All Forums | College Basketball

WICH ST +10.5 they get no respect, wow wow wow

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4130
Posts: 44
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #1
such a good defensive team with offense as well,

yes i'm having a crappy tourney (3-9 or something like that) so fade away if you wish, because fading me the last 6 yrs here at covers means you don't even win 44% (my ATS posted is 56.7% the last 6 yrs at covers with hundreds of picks)

WICHITA ST  +10.5  vs Louisville  (2.2 units to win 2)
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 1980
Posted: #2

Very good rebounding team as well wins against Pitt Gonz Ohio St dominating performance.Pitt was one of the top teams in the big east look what they did to them.Taking the points should be good here.

GL: grid this garbage is unpredictable!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 189
Posted: #3

the teams they have played could beat them if the refs would do their job and call the fouls equally ,but they are not ..they play to rough , need to go to nba ..THEY ARE THUGS

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by captainandseven:

Very good rebounding team as well wins against Pitt Gonz Ohio St dominating performance.Pitt was one of the top teams in the big east look what they did to them.Taking the points should be good here.

GL: grid this garbage is unpredictable!


yea man they kicked the crapp out of good teams in Pitt, Gonz, Ohio St, and even LaSalle was a pretty damn good mid major.

final score of Gonz and Ohio st game does not indicate how they dominated both of those top seeds.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by Skyclad:

the teams they have played could beat them if the refs would do their job and call the fouls equally ,but they are not ..they play to rough , need to go to nba ..THEY ARE THUGS

 


nothing wrong with winning with physical play.  ask the detroit pistons from 89 and 90 who won championships both years.  if the refs are not calling it, thats the refs problem not wichita state's
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 10705
Posted: #6
wich st all day for me as well. Bought it to +12 and fully expect to see you at the window Grid
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 6275
Posted: #7
I dont think LaSalle is considered a mid major. Upsets in these tourneys shouldnt be a shock, these teams have never played one another and the style contrasts and time to prep for teams makes it difficult, besides its a one game sample and when you put two teams that never played one another in one game basically anything can happen.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by jtoler:

I dont think LaSalle is considered a mid major. Upsets in these tourneys shouldnt be a shock, these teams have never played one another and the style contrasts and time to prep for teams makes it difficult, besides its a one game sample and when you put two teams that never played one another in one game basically anything can happen.

okay La Salle is in the A-10 which is a good conf, but they have not made the tourney since 1992 so i would not put them in the class of Pitt, Gonz, and Ohio State, seeds 8, 1, and 2, respectively, who have made the tourney basically every year save for Pitt who missed last yr or the yr before.

La Salle is no juggernaut dude
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 5196
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

such a good defensive team with offense as well,

yes i'm having a crappy tourney (3-9 or something like that) so fade away if you wish, because fading me the last 6 yrs here at covers means you don't even win 44% (my ATS posted is 56.7% the last 6 yrs at covers with hundreds of picks)

WICHITA ST  +10.5  vs Louisville  (2.2 units to win 2)

Who cares what you've done the last 6 years?  You have been amazing fade material recently and you keep talking about how good you used to be...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16153
Posted: #10
I didnt know wichita dominated zags. Pretty sure zags wrre up and wichita hit 7 3s in a row to beat them. Bottom line is wichita will see guard unlike they have seen bfor. Its not like their gona b guarding craft who cant shoot to save his life
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 6275
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:


okay La Salle is in the A-10 which is a good conf, but they have not made the tourney since 1992 so i would not put them in the class of Pitt, Gonz, and Ohio State, seeds 8, 1, and 2, respectively, who have made the tourney basically every year save for Pitt who missed last yr or the yr before.

La Salle is no juggernaut dude
Nobody said LaSalle is a juggernaut, but the conference decides if a team is a mid major or not, you obviously dont know what the term means.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by txtechpika:


Who cares what you've done the last 6 years?  You have been amazing fade material recently and you keep talking about how good you used to be...

prikks who gave me no credit for my 5 - 1 - 1 run during the NFL playoffs from Jan to Feb 2013, were all of a sudden ripping me for a tough start to the tourney,

FADE AWAY, go and take L'VILLE  -10.5,

and can't wait to see how Kliff does in Lubbock  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing:

I didnt know wichita dominated zags. Pretty sure zags wrre up and wichita hit 7 3s in a row to beat them. Bottom line is wichita will see guard unlike they have seen bfor. Its not like their gona b guarding craft who cant shoot to save his life

other way around.  wich st jumped up 13 early, held the lead for most of the game, gonz hit 5 threes in row and still only cut the lead to 4 after doing that, it was a huge lead that they just could not cut into,

wich st dude, wich st
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by txtechpika:


Who cares what you've done the last 6 years?  You have been amazing fade material recently and you keep talking about how good you used to be...

you can only dream of being 56.7% over the course of 150+ picks
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by txtechpika:


Who cares what you've done the last 6 years?  You have been amazing fade material recently and you keep talking about how good you used to be...

thanks for opening my threads.  shows that you must be interested in what i have to say.  i invite you to fade me on every pick i ever make here again, and see how it works for you long term,

then again, fading me will give you -EV of 43.3% over the next 150 picks which exceeds your own 39% ATS winning mark, so it will be an improvement for you.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1472
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

such a good defensive team with offense as well,

yes i'm having a crappy tourney (3-9 or something like that) so fade away if you wish, because fading me the last 6 yrs here at covers means you don't even win 44% (my ATS posted is 56.7% the last 6 yrs at covers with hundreds of picks)

WICHITA ST  +10.5  vs Louisville  (2.2 units to win 2)
  56.7% in your dreams. Fade.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

  56.7% in your dreams. Fade.

suit yourself you know-nothing sports moron that lives in a shitty weather state.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 251
Posted: #18
Louisville will crush them plain and simple.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by Bullgod13:

Louisville will crush them plain and simple.

i'll bet you said the same thing about them vs oregon yet the ducks covered,

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 672
Posted: #20
Gridiron if u wanna rely on a backdoor like Oregon did go right ahead, but this is going to be a beating. And I have been on Wichita the first 4 games
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by steinline:

Gridiron if u wanna rely on a backdoor like Oregon did go right ahead, but this is going to be a beating. And I have been on Wichita the first 4 games


you were truly on WICH ST v Pittsburgh in the round of 64?  Pittsburgh had a veteran team that went 12-6 in the rugged Big East this yr.  Wich St had several transfers and lost 4 of their top 5 scorers from last yr.  What did you know in the rd of 64 that the rest of us did not??
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #22
and you are 4-0 ATS but jumping off them now??

smells kind like:


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 672
Posted: #23
Absolutely was but it really doesn't matter to me what u believe. There were plenty of ppl on them obviously as they were only a 4-5 pt dog against Pitt. The problem here is they have not seen guards like this all year long. Smith and Siva are faster than anybody the shockers have gone up against and behanan and dieng can match Wichita st's physicality in the paint. Could the shockers hang around? Of course they could but it is a lot easier for me to hit submit on the Ville then it is hoping the shockers can hang around for 40 minutes. GL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 37092
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:


yea man they kicked the crapp out of good teams in Pitt, Gonz, Ohio St, and even LaSalle was a pretty damn good mid major.

final score of Gonz and Ohio st game does not indicate how they dominated both of those top seeds.

 Pretty easy path.............was already stated here how overrated  Gonzaga is & that they didn't deserve a 1.........Pitt  & ohio st are consistent folders
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:


 Pretty easy path.............was already stated here how overrated  Gonzaga is & that they didn't deserve a 1.........Pitt  & ohio st are consistent folders


i agree Gonzaga did not deserve a 1 seed but what do you think they deserved, a 10 seed?

come on now.  2 seed or maximum worst seed a 3.  still a nice win for WICH ST as Gonz has talent,

and Ohio St?  the backcourt and a few other key guys from this team led them to the final 4 last yr.

let's give a little more credit where it's due, please  
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.