cover,,at 6-0,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Sac St,,,S Miss,,,WCU,,,N/W,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
0-6 teams able to cover at 0-6,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Elon,,,, san fran,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
6-0 system plays had to wager 3 times to win,,,,,,,,,,,
teams unable to cover,,at 6-0,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Sac St,,,S Miss,,,WCU,,,N/W,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
0-6 teams able to cover at 0-6,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Elon,,,, san fran,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
there was only one team at level 8
there were only( incl current teams ),,5 at #7 level,,,,,,,
there were only,(inc current),,,11 teams at #6 level,,,
that said there were only 17 teams that reached #5 or higher level out of 295 covers listed ATS teams
there was only one team at level 8
there were only( incl current teams ),,5 at #7 level,,,,,,,
there were only,(inc current),,,11 teams at #6 level,,,
that said there were only 17 teams that reached #5 or higher level out of 295 covers listed ATS teams
there was only one team at level 8
there were only( incl current teams ),,5 at #7 level,,,,,,,
there were only,(inc current),,,11 teams at #6 level,,,
that said there were only 17 teams that reached #5 or higher level out of 295 covers listed ATS teams
So your saying that out of your current system Win total....only 17 teams reached #5 or higher?
This doesnt make sense
If that was the case why even chase jus beef up your wager in the second stage and be done with it your losses wouldn't matter because of all your wins
there was only one team at level 8
there were only( incl current teams ),,5 at #7 level,,,,,,,
there were only,(inc current),,,11 teams at #6 level,,,
that said there were only 17 teams that reached #5 or higher level out of 295 covers listed ATS teams
So your saying that out of your current system Win total....only 17 teams reached #5 or higher?
This doesnt make sense
If that was the case why even chase jus beef up your wager in the second stage and be done with it your losses wouldn't matter because of all your wins
I don't think its rediculous, I've looked into it and its what he says it is A CHASE SYSTEM...I jus would like to find a way to put more on my wagers, bet less games, and bank more money...Ive seen a lot of 5 and 6 W/L ATS teams I was wondering if I start my chase at 6 and allow for losses at 8 I would only have one loss and 16 wins ?
I don't think its rediculous, I've looked into it and its what he says it is A CHASE SYSTEM...I jus would like to find a way to put more on my wagers, bet less games, and bank more money...Ive seen a lot of 5 and 6 W/L ATS teams I was wondering if I start my chase at 6 and allow for losses at 8 I would only have one loss and 16 wins ?
rvmblack412: ney numb nuts just follow for a second,,,
illinois tonight is currently 0 -4 ats in a row making it the first play of the system....so leys say you put 50 on them tonight....they lose....you lost 55
so now they are 0 - 5 so you play them the next time they play for 105.....original wager plus what you lost...say they lose ~ -115
so you have lost a combined 115 + 55 +ur original wager u wanted to win of 50 to make the next play 220
so now they are 0 - 6 you play them for 220 and they win....now you have won 50 dollars from your original bet....this system has yet to fail up to the 8 level......so if you have the bankroll and the patience you can make some serious money....it is a chase system and has proven to work in college bballl....stop comingi in and bashing something that has been extremely profitable for those who have followed escpecially just because you cant seem to fig it out...thats all i got.....bol tonight guys
rvmblack412: ney numb nuts just follow for a second,,,
illinois tonight is currently 0 -4 ats in a row making it the first play of the system....so leys say you put 50 on them tonight....they lose....you lost 55
so now they are 0 - 5 so you play them the next time they play for 105.....original wager plus what you lost...say they lose ~ -115
so you have lost a combined 115 + 55 +ur original wager u wanted to win of 50 to make the next play 220
so now they are 0 - 6 you play them for 220 and they win....now you have won 50 dollars from your original bet....this system has yet to fail up to the 8 level......so if you have the bankroll and the patience you can make some serious money....it is a chase system and has proven to work in college bballl....stop comingi in and bashing something that has been extremely profitable for those who have followed escpecially just because you cant seem to fig it out...thats all i got.....bol tonight guys
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.